Cristina García-Fontana

Sensing of environmental signals: classification of chemoreceptors according to the size of their ligand binding regions.

Central to the different forms of taxis are methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs). The increasing number of genome sequences reveals that MCPs differ enormously in sequence, topology and genomic abundance. This work is a one-by-one bioinformatic analysis of the almost-totality of MCP genes available and a classification of motile bacteria according to their lifestyle. On average, motile archaea have 6.7 MCP genes per genome whereas motile bacteria have more than twice as much. We show that the number of MCPs per genome depends on bacterial lifestyle and metabolic diversity, but weakly on genome size. Signal perception at an MCP occurs at the N-terminal ligand binding region (LBR). Here we show that around 88% of MCPs possess an LBR that remains un-annotated in SMART. MCPs can be classified into two clusters according to the size of the LBR. Cluster I receptors have an LBR between 120 and 210 amino acids whereas cluster II receptors have larger LBRs of 220-299 amino acids. There is evidence that suggests that some cluster II LBRs are composed of two cluster I LBRs. Further evidence indicates that other cluster II LBRs might harbour novel sensor domains. Cluster II receptors are dominant in archaea whereas cluster I receptors are prevalent in bacteria. MCPs can be classified into six different receptor topologies and this work contains a first estimation of the relative abundance of different receptor topologies in bacteria and archaea. Topologies involving extracytoplasmic sensing are prevalent in bacteria whereas topologies with cytosolic signal recognition are abundant in archaea.

Diversity at its best: bacterial taxis

Bacterial taxis is one of the most investigated signal transduction mechanisms. Studies of taxis have primarily used Escherichia coli and Salmonella as model organism. However, more recent studies of other bacterial species revealed a significant diversity in the chemotaxis mechanisms which are reviewed here. Differences include the genomic abundance, size and topology of chemoreceptors, the mode of signal binding, the presence of additional cytoplasmic signal transduction proteins or the motor mechanism. This diversity of chemotactic mechanisms is partly due to the diverse nature of input signals. However, the physiological reasons for the majority of differences in the taxis systems are poorly understood and its elucidation represents a major research need.

Paralogous chemoreceptors mediate chemotaxis towards protein amino acids and the non-protein amino acid gamma-aminobutyrate (GABA).

The paralogous receptors PctA, PctB and PctC of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were reported to mediate chemotaxis to amino acids, intermediates of amino acid metabolism and chlorinated hydrocarbons. We show that the recombinant ligand binding regions (LBRs) of PctA, PctB and PctC bind 17, 5 and 2 l‐amino acids respectively. In addition, PctC‐LBR recognized GABA but not any other structurally related compound. l‐Gln, one of the three amino acids that is not recognized by PctA‐LBR, was the most tightly binding ligand to PctB suggesting that PctB has evolved to mediate chemotaxis primarily towards l‐Gln. Bacteria were efficiently attracted to l‐Gln and GABA, but mutation of pctB and pctC, respectively, abolished chemoattraction. The physiological relevance of taxis towards GABA is proposed to reside in an interaction with plants. LBRs were predicted to adopt double PDC (PhoQ/DcuS/CitA) like structures and site‐directed mutagenesis studies showed that ligands bind to the membrane‐distal module. Analytical ultracentrifugation studies have shown that PctA‐LBR and PctB‐LBR are monomeric in the absence and presence of ligands, which is in contrast to the enterobacterial receptors that require sensor domain dimers for ligand recognition.

Responses of Pseudomonas putida to toxic aromatic carbon sources

A number of bacteria can use toxic compounds as carbon sources and have developed complex regulatory networks to protect themselves from the toxic effects of these compounds as well as to benefit from their nutritious properties. As a model system we have studied the responses of Pseudomonas putida strains to toluene. Although this compound is highly toxic, several strains are able to use it for growth. Particular emphasis was given to the responses in the context of taxis, resistance and toluene catabolism. P. putida strains analysed showed chemotactic movements towards toluene. Strain DOT-T1E was characterised by an extreme form of chemotaxis, termed hyperchemotaxis, which is mediated by the McpT chemoreceptor encoded by plasmid pGRT1. Close McpT homologs are found in a number of other plasmids encoding degradation pathways of toxic compounds. The pGRT1 plasmid harbours also the genes for the TtgGHI efflux pump which was identified as the primary determinant for the resistance of strain DOT-T1E towards toluene. Pump expression is controlled by the TtgV repressor in response to a wide range of different mono- and biaromatic compounds. Strain DOT-T1E is able to degrade toluene, benzene and ethylbenzene via the toluene dioxygenase (TOD) pathway. The expression of the pathway operon is controlled by the TodS/T two component system. The sensor kinase TodS recognizes toluene with nanomolar affinity, which in turn triggers an increase in its autophosphorylation and consequently transcriptional activation. Data suggest that transcriptional activation of the TOD pathway occurs at very low toluene concentrations whereas TtgV mediated induction of pump expression sets in as the toluene concentration further increases.

