Damien Josset
Pierre-and-Marie-Curie University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Damien Josset.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2010
G. Mioche; Damien Josset; Jean-François Gayet; Jacques Pelon; Anne Garnier; Andreas Minikin; Alfons Schwarzenboeck
[1]xa0This paper presents a comparison of combined Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) and Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) extinction retrievals with airborne lidar and in situ cirrus cloud measurements. Specially oriented research flights were carried out in western Europe in May 2007 during the Cirrus Cloud Experiment (CIRCLE-2) with the German Deutsches Zentrum fur Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR) and the French Service des Avions Francais Instrumentes pour la Recherche en Environnement (SAFIRE) Falcon aircraft equipped for remote and in situ measurements, respectively. Four cirrus cloud situations including thin cirrus layers and outflow cirrus linked to midlatitude fronts and convective systems were chosen to perform experimental collocated observations along the satellite overpasses. The measurements were carried out with temperatures ranging between −38°C and −60°C and with extinction coefficients no larger than 2 km−1. Comparisons between CALIOP and airborne lidar (LEANDRE New Generation (LNG)) attenuated backscatter coefficients reveal much larger CALIOP values for one frontal cirrus situation which could be explained by oriented pristine ice crystals. During the four selected cases the CALIOP cirrus extinction profiles were compared with in situ extinction coefficients derived from the Polar Nephelometer. The results show a very good agreement for two situations (frontal and outflow cases) despite very different cloud conditions. The slope parameters of linear fittings of CALIOP extinction coefficients with respect to in situ measurements are 0.90 and 0.94, with correlation coefficients of 0.69 and only 0.36 for the latter case because of a small number of measurements. On the contrary, significant differences are evidenced for two other situations. In thin frontal cirrus at temperatures ranging between −58°C and −60°C, systematic larger CALIOP extinctions can be explained by horizontally oriented ice crystals with prevalent planar-plate shape as revealed by the Cloud Particle Imager instrument. This nicely explains the disagreements between CALIOP and LNG observations for that case. For the last cirrus situation related to dense outflow cirrus, CALIOP extinctions are systematically lower than the in situ observations. No clear explanations can be drawn to assess this feature, but the shattering of ice crystals on probe tips may enhance the measured extinction because numerous large ice crystals are observed during this cirrus situation. Finally, relationships between the ice water content and the extinction coefficient, the effective diameter, and the temperature are determined from this in situ measurements data set.
Geophysical Research Letters | 2008
Damien Josset; Jacques Pelon; Alain Protat; Cyrille Flamant
Backscatter lidar observations such as those provided by the CALIPSO mission are expected to give complementary information to long-used radiometric observations for aerosol properties characterization important to climate and environment issues. However, retrieving aerosol optical depth (AOD) and profiling the aerosol extinction cannot be done accurately applying a standard inversion procedure to the backscatter lidar measurements, without a precise knowledge of aerosol properties on the vertical. The objective of this first study is to propose a new approach to quantify the AOD over the ocean combining the surface return signals from the lidar and radar onboard the CALIPSO and CloudSat platforms, respectively. Taking advantage of the satellite formation within the AQUA-train, first comparisons of AODs retrieved with our method and MODIS ones at tropical latitudes show an overall bias smaller than 1%, and a standard deviation of about 0.07. These first results are presented and error sources are discussed.
26th International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC 26) | 2012
Mark A. Vaughan; Anne Garnier; Zhaoyan Liu; Damien Josset; Yongxiang Hu; Kam-Pui Lee; William H. Hunt; Jean-Paul Vernier; Sharon Rodier; Jaques Pelon; David M. Winker
26th International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC 26) | 2012
Damien Josset; Jacques Pelon; Yongxiang Hu; Raymond Rogers; Zhaoyan Liu; A. H. Omar; Mark A. Vaughan; Pengwang Zhai; Icare Team
Archive | 2010
Stuart A. Young; Damien Josset; Mark A. Vaughan
25th International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC) | 2010
Damien Josset; Jacques Pelon; Yongxiang Hu; Pengwang Zhai; K. A. Powell; Sharon Rodier; C. R. Trepte
26th International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC 26) | 2012
Anne Garnier; Mark A. Vaughan; Philippe Dubuisson; Damien Josset; Jacques Pelon; David M. Winker
Archive | 2010
Damien Josset; Mark A. Vaughan; Yongxiang Hu; Melody A. Avery; Kathleen A. Powell; William H. Hunt; David M. Winker; Jacques Pelon; Charles R. Trepte; Patricia L. Lucker; Pengwang Zhai; Sharon Rodier; Simone Tanelli; Gregg Dobrowalski
25th International Laser Radar Conference 2010 (ILRC 25) | 2010
Anne Garnier; Michaël Faivre; Philippe Dubuisson; Jacques Pelon; N. A. Scott; Raymond Armante; Lionel Doppler; Nicolas Pascal; Thierry Tremas; Damien Josset; Steve Ackerman; H. Chepfer; Olivier Chomette; V. Giraud; Yongxiang Hu; David P. Kratz; Vincent Noel; Fédéric Parol; M. Platt; Claudia J. Stubenrauch; Mark A. Vaughan; M. Viollier; D. M. Winker; Pamela Boi Yang
25th International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC) | 2010
Damien Josset; Yongxiang Hu; Jacques Pelon; Pengwang Zhai; D. Tanré; R. R. Rogers; Patricia L. Lucker; C. R. Trepte; K. A. Powell; Sharon Rodier; Nicolas Pascal