Colin A. Pendry
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Colin A. Pendry.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2012
C. Haris Saslis-Lagoudakis; Vincent Savolainen; Elizabeth Williamson; Félix Forest; Steven J. Wagstaff; Sushim R. Baral; Mark F. Watson; Colin A. Pendry; Julie A. Hawkins
There is controversy about whether traditional medicine can guide drug discovery, and investment in bioprospecting informed by ethnobotanical data has fluctuated. One view is that traditionally used medicinal plants are not necessarily efficacious and there are no robust methods for distinguishing those which are most likely to be bioactive when selecting species for further testing. Here, we reconstruct a genus-level molecular phylogenetic tree representing the 20,000 species found in the floras of three disparate biodiversity hotspots: Nepal, New Zealand, and the Cape of South Africa. Borrowing phylogenetic methods from community ecology, we reveal significant clustering of the 1,500 traditionally used species, and provide a direct measure of the relatedness of the three medicinal floras. We demonstrate shared phylogenetic patterns across the floras: related plants from these regions are used to treat medical conditions in the same therapeutic areas. This finding strongly indicates independent discovery of plant efficacy, an interpretation corroborated by the presence of a significantly greater proportion of known bioactive species in these plant groups than in random samples. We conclude that phylogenetic cross-cultural comparisons can focus screening efforts on a subset of traditionally used plants that are richer in bioactive compounds, and could revitalize the use of traditional knowledge in bioprospecting.
Plant Ecology | 2007
Colin A. Pendry; Jan Dick; Martin R. Pullan; Sabina Knees; A. G. Miller; Sophie Neale; Mark F. Watson
Large-scale biodiversity informatics projects will not properly address the needs of one important potential user group. Ecologists do not have ready access to datasets which allow them to assign plant species to functional types. We believe that information technology has developed sufficiently to allow taxonomists and ecologists to work together to address this need and develop specimen databases to combine taxonomic data with ecological and ecophysiological information so that this information will be assigned to the correct taxon in the future. Digital images provide a rapid and economical method of vouchering specimen data, reducing the need to store physical vouchers in herbaria.
Nature Communications | 2017
Lan Qie; Simon L. Lewis; Martin J. P. Sullivan; Gabriela Lopez-Gonzalez; Georgia C. Pickavance; Terry Sunderland; Peter S. Ashton; Wannes Hubau; Kamariah Abu Salim; Shin-ichiro Aiba; Lindsay Banin; Nicholas J. Berry; Francis Q. Brearley; David F. R. P. Burslem; Martin Dančák; Stuart J. Davies; Gabriella Fredriksson; Keith C. Hamer; Radim Hédl; Lip Khoon Kho; Kanehiro Kitayama; Haruni Krisnawati; Stanislav Lhota; Yadvinder Malhi; Colin R. Maycock; Faizah Metali; Edi Mirmanto; Laszlo Nagy; Reuben Nilus; Robert C. Ong
Less than half of anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions remain in the atmosphere. While carbon balance models imply large carbon uptake in tropical forests, direct on-the-ground observations are still lacking in Southeast Asia. Here, using long-term plot monitoring records of up to half a century, we find that intact forests in Borneo gained 0.43 Mg C ha−1 per year (95% CI 0.14–0.72, mean period 1988–2010) in above-ground live biomass carbon. These results closely match those from African and Amazonian plot networks, suggesting that the world’s remaining intact tropical forests are now en masse out-of-equilibrium. Although both pan-tropical and long-term, the sink in remaining intact forests appears vulnerable to climate and land use changes. Across Borneo the 1997–1998 El Niño drought temporarily halted the carbon sink by increasing tree mortality, while fragmentation persistently offset the sink and turned many edge-affected forests into a carbon source to the atmosphere.The existence of a pan-tropical forest carbon sink remains uncertain due to the lack of data from Asia. Here, using direct on-the-ground observations, the authors confirm remaining intact forests in Borneo have provided a long-term carbon sink, but carbon net gains are vulnerable to drought and edge effects.
Methods in Ecology and Evolution | 2018
Martin J. P. Sullivan; Simon L. Lewis; Wannes Hubau; Lan Qie; Timothy R. Baker; Lindsay Banin; Jérôme Chave; Aida Cuni-Sanchez; Ted R. Feldpausch; Gabriela Lopez-Gonzalez; E.J.M.M. Arets; Peter S. Ashton; Jean François Bastin; Nicholas J. Berry; Jan Bogaert; Rene G. A. Boot; Francis Q. Brearley; Roel J. W. Brienen; David F. R. P. Burslem; Charles De Cannière; Markéta Chudomelová; Martin Dančák; Corneille Ewango; Radim Hédl; Jon Lloyd; Jean-Remy Makana; Yadvinder Malhi; Beatriz Schwantes Marimon; Ben Hur Marimon Junior; Faizah Metali
Abstract Quantifying the relationship between tree diameter and height is a key component of efforts to estimate biomass and carbon stocks in tropical forests. Although substantial site‐to‐site variation in height–diameter allometries has been documented, the time consuming nature of measuring all tree heights in an inventory plot means that most studies do not include height, or else use generic pan‐tropical or regional allometric equations to estimate height. Using a pan‐tropical dataset of 73 plots where at least 150 trees had in‐field ground‐based height measurements, we examined how the number of trees sampled affects the performance of locally derived height–diameter allometries, and evaluated the performance of different methods for sampling trees for height measurement. Using cross‐validation, we found that allometries constructed with just 20 locally measured values could often predict tree height with lower error than regional or climate‐based allometries (mean reduction in prediction error = 0.46 m). The predictive performance of locally derived allometries improved with sample size, but with diminishing returns in performance gains when more than 40 trees were sampled. Estimates of stand‐level biomass produced using local allometries to estimate tree height show no over‐ or under‐estimation bias when compared with biomass estimates using field measured heights. We evaluated five strategies to sample trees for height measurement, and found that sampling strategies that included measuring the heights of the ten largest diameter trees in a plot outperformed (in terms of resulting in local height–diameter models with low height prediction error) entirely random or diameter size‐class stratified approaches. Our results indicate that even limited sampling of heights can be used to refine height–diameter allometries. We recommend aiming for a conservative threshold of sampling 50 trees per location for height measurement, and including the ten trees with the largest diameter in this sample.
Archive | 2018
Martin J. P. Sullivan; Simon L. Lewis; Wannes Hubau; Lan Qie; Timothy R. Baker; Lindsay Banin; Jérôme Chave; Aida Cuni Sanchez; Ted R. Feldpausch; Gabriela Lopez-Gonzalez; E.J.M.M. Arets; Peter S. Ashton; Jean-François Bastin; Nicholas J. Berry; Jan Bogaert; Rene G. A. Boot; Francis Q. Brearley; Roel J. W. Brienen; David F. R. P. Burslem; Charles De Cannière; Markéta Chudomelová; Martin Dančák; Corneille Ewango; Radim Hédl; Jon Lloyd; Jean-Remy Makana; Yadvinder Malhi; Beatriz Schwantes Marimon; Ben Hur Marimon Junior; Faizah Metali
1. Quantifying the relationship between tree diameter and height is a key component of efforts to estimate biomass and carbon stocks in tropical forests. Although substantial site-to-site variation in height-diameter allometries has been documented, the time consuming nature of measuring all tree heights in an inventory plot means that most studies do not include height, or else use generic pan-tropical or regional allometric equations to estimate height. 2. Using a pan-tropical dataset of 73 plots where at least 150 trees had in-field ground-based height measurements, we examined how the number of trees sampled affects the performance of locally-derived height-diameter allometries, and evaluated the performance of different methods for sampling trees for height measurement. 3. Using cross-validation, we found that allometries constructed with just 20 locally measured values could often predict tree height with lower error than regional or climate-based allometries (mean reduction in prediction error = 0.46 m). The predictive performance of locally-derived allometries improved with sample size, but with diminishing returns in performance gains when more than 40 trees were sampled. Estimates of stand-level biomass produced using local allometries to estimate tree height show no over- or under-estimation bias when compared with estimates using measured heights. We evaluated five strategies to sample trees for height measurement, and found that sampling strategies that included measuring the heights of the ten largest diameter trees in a plot outperformed (in terms of resulting in local height-diameter models with low height prediction error) entirely random or diameter size-class stratified approaches. 4. Our results indicate that even remarkably limited sampling of heights can be used to refine height-diameter allometries. We recommend aiming for a conservative threshold of sampling 50 trees per location for height measurement, and including the ten trees with the largest diameter in this sample.
Nature Communications | 2018
Lan Qie; Simon L. Lewis; Martin J. P. Sullivan; Gabriela Lopez-Gonzalez; Georgia C. Pickavance; Terry Sunderland; Peter S. Ashton; Wannes Hubau; Kamariah Abu Salim; Shin-ichiro Aiba; Lindsay Banin; Nicholas Berry; Francis Q. Brearley; David F. R. P. Burslem; Martin Dančák; Stuart J. Davies; Gabriella Fredriksson; Keith C. Hamer; Radim Hédl; Lip Khoon Kho; Kanehiro Kitayama; Haruni Krisnawati; Stanislav Lhota; Yadvinder Malhi; Colin R. Maycock; Faizah Metali; Edi Mirmanto; Laszlo Nagy; Reuben Nilus; Robert C. Ong
The original version of this Article contained an error in the third sentence of the abstract and incorrectly read “Here, using long-term plot monitoring records of up to half a century, we find that intact forests in Borneo gained 0.43 Mg C ha−1 year−1 (95% CI 0.14–0.72, mean period 1988–2010) above-ground live biomass”, rather than the correct “Here, using long-term plot monitoring records of up to half a century, we find that intact forests in Borneo gained 0.43 Mg C ha−1 year−1 (95% CI 0.14–0.72, mean period 1988–2010) in above-ground live biomass carbon”. This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.
Check List | 2017
Polina D. Gudkova; Colin A. Pendry; Marcin Nobis; Eugene Bayahmetov
Stipa krylovii is newly reported for the flora of Nepal, and t his is the most southerly location yet found for this species . A full description of S. krylovii is included, along with illustrations, notes on its taxonomy and a distribution map.
Journal of Biogeography | 2003
John Parnell; David Simpson; Justin Moat; Don Kirkup; Pranom Chantaranothai; P.C. Boyce; Paul C. Bygrave; Soejatmi Dransfield; Matthew H.P. Jebb; J. Macklin; Conor Meade; David Middleton; A.M. Muasya; A. Prajaksood; Colin A. Pendry; Rachun Pooma; S. Suddee; Paul Wilkin
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences | 2014
C. Haris Saslis-Lagoudakis; Julie A. Hawkins; Simon J. Greenhill; Colin A. Pendry; Mark F. Watson; Will Tuladhar-Douglas; Sushim R. Baral; Vincent Savolainen
Biodiversity and Conservation | 2006
Richard T. Howorth; Colin A. Pendry