Christina Waldsich

Modulation of RNA function by aminoglycoside antibiotics

One of the most important families of antibiotics are the aminoglycosides, including drugs such as neomycin B, paromomycin, gentamicin and streptomycin. With the discovery of the catalytic potential of RNA, these antibiotics became very popular due to their RNA‐binding capacity. They serve for the analysis of RNA function as well as for the study of RNA as a potential therapeutic target. Improvements in RNA structure determination recently provided first insights into the decoding site of the ribosome at high resolution and how aminoglycosides might induce misreading of the genetic code. In addition to inhibiting prokaryotic translation, aminoglycosides inhibit several catalytic RNAs such as self‐splicing group I introns, RNase P and small ribozymes in vitro. Furthermore, these antibiotics interfere with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) replication by disrupting essential RNA–protein contacts. Most exciting is the potential of many RNA‐binding antibiotics to stimulate RNA activities, conceiving small‐molecule partners for the hypothesis of an ancient RNA world. SELEX (systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment) has been used in this evolutionary game leading to small synthetic RNAs, whose NMR structures gave valuable information on how aminoglycosides interact with RNA, which could possibly be used in applied science.

RNA chaperones, RNA annealers and RNA helicases.

RNA molecules face difficulties when folding into their native structures. In the cell, proteins can assist RNAs in reaching their functionally active states by binding and stabilizing a specific structure or, in a quite opposite way, by interacting in a non-specific manner. These proteins can either facilitate RNA-RNA interactions in a reaction termed RNA annealing, or they can resolve non-functional inhibitory structures. The latter is defined as “RNA chaperone activity” and is the main topic of this review. Here we define RNA chaperone activity in a stringent way and we review those proteins for which RNA chaperone activity has been clearly demonstrated. These proteins belong to quite diverse families such as hnRNPs, histone-like proteins, ribosomal proteins, cold shock domain proteins and viral nucleocapsid proteins. DExD/H-box containing RNA helicases are discussed as a special family of enzymes that restructure RNA or RNPs in an ATP-dependent manner. We further address the different mechanisms RNA chaperones might use to promote folding including the recently proposed theory of protein disorder as a key element in triggering RNA-protein interactions. Finally, we present a new website for proteins with RNA chaperone activity which compiles all the information on these proteins with the perspective to promote the understanding of their activity.

RNA-Puzzles: A CASP-like evaluation of RNA three-dimensional structure prediction

We report the results of a first, collective, blind experiment in RNA three-dimensional (3D) structure prediction, encompassing three prediction puzzles. The goals are to assess the leading edge of RNA structure prediction techniques; compare existing methods and tools; and evaluate their relative strengths, weaknesses, and limitations in terms of sequence length and structural complexity. The results should give potential users insight into the suitability of available methods for different applications and facilitate efforts in the RNA structure prediction community in ongoing efforts to improve prediction tools. We also report the creation of an automated evaluation pipeline to facilitate the analysis of future RNA structure prediction exercises.

RNA folding in vivo.

RNA folding in vivo is influenced by the cellular environment, the vectorial nature of transcription and translation, trans-acting factors and ion homeostasis. Specific RNA-binding proteins promote RNA folding by stabilizing the native structure or by guiding folding. In contrast, RNA chaperones, which are believed to interact nonspecifically with RNA, were proposed to resolve misfolded RNA structures and to promote intermolecular RNA-RNA annealing. Small trans-acting noncoding RNAs are thought to modulate mRNA structures, thereby regulating gene expression. So far, there is some evidence that in vitro and invivo RNA folding pathways share basic features. However, it is unclear whether the rules deduced from in vitro folding experiments generally apply to invivo conditions.

An obligate intermediate along the slow folding pathway of a group II intron ribozyme.

Most RNA molecules collapse rapidly and reach the native state through a pathway that contains numerous traps and unproductive intermediates. The D135 group II intron ribozyme is unusual in that it can fold slowly and directly to the native state, despite its large size and structural complexity. Here we use hydroxyl radical footprinting and native gel analysis to monitor the timescale of tertiary structure collapse and to detect the presence of obligate intermediates along the folding pathway of D135. We find that structural collapse and native folding of Domain 1 precede assembly of the entire ribozyme, indicating that D1 contains an on-pathway intermediate to folding of the D135 ribozyme. Subsequent docking of Domains 3 and 5, for which D1 provides a preorganized scaffold, appears to be very fast and independent of one another. In contrast to other RNAs, the D135 ribozyme undergoes slow tertiary collapse to a compacted state, with a rate constant that is also limited by the formation D1. These findings provide a new paradigm for RNA folding and they underscore the diversity of RNA biophysical behaviors.

