Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Dara S. Ross is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Dara S. Ross.


The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics | 2015

Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT): A Hybridization Capture-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Clinical Assay for Solid Tumor Molecular Oncology

Donavan T. Cheng; Talia Mitchell; Ahmet Zehir; Ronak Shah; Ryma Benayed; Aijazuddin Syed; Raghu Chandramohan; Zhen Yu Liu; Helen H. Won; Sasinya N. Scott; A. Rose Brannon; Catherine O'Reilly; Justyna Sadowska; Jacklyn Casanova; Angela Yannes; Jaclyn F. Hechtman; Jinjuan Yao; Wei Song; Dara S. Ross; Alifya Oultache; Snjezana Dogan; Laetitia Borsu; Meera Hameed; Khedoudja Nafa; Maria E. Arcila; Marc Ladanyi; Michael F. Berger

The identification of specific genetic alterations as key oncogenic drivers and the development of targeted therapies are together transforming clinical oncology and creating a pressing need for increased breadth and throughput of clinical genotyping. Next-generation sequencing assays allow the efficient and unbiased detection of clinically actionable mutations. To enable precision oncology in patients with solid tumors, we developed Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT), a hybridization capture-based next-generation sequencing assay for targeted deep sequencing of all exons and selected introns of 341 key cancer genes in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumors. Barcoded libraries from patient-matched tumor and normal samples were captured, sequenced, and subjected to a custom analysis pipeline to identify somatic mutations. Sensitivity, specificity, reproducibility of MSK-IMPACT were assessed through extensive analytical validation. We tested 284 tumor samples with previously known point mutations and insertions/deletions in 47 exons of 19 cancer genes. All known variants were accurately detected, and there was high reproducibility of inter- and intrarun replicates. The detection limit for low-frequency variants was approximately 2% for hotspot mutations and 5% for nonhotspot mutations. Copy number alterations and structural rearrangements were also reliably detected. MSK-IMPACT profiles oncogenic DNA alterations in clinical solid tumor samples with high accuracy and sensitivity. Paired analysis of tumors and patient-matched normal samples enables unambiguous detection of somatic mutations to guide treatment decisions.


Nature Medicine | 2017

Mutational landscape of metastatic cancer revealed from prospective clinical sequencing of 10,000 patients

Ahmet Zehir; Ryma Benayed; Ronak Shah; Aijazuddin Syed; Sumit Middha; Hyunjae R. Kim; Preethi Srinivasan; Jianjiong Gao; Debyani Chakravarty; Sean M. Devlin; Matthew D. Hellmann; David Barron; Alison M. Schram; Meera Hameed; Snjezana Dogan; Dara S. Ross; Jaclyn F. Hechtman; Deborah DeLair; Jinjuan Yao; Diana Mandelker; Donavan T. Cheng; Raghu Chandramohan; Abhinita Mohanty; Ryan Ptashkin; Gowtham Jayakumaran; Meera Prasad; Mustafa H Syed; Anoop Balakrishnan Rema; Zhen Y Liu; Khedoudja Nafa

Tumor molecular profiling is a fundamental component of precision oncology, enabling the identification of genomic alterations in genes and pathways that can be targeted therapeutically. The existence of recurrent targetable alterations across distinct histologically defined tumor types, coupled with an expanding portfolio of molecularly targeted therapies, demands flexible and comprehensive approaches to profile clinically relevant genes across the full spectrum of cancers. We established a large-scale, prospective clinical sequencing initiative using a comprehensive assay, MSK-IMPACT, through which we have compiled tumor and matched normal sequence data from a unique cohort of more than 10,000 patients with advanced cancer and available pathological and clinical annotations. Using these data, we identified clinically relevant somatic mutations, novel noncoding alterations, and mutational signatures that were shared by common and rare tumor types. Patients were enrolled on genomically matched clinical trials at a rate of 11%. To enable discovery of novel biomarkers and deeper investigation into rare alterations and tumor types, all results are publicly accessible.


