David R. Pearson
Ball State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by David R. Pearson.
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise | 1999
Jeff S. Volek; Noel D. Duncan; Scott A. Mazzetti; Robert S. Staron; Margot Putukian; Ana L. Gómez; David R. Pearson; W. J. Fink; William J. Kraemer
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of creatine supplementation in conjunction with resistance training on physiological adaptations including muscle fiber hypertrophy and muscle creatine accumulation. METHODS Nineteen healthy resistance-trained men were matched and then randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion to either a creatine (N = 10) or placebo (N = 9) group. Periodized heavy resistance training was performed for 12 wk. Creatine or placebo capsules were consumed (25 g x d(-1)) for 1 wk followed by a maintenance dose (5 g x d(-1)) for the remainder of the training. RESULTS After 12 wk, significant (P < or = 0.05) increases in body mass and fat-free mass were greater in creatine (6.3% and 6.3%, respectively) than placebo (3.6% and 3.1%, respectively) subjects. After 12 wk, increases in bench press and squat were greater in creatine (24% and 32%, respectively) than placebo (16% and 24%, respectively) subjects. Compared with placebo subjects, creatine subjects demonstrated significantly greater increases in Type I (35% vs 11%), IIA (36% vs 15%), and IIAB (35% vs 6%) muscle fiber cross-sectional areas. Muscle total creatine concentrations were unchanged in placebo subjects. Muscle creatine was significantly elevated after 1 wk in creatine subjects (22%), and values remained significantly greater than placebo subjects after 12 wk. Average volume lifted in the bench press during training was significantly greater in creatine subjects during weeks 5-8. No negative side effects to the supplementation were reported. CONCLUSION Creatine supplementation enhanced fat-free mass, physical performance, and muscle morphology in response to heavy resistance training, presumably mediated via higher quality training sessions.
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise | 1990
David D. Pascoe; D. L. Costill; Robert A. Robergs; Jacqueline A. Davis; W. J. Fink; David R. Pearson
The purpose of this study was to examine differences in muscle glycogen storage during three successive days of running or cycling. In a crossover design, seven male subjects performed two 3-d trials of either running (trial R) or cycling (trial C) for 60 min at 75% VO2max. Biopsy samples were obtained before and after each days exercise from the gastrocnemius (trial R) or vastus lateralis (trial C) muscle. Diets in the 2 d preceding and during each trial contained 5 g carbohydrate.kg-1.d-1 and 14,475 +/- 402 kJ.d-1. Mean pre-exercise glycogen content (mmol.kg-1 wet wt.) was significantly reduced in both trials on day 3 (103.4 +/- 6.0) when compared to day 1 and day 2 (119.9 +/- 6.8 and 116.4 +/- 5.7, respectively). Day 1 glycogen reduction was significantly greater in trial C (P less than 0.03), and glycogen restorage was greater (P less than 0.02) only in trial C between the 1st and 2nd d. On day 3, spectrophotometric analysis of PAS strains showed that pre-exercise glycogen content in either muscle group was significantly (P less than 0.01) less in Type I as compared to Type II fibers. This difference in fiber glycogen storage did not appear to be attributable to muscle damage as negligible leukocyte infiltration and low blood CK levels were obtained. No difference between modes were observed for CK values throughout the trials. These data suggest that the depressed glycogen storage before the 3rd d of exercise was due to the moderate carbohydrate intake.
Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports | 2007
Scott Trappe; D. L. Costill; B. H. Goodpaster; David R. Pearson
The purpose of this investigation was to examine calf muscle strength and cross‐sectional area in 29 middle‐aged men (current mean=48.4±3.1 years) who had significant differences in their physical activity levels. These men were initially evaluated to determine the physiological requirements for successful distance running in the late 1960s at a time when they were all considered elite distance runners. Based on their training regimens in the interim between testing, subjects were described as highly trained (HI; n=10), fitness trained (FIT; n=12), or untrained (UT; n=7). In addition, an aged‐matched sedentary group (CON; n=7) was tested. Each subject was evaluated for Vo2max plantar flexion calf muscle strength and cross‐sectional area (CSA) of the lower leg (gastrocnemius and soleus). Muscle CSA was determined by computed tomography, whereas calf strength measurements were made using a specially designed leg restraint system and an isokinetic dynamometer. There were no significant differences in plantar flexion strength (at 60 and 180°/s) or CSA of the gastrocnemius and soleus muscles among the groups. Calf muscle strength per CSA was also similar at both test velocities for all groups. These data demonstrate that middle‐aged distance runners who have continued to run at a relatively high level for 20–25 years have similar calf muscle CSA and strength compared with aged‐matched males who run significantly less or not at all.
Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology | 2003
Stephen P. Coburn; Douglas W. Townsend; Karen L. Ericson; Robert D. Reynolds; P J Ziegler; D. L. Costill; J. Dennis Mahuren; W E Schaltenbrand; T A Pauly; Yao Wang; W. J. Fink; David R. Pearson; David L. Hachey
The significance and relevance of the topics being discussed in this text is under scored by Westerhoff’s (2000) suggestion that biochemistry is poised to make major advances in this century, similar to those made in physics in the 20th century. He anticipates that, to understand the nonlinear kinetic interactions between molecules and interpret the vast quantities of data becoming available, biochemistry may soon become as computation-intensive as elementary particle physics. The papers in this book should contribute to that process.
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research | 2006
Robert U. Newton; Aimee Gerber; Sophia Nimphius; Jae K. Shim; B K. Doan; Mike Robertson; David R. Pearson; Bruce W. Craig; Keijo Häkkinen; W. J. Kraemer
Journal of Applied Physiology | 1990
D. L. Costill; David D. Pascoe; W. J. Fink; Robert A. Robergs; S. I. Barr; David R. Pearson
Journal of Applied Physiology | 1989
J. B. Mitchell; D. L. Costill; J. A. Houmard; W. J. Fink; David D. Pascoe; David R. Pearson
Journal of Applied Physiology | 1995
Scott Trappe; D. L. Costill; W. J. Fink; David R. Pearson
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research | 2010
Carwyn P M Sharp; David R. Pearson
Strength and Conditioning Journal | 2000
David R. Pearson; Avery D. Faigenbaum; Mike Conley; William J. Kraemer