Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Brigitte H. W. Faas is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Brigitte H. W. Faas.


Molecular Psychiatry | 2008

CNTNAP2 gene dosage variation is associated with schizophrenia and epilepsy

Joseph I. Friedman; T. Vrijenhoek; S. Markx; Irene M. Janssen; W.A. van der Vliet; Brigitte H. W. Faas; N.V.A.M. Knoers; Wiepke Cahn; René S. Kahn; Lisa Edelmann; Kenneth L. Davis; Jeremy M. Silverman; Han G. Brunner; A.H.M. Geurts van Kessel; Cisca Wijmenga; Roel A. Ophoff; Joris A. Veltman

A homozygous mutation of the CNTNAP2 gene has been associated with a syndrome of focal epilepsy, mental retardation, language regression and other neuropsychiatric problems in children of the Old Order Amish community. Here we report genomic rearrangements resulting in haploinsufficiency of the CNTNAP2 gene in association with epilepsy and schizophrenia. Genomic deletions of varying sizes affecting the CNTNAP2 gene were identified in three non-related Caucasian patients. In contrast, we did not observe any dosage variation for this gene in 512 healthy controls. Moreover, this genomic region has not been identified as showing large-scale copy number variation. Our data thus confirm an association of CNTNAP2 to epilepsy outside the Old Order Amish population and suggest that dosage alteration of this gene may lead to a complex phenotype of schizophrenia, epilepsy and cognitive impairment.


Prenatal Diagnosis | 2013

Position statement from the Aneuploidy Screening Committee on behalf of the Board of the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis

Peter Benn; Antoni Borell; Rossa W.K. Chiu; Howard Cuckle; Lorraine Dugoff; Brigitte H. W. Faas; Susan J. Gross; Jo-Ann Johnson; Ron Maymon; Mary E. Norton; Anthony Odibo; Peter C. J. I. Schielen; Kevin Spencer; Tianhua Huang; Dave Wright; Yuval Yaron

Department of Genetics and Developmental Biology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA Prenatal Diagnosis Unit, Institute of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, Hospital Clinic, Maternitat Campus, University of Barcelona Medical School, Catalonia, Spain Department of Chemical Pathology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Assaf Harofe Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA Laboratory for Infectious Diseases and Perinatal Screening, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands Prenatal Screening Unit, Clinical Biochemistry Department, Barking Havering & Redbridge University Hospitals, King George Hospital, Goodmayes, UK Genetics Program, North York General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK Prenatal Diagnosis Unit, Genetic Institute, Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel *Correspondence to: Peter Benn. E-mail: [email protected] This Statement replaces the January 2011 Statement (Prenatal Diagnosis 2011;31:519–522) and the Rapid Response Statement (Prenatal Diagnosis 2012;32:1–2).


Prenatal Diagnosis | 2015

Position statement from the Chromosome Abnormality Screening Committee on behalf of the Board of the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis

Peter Benn; Antoni Borrell; Rossa W.K. Chiu; Howard Cuckle; Lorraine Dugoff; Brigitte H. W. Faas; Susan J. Gross; Tianhua Huang; Jo-Ann Johnson; Ron Maymon; Mary E. Norton; Anthony Odibo; Peter C. J. I. Schielen; Kevin Spencer; Dave Wright; Yuval Yaron

President President-Elect Past President Secretary Treasurer Lucas Otano MD, PhD (Argentina) Ignatia B. Van den Veyver MD (USA) Jan M.M. van Lith MD, PhD (Netherlands) Louise Wilkins-Haug MD (USA) Antoni Borrell MD, PhD (Spain) Directors Peter Benn PhD, DSc (USA) Lyn Chitty PhD (UK) Rossa Chiu (Hong Kong) Roland Devlieger MD, PhD (Belgium) Sylvie Langlois MD, CCMG (Canada) Anthony O. Odibo MD, MSCE (USA) R. Doug Wilson MD, Msc, FRCSC (Canada) Yuval Yaron MD (Israel) Diana W. Bianchi MD, ex officio (USA) Position Statement from the Chromosome Abnormality Screening Committee on Behalf of the Board of the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis


Journal of Medical Genetics | 2010

Identification of clinically significant, submicroscopic chromosome alterations and UPD in fetuses with ultrasound anomalies using genome-wide 250k SNP array analysis

Brigitte H. W. Faas; I van der Burgt; Angelique J. A. Kooper; R Pfundt; Jayne Y. Hehir-Kwa; A. P. T. Smits; N. de Leeuw

