Daniel T. Mytych

Comparing ELISA and Surface Plasmon Resonance for Assessing Clinical Immunogenicity of Panitumumab

Evaluation of the immunogenicity of panitumumab, a fully human anti-epidermal growth factor receptor mAb approved for use in colorectal cancer patients, led to the development of two separate immunoassays for the detection of anti-panitumumab Abs. The first immunoassay used a bridging ELISA capable of detecting 10 ng/ml positive control anti-panitumumab Ab. The ELISA incorporated an acid dissociation step to reduce drug interference and tolerated the presence of ∼100-fold molar excess of drug. During eight clinical trials, the ELISA detected developing Ab responses in 2 of 612 (0.3%) subjects. In one of the ELISA positive subjects, neutralizing Abs were detected using an epidermal growth factor receptor phosphorylation bioassay. The second immunoassay used a Biacore biosensor immunoassay format capable of detecting 1 μg/ml positive control Ab while tolerating the presence of equal molar amounts of drug. Although less sensitive and less tolerant to competing drug in the assay, the Biacore assay detected developing Ab responses in 25 of the 604 (4.1%) subjects. Additionally, the Biacore assay identified eight subjects who developed neutralizing Abs. Mouse mAbs with affinities ranging from 1.1 × 10−6 to 8.4 × 10−10 M were used to characterize both assay types. The ELISA was more sensitive for the detection of higher affinity mAbs and detected high-affinity mAbs in the presence of higher molar ratio of drug to mAb. The Biacore assay was more sensitive for detection of lower affinity mAbs and detected low affinity Abs in the presence of higher molar ratios of drug to mAb.

Validation parameters for a novel biosensor assay which simultaneously measures serum concentrations of a humanized monoclonal antibody and detects induced antibodies

This report documents the validation of an assay using BIAcore 2000 that, with a single injection of mouse serum, allows the quantitation of a humanized monoclonal antibody and can also detect the presence of antibodies directed against this humanized antibody. The important components required for the validation of biosensor assays including precision, accuracy, linearity, stability of the immobilized ligand, specificity and sensitivity are addressed. The tandem assay that is used as a model for biosensor validations is accomplished by flowing each sample across the surface of two flowcells in sequence. The first flowcell has the antigen that the humanized mAb was generated against immobilized while the humanized mAb itself is immobilized on the second flowcell. The quantitation component of this assay is precise and accurate with a limit of quantitation of 1 microg/ml in mouse serum samples. Any antibodies directed against the humanized mAb can be detected and also characterized as to isotype. This unique assay can be performed with as little as 10 microl of serum which is then diluted ten-fold prior to analysis. The small sample requirement allows analysis of individual mouse serum samples rather than requiring the use of pooled samples from multiple mice. A further advantage of this assay is the automation capability which allows unattended operation.

2015 White Paper on recent issues in bioanalysis: focus on new technologies and biomarkers (Part 3 – LBA, biomarkers and immunogenicity)

The 2015 9th Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (9th WRIB) took place in Miami, Florida with participation of 600 professionals from pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies, contract research organizations and regulatory agencies worldwide. WRIB was once again a 5 day, week-long event - A Full Immersion Bioanalytical Week - specifically designed to facilitate sharing, reviewing, discussing and agreeing on approaches to address the most current issues of interest in bioanalysis. The topics covered included both small and large molecules, and involved LCMS, hybrid LBA/LCMS and LBA approaches, including the focus on biomarkers and immunogenicity. This 2015 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop, and is aimed to provide the bioanalytical community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2015 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts. Part 3 discusses the recommendations for large molecule bioanalysis using LBA, biomarkers and immunogenicity. Part 1 (small molecule bioanalysis using LCMS) and Part 2 (hybrid LBA/LCMS and regulatory inputs from major global health authorities) have been published in volume 7, issues 22 and 23 of Bioanalysis, respectively.

Strategic characterization of anti-drug antibody responses for the assessment of clinical relevance and impact.

All therapeutic proteins have the potential to induce anti-drug antibodies (ADA). Clinically relevant ADA can impact efficacy and/or safety of a biological therapeutic. Immunogenicity assessment strategy evaluates binding and neutralizing ADA, and the need for additional characterization (e.g., epitope, titer and so on) is determined using a risk-based approach. The choice of characterization assays depends on the type, application and immunogenicity of the therapeutic. ADA characterization can impact the interpretation of the risk profile of a given therapeutic, and offers insight into opportunities for risk mitigation and management. This article describes common ADA characterization methods. Strategic assessment and characterization of clinically relevant ADA are discussed, in order to support clinical options for safe and effective patient care and disease management.

Assay signal as an alternative to titer for assessment of magnitude of an antidrug antibody response

BACKGROUNDnTiter methods are commonly used to characterize the magnitude of an antidrug antibody response. Assay S/N is an appealing alternative, but the circumstances under which use of signal-to-noise (S/N) is appropriate have not been well defined.nnnRESULTSnWe validated both titer and S/N-based methods for several therapeutics. S/N correlated strongly with titer both in aggregate and when examined on a per subject basis. Analysis of impact of antibody magnitude on pharmacokinetics yielded the same result using either method. Each assay demonstrated excellent precision, good linearity, and adequate drug tolerance.nnnCONCLUSIONnUnder these circumstances, assay S/N is a valid alternative to titer for assessment of the magnitude of an antidrug antibody response.