Catherine Moulia

Wormy mice in a hybrid zone: A genetic control of susceptibility to parasite infection

‘Laboratoire de Parasitologie Cornparke, (URA 698, CNRS). UniversitP de Montpellier II. PI. E Bataillon; 34095 Montpellier cedex 5; FRANCE. ‘Institut des Sciences de I’Ecolution, “GPnome et Population”, (URA 327 CNRS). UnitlersitP de Montpellier II. PI. E. Bataillon; 34095 Montpeflier cedex 5; FRANCE. ‘Department of Molecular Biology and Plant Physiology. UnicersitJt of Aarhus. C. F. M&en AlIP 130. DK-8000; Aarhus, DENMARK

When mutualists are pathogens: an experimental study of the symbioses between Steinernema (entomopathogenic nematodes) and Xenorhabdus (bacteria)

In this paper, we investigate the level of specialization of the symbiotic association between an entomopathogenic nematode (Steinernema carpocapsae) and its mutualistic native bacterium (Xenorhabdus nematophila). We made experimental combinations on an insect host where nematodes were associated with non‐native symbionts belonging to the same species as the native symbiont, to the same genus or even to a different genus of bacteria. All non‐native strains are mutualistically associated with congeneric entomopathogenic nematode species in nature. We show that some of the non‐native bacterial strains are pathogenic for S. carpocapsae. When the phylogenetic relationships between the bacterial strains was evaluated, we found a clear negative correlation between the effect a bacterium has on nematode fitness and its phylogenetic distance to the native bacteria of this nematode. Moreover, only symbionts that were phylogenetically closely related to the native bacterial strain were transmitted. These results suggest that co‐evolution between the partners has led to a high level of specialization in this mutualism, which effectively prevents horizontal transmission. The pathogenicity of some non‐native bacterial strains against S. carpocapsae could result from the incapacity of the nematode to resist specific virulence factors produced by these bacteria.

Effect of native Xenorhabdus on the fitness of their Steinernema hosts: contrasting types of interaction

Abstract Steinernema species are entomopathogenic nematodes. They are symbiotically associated with Enterobacteriaceae of the genus Xenorhabdus. These nematode–bacteria symbioses are extremely diversified and constitute an important new model in ecology and evolution to investigate symbioses between microbes and invertebrates. However, no study has so far adequately evaluated either the outcome of the interactions or the obligate nature of interactions in different Steinernema species in the same way. Studying three different species of Steinernema, we showed that symbiotic nematodes are always fitter than aposymbiotic ones. Nevertheless, we revealed contrasting types of interaction in terms of outcome and obligate nature of the interaction. Bacterial analyses showed that nematode species differed dramatically in the number of symbiotic Xenorhabdus they carried. We suggested that when the interaction appeared more facultative for a nematode species, the nematodes carried fewer Xenorhabdus cells than strongly dependent worm species. Thus, the symbiont transmission appeared to become more efficient as the relationship between the nematode and the bacteria became tighter.

Assessment of vector/host contact: comparison of animal-baited traps and UV-light/suction trap for collecting Culicoides biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae), vectors of Orbiviruses

BackgroundThe emergence and massive spread of bluetongue in Western Europe during 2006-2008 had disastrous consequences for sheep and cattle production and confirmed the ability of Palaearctic Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) to transmit the virus. Some aspects of Culicoides ecology, especially host-seeking and feeding behaviors, remain insufficiently described due to the difficulty of collecting them directly on a bait animal, the most reliable method to evaluate biting rates.Our aim was to compare typical animal-baited traps (drop trap and direct aspiration) to both a new sticky cover trap and a UV-light/suction trap (the most commonly used method to collect Culicoides).Methods/resultsCollections were made from 1.45 hours before sunset to 1.45 hours after sunset in June/July 2009 at an experimental sheep farm (INRA, Nouzilly, Western France), with 3 replicates of a 4 sites × 4 traps randomized Latin square using one sheep per site. Collected Culicoides individuals were sorted morphologically to species, sex and physiological stages for females. Sibling species were identified using a molecular assay. A total of 534 Culicoides belonging to 17 species was collected. Abundance was maximal in the drop trap (232 females and 4 males from 10 species) whereas the diversity was the highest in the UV-light/suction trap (136 females and 5 males from 15 species). Significant between-trap differences abundance and parity rates were observed.ConclusionsOnly the direct aspiration collected exclusively host-seeking females, despite a concern that human manipulation may influence estimation of the biting rate. The sticky cover trap assessed accurately the biting rate of abundant species even if it might act as an interception trap. The drop trap collected the highest abundance of Culicoides and may have caught individuals not attracted by sheep but by its structure. Finally, abundances obtained using the UV-light/suction trap did not estimate accurately Culicoides biting rate.

