Daniel G. Roberts
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Daniel G. Roberts.
Coal Combustion and Gasification Products | 2011
Alexander Y. Ilyushechkin; Daniel G. Roberts
The flow behaviour of coal mineral matter at high temperatures is an important parameter for coal use in entrained-flow gasification technologies. Recently, gasification performance data was obtained from a series of pilot-scale gasification tests on a suite of well-characterised Australian black coals. Evaluation of the results of the pilot tests and the detailed laboratory investigations provided the opportunity for evaluation of the practical applicability of different laboratory and modelling techniques for coal assessment in terms of mineral matter behaviour in entrained flow gasification. A series of viscosity measurements was made over the range 1200–1600uC using slags produced in a pilot scale gasifier at temperatures between 1200 and 1700 uC, and laboratory-produced slags. These data were compared with viscosity predictions based on an empirical model developed from an extensive database of slag viscosity measurements. Major differences between predicted and measured viscosities were investigated and, where appropriate, related to slag composition and microstructure. There were some significant differences (in some cases up to 100% of the viscosity values) in the viscosity behaviour of laboratory-prepared slags and those produced during the pilot-scale gasification test runs. These differences were attributable to differences between the composition of the laboratory-produced slags and those tapped from the pilot scale gasifier. The major source of these compositional variations appears to be a result of partitioning of mineral matter components into fly ash and slag in the gasifier, and the possible subsequent interaction of this slag with slag already present on the wall of the gasifier. These observations have implications for the manner in which coal mineral matter is assessed for its likely behaviour, and ultimate suitability for use, in entrained flow gasification systems. In order to improve the reliability of coal slag assessment procedures, test procedures should include preliminary modelling based on expected coal ash and slag compositions, viscosity measurements of laboratory-produced slags, and analyses of ash and slag compositions where possible to ascertain the degree of compositional partitioning and its impact on slag behaviour. Ongoing work is required to better understand the nature of mineral matter transformations under gasification conditions and the impact of this on coal and gasifier performance. f 2011 The University of Kentucky Center for Applied Energy Research and the American Coal Ash Association All rights reserved. A R T I C L E I N F O Article history: Received 8 November 2010; Received in revised form 21 March 2011; Accepted 24 March 2011
Low-Rank Coals for Power Generation, Fuel and Chemical Production | 2017
Daniel G. Roberts; S.P.S. Badwal; Louis Wibberley; Sankar Bhattacharya
Abstract Pulverized fuel (pf) combustion in a boiler for power generation is by far the most common approach for the utilization of low rank coals. The properties of low rank coals (in particular, moisture and alkali content) mean that such an approach is often very inefficient, leading to very high CO2 emissions. Low rank coals, however, are inexpensive, and in some regions represent a significant energy resource. This chapter discusses some of the advanced, high efficiency technologies that are being demonstrated or which are under development, which allow low rank coals to play a role in a low-carbon energy future. The chapter discusses the role of gasification in enabling low rank coals to be used for low emissions power or the production of chemicals, fertilizers, or hydrogen. It also gives an overview of emerging technologies, such as Direct Injection Carbon Engines, and those under development, such as Direct Carbon Fuel Cells.
Chemical Engineering Journal | 2009
San Shwe Hla; D. Park; G.J. Duffy; J.H. Edwards; Daniel G. Roberts; Alexander Y. Ilyushechkin; L.D. Morpeth; T. Nguyen
Fuel | 2006
David J. Harris; Daniel G. Roberts; D.G. Henderson
Chemical Engineering Journal | 2015
Naoko Ellis; Mohammad S. Masnadi; Daniel G. Roberts; Mark Kochanek; Alexander Y. Ilyushechkin
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy | 2011
Y. Sun; San Shwe Hla; G.J. Duffy; A. Cousins; David French; L.D. Morpeth; J.H. Edwards; Daniel G. Roberts
Journal of Non-crystalline Solids | 2011
Alexander Y. Ilyushechkin; San Shwe Hla; Daniel G. Roberts; Nikolai N. Kinaev
Catalysis Communications | 2009
San Shwe Hla; G.J. Duffy; L.D. Morpeth; A. Cousins; Daniel G. Roberts; J.H. Edwards
Waste Management | 2015
San Shwe Hla; Daniel G. Roberts
Fuel | 2015
Michele Vascellari; Daniel G. Roberts; San Shwe Hla; David J. Harris; C. Hasse
Collaboration
Dive into the Daniel G. Roberts's collaboration.
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
View shared research outputsCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
View shared research outputsCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
View shared research outputsCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
View shared research outputsCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
View shared research outputsCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
View shared research outputsCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
View shared research outputs