Background The implementation of microarray analysis in prenatal diagnostics is a topic of discussion, as rare copy number variants with unknown/uncertain clinical consequences are likely to be found. The application of targeted microarrays limits such findings, but the potential disadvantage is that relevant, so far unknown, aberrations might be overlooked. Therefore, we explore the possibilities for the prenatal application of the genome-wide 250k single nucleotide polymorphism array platform. Methods Affymetrix 250k NspI single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis (Affymetrix, Inc., Santa Clara, California, USA) was performed on DNA from 38 prenatally karyotyped fetuses with ultrasound anomalies. Analyses were performed after termination of pregnancy, intrauterine fetal death or birth on DNA isolated from fetal or neonatal material. Results Aberrations were detected in 17 of 38 fetuses, 6 of whom with a previously identified chromosomal abnormality and 11 with previously normal or balanced karyotypes. Of the latter, the detected aberration occurred de novo and was considered of clinical relevance in five cases (16%), inherited from a healthy parent in four cases (12%), and de novo yet with unclear clinical relevance in two cases (6%). The clinically relevant abnormalities either were novel copy number variants (n=3) or concerned a uniparental disomy (n=2). Conclusion In at least 16% of fetuses with ultrasound anomalies and a normal or balanced karyotype, causal (submicroscopic) aberrations were detected, illustrating the importance of the (careful) implementation of microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis. The fact that the identified, clinically relevant, aberrations would have gone undetected with most targeted approaches underscores the added value of a genome-wide approach.


Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy | 2012

Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies using massively parallel sequencing-by-ligation and evidence that cell-free fetal DNA in the maternal plasma originates from cytotrophoblastic cells

Brigitte H. W. Faas; J. de Ligt; Irene M. Janssen; Alex J. Eggink; Lia D. E. Wijnberger; J.M.G. van Vugt; Lisenka E.L.M. Vissers; A. Geurts van Kessel

Blood plasma of pregnant women contains circulating cell-free fetal DNA (ccffDNA), originating from the placenta. The use of this DNA for non-invasive detection of fetal aneuploidies using massively parallel sequencing (MPS)-by-synthesis has been proven previously. Sequence performance may, however, depend on the MPS platform and therefore we have explored the possibility for multiplex MPS-by-ligation, using the Applied Biosystems SOLiD™ 4 system. DNA isolated from plasma samples from 52 pregnant women, carrying normal or aneuploid fetuses, was sequenced in multiplex runs of 4, 8 or 16 samples simultaneously. The sequence reads were mapped to the human reference genome and quantified according to their genomic location. In case of a fetal aneuploidy, the number of reads of the aberrant chromosome is expected to be higher or lower than in normal reference samples. To statistically determine this, Z-scores per chromosome were calculated as described previously, with thresholds for aneuploidies set at > +3.0 and < -3.0 for chromosomal over- or underrepresentation, respectively. All samples from fetal aneuploidies yielded Z-scores outside the thresholds for the aberrant chromosomes, with no false negative or positive results. Full-blown fetal aneuploidies can thus be reliably detected in maternal plasma using a multiplex MPS-by-ligation approach. Furthermore, the results obtained with a sample from a pregnancy with 45,X in the cytotrophoblastic cell layer and 46,XX in the mesenchymal core cells show that ccffDNA originates from the cytotrophoblastic cell layer. Discrepancies between the genetic constitution of this cell layer and the fetus itself are well known, and therefore, care should be taken when translating results to the fetus itself.


American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A | 2008

Clinical and cytogenetic characterization of 13 Dutch patients with deletion 9p syndrome: Delineation of the critical region for a consensus phenotype†

Marielle Swinkels; A. Simons; Dominique Smeets; Lisenka E.L.M. Vissers; Joris A. Veltman; Rolph Pfundt; Bert B.A. de Vries; Brigitte H. W. Faas; Connie Schrander-Stumpel; Emma McCann; Elizabeth Sweeney; Paul May; J.M.T. Draaisma; Nine V.A.M. Knoers; Ad Geurts van Kessel; Conny M. A. van Ravenswaaij-Arts

The deletion 9p syndrome is caused by a constitutional monosomy of part of the short arm of chromosome 9. It is clinically characterized by dysmorphic facial features (trigonocephaly, midface hypoplasia, and long philtrum), hypotonia and mental retardation. Deletion 9p is known to be heterogeneous and exhibits variable deletion sizes. The critical region for a consensus phenotype has been reported to be located within a ∼4–6 Mb interval on 9p22. In the present study, deletion breakpoints were determined in 13 Dutch patients by applying fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and in some specific cases by array‐based comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH). No clear genotype–phenotype correlation could be established for various developmental features. However, we were able to narrow down the critical region for deletion 9p syndrome to ∼300 kb. A functional candidate gene for trigonocephaly, the CER1 gene, appeared to be located just outside this region. Sequence analysis of this gene in nine additional patients with isolated trigonocephaly did not reveal any pathogenic mutations.


