Chiara Colaci

Inaccuracy of available surgical risk scores to predict outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Introduction Despite encouraging short-term and mid-term results, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) interventions are still burdened from high rates of adverse events, stressing the need for accurate predictive risk instruments. We compared available surgical risk scores to describe unfavorable outcomes after TAVI. Methods The Age, Creatinine, and Ejection fraction (ACEF) score, the logistic Euroscore, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Mortality score (STS) were appraised for their independent power of prediction and for their accuracy (C-index) to predict 30-day and medium-term mortality, according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium. Results Nine hundred and sixty-two patients were included. All the scores demonstrated a moderate positive correlation. The closest correlation was observed between the STS score and Euroscore. After logistic regression analysis, STS score and Logistic Euroscore provided independent prediction for short-term all-cause mortality [P = 0.02, odds ratio (OR) 1.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06–1.31 and P = 0.027, OR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01–1.405]. For in-hospital complications, only STS score performed significantly (P = 0.005, OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.01–1.06). ACEF, Euroscore, and STS score showed low accuracy for 30-day all-cause mortality (area under the curve 0.6, 0.44–0.75; vs. 0.53, 0.42–0.61; vs. 0.62, 0.52–0.71, respectively), whereas STS score performed better for in-hospital complications (0.59, 0.55–0.64). Moreover, after Cox-multivariate adjustments, only ACEF score was near to significance to predict all-cause mortality at mid-term (OR 1.7; 0.8–2.9; P = 0.058), showing the highest accuracy (0.63, 0.55–0.71). Conclusion In TAVI patients, ACEF score, STS score and Logistic Euroscore provided only a moderate correlation and a low accuracy both for 30-day and medium-term outcomes. Dedicated scores are needed to properly tailor time and kind of approach.

Management of multivessel coronary disease in STEMI patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Appropriate management for patients with multivessel coronary disease presenting with ST segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) remains to be defined. METHODS AND RESULTS Medline and Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or observational studies adjusted with multivariate analysis, reporting about STEMI patients with multivessel coronary disease treated with either a culprit only or complete revascularization strategy, excluding patients in cardiogenic shock. Prespecified analysis was performed according to the strategy of complete revascularization, either during the same procedure of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or during the index hospitalization. MACE (a composite and mutually exclusive end point of death or myocardial infarction or revascularization) at follow-up of at least one year was the primary end point. 9 studies with 4686 patients compared culprit only versus complete PCI performed during the primary PCI. Rates of MACE did not differ at 90 days (OR 0.70 [0.38, 1.27], I(2)=0%) or at 1 year (1-2.5) (OR 0.70 [0.47, 1.03], I(2)=0%). No significant difference was found for the components of the primary outcome, apart from a reduction in repeated revascularization for patients undergoing complete PCI during the STEMI procedure (OR 0.62 [0.39, 0.98], I(2)=0%). 6 studies (1 RCT) with 5855 patients compared culprit only lesions versus complete PCI performed during index hospitalization. 90 day risk of MACE did not differ nor 1 year (1-2.5) MACE (OR 0.86 [0.62, 1.08], I(2)=0%), with a similar reduction in repeated revascularization (0.60 [0.40, 0.90], I(2)=0%). CONCLUSIONS Complete revascularization performed during primary PCI or index hospitalizations for patients presenting with STEMI appears safe at short term follow-up and offers a reduction in repeated revascularization at one year.

Thirty-day readmission rates after PCI in a metropolitan center in Europe: incidence and impact on prognosis.

Introduction Thirty-day readmission rates after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have been related to adverse prognosis, and represent one of the most investigated indicators of quality of care. These data, however, derive from non-European centers evaluating all-cause readmissions, without stratification for diagnosis. Methods All consecutive patients undergoing PCI at our center from January 2009 to December 2011 were enrolled. Thirty-day readmissions related to postinfarction angina, myocardial infarction, unstable angina or heart failure were defined as acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or heart failure rehospitalizations. Major cardiac adverse event (MACE) was the primary outcome, and its single components (death, myocardial infarction and repeated revascularization) the secondary ones. Results A total of 1192 patients were included; among them, 53 (4.7%) were readmitted within 30 days, and 25 (2.1%) were classified as ACS/heart failure related. During hospitalization, patients with ACS/heart failure readmissions were more likely to suffer a periprocedural myocardial infarction (22 vs. 4%; P = 0.012), and to undergo PCI at 30 days (52 vs. 0.5%; P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis indicated that periprocedural myocardial infarction represented the only independent predictor of an ACS/heart failure readmission [odds ratio (OR) 4.5; 1.1–16.8; P = 0.047]. After a median follow-up of 787 days (434–1027; first and third quartiles), patients with a 30-day ACS/heart failure readmission experienced higher rates of MACE, all-cause death and myocardial infarction (64 vs. 21%, P < 0.001; 28 vs. 6%, P = 0.017; and 20 vs. 2.7%, P < 0.001, respectively). Cox multivariate analysis indicated that ACS/heart failure 30-day readmissions were independently related to an increased risk of all-cause death (OR 3.3; 1.1–8.8; P = 0.02), differently from 30-day non-ACS/heart failure readmissions (OR 3.1; 0.7–12.9; P = 0.12). Conclusion Thirty-day readmissions after PCI in an Italian center are infrequent, and only those patients with ACS/heart failure show a detrimental impact on prognosis who have periprocedural myocardial infarction as the only independent predictor.