High Specificity in CheR Methyltransferase Function CheR2 OF PSEUDOMONAS PUTIDA IS ESSENTIAL FOR CHEMOTAXIS, WHEREAS CheR1 IS INVOLVED IN BIOFILM FORMATION

Background: Many bacteria possess multiple CheR methyltransferases that methylate the conserved chemoreceptor signaling domains. Results: CheR2 of Pseudomonas putida is essential for chemotaxis, whereas CheR1 is required for efficient biofilm formation, and only CheR2 methylates chemotaxis receptors McpS and McpT. Conclusion: Paralogous CheR have different functions. Significance: CheR have evolved to specifically recognize cognate chemoreceptors. Chemosensory pathways are a major signal transduction mechanism in bacteria. CheR methyltransferases catalyze the methylation of the cytosolic signaling domain of chemoreceptors and are among the core proteins of chemosensory cascades. These enzymes have primarily been studied Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium, which possess a single CheR involved in chemotaxis. Many other bacteria possess multiple cheR genes. Because the sequences of chemoreceptor signaling domains are highly conserved, it remains to be established with what degree of specificity CheR paralogues exert their activity. We report here a comparative analysis of the three CheR paralogues of Pseudomonas putida. Isothermal titration calorimetry studies show that these paralogues bind the product of the methylation reaction, S-adenosylhomocysteine, with much higher affinity (KD of 0.14–2.2 μm) than the substrate S-adenosylmethionine (KD of 22–43 μm), which indicates product feedback inhibition. Product binding was particularly tight for CheR2. Analytical ultracentrifugation experiments demonstrate that CheR2 is monomeric in the absence and presence of S-adenosylmethionine or S-adenosylhomocysteine. Methylation assays show that CheR2, but not the other paralogues, methylates the McpS and McpT chemotaxis receptors. The mutant in CheR2 was deficient in chemotaxis, whereas mutation of CheR1 and CheR3 had either no or little effect on chemotaxis. In contrast, biofilm formation of the CheR1 mutant was largely impaired but not affected in the other mutants. We conclude that CheR2 forms part of a chemotaxis pathway, and CheR1 forms part of a chemosensory route that controls biofilm formation. Data suggest that CheR methyltransferases act with high specificity on their cognate chemoreceptors.

Physiologically relevant divalent cations modulate citrate recognition by the McpS chemoreceptor

The McpS chemoreceptor of Pseudomonas putida KT2440 recognizes six different tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle intermediates. However, the magnitude of the chemotactic response towards these compounds differs largely, which has led to distinguish between strong attractants (malate, succinate, fumarate, oxaloacetate) and weak attractants (citrate, isocitrate). Citrate is abundantly present in plant tissues and root exudates and can serve as the only carbon source for growth. Citrate is known to form complexes with divalent cations which are also abundantly present in natural habitats of this bacterium. We have used isothermal titration calorimetry to study the formation of citrate–metal ion complexes. In all cases binding was entropy driven but significant differences in affinity were observed ranging from KD = 157 µM (for Mg2+) to 3 µM (for Ni2+). Complex formation occurred over a range of pH and ionic strength. The ligand binding domain of McpS (McpS‐LBD) was found to bind free citrate, but not complexes with physiologically relevant Mg2+ and Ca2+. In contrast, complexes with divalent cations which are present as trace elements (Co2+, Cd2+ and Ni2+) were recognized by McpS‐LBD. This discrimination differs from other citrate sensing proteins. These results are discussed in the context of the three dimensional structure of free citrate and its complex with Mg2+. Chemotaxis assays using P. putida revealed that taxis towards the strong attractant malate is strongly reduced in the presence of free citrate. However, this reduction is much less important in the presence of citrate–Mg2+ complexes. The physiological relevance of these findings is discussed. Copyright

Tactic responses to pollutants and their potential to increase biodegradation efficiency

A significant number of bacterial strains are able to use toxic aromatic hydrocarbons as carbon and energy sources. In a number of cases, the evolution of the corresponding degradation pathway was accompanied by the evolution of tactic behaviours either towards or away from these toxic carbon sources. Reports are reviewed which show that a chemoattraction to heterogeneously distributed aromatic pollutants increases the bioavailability of these compounds and their biodegradation efficiency. An extreme form of chemoattraction towards aromatic pollutants, termed ‘hyperchemotaxis’, was described for Pseudomonas putida DOT‐T1E, which is based on the action of the plasmid‐encoded McpT chemoreceptor. Cells with this phenotype were found of being able to approach and of establishing contact with undiluted crude oil samples. Although close McpT homologues are found on other degradation plasmids, the sequence of their ligand‐binding domains does not share significant similarity with that of NahY, the other characterized chemoreceptor for aromatic hydrocarbons. This may suggest the existence of at least two families of chemoreceptors for aromatic pollutants. The use of receptor chimers comprising the ligand‐binding region of McpT for biosensing purposes is discussed.

