Claire N. Manzotti

Trans-Endocytosis of CD80 and CD86: A Molecular Basis for the Cell Extrinsic Function of CTLA-4

An inhibitory T cell receptor acts by stripping activating ligands off dendritic cells. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) is an essential negative regulator of T cell immune responses whose mechanism of action is the subject of debate. CTLA-4 shares two ligands (CD80 and CD86) with a stimulatory receptor, CD28. Here, we show that CTLA-4 can capture its ligands from opposing cells by a process of trans-endocytosis. After removal, these costimulatory ligands are degraded inside CTLA-4–expressing cells, resulting in impaired costimulation via CD28. Acquisition of CD86 from antigen-presenting cells is stimulated by T cell receptor engagement and observed in vitro and in vivo. These data reveal a mechanism of immune regulation in which CTLA-4 acts as an effector molecule to inhibit CD28 costimulation by the cell-extrinsic depletion of ligands, accounting for many of the known features of the CD28–CTLA-4 system.

CD86 and CD80 differentially modulate the suppressive function of human regulatory T cells.

Regulatory T cells (Treg) are important in maintaining tolerance to self tissues. As both CD28 and CTLA-4 molecules are implicated in the function of Treg, we investigated the ability of their two natural ligands, CD80 and CD86, to influence the Treg-suppressive capacity. During T cell responses to alloantigens expressed on dendritic cells, we observed that Abs against CD86 potently enhanced suppression by CD4+CD25+ Treg. In contrast, blocking CD80 enhanced proliferative responses by impairing Treg suppression. Intriguingly, the relative expression levels of CD80 and CD86 on dendritic cells are modulated during progression from an immature to a mature state, and this correlates with the ability of Treg to suppress responses. Our data show that CD80 and CD86 have opposing functions through CD28 and CTLA-4 on Treg, an observation that has significant implications for manipulation of immune responses and tolerance in vivo.

What's the difference between CD80 and CD86?

CD28 and CD152 have crucial yet opposing functions in T-cell stimulation, in which CD28 promotes but CD152 inhibits T-cell responses. Intriguingly, they share two ligands, CD80 and CD86, but at present there is no clear model for understanding whether a ligand will promote or inhibit responses. Current perceptions are based around the concept that CD86 is the initial co-stimulatory ligand based on its more abundant and earlier expression pattern; CD80 has a role following antigen-presenting-cell activation. We describe an alternative view in which CD80 is the initial ligand, responsible for maintaining aspects of immune tolerance through interactions with CD152. These inhibitory functions can then be over-ridden by the upregulation of CD86 on dendritic cells as a result of inflammatory stimuli, leading to immune activation.

Inhibition of human T cell proliferation by CTLA-4 utilizes CD80 and requires CD25+ regulatory T cells.

CD28 and CTLA‐4 are opposing regulators of T cell activation, triggered by the two ligands CD80 and CD86. How these ligands promote either T cell activation via CD28 or inhibition via CTLA‐4 is not understood. Using CD80 and CD86 molecules expressed on transfected cells, we have identified a major difference between these ligands in that CD80 transfectants have the ability to inhibit activation of resting human peripheral blood T cells via interaction with CTLA‐4, whereas CD86 transfectants do not. Rather, CTLA‐4–CD86 interactions appear to contribute towards T cell proliferation. We also observed that CTLA‐4 function is strongly influenced by TCR stimulation, effects being observed only at relatively low levels of TCR stimulation. The kinetics of CD80–CTLA‐4 interactions revealed that CTLA‐4 inhibition took place within the first 8 h of T cell stimulation, despite there being little measurable CTLA‐4 expression on the majority T cells. However, significant amounts of CTLA‐4 were observed in the CD25+ CD4+ subset of T cells which, when removed from the cultures, accounted for the CTLA‐4 inhibition observed. Overall, these data provide evidence that CD80 and CD86 differ in their interactions with CTLA‐4 and that CD80 appears to be the preferential inhibitory ligand for CTLA‐4 working via a population of CD4+ CD25+ CTLA‐4+ regulatory T cells.

