Bruce R. Baumgartner
Emory University Hospital
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Bruce R. Baumgartner.
Investigative Radiology | 1991
Joel E. Perchik; Bruce R. Baumgartner; Michael E. Bernardino
Over a two-year period, 275 duplex Doppler ultrasound (US) examinations were performed on 75 renal allograft recipients. Retrospective visual analysis of the Doppler tracings was compared to concurrent clinical findings and to biopsy results. One hundred eight of the 176 Doppler examinations (61%) that showed acute rejection clinically or histologically were interpreted as rejection, while 80 of 99 examinations (81%) in clinically normal patients were interpreted as normal. Two hundred thirty-four examinations had resistive index (RI) calculations. Seventy-two of 141 examinations (51%) with RI less than 0.70 had clinical or biopsy evidence of rejection. Studies compared with only concurrent biopsies revealed that 35 of 39 US examinations interpreted as rejection were confirmed histologically, but only one of 32 examinations that appeared normal sonographically was histologically normal. The low sensitivity of Doppler US, whether by waveform analysis or RI calculation, makes it a poor screening test for acute rejection. The findings support the conclusion that Doppler sonography cannot replace biopsy in the evaluation of renal transplant dysfunction, particularly when the waveform analysis is normal and the RI less than 0.70.
Abdominal Imaging | 1988
Rendon C. Nelson; Judith L. Chezmar; Harvey V. Steinberg; William E. Torres; Bruce R. Baumgartner; R. Kristina Gedgaudas-McClees; Michael E. Bernardino
Eighteen patients with focal hepatic lesions were evaluated with two computed tomographic (CT) techniques including dynamic sequential bolus contrast CT and delayed contrast CT, and 3 magnetic resonance (MR) techniques including a spin echo pulse sequence with TE/TR of 21/310 msec and 2 fast field echo sequences using a TE/TR of 15/300 msec and 80° flip angle (T1-weighted) and TE/TR of 15/500 msec and 10–20° flip angle (T2-weighted). We concluded that CT, using delayed contrast and dynamic sequential bolus contrast techniques, was consistently superior to the 3 MR pulse sequences used on our imagers in terms of number of lesions detected, lesion-to-liver contrast, and quality of scan.
Investigative Radiology | 1989
Bruce R. Baumgartner; Rendon C. Nelson; William E. Torres; John A. Malko; Jack E. Peterson; Michael E. Bernardino
Inability to demonstrate the renal corticomedullary junction (CMJ) on magnetic resonance (MR) images has been reported in connection with several medical renal diseases. T1-weighted spin echo pulse sequences have been advocated to demonstrate a signal intensity difference between cortex and medulla. This study was undertaken to determine which of several T1-weighted spin echo (SE) and gradient echo (GE) sequences are better for delineation of the CMJ. The MR studies were performed at 0.5 Tesla on 27 normal volunteers. Multi-slice axial images of both kidneys were obtained in all subjects at each of the following five pulse sequences: SE 250/20, SE 500/30, SE 900/30, and GE 300/15 with 80 degrees and 64 degrees flip angles. Contrast/noise ratios were calculated for the signal intensity differences between cortex and medulla; the average standardized contrast/noise ratios ranked as follows: GE 300/15/80 degrees = 3.01 +/- 0.74, GE 300/15/64 degrees = 2.72 +/- 0.74, SE 250/20 = 2.02 +/- 0.33, SE 500/30 = 1.96 +/- 0.51, and SE 900/30 = 1.71 +/- 0.39. In addition, the five sequences for each patient were randomized and the images were independently ranked for delineation of CMJ by three MR radiologists. The cumulative subjective ranking for all observers from best to worst is as follows: SE 500/30, GE 300/15/80 degrees, GE 300/15/64 degrees, SE 900/30, SE 250/20. Although better contrast/noise ratios are achieved with the GE sequences and the more T1-weighted SE sequences, as a practical matter this does not seem to be the only significant factor when compared with the visual image evaluation by independent observers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Archive | 1986
Bruce R. Baumgartner; Michael E. Bernardino
Considerable attention has been given to abdominal abscesses in the recent literature and to the importance of the role of the radiologist in their diagnosis and treatment. Untreated intra-abdominal abscesses continue to be associated with high mortality, especially in the subphrenic and upper abdominal regions [5]. Most of these cases are seen following intra-abdominal surgery, and the clinical presentation is often subtle with today’s widespread use of antibiotics in the postoperative period. The etiology of retroperitoneal abscesses differs with the three various subdivisions of that region. Anterior pararenal abscesses tend to originate in the gastrointestinal tract secondary to pancreatitis, diverticulitis, or ulcer perforation [34]. An isolated abscess in the perinephric space, however, is most often the result of direct extension from a primary infectious process in the kidney [30]. With the decline of hematogenous staphylococcal renal abscesses, postoperative abscesses now account for an increasing proportion of lesions in this space. Postoperative and primary renal infections are also the source of the majority of the abscesses in the posterior pararenal space [8]. As with intraperitoneal abscesses, there is a need for prompt diagnosis and treatment of those in the retroperitoneal space. Thus, these abscesses are ideal lesions to respond to percutaneous aspiration and drainage combined with appropriate antibiotic therapy. This report will discuss the anatomy, diagnosis, accuracy, technique, and indications of interventional procedures in patients with abnormal renal or perirenal fluid collections.