Host preferences of Palaearctic Culicoides biting midges: implications for transmission of orbiviruses

Feeding success depends on host availability, host defensive reactions and host preferences. Host choice is a critical determinant of the intensity at which pathogens are transmitted. The aim of the current study was to describe host preferences of Palaearctic Culicoides species (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) Latreille using traps baited with the five different host species of poultry, horse, cattle, sheep and goat. Collections were carried out nightly in July and August 2009 in western France with three replicates of a 5 × 5 randomized Latin square (five sites, five hosts). Moreover, an ultraviolet (UV) light/suction trap was operated during host‐baited collections to correlate Culicoides biting rates and UV light/suction trap catches. A total of 660 Culicoides belonging to 12 species, but comprised mainly of Culicoides scoticus Downes and Kettle, Culicoides dewulfi Goetghebuer and Culicoides obsoletus Meigen, were collected on animal baits. Abundance was highest for the horse, which accounted for 95% of all Culicoides caught, representing 10 species. The horse, the largest bait, was the most attractive host, even when abundance data were corrected by weight, body surface or Kleibers scaling factor. Culicoides obsoletus was the only dominant species attracted by birds. Both C. scoticus and C. dewulfi were collected mainly from the upper body of the horse. Finally, the quantification of host preferences allows for discussion of implications for the transmission of Culicoides‐borne pathogens such as bluetongue virus.

Hybrid vigour against parasites in interspecific crosses between two mice species

The resistance and susceptibility to the intestinal pinworm Aspiculuris tetraptera, a natural parasite of the house mouse Mus musculus, is experimentally analysed using both the F1 from wild-type mice of the two subspecies (M. m. domesticus and M. m. musculus) and the F1 from different laboratory inbred mice. The results show that: (i) the F1 from wild-type mice harbour a lower parasite load than the parental mice, suggesting a phenomenon of hybrid vigour; and (ii) the F1 from inbred mice harbour parasite loads similar to the resistant parent, suggesting that resistance is inherited as a dominant feature in these laboratory mice. This analysis supports the hypothesis that recombinations occurring between the two mouse genomes (i.e. M. m. domesticus and M. m. musculus) are responsible for the hybrid dysgenesis observed in the natural hybrid zone between the two mice subspecies.

Host-Seeking Activity of Bluetongue Virus Vectors: Endo/Exophagy and Circadian Rhythm of Culicoides in Western Europe

Feeding success of free-living hematophagous insects depends on their ability to be active when hosts are available and to reach places where hosts are accessible. When the hematophagous insect is a vector of pathogens, determining the components of host-seeking behavior is of primary interest for the assessment of transmission risk. Our aim was to describe endo/exophagy and circadian host-seeking activity of Palaearctic Culicoides species, which are major biting pests and arbovirus vectors, using drop traps and suction traps baited with four sheep, as bluetongue virus hosts. Collections were carried out in the field, a largely-open stable and an enclosed stable during six collection periods of 24 hours in April/May, in late June and in September/October 2010 in western France. A total of 986 Culicoides belonging to 13 species, mainly C. brunnicans and C. obsoletus, was collected on animal baits. Culicoides brunnicans was clearly exophagic, whereas C. obsoletus was able to enter stables. Culicoides brunnicans exhibited a bimodal pattern of host-seeking activity with peaks just after sunrise and sunset. Culicoides obsoletus was active before sunset in spring and autumn and after sunset in summer, thus illustrating influence of other parameters than light, especially temperature. Description of host-seeking behaviors allowed us to discuss control strategies for transmission of Culicoides-borne pathogens, such as bluetongue virus. However, practical vector-control recommendations are difficult to provide because of the variation in the degree of endophagy and time of host-seeking activity.

Interspecific competition between entomopathogenic nematodes (Steinernema) is modified by their bacterial symbionts (Xenorhabdus)

