Charles Harb
American University of Beirut
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Charles Harb.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology | 2004
Michael Harris Bond; Kwok Leung; A Au; Kwok-Kit Tong; De Carrasquel; Fumio Murakami; Susumu Yamaguchi; Bierbrauer G; Theodore M. Singelis; M Broer; Filip Boen; Sm Lambert; Maria Cristina Ferreira; Kimberly A. Noels; J Van Bavel; Saba Safdar; Jianxin Zhang; L Chen; I Solcova; I Stetovska; T Niit; Kk Niit; Helena Hurme; M B ling; Franchi; N Magradze; Nino Javakhishvili; Klaus Boehnke; E Klinger; Xu Huang
Leung and colleagues have revealed a five-dimensional structure of social axioms across individuals from five cultural groups. The present research was designed to reveal the culture level factor structure of social axioms and its correlates across 41 nations. An ecological factor analysis on the 60 items of the Social Axioms Survey extracted two factors: Dynamic Externality correlates with value measures tapping collectivism, hierarchy, and conservatism and with national indices indicative of lower social development. Societal Cynicism is less strongly and broadly correlated with previous values measures or other national indices and seems to define a novel cultural syndrome. Its national correlates suggest that it taps the cognitive component of a cultural constellation labeled maleficence, a cultural syndrome associated with a general mistrust of social systems and other people. Discussion focused on the meaning of these national level factors of beliefs and on their relationships with individual level factors of belief derived from the same data set.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology | 2009
Ronald Fischer; Maria Cristina Ferreira; Eveline Maria Leal Assmar; Paul Redford; Charles Harb; Sharon Glazer; Bor-Shiuan Cheng; Ding-Yu Jiang; Corbin C. Wong; Neelam Kumar; Joscha Kärtner; Jan Hofer; Mustapha Achoui
The development and validation of a new instrument for measuring the descriptive norms related to individualism-collectivism (IC) is presented. IC is conceptualized as a group- specific unidimensional cultural construct with four defining attributes (Triandis, 1995). Three studies are reported showing the dimensionality and validities at individual and cultural levels across samples from 11 cultures. The new instrument has good statistical properties with iden- tical structures at the individual and cultural level, good reliabilities at the individual level, adequate agreement within cultures, and demonstrates first signs of convergent and discriminant validity. Correlations at the cultural level also indicate that the measure has the potential to add to research by integrating previously untapped attributes of IC. Finally, normative IC explains variance in self-reported behavior over and above self-referenced IC. Implications and opportunities for norm-oriented research and scale refinement are discussed.
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management | 2005
Ronald Fischer; Maria Cristina Ferreira; Eveline Maria Leal Assmar; Paul Redford; Charles Harb
The present article has two objectives. First, general issues for developing and testing cross cultural multi-level models such as variable identification, measurement, sampling and data analysis are discussed. A second aim is to illustrate some of these issues by developing a multi-level framework incorporating variables at an individual, organizational and national level. The goal is to explain cross cultural differences in extra-role behaviour. Based on a review of previous multi-level research and cross cultural research it is proposed that the effect of national culture on work attitudes and behaviour is mediated by organizational practices. The framework is formulated using recent recommendations for the development of multi-level models.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology | 2012
Peter B. Smith; Hai Juan Huang; Charles Harb; Claudio Vaz Torres
The purpose of the study was to investigate the cultural specificity of guanxi, wasta, and jeitinho, each of which has been identified as an indigenous process of informal influence. Students in Brazil, China, Lebanon, and the United Kingdom were presented with three scenarios derived from each of the nations sampled. They rated the extent to which each scenario was representative of the locally indigenous process, the typicality for their culture of the events portrayed in the scenarios, and the extent to which these interpersonal exchanges were perceived positively. While each type of scenario was perceived as representative and typical in its culture of origin, each was also perceived as somewhat typical by respondents in additional locations. Informal influence processes may vary between cultures more in frequency than in quality. Rated scenario positivity was significantly predicted by respondents’ values. The United Kingdom–based process of “pulling strings” was rated as typical in all locations and was more positively evaluated than the other influence processes by all respondents. It is concluded that in addition to the pragmatic value of these concepts locally, their comparative testing can contribute to the development of culture-general models of social influence processes.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology | 2012
Maja Becker; Vivian L. Vignoles; Ellinor Owe; Rupert Brown; Peter B. Smith; Matthew J. Easterbrook; Ginette Herman; Isabelle de Sauvage; David Bourguignon; Ana Raquel Rosas Torres; Leoncio Camino; Flávia Cristina Silveira Lemos; M. Cristina Ferreira; Silvia Helena Koller; Roberto González; Diego Carrasco; Maria Paz Cadena; Siugmin Lay; Qian Wang; Michael Harris Bond; Elvia Vargas Trujillo; Paola Balanta; Aune Valk; Kassahun Habtamu Mekonnen; George Nizharadze; Márta Fülöp; Camillo Regalia; Claudia Manzi; Maria Brambilla; Charles Harb
The motive to attain a distinctive identity is sometimes thought to be stronger in, or even specific to, those socialized into individualistic cultures. Using data from 4,751 participants in 21 cultural groups (18 nations and 3 regions), we tested this prediction against our alternative view that culture would moderate the ways in which people achieve feelings of distinctiveness, rather than influence the strength of their motivation to do so. We measured the distinctiveness motive using an indirect technique to avoid cultural response biases. Analyses showed that the distinctiveness motive was not weaker-and, if anything, was stronger-in more collectivistic nations. However, individualism-collectivism was found to moderate the ways in which feelings of distinctiveness were constructed: Distinctiveness was associated more closely with difference and separateness in more individualistic cultures and was associated more closely with social position in more collectivistic cultures. Multilevel analysis confirmed that it is the prevailing beliefs and values in an individuals context, rather than the individuals own beliefs and values, that account for these differences.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology | 2008
Charles Harb; Peter B. Smith
This article reviews the literature on cross-cultural assessment of self-construals and proposes to refine their conceptualization by incorporating principles derived from self-categorization theory and a critique of cross-cultural research. A Sixfold Self-Construal Scale is devised to measure six subcategories of self-construal: the personal self, relational horizontal and relational vertical selves, collective horizontal and collective vertical selves, and humanity-bound self-construal. The instruments reliability and factor structure are tested in four student samples ( N = 855) from the United Kingdom, Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria. Convergent validity of the Sixfold Self-Construal Scale is tested with measures of Group Identification, Inclusion of the Other in the Self, the Schwartz value survey, and comparison of national mean scores. Results support the reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the scale in all samples.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General | 2016
Vivian L. Vignoles; Ellinor Owe; Maja Becker; Peter B. Smith; Matthew J. Easterbrook; Rupert Brown; Roberto González; Nicolas Didier; Diego Carrasco; Maria Paz Cadena; Siugmin Lay; Seth J. Schwartz; Sabrina E. Des Rosiers; Juan A. Villamar; Alin Gavreliuc; Martina Zinkeng; Robert Kreuzbauer; Peter Baguma; Mariana Martin; Alexander Tatarko; Ginette Herman; Isabelle de Sauvage; Marie Courtois; Ragna B. Garðarsdóttir; Charles Harb; Inge Schweiger Gallo; Paula Prieto Gil; Raquel Lorente Clemares; Gabriella Campara; George Nizharadze
Markus and Kitayamas (1991) theory of independent and interdependent self-construals had a major influence on social, personality, and developmental psychology by highlighting the role of culture in psychological processes. However, research has relied excessively on contrasts between North American and East Asian samples, and commonly used self-report measures of independence and interdependence frequently fail to show predicted cultural differences. We revisited the conceptualization and measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals in 2 large-scale multinational surveys, using improved methods for cross-cultural research. We developed (Study 1: N = 2924 students in 16 nations) and validated across cultures (Study 2: N = 7279 adults from 55 cultural groups in 33 nations) a new 7-dimensional model of self-reported ways of being independent or interdependent. Patterns of global variation support some of Markus and Kitayamas predictions, but a simple contrast between independence and interdependence does not adequately capture the diverse models of selfhood that prevail in different world regions. Cultural groups emphasize different ways of being both independent and interdependent, depending on individualism-collectivism, national socioeconomic development, and religious heritage. Our 7-dimensional model will allow future researchers to test more accurately the implications of cultural models of selfhood for psychological processes in diverse ecocultural contexts. (PsycINFO Database Record
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology | 2013
Ellinor Owe; Vivian L. Vignoles; Maja Becker; Rupert Brown; Peter B. Smith; Spike W. S. Lee; Matthew J. Easterbrook; Tanuja Gadre; Xiao Zhang; Mirona Gheorghiu; Peter Baguma; Alexander Tatarko; Said Aldhafri; Martina Zinkeng; Seth J. Schwartz; Sabrina E. Des Rosiers; Juan A. Villamar; Kassahun Habtamu Mekonnen; Camillo Regalia; Claudia Manzi; Maria Brambilla; Ersin Kusdil; Selinay Çaǧlar; Alin Gavreliuc; Mariana Martin; Zhang Jian-xin; Shaobo Lv; Ronald Fischer; Taciano L. Milfont; Ana Raquel Rosas Torres
Beliefs about personhood are understood to be a defining feature of individualism-collectivism (I-C), but they have been insufficiently explored, given the emphasis of research on values and self-construals. We propose the construct of contextualism, referring to beliefs about the importance of context in understanding people, as a facet of cultural collectivism. A brief measure was developed and refined across 19 nations (Study 1: N = 5,241), showing good psychometric properties for cross-cultural use and correlating well at the nation level with other supposed facets and indicators of I-C. In Study 2 (N = 8,652), nation-level contextualism predicted ingroup favoritism, corruption, and differential trust of ingroup and outgroup members, while controlling for other facets of I-C, across 35 nations. We conclude that contextualism is an important part of cultural collectivism. This highlights the importance of beliefs alongside values and self-representations and contributes to a wider understanding of cultural processes.
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management | 2007
Peter B. Smith; Mustafa Achoui; Charles Harb
A key approach to understanding cross-national variations in leadership is to examine how leaders handle routine events within their span of control. The sources of guidance employed by samples of middle and senior managers in four Arab nations were surveyed. Saudi managers showed the expected traditional and personalistic pattern of relatively strong reliance on both formal rules and unwritten rules, as well on as co-workers and subordinates. Respondents from Qatar, Oman and Lebanon each differed from this pattern in ways consistent with theories of modernity. Correlations with evaluations of how specific work events had been handled in each nation confirmed the presence of distinctive leader styles. The assumption that there is a relatively uniform style of leadership across Arab nations is thus questioned.
Journal of Interpersonal Violence | 2010
Maria J. Rebeiz; Charles Harb
This study investigated values, ambivalent sexism, religiosity, religious differences, gender, and attitudes toward rape victims as predictors of rape myths in a sample of Lebanese students (N = 300). Values of self-transcendence and conservation, gender, hostile sexism, and attitudes toward rape victims emerged as significant predictors of rape myths, confirming some of the premises in the literature. Type of rape (date, marital, acquaintance, and stranger rape) and victim’s characteristics (widowed, married, devout, promiscuous, and chaste) were also investigated. Results revealed that no matter what the relationship between the victim and her perpetrator was, and regardless of the victim’s characteristics, forcible sexual contact was always considered as rape. However, differences did emerge as to the degree to which these variations were perceived as rape. Implication of findings for research and the Lebanese culture are discussed.