Christin Whalen

Cediranib, an Oral Inhibitor of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Kinases, Is an Active Drug in Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, and Peritoneal Cancer

PURPOSE Angiogenesis is important for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) growth, and blocking angiogenesis can lead to EOC regression. Cediranib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) -1, VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3, and c-kit. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a phase II study of cediranib for recurrent EOC or peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer; cediranib was administered as a daily oral dose, and the original dose was 45 mg daily. Because of toxicities observed in the first 11 patients, the dose was lowered to 30 mg. Eligibility included <or= two lines of chemotherapy for recurrence. End points included response rate (via Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] or modified Gynecological Cancer Intergroup CA-125), toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Forty-seven patients were enrolled; 46 were treated. Clinical benefit rate (defined as complete response [CR] or partial response [PR], stable disease [SD] > 16 weeks, or CA-125 nonprogression > 16 weeks), which was the primary end point, was 30%; eight patients (17%; 95% CI, 7.6% to 30.8%) had a PR, six patients (13%; 95% CI, 4.8% to 25.7%) had SD, and there were no CRs. Eleven patients (23%) were removed from study because of toxicities before two cycles. Grade 3 toxicities (> 20% of patients) included hypertension (46%), fatigue (24%), and diarrhea (13%). Grade 2 hypothyroidism occurred in 43% of patients. Grade 4 toxicities included CNS hemorrhage (n = 1), hypertriglyceridemia/hypercholesterolemia/elevated lipase (n = 1), and dehydration/elevated creatinine (n = 1). No bowel perforations or fistulas occurred. Median PFS was 5.2 months, and median OS has not been reached; median follow-up time is 10.7 months. CONCLUSION Cediranib has activity in recurrent EOC, tubal cancer, and peritoneal cancer with predictable toxicities observed with other TKIs.

Combination cediranib and olaparib versus olaparib alone for women with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: a randomised phase 2 study

BACKGROUND Olaparib is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor and cediranib is an anti-angiogenic agent with activity against VEGF receptor (VEGFR) 1, VEGFR2, and VEGFR3. Both oral agents have antitumour activity in women with recurrent ovarian cancer, and their combination was active and had manageable toxicities in a phase 1 trial. We investigated whether this combination could improve progression-free survival (PFS) compared with olaparib monotherapy in women with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. METHODS In our randomised, open-label, phase 2 study, we recruited women (aged ≥18 years) who had measurable platinum-sensitive, relapsed, high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer, or those with deleterious germline BRCA1/2 mutations from nine participating US academic medical centres. We randomly allocated participants (1:1) according to permuted blocks, stratified by germline BRCA status and previous anti-angiogenic therapy, to receive olaparib capsules 400 mg twice daily or the combination at the recommended phase 2 dose of cediranib 30 mg daily and olaparib capsules 200 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival analysed in the intention-to-treat population. The phase 2 trial is no longer accruing patients. An interim analysis was conducted in November, 2013, after 50% of expected events had occurred and efficacy results were unmasked. The primary analysis was performed on March 31, 2014, after 47 events (66% of those expected). The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01116648. FINDINGS Between Oct 26, 2011, and June 3, 2013, we randomly allocated 46 women to receive olaparib alone and 44 to receive the combination of olaparib and cediranib. Median PFS was 17·7 months (95% CI 14·7-not reached) for the women treated with cediranib plus olaparib compared with 9·0 months (95% CI 5·7-16·5) for those treated with olaparib monotherapy (hazard ratio 0·42, 95% CI 0·23-0·76; p=0·005). Grade 3 and 4 adverse events were more common with combination therapy than with monotherapy, including fatigue (12 patients in the cediranib plus olaparib group vs five patients in the olaparib monotherapy group), diarrhoea (ten vs none), and hypertension (18 vs none). INTERPRETATION Cediranib plus olaparib seems to improve PFS in women with recurrent platinum-sensitive high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian cancer, and warrants study in a phase 3 trial. The side-effect profile suggests such investigations should include assessments of quality of life and patient-reported outcomes to understand the effects of a continuing oral regimen with that of intermittent chemotherapy. FUNDING American Recovery and Reinvestment Act grant from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (3 U01 CA062490-16S2); Intramural Program of the Center for Cancer Research; and the Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, NIH.

A Phase 1 trial of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib (AZD2281) in combination with the anti-angiogenic cediranib (AZD2171) in recurrent epithelial ovarian or triple-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)-inhibitors and anti-angiogenics have activity in recurrent ovarian and breast cancer; however, the effect of combined therapy against PARP and angiogenesis in this population has not been reported. We investigated the toxicities and recommended phase 2 dosing (RP2D) of the combination of cediranib, a multitargeted inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-1/2/3 and olaparib, a PARP-inhibitor (NCT01116648). METHODS Cediranib tablets once daily and olaparib capsules twice daily were administered orally in a standard 3+3 dose escalation design. Patients with recurrent ovarian or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer were eligible. Patients had measurable disease by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 or met Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) CA125 criteria. No prior PARP-inhibitors or anti-angiogenics in the recurrent setting were allowed. RESULTS 28 patients (20 ovarian, 8 breast) enrolled to 4 dose levels. 2 dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) (1 grade 4 neutropenia ≥ 4 days; 1 grade 4 thrombocytopenia) occurred at the highest dose level (cediranib 30 mg daily; olaparib 400 mg twice daily [BID]). The RP2D was cediranib 30 mg daily and olaparib 200 mg BID. Grade 3 or higher toxicities occurred in 75% of patients, and included grade 3 hypertension (25%) and grade 3 fatigue (18%). One grade 3 bowel obstruction occurred. The overall response rate (ORR) in the 18 RECIST-evaluable ovarian cancer patients was 44%, with a clinical benefit rate (ORR plus stable disease (SD) > 24 weeks) of 61%. None of the seven evaluable breast cancer patients achieved clinical response; two patients had stable disease for > 24 weeks. INTERPRETATION The combination of cediranib and olaparib has haematologic DLTs and anticipated class toxicities, with promising evidence of activity in ovarian cancer patients.

A phase II trial of Sunitinib malate in recurrent and refractory ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal carcinoma

OBJECTIVE Ovarian cancer is a highly angiogenic tumor and a model for antiangiogenic research. The tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitors target several receptors allowing for the pharmacological disruption of several independent pathways. Sunitinib malate is a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor. A phase II study utilizing a modified dosing schedule was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of Sunitinib in recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal carcinoma. METHODS A nonrandomized phase II study was modeled as a two-stage Simon design initially enrolling 17 evaluable participants in stage one and 18 patients in stage two. Patients received the study drug at 37.5mg every day over a 28 day treatment cycle until clinical or radiological evidence of progressive disease. Disease was evaluated radiographically and best overall response was defined using the RECIST 1.0 criteria. The primary objective of this study was to define the response rate (defined as complete response and partial response) while the secondary objectives included both the progression free rate as well as the safety of this agent in this patient population. RESULTS The response rate (PR+CR) was 8.3% (95% confidence interval: 1.8%, 22.5%). The 16-week and 24 week progression-free survival estimate was 36% (95% confidence interval and 19.2%), respectively. The median progression-free survival estimate was 9.9 weeks. Hypertension and gastrointestional events were the most common toxicities noted. CONCLUSIONS A modest response rate of 8.3% was achieved with Sunitinib malate. This phase II study adds to the body of literature of VEGFR inhibitors and further underscores the need of defining a genetic angiogenic signature.

A randomized phase 2 trial comparing efficacy of the combination of the PARP inhibitor olaparib and the antiangiogenic cediranib against olaparib alone in recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.