IL-21 inhibits T cell IL-2 production and impairs Treg homeostasis.

Modulation of regulatory T cell (Treg) suppression has important implications for vaccine development, the effectiveness of tumor surveillance, and the emergence of autoimmunity. We have previously shown that the cytokine IL-21 can counteract Treg suppression. However, whether this reflects an effect of IL-21 on Treg, conventional T cells, or antigen-presenting cells is not known. Here we have used lymphocyte populations from IL-21R-deficient mice to pinpoint which cell type needs to be targeted by IL-21 for Treg suppression to be overcome. We show that IL-21 counteracts suppression by acting on conventional T cells and that this is associated with inhibition of IL-2 production. Despite the lack of IL-2, conventional T-cell responses proceed unimpaired because IL-21 can substitute for IL-2 as a T cell growth factor. However, IL-21 is unable to substitute for IL-2 in supporting the Treg compartment. Thus, IL-21 signaling in conventional T cells indirectly impacts Treg homeostasis by decreasing IL-2 availability. These data demonstrate that IL-21 and IL-2 can have overlapping roles in promoting conventional T-cell responses but play distinct roles in controlling Treg homeostasis and function. The data also suggest a new paradigm whereby cytokines can promote immunity by inhibiting IL-2.

Acquisition of Suppressive Function by Activated Human CD4+CD25− T Cells Is Associated with the Expression of CTLA-4 Not FoxP3

The role of CTLA-4 in regulatory T cell (Treg) function is not well understood. We have examined the role of CTLA-4 and its relationship with the transcription factor FoxP3 using a model of Treg induction in human peripheral blood. Activation of human CD4+CD25− T cells resulted in the appearance of a de novo population of FoxP3-expressing cells within 48 h. These cells expressed high levels of CTLA-4 and cell sorting on expression of CTLA-4 strongly enriched for FoxP3+-expressing cells with suppressive function. Culture in IL-2 alone also generated cells with suppressive capacity that also correlated with the appearance of CTLA-4. To directly test the role of CTLA-4, we transfected resting human T cells with CTLA-4 and found that this method conferred suppression, similar to that of natural Tregs, even though these cells did not express FoxP3. Furthermore, transfection of FoxP3 did not induce CTLA-4 and these cells were not suppressive. By separating the expression of CTLA-4 and FoxP3, our data show that FoxP3 expression alone is insufficient to up-regulate CTLA-4; however, activation of CD4+CD25− T cells can induce both FoxP3 and CTLA-4 in a subpopulation of T cells that are capable of suppression. These data suggest that the acquisition of suppressive behavior by activated CD4+CD25− T cells requires the expression of CTLA-4, a feature that appears to be facilitated by, but is not dependent on, expression of FoxP3.

Exocytosis of CTLA-4 Is Dependent on Phospholipase D and ADP Ribosylation Factor-1 and Stimulated during Activation of Regulatory T Cells

CTLA-4 is an essential protein in the regulation of T cell responses that interacts with two ligands found on the surface of APCs (CD80 and CD86). CTLA-4 is itself poorly expressed on the T cell surface and is predominantly localized to intracellular compartments. We have studied the mechanisms involved in the delivery of CTLA-4 to the cell surface using a model Chinese hamster ovary cell system and compared this with activated and regulatory human T cells. We have shown that expression of CTLA-4 at the plasma membrane (PM) is controlled by exocytosis of CTLA-4-containing vesicles and followed by rapid endocytosis. Using selective inhibitors and dominant negative mutants, we have shown that exocytosis of CTLA-4 is dependent on the activity of the GTPase ADP ribosylation factor-1 and on phospholipase D activity. CTLA-4 was identified in a perinuclear compartment overlapping with the cis-Golgi marker GM-130 but did not colocalize strongly with lysosomal markers such as CD63 and lysosome-associated membrane protein. In regulatory T cells, activation of phospholipase D was sufficient to trigger release of CTLA-4 to the PM but did not inhibit endocytosis. Taken together, these data suggest that CTLA-4 may be stored in a specialized compartment in regulatory T cells that can be triggered rapidly for deployment to the PM in a phospholipase D- and ADP ribosylation factor-1-dependent manner.

