Britt E. Anderson

Memory CD4+ T cells do not induce graft-versus-host disease

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). Donor T cells that accompany stem cell grafts cause GVHD by attacking recipient tissues; therefore, all patients receive GVHD prophylaxis by depletion of T cells from the allograft or through immunosuppressant drugs. In addition to providing a graft-versus-leukemia effect, donor T cells are critical for reconstituting T cell-mediated immunity. Ideally, immunity to infectious agents would be transferred from donor to host without GVHD. Most donors have been exposed to common pathogens and have an increased precursor frequency of memory T cells against pathogenic antigens. We therefore asked whether memory CD62L-CD44+ CD4+ T cells would induce less GVHD than unfractionated or naive CD4+ T cells. Strikingly, we found that memory CD4 cells induced neither clinical nor histologic GVHD. This effect was not due to the increased number of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells found in the CD62L-CD44+ fraction because memory T cells depletion of these cells did not cause GVHD. Memory CD4 cells engrafted and responded to antigen both in vivo and in vitro. If these murine results are applicable to human alloSCT, selective administration of memory T cells could greatly improve post-transplant immune reconstitution.

Donor APCs are required for maximal GVHD but not for GVL.

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major source of morbidity in allogenic stem cell transplantation. We previously showed that recipient antigen-presenting cells (APCs) are required for CD8-dependent GVHD in a mouse model across only minor histocompatibility antigens (minor H antigens). However, these studies did not address the function of donor-derived APCs after GVHD is initiated. Here we show that GVHD develops in recipients of donor major histocompatibility complex class I–deficient (MHC I−) bone marrow. Thus, after initial priming, CD8 cells caused GVHD without a further requirement for hematopoietic APCs, indicating that host APCs are necessary and sufficient for GHVD. Nonetheless, GVHD was less severe in recipients of MHC I− bone marrow. Therefore, once initiated, GVHD is intensified by donor-derived cells, most probably donor APCs cross-priming alloreactive CD8 cells. Nevertheless, donor APCs were not required for CD8-mediated graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) against a mouse model of chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia. These studies identify donor APCs as a new target for treating GVHD, which may preserve GVL.

Target Antigens Determine Graft-versus-Host Disease Phenotype

Chronic graft-vs-host disease (cGVHD) is an increasingly frequent complication of allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Phenotypically, cGVHD differs from patient to patient; in particular, a subset of patients develops extensive cutaneous fibrosis. Similarly, graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) is distinct in inbred murine donor:recipient pairings, indicating a genetic component to disease phenotype. The B10.D2 → BALB/c (H-2d) strain pairing uniquely recapitulates key pathologic features of fibrotic human cutaneous cGVHD. To distinguish whether this genetic component is due to differences in genes that modulate immune responses or to the specific Ags targeted, we asked whether skin-dominant cGVHD also develops in the B10 → BALB.B (H-2b) and B10.BR → BALB.K (H-2k) MHC-congenic pairings. Because each MHC haplotype presents different peptides and selects different T cell repertoires, GVHD in each donor:recipient pair undoubtedly targets different Ags. We found that, in contrast to BALB/c recipients, BALB.B mice never manifested skin disease while BALB.K mice developed a modified form of skin disease. Instead, BALB.B and BALB.K recipients developed systemic GVHD which was absent in BALB/c mice. Moreover, in (B10 × B10.D2)F1 → (BALB.B × BALB/c)F1 H-2b/d transplants, recipients developed both cutaneous and systemic disease. Thus, the selection of immunodominant Ags determines the target and character of GVHD, providing insight into the genetic basis for different forms of GVHD.

Effects of donor T-cell trafficking and priming site on graft-versus-host disease induction by naive and memory phenotype CD4 T cells

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Effector memory T cells (T(EM)) do not cause GVHD but engraft and mount immune responses, including graft-versus-tumor effects. One potential explanation for the inability of T(EM) to cause GVHD is that T(EM) lack CD62L and CCR7, which are instrumental in directing naive T cells (T(N)) to lymph nodes (LN) and Peyer patches (PP), putative sites of GVHD initiation. Thus T(EM) should be relatively excluded from LN and PP, possibly explaining their inability to cause GVHD. We tested this hypothesis using T cells deficient in CD62L or CCR7, transplant recipients lacking PNAd ligands for CD62L, and recipients without LN and PP or LN, PP, and spleen. Surprisingly, CD62L and CCR7 were not required for T(N)-mediated GVHD. Moreover, in multiple strain pairings, GVHD developed in recipients that lacked LN and PP. Mild GVHD could even be induced in mice lacking all major secondary lymphoid tissues (SLT). Conversely, enforced constitutive expression of CD62L on T(EM) did not endow them with the ability to cause GVHD. Taken together, these data argue against the hypothesis that T(EM) fail to induce GVHD because of inefficient trafficking to LN and PP.