LBA5500 Background: PARP inhibitors and anti-angiogenics are clinically active in recurrent ovarian cancer (OvCa). Preclinical studies suggest these agents can synergize, and a phase 1 study showed that the combination of cediranib (ced) and olaparib (olap) is well-tolerated. We therefore compared the activity of olap alone (Olap) to combined ced and olap (Ced/Olap) in treatment of recurrent platinum-sensitive (plat-sens) high-grade serous (HGS) or BRCA-related OvCa (NCT 01116648). METHODS Patients (pts) across 9 centers were randomized 1:1 in this Ph 2 open label study to Olap (olap 400 mg capsules BID) or Ced/Olap (olap 200 mg capsules BID; ced 30 mg daily), stratified by BRCA status and prior anti-angiogenic therapy. Eligibility included pts with recurrent plat-sens HGS or BRCA-related OvCa. Pts had measurable disease by RECIST 1.1, PS 0 or 1, and the ability to take POs. No prior anti-angiogenics in the recurrent setting or prior PARP inhibitor was allowed. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as time from randomization to radiographic progression or death. With a target N=90 pts, the study was powered to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.75 (median PFS 6 vs 10.5 mo). RESULTS Pts were enrolled from Oct 2011 to Jun 2013: 46 to Olap, 44 to Ced/Olap. 48 pts were known BRCA carriers (25 Olap; 23 Ced/Olap). At a planned interim analysis the DSMB recommended release of data. As of Jan 7, 2014, 41 pts had a PFS event. Median PFS was 9.0 mos for Olap and 17.7 mos for Ced/Olap (HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.5-5.6, p = 0.001). There were 2 complete responses (CR) and 21 partial responses (PR) in pts on Olap (56% objective response rate, ORR) and 3 CRs and 33 PRs in pts on Ced/Olap (84% ORR, p = 0.008). The overall rate of Gr3/4 toxicity was higher for pts on Ced/Olap (70%) than on Olap (7%). Differentially occurring toxicities included fatigue (27% Ced/Olap vs 7% Olap), diarrhea (23% vs 0%), and hypertension (39% vs 0%). Updated efficacy and exploratory subgroup analyses will be presented. CONCLUSIONS Combined Ced/Olap significantly extended PFS and ORR compared to Olap in plat-sens OvCa. Further studies of this oral combination in plat-sens OvCa are warranted. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION NCT01116648.

Phase I dose escalation study of the PI3kinase pathway inhibitor BKM120 and the oral poly (ADP ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib for the treatment of high-grade serous ovarian and breast cancer

Background Based upon preclinical synergy in murine models, we carried out a phase I trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicities, pharmacokinetics, and biomarkers of response for the combination of BKM120, a PI3K inhibitor, and olaparib, a PARP inhibitor. Patients and methods Olaparib was administered twice daily (tablet formulation) and BKM120 daily on a 28-day cycle, both orally. A 3 + 3 dose-escalation design was employed with the primary objective of defining the combination MTD, and secondary objectives were to define toxicities, activity, and pharmacokinetic profiles. Eligibility included recurrent breast (BC) or ovarian cancer (OC); dose-expansion cohorts at the MTD were enrolled for each cancer. Results In total, 69 of 70 patients enrolled received study treatment; one patient never received study treatment because of ineligibility. Twenty-four patients had BC; 46 patients had OC. Thirty-five patients had a germline BRCA mutation (gBRCAm). Two DLTs (grade 3 transaminitis and hyperglycemia) were observed at DL0 (BKM120 60 mg/olaparib and 100 mg b.i.d.). The MTD was determined to be BKM120 50 mg q.d. and olaparib 300 mg b.i.d. (DL8). Additional DLTs included grade 3 depression and transaminitis, occurring early in cycle 2 (DL7). Anticancer activity was observed in BC and OC and in gBRCAm and gBRCA wild-type (gBRCAwt) patients. Conclusions BKM120 and olaparib can be co-administered, but the combination requires attenuation of the BKM120 dose. Clinical benefit was observed in both gBRCAm and gBRCAwt pts. Randomized phase II studies will be needed to further define the efficacy of PI3K/PARP-inhibitor combinations as compared with a PARP inhibitor alone.

Abstract CT324: Phase I of oral BKM120 or BYL719 and olaparib for high-grade serous ovarian cancer or triple-negative breast cancer: Final results of the BKM120 plus olaparib cohort

Background: Similarities exist between high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC); both often have gBRCA mutations, are sensitive to platinum agents, and have high copy number alterations per the TCGA. Preclinical data for both BKM120/olaparib and BYL719/olaparib combinations showed synergistic efficacy. These data served as the rationale for this study in pts with either recurrent HGSC or TNBC. The phase I study of BKM120 and olaparib has been completed, and the phase I study of BYL719 and olaparib is currently in dose escalation (NCT01623349). Methods: This study has a 3 + 3 design, escalating dose levels (DL) if 0/3 or 1/6 pts have a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) during the first cycle (1st 28 days). Objectives were to determine the MTD and RP2D of daily oral olaparib (tablet formulation) and BKM120, assess toxicities, activity of this combination, and PK profiles of both drugs. Planned translational endpts include PI3kinase pathway effects, BRCA1 immunostaining/methylation, IL-8/circulating DNA levels, and somatic mutations in BRCA1/2 using FFPE tissue. Eligibility included: recurrent TNBC or HGSC or any histology of ovarian cancer (OvCa) or breast cancer (BrCa) with presence of a gBRCAmut, PS 0-1, and measurable/evaluable cancer. Prior PARP inhibitor use was allowed. Results: 46 pts to date have received study drugs as part of the ph1 dose escalation of BKM120/olaparib (12 pts w/BrCa and 34 pts w/OvCa). 35 have known gBRCAm. Dosing started at DL1 (BKM120 60 mg and olaparib 100 mg BID); 2 DLTs were observed (1 gr 3 LFTs and 1 gr 3 hyperglycemia). A lower dose (-1) was pursued followed by re-escalation; MTD is BKM120 50 mg and olaparib 300 mg BID. Toxicities that defined DLTs included CNS toxicities (gr 3 depression) and grade 3 LFTs, early in cycle 2 (DL6). At the MTD of BKM120/olaparib, 11 pts with OvCa and 12 pts w BrCa were enrolled into a dose expansion cohort (DEC). Evidence of clinical benefit by RECIST 1.1 was observed on all DL9s and in the DEC’s, in pts with a gBRCApos as well as gBRCAwt. AEs seen were compatible with AE profile of BKM120 and olaparib. Conclusions: Combined BKM120 and olaparib is feasible, and evidence of clinical benefit was seen at all DL9s both in gBRCApos and gBRCAwt pts. Toxicities that defined DLTs included CNS toxicities and LFT abnormalities. Clinical trial information: NCT01623349. Citation Format: Ursula A. Matulonis, Gerburg Wulf, William Barry, Michael Birrer, Shannon Westin, Tatum Spagnoletti, Katherine Bell-McGuinn, Elizabeth Obermayer, Christin Whalen, Carol Aghajanian, David Solit, Gordon Mills, Lewis Cantley, Eric Winer. Phase I of oral BKM120 or BYL719 and olaparib for high-grade serous ovarian cancer or triple-negative breast cancer: Final results of the BKM120 plus olaparib cohort. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr CT324. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-CT324

Sequential bevacizumab and oral cyclophosphamide for recurrent ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE Test the safety and efficacy of sequentially blocking angiogenesis by adding oral cyclophosphamide to bevacizumab following cancer progression on bevacizumab in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS Eligibility included ≤ 2 lines of treatment for recurrence and measurable cancer by RECIST 1.0. Patients received bevacizumab (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks IV) and upon RECIST progression, oral cyclophosphamide (50mg orally daily) was added. Objectives included safety, toxicities, 3- and 6-month PFS rates, response rate, PFS, and OS. RESULTS 20 patients were enrolled. Overall response rate was 10%, and 65% of patients had confirmed stable disease (SD). Thirteen of 20 patients received oral cyclophosphamide added to bevacizumab upon bevacizumab progression. Of these 13 patients, 1 patient subsequently achieved a PR (this patient had SD as best response during bevacizumab) and 3 patients had a confirmed SD. For all patients, median PFS was 8.41 months, 6 month PFS rate was 65%, duration of response (DOR) was 7.3 months, and median OS was 22.72 months. Median DOR for patients receiving both bevacizumab and cyclophosphamide was 8.4 months. Most toxicities were grades 1 and 2 and manageable. Grades 3 and grade 4 toxicities included 1 myocardial infarction, 1 gastrointestinal perforation (GIP), and 12/20 patients (60%) developed grade 3 HTN. CONCLUSIONS Addition of oral cyclophosphamide to bevacizumab at the time of cancer progression on bevacizumab appears to have continued anti-cancer effects in a subgroup of patients and appears to be safe. Randomized trials testing combination versus sequential anti-angiogenic therapy for recurrent ovarian cancer are warranted.

Eribulin mesylate (halichondrin B analog E7389) in platinum-resistant and platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: a 2-cohort, phase 2 study.

Eribulin mesylate is a tubulin inhibitor with activity superior to paclitaxel in NIH:OVCAR‐3 human epithelial ovarian cancer xenograft models. In this study, the authors assessed the efficacy of eribulin in platinum‐resistant and platinum‐sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.

Abstract CT008: Phase I study of the alpha specific PI3-Kinase inhibitor BYL719 and the poly (ADP-Ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib in recurrent ovarian and breast cancer: Analysis of the dose escalation and ovarian cancer expansion cohort

Background:In vivo synergy with concurrent PI3-Kinase inhibition and PARP inhibition has been observed in BRCA-deficient and BRCA-proficient preclinical models of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and ovarian cancer (OC). A phase I trial of the oral pan-class I PI3-Kinase inhibitor BKM120 and the PARP inhibitor olaparib demonstrated anti-cancer activity in TNBC and OC, both in patients with and without germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA) mutations. However, CNS toxicity (depression) and liver function test abnormalities limited dose escalation of BKM120 prompting evaluation of the alpha specific PI3-Kinase inhibitor BYL719 (which has no CNS toxicity) in combination with olaparib. Methods: Olaparib was administered twice daily (tablet formulation) and BYL719 daily on a 28-day cycle, both orally. A 3 + 3 dose-escalation design was employed with primary objectives of defining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose of the combination of BYL719 and olaparib, and secondary objectives of defining toxicity, activity, and pharmacokinetic profiles of both agents. Eligibility included recurrent TNBC or high grade serous (HGS) OC, or any histology OC or breast cancer (BC) with presence of a known germline BRCA mutation, performance status of 0-1 and measurable/evaluable cancer. Patients with platinum sensitive or resistant or refractory OC were eligible and prior PARP inhibitor use was allowed. Dose-expansion cohorts at the MTD were enrolled for both BC and OC. Results: 46 patients (16 BC and 30 OC) have been enrolled in the study; 28 patients participated in the dose escalation portion of the study (4 BC and 24 OC). Two patients with OC did not receive study drugs because of ineligibility. MTD was defined as BYL719 200mg once daily and olaparib 200mg twice daily. Dose limiting toxicities included hyperglycemia, rash and fever with decreased neutrophil count. Four patients (3 OC and 1 BC) discontinued protocol therapy because of toxicity (2 for hyperglycemia, 1 for nausea and 1 for allergic reaction). Most common toxicities included nausea, hyperglycemia, fatigue, diarrhea and vomiting. At the MTD, 6 patients with OC and 12 patients with BC were enrolled into a dose expansion cohort. The OC expansion cohort has completed enrollment, while the BC cohort is still enrolling. Among patients with OC who received study drugs (28 patients, 26 (93%) with platinum resistant disease), objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1 was 36% (10/28 patients, all partial responses (PRs)). Median duration of response was 167 days (range 16-398 days); 5 of 10 patients with PR remain on treatment. ORR was 33% for patients with germline BRCA mutations and 31% for patients without germline BRCA mutations. Among patients without germline BRCA mutations with platinum resistant OC, ORR was 29%. Conclusions: Combined BYL719 and olaparib is feasible, and similar clinical benefit was observed in patients with and without germline BRCA mutations. The activity of this combination in OC patients without germline BRCA mutations and with platinum resistant disease was higher than expected from olaparib monotherapy and warrants further investigation. This work was funded in part by the Stand Up To Cancer Ovarian Dream Team. Clinical trial: NCT01623349. Citation Format: Panagiotis A. Konstantinopoulos, William T. Barry, Michael Birrer, Shannon N. Westin, Sarah Farooq, Karen Cadoo, Christin Whalen, Weixiu Luo, Hui Liu, Carol Aghajanian, David B. Solit, Gordon B. Mills, Barry S. Taylor, Helen Won, Michael F. Berger, Sangeetha Palakurthi, Joyce F. Liu, Lew Cantley, Scott H. Kaufmann, Elizabeth M. Swisher, Alan D. D9Andrea, Eric Winer, Gerburg M. Wulf, Ursula A. Matulonis. Phase I study of the alpha specific PI3-Kinase inhibitor BYL719 and the poly (ADP-Ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib in recurrent ovarian and breast cancer: Analysis of the dose escalation and ovarian cancer expansion cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT008. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-CT008