Cutting Edge: Cell-Extrinsic Immune Regulation by CTLA-4 Expressed on Conventional T Cells

The CTLA-4 pathway is a key regulator of T cell activation and a critical failsafe against autoimmunity. Although early models postulated that CTLA-4 transduced a negative signal, in vivo evidence suggests that CTLA-4 functions in a cell-extrinsic manner. That multiple cell-intrinsic mechanisms have been attributed to CTLA-4, yet its function in vivo appears to be cell-extrinsic, has been an ongoing paradox in the field. Although CTLA-4 expressed on conventional T cells (Tconv) can mediate inhibitory function, it is unclear why this fails to manifest as an intrinsic effect. In this study, we show that Tconv-expressed CTLA-4 can function in a cell-extrinsic manner in vivo. CTLA-4+/+ T cells, from DO11/rag−/− mice that lack regulatory T cells, were able to regulate the response of CTLA-4−/− T cells in cotransfer experiments. This observation provides a potential resolution to the above paradox and suggests CTLA-4 function on both Tconv and regulatory T cells can be achieved through cell-extrinsic mechanisms.

Integration of CD28 and CTLA-4 function results in differential responses of T cells to CD80 and CD86

CD80 and CD86 have the capacity to either stimulate or inhibit T cell responses through their receptors CD28 and cytotoxic T lymphocyte‐associated antigen 4 (CTLA‐4). Blockade of CD80 and CD86 in autoimmune disease settings has revealed distinct outcomes, yet the differential functions of CD80 and CD86 are still unclear. We have studied the ability of individual ligands to stimulate primary responses in human CD4+ T cells. Our data reveal both quantitative and qualitative differences between the ligands. Both CD80 and CD86 demonstrated the capacity to costimulate T cell proliferation. However, CD80 committed a greater number of T cells to divide with faster kinetics, consistent with it being a superior ligand for CD28. Once cell division had been initiated, all T cells undergoing cell division expressed CTLA‐4, irrespective of whether CD80 or CD86 costimulation was used. However, only in the presence of CD80 was evidence of CTLA‐4 engagement and inhibitory function observed. Finally, differences between CD80 and CD86 costimulation extended to the T cell phenotype, in particular the levels of CD40 ligand expression.

IL-21 Promotes CD4 T Cell Responses by Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase–Dependent Upregulation of CD86 on B Cells

The cytokine IL-21 is a potent immune modulator with diverse mechanisms of action on multiple cell types. IL-21 is in clinical use to promote tumor rejection and is an emerging target for neutralization in the setting of autoimmunity. Despite its clinical potential, the biological actions of IL-21 are not yet fully understood and the full range of effects of this pleiotropic cytokine are still being uncovered. In this study, we identify a novel role for IL-21 as an inducer of the costimulatory ligand CD86 on B lymphocytes. CD86 provides critical signals through T cell–expressed CD28 that promote T cell activation in response to Ag engagement. Expression levels of CD86 are tightly regulated in vivo, being actively decreased by regulatory T cells and increased in response to pathogen-derived signals. In this study, we demonstrate that IL-21 can trigger potent and sustained CD86 upregulation through a STAT3 and PI3K-dependent mechanism. We show that elevated CD86 expression has functional consequences for the magnitude of CD4 T cell responses both in vitro and in vivo. These data pinpoint CD86 upregulation as an additional mechanism by which IL-21 can elicit immunomodulatory effects.