BackgroundSymbioses between invertebrates and prokaryotes are biological systems of particular interest in order to study the evolution of mutualism. The symbioses between the entomopathogenic nematodes Steinernema and their bacterial symbiont Xenorhabdus are very tractable model systems. Previous studies demonstrated (i) a highly specialized relationship between each strain of nematodes and its naturally associated bacterial strain and (ii) that mutualism plays a role in several important life history traits of each partner such as access to insect host resources, dispersal and protection against various biotic and abiotic factors. The goal of the present study was to address the question of the impact of Xenorhabdus symbionts on the progression and outcome of interspecific competition between individuals belonging to different Steinernema species. For this, we monitored experimental interspecific competition between (i) two nematode species: S. carpocapsae and S. scapterisci and (ii) their respective symbionts: X. nematophila and X. innexi within an experimental insect-host (Galleria mellonella). Three conditions of competition between nematodes were tested: (i) infection of insects with aposymbiotic IJs (i.e. without symbiont) of both species (ii) infection of insects with aposymbiotic IJs of both species in presence of variable proportion of their two Xenorhabdus symbionts and (iii) infection of insects with symbiotic IJs (i.e. naturally associated with their symbionts) of both species.ResultsWe found that both the progression and the outcome of interspecific competition between entomopathogenic nematodes were influenced by their bacterial symbionts. Thus, the results obtained with aposymbiotic nematodes were totally opposite to those obtained with symbiotic nematodes. Moreover, the experimental introduction of different ratios of Xenorhabdus symbionts in the insect-host during competition between Steinernema modified the proportion of each species in the adults and in the global offspring.ConclusionWe showed that Xenorhabdus symbionts modified the competition between their Steinernema associates. This suggests that Xenorhabdus not only provides Steinernema with access to food sources but also furnishes new abilities to deal with biotic parameters such as competitors.

Effect of phenotypic variation in Xenorhabdus nematophila on its mutualistic relationship with the entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema carpocapsae.

The entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema carpocapsae is mutualistically associated with the bacterium Xenorhabdus nematophila. Infective Juveniles (IJs) transport X. nematophila cells that provide them with good conditions to reproduce within the insect. In the laboratory, long term stationary-phase culture conditions sometimes lead X. nematophilas variant 1 cells, which were previously isolated from the worms, to spontaneously and irreversibly change into a new phenotypic variant (variant 2). In this paper, we tested the ability of each phenotypic variant to (i) be transmitted by IJs, (ii) to optimize the worms fitness within the insect, and (iii) to counteract the effect of closely related antagonistic bacteria previously shown as being able to totally prevent S. carpocapsaes reproduction within the insect. We found that IJs did associate with cells of both phenotypes but that the variant 2 cells were preferentially retained by the nematodes when both variants were present in the insect. Both phenotypic variants led to the same fitness of S. carpocapsae in insects not infected by antagonistic bacteria. In insects infected by antagonistic bacteria, both variants were able to provide protection to S. carpocapsae. Nevertheless, this protection depended on the phenotypic variant and the antagonistic bacteria that were co-injected into the insect. Further analysis conduced in vitro showed that this variability could be partly linked to the sensitivity of each antagonistic bacterium to xenorhabdicin, produced by X. nematophila.

Specialization of the entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema scapterisci with its mutualistic Xenorhabdus symbiont

The level of specialization of the entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema scapterisci with its native Xenorhabdus symbiont was investigated by testing (1) the influence of non-native bacterial strains on nematode fitness within an insect-host (Galleria mellonella) and (2) specificity of the association between the nematode infective juveniles and non-native bacteria. All non-native Xenorhabdus spp. or Photorhabdus spp. strains tested were mutualistically associated with other entomopathogenic nematodes in nature. We showed that most of the Xenorhabdus spp. strains tested led to an insignificant difference of the nematodes fitness compared to the one obtained with the native bacterium. Conversely, Photorhabdus spp. strains almost entirely abolished nematode reproduction. The phylogenetic analysis of bacterial strains tested, showed that there was a negative correlation between S. scapteriscis reproduction rate with a bacterial strain and the genetic distance of this bacterial strain from the native one. We also showed that the native bacterium was the only one which was transmitted by S. scapteriscis infective juveniles. All these results, suggested a specialization between S. scapterisci and its native Xenorhabdus. As the same phenomenon was already demonstrated in the association between S. carpocapsae and X. nematophila, specialization between partners would not be an exception in entomopathogenic nematode-bacteria interactions. Nevertheless, S. scapterisci showed a dramatically higher compatibility with non-native Xenorhabdus spp. strains than did S. carpocapsae, suggesting differences in the co-evolutionary processes between nematodes and bacteria in these two model systems.Table 1List of the bacterial strains, native nematode species with their geographical origin, accession numbers of bacterial 16S rDNA partial sequences and number of combination experiments for each bacterium testedBacterial species and strainsNative nematode speciesAccession no. of the 16S rDNA sequenceGeographical originNo. of combination experimentsX. innexi UY61S. scapterisciAY521243Uruguay80X. poinarii SK72S. glaseriAY521239USA40X. beddingii Q58Steinernema sp.D78006Australia40X. bovienii FR10S. feltiaeAY521240France40Xenorhabdus sp. USTX62S. riobraveAY521244USA40X. nematophila F1S. carpocapsaeAY521241France40P. luminescens TT01H. bacteriophoraAJ007404Trinidad40P. temperata XLNACHH. megidisAJ007405Russia40