Investigative Radiology | 1991
Bruce R. Baumgartner; M Todd Jones; William E. Torres; Rendon C. Nelson; Jack E. Peterson
Both ultrasonography (US) and oral cholecystography (OCG) are being used to evaluate patients after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for gallstones. Criteria for retreatment after the initial ESWL are usually related to the size of the residual fragments. This study examines the efficacy of ultrasound and OCG for determining both the size and number of stone fragments in the gallbladder in an in vitro model and in patients. Ultrasonography and OCG examinations using an in vitro ESWL phantom with ten groups of stones, and on 39 patients, were reviewed independently by three radiologists to determine both the size and number of stone fragments. For the in vitro study, the three readers estimated the correct number of fragments, or the next closest range, in 87% of observations by OCG and in 43% by US. The size of the largest fragment was measured within 1 mm of its actual size in 87% of observations by OCG and 20% by US. Correlation coefficients for the mean measurements of the three readers versus the actual fragment size and number were greater for OCG than for US. For the in vivo study, the three readers agreed in 47% of the OCG versus 32% of US examinations with respect to the number of fragments, and in 65% of OCG compared to 40% of US studies with respect to size of the largest fragment. Multiple statistical analyses demonstrate that these differences are statistically significant. A discrepancy among the readers concerning whether a patient was eligible for retreatment occurred in 15% of OCG as compared to 45% of US studies. Both the in vivo and in vitro studies indicate that there is more interobserver reproducibility for OCG than for US, and that OCG is more reliable in making the decision concerning patient eligibility for retreatment following lithotripsy.
Investigative Radiology | 1991
William E. Torres; Bruce R. Baumgartner; M Todd Jones; Harvey V. Steinberg; Jack E. Peterson
Ultrasound and oral cholecystography (OCG) are both used to evaluate candidates for biliary lithotripsy. Some investigators have suggested abandoning the OCG, believing that sufficient screening information can be obtained from ultrasound. This study compares ultrasound and OCG in assessing the size and number of gallstones, both in vitro and in vivo. In the in vitro model, 35 gallstones, divided into 20 groups, were separately suspended in dilute contrast media in a phantom, and examined by ultrasound and simulated OCG by each of three gastrointestinal radiologists. In the in vivo study, the ultrasound and OCG examinations from 53 patients were independently reviewed by three radiologists. The number and size of the stones were recorded in both studies. In the in vitro study, the stone size was measured within 2 mm of the actual size by OCG in 23/35 stones (66%) and by ultrasound in 4/35 stones (11%). The correct number of stones was determined by OCG in 19/20 groups (95%), and by ultrasound in 14/20 (70%). In the in vivo study, all readers saw the same number of stones in 40/50 (80%) patients by OCG and 33/49 (67%) patients by ultrasound. Statistical analyses revealed correlation coefficients for OCG greater than those for ultrasound in each comparison. The size of the largest stone was within 2 mm by all readers in 26/51 (51%) of patients by OCG and 20/47 (43%) patients by ultrasound. Oral cholecystography is more reliable than ultrasound for the determination of size and number of stones in patients being screened for biliary lithotripsy.
Radiology | 1987
Bruce R. Baumgartner; K W Dickey; S S Ambrose; K N Walton; Rendon C. Nelson; Michael E. Bernardino
Radiology | 2000
Russell B. Tippins; William E. Torres; Bruce R. Baumgartner; Deborah A. Baumgarten
Radiology | 1986
Michael E. Bernardino; B C Erwin; Harvey V. Steinberg; Bruce R. Baumgartner; William E. Torres; R K Gedgaudas-McClees
American Journal of Roentgenology | 1986
William E. Torres; Mb Evert; Bruce R. Baumgartner; Michael E. Bernardino