Prenatal Diagnosis | 2013

Summary of the ISPD Preconference Day, June 3, 2012, Miami Beach

Brigitte H. W. Faas; Anthony Odibo; Vincenzo Cirigliano; Peter C. J. I. Schielen; D. Pergament; Patricia Devers; Dick Oepkes; Peter Benn

Human Genetics, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA Molecular Genetics, Labco Quality Diagnostics, c/Londres 28, 08029 Barcelona and Biologia Cellular, Fisiologia y Immunologia, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain Laboratory for Infectious Diseases and Screening, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands Children’s Law Group and DePaul University College of Law, Chicago, IL, USA University of North Carolina, North Carolina, USA Fetal Medicine Section, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands Department of Genetics and Developmental Biology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA *Correspondence to: Brigitte H. W. Faas. E-mail: [email protected] Presented at the 16th International Conference on Prenatal Diagnosis and Therapy, Miami, Florida, June 3–6, 2012. Overall organizer preconference day. Current position: Verinata Health Inc., Redwood Cyto, CA, USA.


Prenatal Diagnosis | 2016

Trial by Dutch Laboratories for Evaluation of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing. Part I - Clinical Impact

Dick Oepkes; G. C. M. L. Page-Christiaens; Caroline J. Bax; Mireille N. Bekker; C. M. Bilardo; Elles M.J. Boon; G. Heleen Schuring-Blom; A. Coumans; Brigitte H. W. Faas; Robert-Jan H. Galjaard; A. T. J. I. Go; Lidewij Henneman; Merryn V. E. Macville; Eva Pajkrt; Ron Suijkerbuijk; Karin Huijsdens-van Amsterdam; Diane Van Opstal; E. J. (Joanne) Verweij; Marjan M. Weiss; Erik A. Sistermans

To evaluate the clinical impact of nationwide implementation of genome‐wide non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in pregnancies at increased risk for fetal trisomies 21, 18 and 13 (TRIDENT study).


Prenatal Diagnosis | 2013

Benefits and limitations of whole genome versus targeted approaches for noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidies

Elles M.J. Boon; Brigitte H. W. Faas

The goal to noninvasively detect fetal aneuploidies using circulating cell‐free fetal DNA in the maternal plasma seems to be achieved by the use of massively parallel sequencing (MPS). To date, different MPS approaches exist, all aiming to deliver reliable results in a cost effective manner. The most widely used approach is the whole genome MPS method, in which sequencing is performed on maternal plasma to determine the presence of a fetal trisomy. To reduce costs targeted approaches, only analyzing loci from the chromosome(s) of interest has been developed. This review summarizes the different MPS approaches, their benefits and limitations and discusses the implications for future noninvasive prenatal testing.


Cytogenetic and Genome Research | 2011

SNP array analysis in constitutional and cancer genome diagnostics--copy number variants, genotyping and quality control.

N. de Leeuw; Jayne Y. Hehir-Kwa; A. Simons; A. Geurts van Kessel; Dominique Smeets; Brigitte H. W. Faas; R Pfundt

Array-based comparative genomic hybridization analysis of genomic DNA was first applied in postnatal diagnosis for patients with intellectual disability (ID) and/or congenital anomalies (CA). Genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array analysis was subsequently implemented as the first line diagnostic test for ID/CA patients in our laboratory in 2009, because its diagnostic yield is significantly higher than that of routine cytogenetic analysis. In addition to the detection of copy number variations, the genotype information obtained with SNP array analysis enables the detection of stretches of homozygosity and thereby the possible identification of recessive disease genes, mosaic aneuploidy, or uniparental disomy. Patient-parent (trio) information analysis is used to screen for the presence of any form of uniparental disomy in the patient and can determine the parental origin of a de novo copy number variation. Moreover, the outcome of a genotype analysis is used as a final quality control by ruling out potential sample mismatches due to non-paternity or sample mix-up. SNP array analysis is now also used in our laboratory for patients with disorders for which locus heterogeneity is known (homozygosity pre-screening), in prenatal diagnosis in case of structural ultrasound anomalies, and for patients with leukemia. In this report, we summarize our array findings and experiences in the various diagnostic applications and demonstrate the power of a SNP-based array platform for molecular karyotyping, because it not only significantly improves the diagnostic yield in both constitutional and cancer genome diagnostics, but it also enhances the quality of the diagnostic laboratory workflow.

Collaboration


Dive into the Brigitte H. W. Faas's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lean Beulen

Radboud University Nijmegen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ilse Feenstra

Radboud University Nijmegen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anthony Odibo

University of South Florida

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Angelique J. A. Kooper

Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dick Oepkes

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jayne Y. Hehir-Kwa

Radboud University Nijmegen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge