C. Buchmann

Plastic mulching in agriculture. Trading short-term agronomic benefits for long-term soil degradation?

Plastic mulching has become a globally applied agricultural practice for its instant economic benefits such as higher yields, earlier harvests, improved fruit quality and increased water-use efficiency. However, knowledge of the sustainability of plastic mulching remains vague in terms of both an environmental and agronomic perspective. This review critically discusses the current understanding of the environmental impact of plastic mulch use by linking knowledge of agricultural benefits and research on the life cycle of plastic mulches with direct and indirect implications for long-term soil quality and ecosystem services. Adverse effects may arise from plastic additives, enhanced pesticide runoff and plastic residues likely to fragment into microplastics but remaining chemically intact and accumulating in soil where they can successively sorb agrochemicals. The quantification of microplastics in soil remains challenging due to the lack of appropriate analytical techniques. The cost and effort of recovering and recycling used mulching films may offset the aforementioned benefits in the long term. However, comparative and long-term agronomic assessments have not yet been conducted. Furthermore, plastic mulches have the potential to alter soil quality by shifting the edaphic biocoenosis (e.g. towards mycotoxigenic fungi), accelerate C/N metabolism eventually depleting soil organic matter stocks, increase soil water repellency and favour the release of greenhouse gases. A substantial process understanding of the interactions between the soil microclimate, water supply and biological activity under plastic mulches is still lacking but required to estimate potential risks for long-term soil quality. Currently, farmers mostly base their decision to apply plastic mulches rather on expected short-term benefits than on the consideration of long-term consequences. Future interdisciplinary research should therefore gain a deeper understanding of the incentives for farmers and public perception from both a psychological and economic perspective in order to develop new support strategies for the transition into a more environment-friendly food production.

The role of sediment structure in gas bubble storage and release

Ebullition is an important pathway for methane emission from inland waters. However, the mechanisms controlling methane bubble formation and release in aquatic sediments remain unclear. A laboratory incubation experiment was conducted to investigate the dynamics of methane bubble formation, storage, and release in response to hydrostatic head drops in three different types of natural sediment. Homogenized clayey, silty, and sandy sediments (initially quasi-uniform through the depth of the columns) were incubated in chambers for 3 weeks. We observed three distinct stages of methane bubble formation and release: stage I—microbubble formation-displacing mobile water from sediment pores with negligible ebullition; stage II—formation of large bubbles, displacing the surrounding sediment with concurrent increase in ebullition; and stage III—formation of conduits with relatively steady ebullition. The maximum depth-averaged volumetric gas content at steady state varied from 18.8% in clayey to 12.0% in silty and 13.2% in sandy sediment. Gas storage in the sediment columns showed strong vertical stratification: most of the free gas was stored in an upper layer, whose thickness varied with sediment grain size. The magnitude of individual ebullition episodes was linearly correlated to hydrostatic head drop and decreased from clayey to sandy to silty sediment and was in excess of that estimated from gas expansion alone, indicating the release of pore water methane. These findings combined with a hydrodynamic model capable of determining dominant sediment type and depositional zones could help resolve spatial heterogeneities in methane ebullition at medium to larger scales in inland waters.

Effect of water entrapment by a hydrogel on the microstructural stability of artificial soils with various clay content

Background and aimsInteractions between soil constituents define soil microstructural stability and are enhanced by swellable organic substances (hydrogels) such as extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), root mucilage or synthetic polymers. This study aims to identify the still largely unknown mechanisms behind hydrogel-induced soil microstructural stability. We hypothesized that soil microstructural stability increased with increasing limitation of hydrogel swelling between soil particles.MethodsOne- and two-dimensional 1H proton nuclear magnetic resonance relaxometry (1H–NMR relaxometry) measurements were performed with untreated and polyacrylic-acid (PAA) treated artificial soils at various clay content and PAA concentrations. The results on the water distribution and water mobility in the artificial soils were related to their microstructural stability as measured by rheology.ResultsPAA treatment significantly increased soil microstructural stability up to five times, especially at high clay content. Soil microstructural stability increased with decreasing rotational mobility of water in the PAA-treated artificial. At the two highest PAA concentrations, the microstructural stability was the highest, although the mobility of water molecules was not further restricted.ConclusionIn artificial soils, the viscosity of hydrogel structures between mineral particles and the additional formation of an external network by polymer-clay interactions such as polyvalent cation bridging seem to promote microstructural stability.

Methane Bubble Growth and Migration in Aquatic Sediments Observed by X-ray μCT

Methane bubble formation and transport is an important component of biogeochemical carbon cycling in aquatic sediments. To improve understanding of how sediment mechanical properties influence bubble growth and transport in freshwater sediments, a 20-day laboratory incubation experiment using homogenized natural clay and sand was performed. Methane bubble development at high resolution was characterized by μCT. Initially, capillary invasion by microbubbles (<0.1 mm) dominated bubble formation, with continued gas production (4 days for clay; 8 days for sand), large bubbles formed by deforming the surrounding sediment, leading to enhanced of macropore connectivity in both sediments. Growth of large bubbles (>1 mm) was possible in low shear yield strength sediments (<100 Pa), where excess gas pressure was sufficient to displace the sediment. Lower within the sand, higher shear yield strength (>360 Pa) resulted in a predominance of microbubbles where the required capillary entry pressure was low. Enhanced bubble migration, triggered by a controlled reduction in hydrostatic head, was observed throughout the clay column, while in sand mobile bubbles were restricted to the upper 6 cm. The observed macropore network was the dominant path for bubble movement and release in both sediments.