Study of the TmoS/TmoT two‐component system: towards the functional characterization of the family of TodS/TodT like systems

The two‐component system TmoS/TmoT controls the expression of the toluene‐4‐monooxygenase pathway in Pseudomonas mendocina RK1 via modulation of PtmoX activity. The TmoS/TmoT system belongs to the family of TodS/TodT like proteins. The sensor kinase TmoS is a 108 kDa protein composed of seven different domains. Using isothermal titration calorimetry we show that purified TmoS binds a wide range of aromatic compounds with high affinities. Tightest ligand binding was observed for toluene (KD = 150 nM), which corresponds to the highest affinity measured between an effector and a sensor kinase. Other compounds with affinities in the nanomolar range include benzene, the 3 xylene isomers, styrene, nitrobenzene or p‐chlorotoluene. We demonstrate that only part of the ligands that bind to TmoS increase protein autophosphorylation in vitro and consequently pathway expression in vivo. These compounds are referred to as agonists. Other TmoS ligands, termed antagonists, failed to increase TmoS autophosphorylation, which resulted in their incapacity to stimulate gene expression in vivo. We also show that TmoS saturated with different agonists differs in their autokinase activities. The effector screening of gene expression showed that promoter activity of PtmoX and PtodX (controlled by the TodS/TodT system) is mediated by the same set of 22 compounds. The common structural feature of these compounds is the presence of a single aromatic ring. Among these ligands, toluene was the most potent inducer of both promoter activities. Information on the TmoS/TmoT and TodS/TodT system combined with a sequence analysis of family members permits to identify distinct features that define this protein family.

Specificity of the CheR2 Methyltransferase in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Is Directed by a C-Terminal Pentapeptide in the McpB Chemoreceptor

Pentapeptide sequences in a bacterial chemoreceptor mediate adaptation by recruiting a methyltransferase. Guided by a Pentapeptide Sensory adaptation is critical to chemotaxis and survival in bacteria. The chemosensory response is modified by reversible methylation of the cytoplasmic domain of the chemoreceptor. Some chemoreceptors have a pentapeptide sequence at the C terminus, which can bind the methyltransferases or methylesterases, increasing their local concentration. García-Fontana et al. investigated the selectivity of the interactions between the methyltransferases of the CheR family and chemoreceptors in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Of the four methyltransferases and 26 chemoreceptors, a functional interaction (binding and methylation) was only detected between CheR2 and the chemoreceptor McpB (methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein B), which has the pentapeptide GWEEF at its C terminus. Both the physical and functional interactions between CheR2 and McpB were abolished by deletion of either GWEEF in McpB or a tripeptide motif in CheR2, which was partially conserved in pentapeptide-binding CheRs in other bacteria species. The findings identify a specificity mechanism in the functional modification of bacterial chemoreceptors. Methyltransferases of the CheR family and methylesterases of the CheB family control chemoreceptor methylation, and this dynamic posttranslational modification is necessary for proper chemotaxis of bacteria. Studies with enterobacteria that contain a single CheR or CheB show that, in addition to binding at the methylation site, some chemoreceptors bind CheR or CheB through additional high-affinity sites at distinct pentapeptide sequences in the chemoreceptors. We investigated the recognition of chemoreceptors by CheR proteins in the human pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Of the four methyltransferases in PAO1, we detected an interaction only between CheR2 and the chemoreceptor methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein B (McpB), which contains the pentapeptide GWEEF at its carboxyl terminus. Furthermore, CheR2 was also the only paralog that methylated McpB in vitro, and deletion of the pentapeptide sequence abolished both the CheR2-McpB interaction and the methylation of McpB. When clustered according to protein sequence, bacterial CheR proteins form two distinct families—those that bind pentapeptide-containing chemoreceptors and those that do not. These two families are distinguished by an insertion of three amino acids in the β-subdomain of CheR. Deletion of this insertion in CheR2 prevented its interaction with and methylation of McpB. Pentapeptide-containing chemoreceptors are common to many bacteria species; thus, these short, distinct motifs may enable the specific assembly of signaling complexes that mediate different responses.

Characterization of molecular interactions using isothermal titration calorimetry.

Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) is based on a simple titration of one ligand with another and the small heat changes caused by the molecular interaction are detected. From one ITC experiment the complete set of thermodynamic parameters of binding including association and dissociation constants as well as changes in enthalpy, entropy, and free energy can be derived. Using this technique almost any type of molecular interaction can be analyzed. Both ligands are in solution, and there is no need for their chemical derivatization. There are no limits as to the choice of the analysis buffer, and the analysis temperature can be set between 4 and 80 °C. This technique has been primarily applied to study the interaction between various proteins of Pseudomonas with small molecule ligands. In addition, ITC has been used to study the binding of Pseudomonas proteins to target DNA fragments.