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine | 2016

Detection of HER2-Positive Metastases in Patients with HER2-Negative Primary Breast Cancer Using 89Zr-Trastuzumab PET/CT

Gary A. Ulaner; David M. Hyman; Dara S. Ross; Adriana D. Corben; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Shari Goldfarb; Heather L. McArthur; Joseph P. Erinjeri; Stephen B. Solomon; Hartmuth C. Kolb; Serge K. Lyashchenko; Jason S. Lewis; Jorge A. Carrasquillo

Our objective was to determine whether imaging with a human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–targeted PET tracer can detect HER2-positive metastases in patients with HER2-negative primary breast cancer. Methods: Patients with HER2-negative primary breast cancer and evidence of distant metastases were enrolled in an Institutional Review Board–approved prospective clinical trial. Archived pathologic samples from the patient’s primary breast cancer were retested to confirm HER2-negative disease. Patients with confirmed HER2-negative primary breast cancer underwent 89Zr-trastuzumab PET/CT to screen for 89Zr-trastuzumab metastases. Metastases avid for 89Zr-trastuzumab by PET/CT were biopsied and pathologically examined to define HER2 status. Patients with pathologically proven HER2-positive metastases subsequently received off-protocol HER2-targeted therapy to evaluate treatment response. Results: Nine patients were enrolled, all of whom had pathologic retesting that confirmed HER2-negative primary breast cancer. Five demonstrated suggestive foci on 89Zr-trastuzumab PET/CT. Of these 5 patients, 2 had biopsy-proven HER2-positive metastases and went on to benefit from HER2-targeted therapy. In the other 3 patients, biopsy showed no evidence of HER2-positive disease, and their foci on 89Zr-trastuzumab PET were considered false-positive. Conclusion: In this proof-of-concept study, we demonstrated that 89Zr-trastuzmab PET/CT detects unsuspected HER2-positive metastases in patients with HER2-negative primary breast cancer. Although these are only initial results in a small sample, they are a proof of the concept that HER2-targeted imaging can identify additional candidates for HER2-targeted therapy. More specific HER2-targeted agents will be needed for clinical use.


Journal of Thoracic Oncology | 2016

HER2 Amplification and HER2 Mutation Are Distinct Molecular Targets in Lung Cancers

Bob T. Li; Dara S. Ross; Dara L. Aisner; Jamie E. Chaft; Meier Hsu; Severine Kako; Mark G. Kris; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Maria E. Arcila

Introduction: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 gene (HER2 [also known as ERBB2]) alterations have been identified as oncogenic drivers and potential therapeutic targets in lung cancers. The molecular associations of HER2 gene amplification, mutation, and HER2 protein overexpression in lung cancers have not been distinctly defined. To explore these associations, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and the University of Colorado combined their data on HER2 alterations in lung cancers. Methods: Tumor specimens from 175 patients with lung adenocarcinomas and no prior targeted therapy were evaluated for the presence of HER2 amplification and mutation and HER2 protein overexpression. Amplification was assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and defined as an HER2‐to‐chromosome enumeration probe 17 ratio of at least 2.0. Mutation was assessed by fragment analysis, mass spectrometry genotyping, and Sanger sequencing. Overexpression was assessed by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. The frequencies of HER2 amplification and mutation and HER2 overexpression were calculated and their overlap examined. Results: HER2 amplification was detected by FISH in 5 of 175 cases (3%). HER2 mutation was detected in 4 of 148 specimens (3%), including three identical 12–base pair insertions (p.A775_G776insYVMA) and a 9–base pair insertion, all in exon 20. None of the HER2‐mutant cases was amplified. HER2 overexpression (2+ or 3+) on IHC staining was not detected in the 25 specimens available for testing, and negative IHC staining correlated with the negative results according to FISH. Conclusions: HER2 mutations are not associated with HER2 amplification, thus suggesting a distinct entity and therapeutic target. HER2‐positive lung cancer may not be an adequate term, and patient cohorts for the study of HER2‐targeted agents should be defined by the specific HER2 alteration present.


The Journal of Pathology | 2016

Massively parallel sequencing of phyllodes tumours of the breast reveals actionable mutations, and TERT promoter hotspot mutations and TERT gene amplification as likely drivers of progression

Salvatore Piscuoglio; Charlotte K.Y. Ng; Melissa P. Murray; Kathleen A. Burke; Marcia Edelweiss; Felipe C. Geyer; Gabriel S. Macedo; Akiko Inagaki; Anastasios D. Papanastasiou; Luciano G. Martelotto; Caterina Marchiò; Raymond S. Lim; Rafael A. Ioris; Pooja K. Nahar; Ino de Bruijn; Lillian Mary Smyth; Muzaffar Akram; Dara S. Ross; John H.J. Petrini; Larry Norton; David B. Solit; José Baselga; Edi Brogi; Marc Ladanyi; Britta Weigelt; Jorge S. Reis-Filho

Phyllodes tumours (PTs) are breast fibroepithelial lesions that are graded based on histological criteria as benign, borderline or malignant. PTs may recur locally. Borderline PTs and malignant PTs may metastasize to distant sites. Breast fibroepithelial lesions, including PTs and fibroadenomas, are characterized by recurrent MED12 exon 2 somatic mutations. We sought to define the repertoire of somatic genetic alterations in PTs and whether these may assist in the differential diagnosis of these lesions. We collected 100 fibroadenomas, 40 benign PTs, 14 borderline PTs and 22 malignant PTs; six, six and 13 benign, borderline and malignant PTs, respectively, and their matched normal tissue, were subjected to targeted massively parallel sequencing (MPS) using the MSK‐IMPACT sequencing assay. Recurrent MED12 mutations were found in 56% of PTs; in addition, mutations affecting cancer genes (eg TP53, RB1, SETD2 and EGFR) were exclusively detected in borderline and malignant PTs. We found a novel recurrent clonal hotspot mutation in the TERT promoter (−124 C>T) in 52% and TERT gene amplification in 4% of PTs. Laser capture microdissection revealed that these mutations were restricted to the mesenchymal component of PTs. Sequencing analysis of the entire cohort revealed that the frequency of TERT alterations increased from benign (18%) to borderline (57%) and to malignant PTs (68%; p < 0.01), and TERT alterations were associated with increased levels of TERT mRNA (p < 0.001). No TERT alterations were observed in fibroadenomas. An analysis of TERT promoter sequencing and gene amplification distinguished PTs from fibroadenomas with a sensitivity and a positive predictive value of 100% (CI 95.38–100%) and 100% (CI 85.86–100%), respectively, and a sensitivity and a negative predictive value of 39% (CI 28.65–51.36%) and 68% (CI 60.21–75.78%), respectively. Our results suggest that TERT alterations may drive the progression of PTs, and may assist in the differential diagnosis between PTs and fibroadenomas. Copyright


Breast Journal | 2015

Is There a Role for Oncotype Dx Testing in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma

Niamh Conlon; Dara S. Ross; Jane Howard; Jeffrey Catalano; Maura N. Dickler; Lee K. Tan

Oncotype Dx Breast Cancer Assay is a 21‐gene assay used in estrogen receptor (ER)‐positive breast cancer to predict benefit from chemotherapy (CT). Tumors are placed into one of three risk categories based on their recurrence score (RS). This paper explores the impact of tumor histopathologic features and Oncotype Dx RS on the treatment plan for invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). Invasive lobular carcinoma cases submitted for Oncotype Dx testing were identified from a clinical data base. The histopathologic and immunohistochemical features and RS subcategory of each tumor, and treatment regimen and medical oncologic assessments of each patient were reviewed. A total of 135 cases of ILC had RS testing, which represented 15% of all ILC diagnosed at the institution over the time period. 80% of ILC was of the classical subtype and all tumors were ER positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER‐2) negative by immunohistochemistry. Sixty three percent of cases were low risk (LR), 35.5% were intermediate risk (IR) and 1.5% were high risk (HR). Both HR cases were pleomorphic ILC. Sixty eight percent of classical ILC had a LR score, while 70% of pleomorphic ILC had an IR score. Patients in the IR category were significantly more likely to undergo CT than patients in the LR category (54% versus 18%; p < 0.0001). In the LR category, those undergoing CT were significantly younger and more likely to have positive lymph nodes (p < 0.05). Qualitative analysis of medical oncologic assessments showed that RS played a role in decision‐making on CT in 74% of cases overall. At our institution, Oncotype Dx RS currently plays a role in the management of a proportion of ILC and impacts on treatment decisions.


Breast Journal | 2017

Fibroepithelial Lesions in the Breast of Adolescent Females: A Clinicopathological Study of 54 Cases

Dara S. Ross; Dilip Giri; Muzaffar Akram; Jeffrey Catalano; Cristina Olcese; Kimberly J. Van Zee; Edi Brogi

Fibroepithelial lesions (FELs) are the most frequent breast tumors in adolescent females. The pubertal hormonal surge could impact the growth and microscopic appearance of FELs in this age group. In this study, we evaluate the morphology and clinical behavior of FELs in adolescents. We searched the 1992–2012 pathology data base for FELs in females 18 years old or younger (F ≤18 years). Seven FELs from 1975 to 1983 were also included. Three pathologists reviewed all available material. Patient (pt) characteristics and follow‐up information were obtained from electronic medical records. Forty‐eight F ≤18 years had 54 FELs with available slides. Thirty (67%) pts were Caucasian, 12 (27%) African‐American, two (4%) Hispanic, one (2%) Asian; three were of unknown race/ethnicity. Median age at diagnosis was 16 years. Median age at menarche was 12 years; most (96%) FELs occurred after menarche (median interval 48 months). All patients underwent lumpectomy; one required subsequent mastectomy. The FELs were 34 fibroadenomas (FAs) (11 usual, 23 juvenile), and 20 phyllodes tumors (PTs) (16 benign, one borderline and three malignant). Eight (35%) juvenile FAs showed slight intratumoral heterogeneity. The mean mitotic rate was 1.3 mitoses/10 high‐power fields (HPFs) (range, 0–6) in usual FAs, 1.8/10 HPFs in juvenile FAs, 3.1/10 HPFs in benign PTs, 10/10 HPFs in the borderline PT and 17/10 HPFs in malignant PTs. The mean follow‐up for 29 pts with 33 FELs was 44 months. Two (10%) PTs recurred locally (a benign PT at 18 months, and a borderline PT at 11 months). Both recurrent PTs had microscopic margins <1 mm. Mitotic activity in FAs from adolescents can be substantial and this finding should be interpreted cautiously. Awareness of the morphologic features of FELs in adolescents is important to avoid overdiagnosis of PTs, which can lead to additional unnecessary and potentially disfiguring surgery.


Advances in Anatomic Pathology | 2013

Ductal carcinoma in situ: morphology-based knowledge and molecular advances.

Dara S. Ross; Yong Hannah Wen; Edi Brogi

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is an established precursor of invasive breast carcinoma. Immunoperoxidase stains for selected markers can assist pathologists in the diagnosis of challenging ductal epithelial proliferations, but they cannot replace morphologic evaluation as the primary and critical assessment of this disease. Molecular studies provide further insight into how DCIS progresses to invasive carcinoma and also confirm the heterogeneity of this lesion. Morphology-based knowledge, immunohistochemistry, and molecular advances in DCIS are the subjects of this review.


Cancer Research | 2016

Abstract P6-07-08: Androgen receptor (AR) mutations in a cohort of patients with breast cancer (BC) who have undergone tumor genomic profiling

Ayca Gucalp; Tracy Ann Proverbs-Singh; Pedram Razavi; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Sujata Patil; Dara S. Ross; Ahmet Zehir; José Baselga; C. Hudis; Tiffany A. Traina