A repertoire-independent and cell-intrinsic defect in murine GVHD induction by effector memory T cells.

Effector memory T cells (T(EM)) do not cause graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), though why this is has not been elucidated. To compare the fates of alloreactive naive (T(N)) or memory (T(M)) T cells, we developed a model of GVHD in which donor T cells express a transgene-encoded TCR specific for an antigenic peptide that is ubiquitously expressed in the recipient. Small numbers of naive TCR transgenic (Tg) T cells induced a robust syndrome of GVHD in transplanted recipients. We then used an established method to convert TCR Tg cells to T(M) and tested these for GVHD induction. This allowed us to control for the potentially different frequencies of alloreactive T cells among T(N) and T(M), and to track fates of alloreactive T cells after transplantation. T(EM) caused minimal, transient GVHD whereas central memory T cells (T(CM)) caused potent GVHD. Surprisingly, T(EM) were not inert: they, engrafted, homed to target tissues, and proliferated extensively, but they produced less IFN-γ and their expansion in target tissues was limited at later time points, and local proliferation was reduced. Thus, cell-intrinsic properties independent of repertoire explain the impairment of T(EM), which can initiate but cannot sustain expansion and tissue damage.

Recipient B Cells Are Not Required for Graft-Versus-Host Disease Induction

Recipient antigen presenting cells (APCs) are required for CD8-mediated graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and have an important and nonredundant role in CD4-mediated GVHD in mouse major histocompatibility complex-matched allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (alloBMT). However, the precise roles of specific recipient APCs-dendritic cells, macrophages, and B cells-are not well defined. If recipient B cells are important APCs they could be depleted with rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. On the other hand, B cells can downregulate T cell responses, and consequently, B cell depletion could exacerbate GVHD. Patients with B cell lymphomas undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) and many are B-cell-deficient because of prior rituximab. We therefore studied the role of recipient B cells in major histocompatibility complex-matched murine models of CD8- and CD4-mediated GVHD by using recipients genetically deficient in B cells and with antibody-mediated depletion of host B cells. In both CD4- and CD8-dependent models, B cell-deficient recipients developed clinical and pathologic GVHD. However, although CD8-mediated GVHD was clinically less severe in hosts genetically deficient in B cells, it was unaffected in anti-CD20-treated recipients. These data indicate that recipient B cells are not important initiators of GVHD, and that efforts to prevent GVHD by APC depletion should focus on other APC subsets.

Enhancing alloreactivity does not restore GVHD induction but augments skin graft rejection by CD4+ effector memory T cells

Graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) caused by donor T cells attacking recipient tissues is a major cause of morbidity and mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). Studies have shown that effector memory T (TEM) cells do not cause GVHD but are capable of immune functions post‐transplant, including graft‐versus‐leukemia (GVL) effects, but the reasons for this are unclear. In mice, the TEM pool may have a less diverse T‐cell receptor (TCR) repertoire than naive T (TN) cells with fewer alloreactive clones. We therefore tested whether enhancing the alloreactivity of TEM cells would restore their ability to cause GVHD. In an MHC‐matched system, alloreactive TEM cells were created by transferring GVHD effector cells into syngeneic recipients and allowing conversion to TEM cells. Upon retransfer to freshly transplanted recipients, these cells caused only mild GVHD. Similarly, in an MHC‐mismatched system, TEM cells with a proven increased precursor frequency of alloreactive clones only caused limited GVHD. Nonetheless, these same cells mounted strong in vitro alloresponses and caused rapid skin graft rejection. TEM cells created from CD4+ T cells that had undergone lymphopenia‐induced proliferation (LIP) also caused only mild GVHD. Our findings establish that conversion to TEM cells significantly reduces GVHD potency, even in cells with a substantially enhanced alloreactive repertoire.

Recipient γδ T cells in graft-versus-host disease

We read with interest the paper by Maeda et al,[1][1] which concluded that host γδ T cells exacerbated graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) by promoting maturation of host antigen-presenting cells (APCs). In the “Introduction,” the authors state that the role of host γδ T cells (in GVHD) is not

Recipient gammadelta T cells in graft-versus-host disease.

We read with interest the paper by Maeda et al,[1][1] which concluded that host γδ T cells exacerbated graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) by promoting maturation of host antigen-presenting cells (APCs). In the “Introduction,” the authors state that the role of host γδ T cells (in GVHD) is not