Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where David A. Briscoe is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by David A. Briscoe.


Nature | 2004

Spatial scaling of microbial eukaryote diversity

Jessica L. Green; Andrew J. Holmes; Mark Westoby; Ian Oliver; David A. Briscoe; Mark Dangerfield; Michael R. Gillings; Andrew J. Beattie

Patterns in the spatial distribution of organisms provide important information about mechanisms that regulate the diversity of life and the complexity of ecosystems. Although microorganisms may comprise much of the Earths biodiversity and have critical roles in biogeochemistry and ecosystem functioning, little is known about their spatial diversification. Here we present quantitative estimates of microbial community turnover at local and regional scales using the largest spatially explicit microbial diversity data set available (> 106 sample pairs). Turnover rates were small across large geographical distances, of similar magnitude when measured within distinct habitats, and did not increase going from one vegetation type to another. The taxa–area relationship of these terrestrial microbial eukaryotes was relatively flat (slope z = 0.074) and consistent with those reported in aquatic habitats. This suggests that despite high local diversity, microorganisms may have only moderate regional diversity. We show how turnover patterns can be used to project taxa–area relationships up to whole continents. Taxa dissimilarities across continents and between them would strengthen these projections. Such data do not yet exist, but would be feasible to collect.


Archive | 2010

Introduction to Conservation Genetics: Frontmatter

Richard Frankham; Jonathan D. Ballou; David A. Briscoe

The biological diversity of the planet is being rapidly depleted due to the direct and indirect consequences of human activity. As the size of animal and plant populations decreases, loss of genetic diversity reduces their ability to adapt to changes in the environment, with inbreeding and reduced fitness inevitable consequences for most species. This textbook provides a clear and comprehensive introduction to genetic principles and practices involved in conservation. Topics covered include: • evolutionary genetics of natural populations • loss of genetic diversity in small populations • inbreeding and loss of fitness • population fragmentation • resolving taxonomic uncertainties • genetic management of threatened species • contributions of molecular genetics to conservation. The text is presented in an easy-to-follow format, with main points and terms clearly highlighted. Each chapter concludes with a concise summary, which, together with worked examples and problems and answers, illuminates the key principles covered. Text boxes containing interesting case studies and other additional information enrich the content throughout, and over 100 beautiful pen-and-ink drawings help bring the material to life.


Conservation Genetics | 2004

Does Inbreeding and Loss of Genetic Diversity Decrease Disease Resistance

Derek Spielman; Barry W. Brook; David A. Briscoe; Richard Frankham

Inbreeding and loss of genetic diversity are predicted to decrease the resistance of species to disease. However, this issue is controversial and there is limited rigorous scientific evidence available. To test whether inbreeding and loss of genetic diversity affect a hosts resistance to disease, Drosophila melanogasterpopulations with different levels of inbreeding and genetic diversity were exposed separately to (a) thuringiensin, an insecticidal toxin produced by some strains of Bacillus thuringiensis, and (b) live Serratia marcescensbacteria. Inbreeding and loss of genetic diversity significantly reduced resistance of D. melanogasterto both the thuringiensin toxin and live Serratia marcescens. For both, the best fitting relationships between resistance and inbreeding were curvilinear. As expected, there was wide variation among replicate inbred populations in disease resistance. Lowered resistances to both the toxin and the pathogen in inbred populations were due to specific resistance alleles, rather than generalized inbreeding effects, as correlations between resistance and population fitness were low or negative. Wildlife managers should strive to minimise inbreeding and loss of genetic diversity within threatened populations and to minimise exposure of inbred populations to disease.


Molecular Ecology | 2001

The impact of habitat fragmentation on dispersal of Cunningham’s skink (Egernia cunninghami): evidence from allelic and genotypic analyses of microsatellites

Adam J. Stow; Paul Sunnucks; David A. Briscoe; Michael G. Gardner

The effects of habitat fragmentation on processes within and among populations are important for conservation management. Despite a broad spectrum of lifestyles and the conservation significance of many reptiles, very little work on fine‐scale population genetics has been carried out on this group. This study examines the dispersal patterns of a rock crevice‐dwelling lizard, Cunningham’s skink (Egernia cunninghami), in a naturally vegetated reserve and an adjacent deforested site. Both genotypic and genic approaches were employed, using microsatellite loci. The spatial organization of individuals with respect to pairwise relatedness coefficients and allele frequencies, along with assignment tests, were used to infer dispersal characteristics for both sexes in a natural and a cleared area. The distribution of relatedness in both habitats was spatially structured, with E. cunninghami showing high pairwise relatedness within their rocky retreat sites. Analysis of relatedness over different spatial scales, spatial autocorrelation of alleles and assignment tests, all indicated that both sexes in the cleared area show less dispersal than their counterparts in the reserve. Furthermore, deforestation may inhibit female dispersal to a greater extent than that of males. The geographical structuring of allele frequencies for adults in the cleared area, but not the reserve, indicates that habitat fragmentation has the potential to alter at least the microevolution of E. cunninghami populations.


Conservation Genetics | 2003

Effects of intense versus diffuse population bottlenecks on microsatellite genetic diversity and evolutionary potential

Graham H.R. Osler; Lynn M. Woodworth; Margaret E. Montgomery; David A. Briscoe; Richard Frankham

Population bottlenecks occur frequently inthreatened species and result in loss ofgenetic diversity and evolutionary potential.These may range in severity between shortintense bottlenecks, and more diffusebottlenecks over many generations. However,there is little information on the impacts ofdifferent types of bottlenecks and disagreementas to their likely impacts. To resolve thisissue, we subjected replicate Drosophilapopulations to intense bottlenecks, consistingof one pair over a single generation, versusdiffuse bottlenecks consisting of an effectivesize of 100 over 57 generations. The intenseand diffuse bottlenecks were designed to induceidentical losses of heterozygosity. However,computer simulations showed that theprobability of retaining alleles is lower inthe intense than the diffuse bottlenecktreatment. The effects of these bottlenecks ongenetic diversity at nine microsatellite lociin Drosophila were evaluated. Bottleneckssubstantially reduced allelic diversity,heterozygosity and proportion of locipolymorphic, changed allele frequencydistributions and resulted in large differencesamong replicate populations. Allelic diversity,scaled by heterozygosity, was lower in theintense than the diffuse treatments. Short-termevolutionary potential, measured as the abilityof bottlenecked populations to cope withincreasing concentrations of NaCl, did notdiffer between the intense and diffusebottlenecked populations. The effects ofbottlenecks on short-term evolutionarypotential relate to loss of heterozygosity,rather than allelic diversity.


Archive | 2004

A Primer of Conservation Genetics by Richard Frankham

Richard Frankham; Jonathan D. Ballou; David A. Briscoe; Karina H. McInnes

Preface Take home messages 1. Introduction 2. Genetic diversity 3. Evolutionary genetics of natural populations 4. Genetic consequences of small population size 5. Genetics and extinction 6. Resolving taxonomic uncertainties and defining management units 7. Genetic management of endangered species in the wild 8. Captive breeding and reintroduction 9. Molecular genetics in forensics and understanding species biology Final messages Glossary Sources and copyright acknowledgments Index.


Archive | 2004

A Primer of Conservation Genetics: Frontmatter

Richard Frankham; Jonathan D. Ballou; David A. Briscoe; Karina H. McInnes

Preface Take home messages 1. Introduction 2. Genetic diversity 3. Evolutionary genetics of natural populations 4. Genetic consequences of small population size 5. Genetics and extinction 6. Resolving taxonomic uncertainties and defining management units 7. Genetic management of endangered species in the wild 8. Captive breeding and reintroduction 9. Molecular genetics in forensics and understanding species biology Final messages Glossary Sources and copyright acknowledgments Index.


Conservation Genetics | 2003

Inbreeding and extinction: Effects of rate of inbreeding

David H. Reed; Edwin H. Lowe; David A. Briscoe; Richard Frankham

Deleterious alleles may be removed (purged) bynatural selection in populations undergoinginbreeding. However, there is controversyregarding the effectiveness of selection inreducing the risk of extinction due toinbreeding, especially in relation to the rateof inbreeding. We evaluated the effect of therate of inbreeding on reducing extinction risk,in populations of Drosophila melanogastermaintained using full-sib mating (160replicates), or at effective population sizes(Ne) of 10 (80) or 20 (80).Extinction rates in the populations maintainedusing full-sib mating occurred at lower levelsof inbreeding than in the larger populations,whereas the two larger populations did notdiffer significantly from each other.Inbreeding coefficients at 50% extinction were0.62, 0.79 and 0.77 for the full-sib (Ne = 2.6), Ne = 10 and Ne = 20 treatments, respectively. Populations of Ne = 20 that remained extant after 60 generations, showed inbreeding depression, with the mean fitness of these populations being only 45% of the outbredcontrols. There was considerable variationamong the 31 inbred populations in fitness, butnone of the Ne = 20 populations hadfitness that was higher than the outbredcontrol. We conclude that purging may slow therate of extinction slightly, but it cannot berelied on to eliminate the deleterious effectsof inbreeding.


Conservation Genetics | 2002

Inbreeding and extinction: The effect of environmental stress and lineage

David H. Reed; David A. Briscoe; Richard Frankham

Human activities are simultaneously decreasing the size of wildlife populations (causing inbreeding) and increasing the level of stress that wildlife populations must face. Inbreeding reduces population fitness and increases extinction risk. However, very little information on the impact of stressful environments on extinction risk under inbreeding is available. We evaluated the impact of full sib inbreeding on extinction risk, using Drosophila melanogaster, in a benign and three stressful environments. The three stressful environments involved the addition to the medium of copper sulfate, methanol or alternating copper sulfate and methanol. There were 128 replicate populations for each of the four treatments. Under inbreeding, extinction rates were significantly higher in all three stressful environments compared with the benign environment. The percent extinct at generation eight (F = 0.826) for the four treatments were: 62.5% in the benign environment, 75.8%in the copper sulfate environment, 82.8% in the methanol environment, and 83.6% in the variable stress environment. However, the extinction rate in the variable stress environment did not differ significantly from the constant stress environments. Highly significant differences, among lineages, in extinction risk were detected. The results of this study indicate that wild populations are more vulnerable to inbreeding than indicated by extrapolation from captive environments.


Evolution | 2003

FITNESS AND ADAPTATION IN A NOVEL ENVIRONMENT: EFFECT OF INBREEDING, PRIOR ENVIRONMENT, AND LINEAGE

David H. Reed; Edwin H. Lowe; David A. Briscoe; Richard Frankham

Abstract. The ability of populations to undergo adaptive evolution depends on the presence of genetic variation for ecologically important traits. The maintenance of genetic variation may be influenced by many variables, particularly long‐term effective population size and the strength and form of selection. The roles of these factors are controversial and there is very little information on their impacts for quantitative characters. The aims of this study were to determine the impacts of population size and variable versus constant prior environmental conditions on fitness and the magnitude of response to selection. Outbred and inbred populations of Drosophila melanogaster were maintained under benign, constant stressful, and variably stressful conditions for seven generations, and then forced to adapt to a novel stress for seven generations. Fitness and adaptability were assayed in each replicate population. Our findings are that: (1) populations inbred in a variable environment were more adaptable than those inbred in a constant environment; (2) populations adapted to a prior stressful environment had greater fitness when reared in a novel stress than those less adapted to stress; (3) inbred populations had lower fitness and were less adaptable than the outbred population they were derived from; and (4) strong lineage effects were detectable across environments in the inbred populations.

Collaboration


Dive into the David A. Briscoe's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge