Harvey V. Steinberg

Focal Hepatic Lesions: Detection by Dynamic and Delayed Computed Tomography Versus Short TE(TR Spin Echo and Fast Field Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Eighteen patients with focal hepatic lesions were evaluated with two computed tomographic (CT) techniques including dynamic sequential bolus contrast CT and delayed contrast CT, and 3 magnetic resonance (MR) techniques including a spin echo pulse sequence with TE/TR of 21/310 msec and 2 fast field echo sequences using a TE/TR of 15/300 msec and 80° flip angle (T1-weighted) and TE/TR of 15/500 msec and 10–20° flip angle (T2-weighted). We concluded that CT, using delayed contrast and dynamic sequential bolus contrast techniques, was consistently superior to the 3 MR pulse sequences used on our imagers in terms of number of lesions detected, lesion-to-liver contrast, and quality of scan.

Comparison of Ultrasonography and Oral Cholecystography in Biliary Lithotripsy: I. Screening Patients

Ultrasound and oral cholecystography (OCG) are both used to evaluate candidates for biliary lithotripsy. Some investigators have suggested abandoning the OCG, believing that sufficient screening information can be obtained from ultrasound. This study compares ultrasound and OCG in assessing the size and number of gallstones, both in vitro and in vivo. In the in vitro model, 35 gallstones, divided into 20 groups, were separately suspended in dilute contrast media in a phantom, and examined by ultrasound and simulated OCG by each of three gastrointestinal radiologists. In the in vivo study, the ultrasound and OCG examinations from 53 patients were independently reviewed by three radiologists. The number and size of the stones were recorded in both studies. In the in vitro study, the stone size was measured within 2 mm of the actual size by OCG in 23/35 stones (66%) and by ultrasound in 4/35 stones (11%). The correct number of stones was determined by OCG in 19/20 groups (95%), and by ultrasound in 14/20 (70%). In the in vivo study, all readers saw the same number of stones in 40/50 (80%) patients by OCG and 33/49 (67%) patients by ultrasound. Statistical analyses revealed correlation coefficients for OCG greater than those for ultrasound in each comparison. The size of the largest stone was within 2 mm by all readers in 26/51 (51%) of patients by OCG and 20/47 (43%) patients by ultrasound. Oral cholecystography is more reliable than ultrasound for the determination of size and number of stones in patients being screened for biliary lithotripsy.