Background: AR mutations have been described as a mechanism of resistance to AR antagonists in prostate cancer. There are limited data regarding the presence of AR mutations in breast cancer. We aim to describe the presence of tumor AR mutations in a cohort of patients (pts) with breast cancer who are candidates for targeted cancer therapy, who underwent tumor genomic profiling as part of a clinical trial at MSK (NCT01775072). Methods: MSK-IMPACT is a targeted tumor sequencing assay capable of detecting mutations and other critical genetic aberrations in 410 cancer genes; these data are available through an institutional database. Following IRB approval and using an electronic medical record, we examined the subset of pts in this database with breast cancer for the presence of AR mutations and performed a chart review for clinicopathologic features and outcomes. Statistics are descriptive. Results: As of 03JUN2015, 628 of 4,379 samples that underwent MSK-IMPACT testing since 2012 were from invasive breast cancers. 6 of 628 (1%) harbored AR mutations (Table 1), none of which contribute to a reported or predicted functional alteration. Patient/tumor characteristics are shown in Table 2. Five out of 6 patients recurred between 7.4 and 117.4 months (mo) from the date of initial diagnosis. One patient is without disease recurrence at 3.9mo from diagnosis at date of last contact, 7.9mo ago. Conclusions: AR mutations were uncommon in this dataset of 628 breast cancers. Similarly, TCGA sequencing data has revealed only 12 invasive breast cancers with AR mutations (2.2% of 973 samples). The functional significance of these mutations has not been demonstrated. As tissue from therapeutic studies using AR antagonists for the treatment of breast cancer become available, mutations or amplification in AR may be more readily identified as a potential mechanism of resistance to AR-targeted therapy. Acknowledgments: We gratefully acknowledge the members of the Molecular Diagnostics Service in the Department of Pathology and the Marie-Josee and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology. Citation Format: Gucalp A, Proverbs-Singh TA, Razavi P, Chandarlapaty S, Patil S, Ross DS, Zehir A, Baselga J, Hudis CA, Traina TA. Androgen receptor (AR) mutations in a cohort of patients with breast cancer (BC) who have undergone tumor genomic profiling. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-07-08.


Modern Pathology | 2018

Immunohistochemical analysis of estrogen receptor in breast cancer with ESR1 mutations detected by hybrid capture-based next-generation sequencing

Dara S. Ross; Ahmet Zehir; Edi Brogi; Fumiko Konno; Melissa Krystel-Whittemore; Marcia Edelweiss; Michael F. Berger; Weiyi Toy; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Pedram Razavi; José Baselga; Hannah Y. Wen

Estrogen receptor-α (ER-α), encoded by ESR1, is detected by immunohistochemistry in approximately 70% of invasive breast cancers and serves as a strong predictive biomarker. ESR1-activating mutations in the ligand-binding domain have been reported in up to 35–40% of ER-positive metastatic breast cancers and are associated with endocrine therapy resistance and disease progression. At present, it is unclear whether ESR1 mutations alter the immunohistochemical detection of ER performed in routine clinical practice. In this study, ESR1 mutations in breast cancer were identified utilizing Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT), a Food and Drug Administration-approved hybridization capture-based next-generation sequencing assay. Five hundred and eighty-six breast cancers from patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease were analyzed using MSK-IMPACT in the study period. ESR1 somatic alterations were identified in 67 breast cancer samples from 66 patients. Immunohistochemical analysis of ER, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 was performed on the primary and treated breast cancers from these patients at the time of diagnosis. Twenty unique ESR1 mutations were identified involving the ligand-binding domain, all in breast cancer samples from patients previously treated with endocrine therapy. The most frequent mutations were D538G (n = 22), Y537S (n = 7), and E380Q (n = 7). All breast cancer samples with an ESR1 mutation were ER-positive by immunohistochemistry. Review of the ER immunohistochemistry in the paired untreated primary tumor and treated tumor from 34 patients showed no detectable change in the ER-positive immunohistochemical status (median percentage of invasive tumor cells with nuclear staining: untreated primary tumor 90%, treated tumor 95%). We conclude that ESR1 mutations do not appreciably diminish ER-positive staining by immunohistochemistry. In addition to standard biomarker testing by immunohistochemistry, the assessment of ESR1 mutations by molecular testing can help guide the clinical management of patients with ER-positive breast cancer in the setting of endocrine resistance and progression of disease.

Collaboration


Dive into the Dara S. Ross's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ahmet Zehir

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marc Ladanyi

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Maria E. Arcila

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael F. Berger

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pedram Razavi

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

José Baselga

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David M. Hyman

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Edi Brogi

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bob T. Li

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Donavan T. Cheng

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge