Bridget E. Ferriss

Chronic low-level exposure to the common seafood toxin domoic acid causes cognitive deficits in mice

The consumption of one meal of seafood containing domoic acid (DA) at levels high enough to induce seizures can cause gross histopathological lesions in hippocampal regions of the brain and permanent memory loss in humans and marine mammals. Seafood regulatory limits have been set at 20mgDA/kg shellfish to protect human consumers from symptomatic acute exposure, but the effects of repetitive low-level asymptomatic exposure remain a critical knowledge gap. Recreational and Tribal-subsistence shellfish harvesters are known to regularly consume low levels of DA. The aim of this study was to determine if chronic low-level DA exposure, at doses below those that cause overt signs of neurotoxicity, has quantifiable impacts on cognitive function. To this end, female C57BL/6NJ mice were exposed to asymptomatic doses of DA (≈0.75mg/kg) or vehicle once a week for several months. Spatial learning and memory were tested in a radial water maze paradigm at one, six and 25 weeks of exposure, after a nine-week recovery period following cessation of exposure, and at three old age time points (18, 24 and 28 months old). Mice from select time points were also tested for activity levels in a novel cage environment using a photobeam activity system. Chronic low-level DA exposure caused significant spatial learning impairment and hyperactivity after 25 weeks of exposure in the absence of visible histopathological lesions in hippocampal regions of the brain. These cognitive effects were reversible after a nine-week recovery period with no toxin exposure and recovery was sustained into old age. These findings identify a new potential health risk of chronic low-level exposure in a mammalian model. Unlike the permanent cognitive impacts of acute exposure, the chronic low-level effects observed in this study were reversible suggesting that these deficits could potentially be managed through cessation of exposure if they also occur in human seafood consumers.

Acute and chronic dietary exposure to domoic acid in recreational harvesters: A survey of shellfish consumption behavior

Domoic acid (DA) is a neurotoxin that is naturally produced by phytoplankton and accumulates in seafood during harmful algal blooms. As the prevalence of DA increases in the marine environment, there is a critical need to identify seafood consumers at risk of DA poisoning. DA exposure was estimated in recreational razor clam (Siliqua patula) harvesters to determine if exposures above current regulatory guidelines occur and/or if harvesters are chronically exposed to low levels of DA. Human consumption rates of razor clams were determined by distributing 1523 surveys to recreational razor clam harvesters in spring 2015 and winter 2016, in Washington, USA. These consumption rate data were combined with DA measurements in razor clams, collected by a state monitoring program, to estimate human DA exposure. Approximately 7% of total acute exposures calculated (including the same individuals at different times) exceeded the current regulatory reference dose (0.075mgDA·kgbodyweight-1·d-1) due to higher than previously reported consumption rates, lower bodyweights, and/or by consumption of clams at the upper range of legal DA levels (maximum 20mg·kg-1 wet weight for whole tissue). Three percent of survey respondents were potentially at risk of chronic DA exposure by consuming a minimum of 15 clams per month for at 12 consecutive months. These insights into DA consumption will provide an additional tool for razor clam fishery management.

Assessing Coastal Practitioners' Views on Environmental Indicators: Case studies in U.S. Pacific Northwest Estuaries

An online survey of coastal practitioners, followed by personal interviews, was conducted to examine the potential of environmental indicators as tools in the management of estuaries along the Washington and Oregon coasts (U.S.A.). Specifically, the perceptions of coastal practitioners regarding current uses of indicators and factors limiting indicator use were explored. Results show that the organizations we surveyed generally do not use indicators to their full potential. Indicator use and factors limiting their use vary across both levels of government (Local, State, Federal) and job functions (Administration, Research, Planning & Development, Management, Education & Outreach). Limiting factors include lack of resources and unfamiliarity with indicators, especially in local management. These results demonstrate that while indicators are potentially beneficial management tools, realizing these benefits likely requires tailoring to the specific needs and limitations of intended users. The scientific community is well aware that a single set of environmental indicators can not be applied across all geographic or ecological scales. This study demonstrates that it is also necessary to recognize the breadth of the spectrum of user groups and management contexts, and how their individual characteristics may affect the applicability of environmental indicators, for them to be truly useful to management.