Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Daniel F. Grimm is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Daniel F. Grimm.


Medical Physics | 2002

Evaluation of Kodak EDR2 film for dose verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy delivered by a static multileaf collimator.

X. R. Zhu; P Jursinic; Daniel F. Grimm; F. Lopez; Jason Rownd; M Gillin

A new type of radiographic film, Kodak EDR2 film, was evaluated for dose verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivered by a static multileaf collimator (SMLC). A sensitometric curve of EDR2 film irradiated by a 6 MV x-ray beam was compared with that of Kodak X-OMAT V (XV) film. The effects of field size, depth and dose rate on the sensitometric curve were also studied. It is found that EDR2 film is much less sensitive than XV film. In high-energy x-ray beams, the double hit process is the dominant mechanism that renders the grains on EDR2 films developable. As a result, in the dose range that is commonly used for film dosimetry for IMRT and conventional external beam therapy, the sensitometric curves of EDR2 films cannot be approximated as a linear function, OD = c * D. Within experimental uncertainty, the film sensitivity does not depend on the dose rate (50 vs 300 MU/min) or dose per pulse (from 1.0 x 10(-4) to 4.21 x 10(-4) Gy/pulse). Field sizes and depths (up to field size of 10 x 10 cm2 and depth = 10 cm) have little effect on the sensitometric curves. Percent depth doses (PDDs) for both 6 and 23 MV x rays were measured with both EDR2 and XV films and compared with ion chamber data. Film data are within 2.5% of the ion chamber results. Dose profiles measured with EDR2 film are consistent with those measured with an ion chamber. Examples of measured IMRT isodose distributions versus calculated isodoses are presented. We have used EDR2 films for verification of all IMRT patients treated by SMLC in our clinic. In most cases, with EDR2 film, actual clinical daily fraction doses can be used for verification of composite isodose distributions of SMLC-based IMRT.


Medical Physics | 2003

Characteristics of sensitometric curves of radiographic films.

X. R. Zhu; S Yoo; P Jursinic; Daniel F. Grimm; F. Lopez; Jason Rownd; M Gillin

A new type of radiographic film, EDR (extended dose range) film, has been recently become available for film dosimetry. It is particularly attractive for composite isodose verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy because of its low sensitivity relative to the more common Kodak XV film. For XV film, the relationship between optical density and dose, commonly known as the sensitometric curve, depends linearly on the dose at low densities. Unlike XV film, the sensitometric curve of EDR film irradiated by megavoltage x rays is not linearly dependent on the dose at low densities. In this work, to understand the mechanisms governing the shape of the sensitometric curves, EDR film was studied with kilovoltage x rays, 60Co gamma rays, megavoltage x rays, and electron beams. As a comparison, XV film was also studied with the same beams mentioned above. The model originally developed by Silberstein [J. Opt. Soc. Am. 35, 93-107, 1945)] is used to fit experimental data. It is found that the single hit model can be used to predict the sensitometric curve for XV films irradiated by all beams used in this work and for EDR films exposed to kilovoltage x rays. For EDR film irradiated by 60Co gamma rays, megavoltage x rays, and electron beams, the double hit model is used to fit the sensitometric curves. For doses less than 100 cGy, a systematic difference between measured densities and that predicted by the double hit model is observed. Possible causes of the observed differences are discussed. The results of this work provide a theoretical explanation of the sensitometric behavior of EDR film.


Medical Physics | 1985

The effect of thickness of the waterproofing sheath on the calibration of photon and electron beams

M Gillin; Robert W. Kline; Azam Niroomand-Rad; Daniel F. Grimm

The TG-21 protocol recommends using a thin sheath for waterproofing an ion chamber used in the calibration of photon and electron beams. A thickness of 0.5 mm is suggested for a material having a composition and density close to that of water. This work investigates the effect on the calibration of photon beams ranging from Co60 to 25 MV, and electron beams ranging from nominal energies of 7-18 MeV, for changes in the thickness of the waterproofing sheath from 0.5 to 5.5 mm. For photon beams, a maximum change of 1.2% was found for the 25-MV x-ray beam. For electron beams, a maximum change of 0.5% was found for 10-MeV electrons. It is concluded that the thickness of the waterproofing sheath is not a very sensitive variable, assuming the thickness is between 0.5 and 2.0 mm.


Medical Physics | 1987

Performance characteristics of an orthovoltage x‐ray therapy machine

Azam Niroomand-Rad; M Gillin; F. Lopez; Daniel F. Grimm

Performance characteristics sufficient to provide physical data base specific to the Siemens Stabilipan 2 orthovoltage x-ray therapy machine are presented. Operating conditions covering the working range of the unit from 100 to 300 kVp are selected. Beam quality, output, the central axis depth dose, relative output factors, field flatness, uniformity index, and filtration characteristics of the beams are studied. Selected results are reported.