A folding control element for tertiary collapse of a group II intron ribozyme.

Ribozymes derived from the group II intron ai5γ collapse to a compact intermediate, folding to the native state through a slow, direct pathway that is unperturbed by kinetic traps. Molecular collapse of ribozyme D135 requires high magnesium concentrations and is thought to involve a structural element in domain 1 (D1). We used nucleotide analog interference mapping, in combination with nondenaturing gel electrophoresis, to identify RNA substructures and functional groups that are essential for D135 tertiary collapse. This revealed that the most crucial atoms for compaction are located within a small section of D1 that includes the κ and ζ elements. This small substructure controls specific collapse of the molecule and, in later steps of the folding pathway, it forms the docking site for catalytic D5. In this way, the stage is set for proper active site formation during the earliest steps of ribozyme folding.

RNA folding in living cells.

RNA folding is the most essential process underlying RNA function. While significant progress has been made in understanding the forces driving RNA folding in vitro, exploring the rules governing intracellular RNA structure formation is still in its infancy. The cellular environment hosts a great diversity of factors that potentially influence RNA folding in vivo. For example, the nature of transcription and translation is known to shape the folding landscape of RNA molecules. Trans-acting factors such as proteins, RNAs and metabolites, among others, are also able to modulate the structure and thus the fate of an RNA. Here we summarize the ongoing efforts to uncover how RNA folds in living cells.

Monitoring intermediate folding states of the td group I intron in vivo.

Group I introns consist of two major structural domains, the P4‐P6 and P3‐P9 domains, which assemble through interactions with peripheral extensions to fold into an active ribozyme. To assess group I intron folding in vivo, we probed the structure of td wild‐type and mutant introns using dimethyl sulfate. The results suggest that the majority of the intron population is in the native state in accordance with the current structural model, which was refined to include two novel tertiary contacts. The importance of the loop E motif in the P7.1‐P7.2 extension in assisting ribozyme folding was deduced from modeling and mutational analyses. Destabilization of stem P6 results in a deficiency in tertiary structure formation in both major domains, while weakening of stem P7 only interferes with folding of the P3‐P9 domain. The different impact of mutations on the tertiary structure suggests that they interfere with folding at different stages. These results provide a first insight into the structure of folding intermediates and suggest a putative order of events in a hierarchical folding pathway in vivo.

PROBING RNA STRUCTURE WITHIN LIVING CELLS

RNA folding is the most fundamental process underlying RNA function. RNA structure and associated folding paradigms have been intensively studied in vitro. However, in vivo RNA structure formation has only been explored to a limited extent. To determine the influence of the cellular environment, which differs significantly from the in vitro refolding conditions, on RNA architecture, we have applied a chemical probing technique to assess the structure of catalytic RNAs in living cells. This method is based on the fact that chemicals like dimethyl sulfate readily penetrate cells and modify specific atoms of RNA bases (N1-A, N3-C), provided that these positions are solvent accessible. By mapping the modified residues, one gains substantial information on the architecture of the target RNA on the secondary and tertiary structure level. This method also allows exploration of interactions of the target RNA with ligands such as proteins, metabolites, or other RNA molecules and associated conformational changes. In brief, in vivo chemical probing is a powerful tool to investigate RNA structure in its natural environment and can be easily adapted to study RNAs in different cell types.

A structural determinant required for RNA editing

RNA editing by adenosine deaminases acting on RNAs (ADARs) can be both specific and non-specific, depending on the substrate. Specific editing of particular adenosines may depend on the overall sequence and structural context. However, the detailed mechanisms underlying these preferences are not fully understood. Here, we show that duplex structures mimicking an editing site in the Gabra3 pre-mRNA unexpectedly fail to support RNA editing at the Gabra3 I/M site, although phylogenetic analysis suggest an evolutionarily conserved duplex structure essential for efficient RNA editing. These unusual results led us to revisit the structural requirement for this editing by mutagenesis analysis. In vivo nuclear injection experiments of mutated editing substrates demonstrate that a non-conserved structure is a determinant for editing. This structure contains bulges either on the same or the strand opposing the edited adenosine. The position of these bulges and the distance to the edited base regulate editing. Moreover, elevated folding temperature can lead to a switch in RNA editing suggesting an RNA structural change. Our results indicate the importance of RNA tertiary structure in determining RNA editing.