Shaping an ectatic coronary artery: Stentys implantation.

assessment of a first reported case of duplicate right coronary artery. Int J Cardiol 2005;101:329–31. [6] Sawaya FJ, Sawaya JI, Angelini P. Split right coronary artery. Its definition and its territory. Tex Heart Inst J 2008;35:477–9. [7] Yoon SR, Jung AY, Choi SH, Bang OY, Lee NH. Anomalous double right coronary arteries: characteristic multidetector-row computed tomography findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2010;34(5):666–9. [8] Lemburg SP, Peters SA, Scheeler M, Nicolas V, Heyer CM. Detection of a double right coronary artery with 16-row multidetector computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2007;23(2):293–7. [9] Altun A, Akdemir O, Erdogan O, Ozbay G. An interesting diagnostic dilemma: double right coronary artery or high take off of a large right ventricular branch. Int J Cardiol 2002;82:99–102. [10] Nair K, Krishnamoorthy KM, Tharakan JA. Double right coronary artery with anomalous origin of septal arteries from the right coronary sinus. Int J Cardiol 2005;101:309–10. [11] Sato Y, Kunimasa T, Matsumoto N, Saito S. Detection of double right coronary artery by multi-detector row computed tomography: is angiography still gold standard? Int J Cardiol 2008;126:134–5. [12] Chien TM, Lee CS, Lin CC, Chen YF. The correct case number of double right coronary arteries. Int J Cardiol 2011;153:234–6. [13] Soydinc S, Sari I, Davutoglu V. The dilemma in diagnosing double right coronary artery: contribution of multidetector computed tomography. Int J Cardiol 2008;126:132–3.

Heart failure in patients with human immunodeficiency virus: a review of the literature.

Coronary artery disease represents the leading cause of death for HIV patients treated with highly active antiretroviral treatment. Besides this, an extensive amount of data related to the risk of overt heart failure and consequently of atrial fibrillation and sudden cardiac death (SCD) in this population has been reported. It seems that persistent deregulation of immunity in HIV-infected patients is a common pathway related to both of these adverse clinical outcomes. Despite the fact that atrial fibrillation and heart failure are relatively common in HIV, few data are reported about screening, diagnosis, and potential treatment of these conditions.

Diffuse coronary disease: short- and long-term outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention

AIM The aim of this study was to evaluate short- and long-term results of PCI (percutaneous coronary intervention) in patients with small vessel coronary artery disease and the prognostic impact of the extension and the length of coronary lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS All consecutive patients treated with PCI in our centre between July 2002 and December 2004 were included and divided into two groups according to the diameter of the implanted stents: small vessel disease was defined as requiring implantation of stents < 2.75 mm in diameter. The primary end point was the long-term incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), the composite of cardiac mortality, nonfatal myocardial reinfarction, and repeated percutaneous target vessel revascularization (re-PTCA TVR). 1599 patients were treated by PCI: 419 (26.2%) were implanted with 2.75 mm or smaller stents. At both 1 and 36 months as well as at 53 + 20 months of follow-up small vessel stenting was associated with a higher rate of MACE (4.2% vs 2.1%, P= 0.028; 20.3% vs 17.9%, P <0.001; 27.5% vs 22.4%, P= 0.04, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed higher rates of revascularization for patients with small vessel disease regardless of lesion length. Rates of death were higher in patients with small vessels and long lesions. CONCLUSION Atherosclerotic involvement of small vessels in patients with CAD confers a higher short- and long-term risk of adverse outcome after PCI.

Relationship between ventricular pressure and coronary artery disease in asymptomatic adult heart transplant recipients

Introduction The association between data of right heart catheterization and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) in adult heart transplant (HTx) recipients remains to be determined. Methods and results This is an observational, retrospective study, including all consecutive asymptomatic HTx patients undergoing routine right and left catheterization. The independent predictive power of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) to predict CAV (classified according to working formulation of a standardized nomenclature for CAV-2010) was the primary end point. Seventy-one patients were included, with a mean time from HTx to procedure of 19 ± 25 months. At coronary angiography first degree of CAV was found in eight patients (11.2%), second degree of CAV in two patients (2.8%), and third in two (2.8%). PCWP values were significantly higher in patients with CAV compared with patients without CAV (17.5 ± 7.5 vs. 10.4 ± 5.6, P < 0.001) and values of 15 mmHg or greater had an AUC of 0.71 (0.48–0.92), with a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 73% in predicting CAV, with an independent relationship confirmed at logistic regression analysis (odds ratio 1.28, IC 1.06–1.53; P = 0.008). Conclusion A significantly elevated PCWP at the time of the diagnosis of transplant coronary artery disease may be considered as an early marker of CAV, especially in asymptomatic HTx recipients.