Medical Physics | 2000

Comparison of dosimetric characteristics of Siemens virtual and physical wedges

X. R. Zhu; M Gillin; P Jursinic; F. Lopez; Daniel F. Grimm; Jason Rownd

Dosimetric properties of Virtual Wedge (VW) and physical wedge (PW) in 6 and 23 MV photon beams from a Siemens Primus linear accelerator, including wedge factors, depth doses, dose profiles, peripheral doses and surface doses, are compared. While there is a great difference in absolute values of wedge factors, VW factors (VWFs) and PW factors (PWFs) have a similar trend as a function of field size. PWFs have a stronger depth dependence than VWF due to beam hardening in PW fields. VW dose profiles in the wedge direction, in general, match very well with PW, except in the toe area of large wedge angles with large field sizes. Dose profiles in the nonwedge direction show a significant reduction in PW fields due to off-axis beam softening and oblique filtration. PW fields have significantly higher peripheral doses than open and VW fields. VW fields have similar surface doses as the open fields while PW fields have lower surface doses. Surface doses for both VW and PW increase with field size and slightly with wedge angle. For VW fields with wedge angles 45 degrees and less, the initial gap up to 3 cm is dosimetrically acceptable when compared to dose profiles of PW. VW fields in general use less monitor units than PW fields.


Medical Physics | 1986

Film dosimetry of small electron beams for routine radiotherapy planning

Azam Niroomand-Rad; M Gillin; Robert W. Kline; Daniel F. Grimm

The characteristics of very small fields, 1 X 1 and 2 X 2 cm, of electron beams of nominal energies, 5, 7, 10, 12, 15, and 18 MeV have been studied and compared to a 10 X 10 cm field. A parallel-plate ion chamber and film have been used to obtain various dose parameters. The central axis depth dose measurements, field flatness, uniformity index, and relative output factors are presented. It was found that satisfactory results for determining the relative output factor can be obtained from film data using a scanning densitometer. It is our conclusion that film dosimetry is acceptable in determining the necessary clinical parameters needed to treat patients with fields as small as 2 X 2 cm. For the 1 X 1 cm field size and for the electron energies greater than 10 MeV, there was substantial disagreement between the ion chamber and film data in the buildup region as well as the regions beyond the depth of maximum dose to the depth of 90% dose.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1986

Dose distribution in total skin electron beam irradiation using the six-field technique

Azam Niroomand-Rad; M Gillin; Ritsuko Komaki; Robert W. Kline; Daniel F. Grimm

Total skin low energy electron beam irradiation is used to treat superficially widespread skin lesions such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Total skin irradiation involves delivering an adequate dose at a depth of 0.25 to 1.0 cm, while sparing underlying tissue. The dose distributions obtained when using a modified Stanford six-field technique depend upon the beam energy, the beam angle, the diameter and shape of the body part, and other variables. The dose distribution uniformity of six pairs of angulated electron beams has been studied as a function of beam energy, the gantry angle, +/- theta, above and below the horizontal and the diameter of a cylindrical polystyrene phantom. Depth doses and dose uniformity for single and multiple fields have been measured as a function of beam energy, phantom diameter and position.


Medical Physics | 2001

Dependence of virtual wedge factor on dose calibration and monitor units.

X. R. Zhu; M Gillin; K. Ehlers; F. Lopez; Daniel F. Grimm; Jason Rownd; Todd H. Steinberg

One of the important features of the Siemens Virtual Wedge (VW) is that the VW factor (VWF) is approximately equal to unity for all beams with a total deviation for a given wedge no greater than 0.05, as specified by Siemens. In this note we report the observed dependence of VWF on dose calibration (cGy/MU), monitor units (MU), and beam tuning for a Primus, a linear accelerator with two dose-rate ranges available for VW operation. The VWF is defined as the ratio of doses measured on the beam central axis for the wedge field to the open field; the open field dose is always measured with the nominal high dose-rate beam. When VW operates in the high dose-rate range, the VWF is independent of calibration (cGy/MU). When VW works in the low dose-rate range, the VWF varies linearly with the calibration of the low dose-rate mode. For a linear accelerator that has only one dose-rate range for VW, there is no observable dependence of VWF on the calibration. We also studied the monitor unit dependence of VWF. A discontinuity in VWF was observed at the switching point between the high and low dose-rate ranges. Working with Siemens, we have investigated causes of this discontinuity. As a result of this investigation, the discontinuity in VWF as a function monitor unit is practically removed.


Medical Physics | 1988

Comparison of measured and calculated dose distributions around an iridium‐192 wire

M Gillin; F. Lopez; Robert W. Kline; Daniel F. Grimm; Azam Niroomand-Rad

The relative dose distribution around a 5.0-cm-long piece of 192Ir wire has been measured using LiF chips. Measurements were made at distances of 0.25 to 5.0 cm away from the source and distances of 0.0 to 4.0 cm along the source. In addition, measurements were also made at several distances along the axis of the source. Attention was paid to the errors associated with these measurements. A comparison was made between a commercial software program, ISODOS, an analytical solution to the Sievert integral, and the measurements. Good agreement was obtained at distances along and away from the source. Major disagreements were found at points along the source axis.


Medical Physics | 1985

Computer dosimetry of 192Ir wire

Robert W. Kline; M Gillin; Daniel F. Grimm; Azam Niroomand-Rad

The dosimetry of 192Ir linear sources with a commercial treatment planning computer system has been evaluated. Reference dose rate data were selected from the literature and normalized in a manner consistent with our clinical and dosimetric terminology. The results of the computer calculations are compared to the reference data and good agreement is shown at distances within about 7 cm from a linear source. The methodology of translating source calibration in terms of exposure rate for use in the treatment planning computer is developed. This may be useful as a practical guideline for users of similar computer calculation programs for iridium as well as other sources.

Collaboration


Dive into the Daniel F. Grimm's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M Gillin

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert W. Kline

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Azam Niroomand-Rad

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

F. Lopez

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jason Rownd

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

P Jursinic

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

X. R. Zhu

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ritsuko Komaki

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Candice Johnstone

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge