Diego Antonio Bittencourt Marconatto
Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Hotspot
Dive into the research topics where Diego Antonio Bittencourt Marconatto is active.
Publication
Featured researches published by Diego Antonio Bittencourt Marconatto.
RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie | 2013
Diego Antonio Bittencourt Marconatto; Marcelo Trevisan; Eugenio Avila Pedrozo; Kleiton Douglas Saggin; Valdecir José Zonin
ABSTRACT The sustainable development is entrenched. Your field is characterized by con-flicting visions and interests that provide feedback for its fragmentation in two main ideological groups which oppose one another. In one trench are the bio-centered, who advocate for the prioritization of natural resources preservation over socio-economic systems; the other trench is occupied by the antropocente-red, moved by the belief that Nature exists to serve men and that market growth and technological evolution are enough to create sustainability. This loggerheads makes more difficult to construct a common vision for sustainable development, what results in slow advancement, if not in regress for a bigger equilibrium between economy, society and environment all over the world. Then there is the necessity to reduce the gap between these two vision, so that will make room for actions and politics towards a viable sustainable development. This paper aims: to propose a new conceptual perspective for sustainable analyses and decision, which allows a closer approach of both visions. From a “general map”, where we track biocentered and antropocentered actors in opposite fields, we begin the construction of the conceptual model. The industrial ecology perspective is integrated to the stakeholders theory and to the Mauerhofer’s (2008) 3-D sustai-nability for the construction of it, which is conceived to reflect instrinsic sustaina-ble development characteristics and it works as a closed circuit, retrofitted. This model fulfills this paper’s objective and is its main contribuition. We suggest the following advancements: 1. the model operation development and its ulterior application over the biocentered and antropocentered main demands, present in the diverse discussion forums; and 2. the model adaptation to specific industries.
RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie | 2013
Diego Antonio Bittencourt Marconatto; Marcelo Trevisan; Eugenio Avila Pedrozo; Kleiton Douglas Saggin; Valdecir José Zonin
ABSTRACT The sustainable development is entrenched. Your field is characterized by con-flicting visions and interests that provide feedback for its fragmentation in two main ideological groups which oppose one another. In one trench are the bio-centered, who advocate for the prioritization of natural resources preservation over socio-economic systems; the other trench is occupied by the antropocente-red, moved by the belief that Nature exists to serve men and that market growth and technological evolution are enough to create sustainability. This loggerheads makes more difficult to construct a common vision for sustainable development, what results in slow advancement, if not in regress for a bigger equilibrium between economy, society and environment all over the world. Then there is the necessity to reduce the gap between these two vision, so that will make room for actions and politics towards a viable sustainable development. This paper aims: to propose a new conceptual perspective for sustainable analyses and decision, which allows a closer approach of both visions. From a “general map”, where we track biocentered and antropocentered actors in opposite fields, we begin the construction of the conceptual model. The industrial ecology perspective is integrated to the stakeholders theory and to the Mauerhofer’s (2008) 3-D sustai-nability for the construction of it, which is conceived to reflect instrinsic sustaina-ble development characteristics and it works as a closed circuit, retrofitted. This model fulfills this paper’s objective and is its main contribuition. We suggest the following advancements: 1. the model operation development and its ulterior application over the biocentered and antropocentered main demands, present in the diverse discussion forums; and 2. the model adaptation to specific industries.
Journal of Cleaner Production | 2016
Diego Antonio Bittencourt Marconatto; Luciano Barin-Cruz; Marlei Pozzebon; Jean-Emmanuel Poitras
Journal of Cleaner Production | 2016
Diego Antonio Bittencourt Marconatto; Luciano Barin Cruz; Eugenio Avila Pedrozo
Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Desenvolvimento Regional | 2013
Diego Antonio Bittencourt Marconatto; Eugenio Avila Pedrozo
Revista de Administração Mackenzie (Mackenzie Management Review) | 2017
Claudia Cristina Bitencourt; Diego Antonio Bittencourt Marconatto; Luciano Barin Cruz; Emmanuel Raufflet
Academy of Management Proceedings | 2017
Diego Antonio Bittencourt Marconatto; Luciano Barin Cruz; Eugenio Avila Pedrozo
Revista Brasileira de Casos de Ensino em Administração | 2016
Diego Antonio Bittencourt Marconatto; Luciano Barin Cruz
Revista Brasileira de Casos de Ensino em Administração | 2016
Diego Antonio Bittencourt Marconatto; Luciano Barin Cruz
RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie | 2016
Claudia Cristina Bitencourt; Diego Antonio Bittencourt Marconatto; Luciano Barin Cruz; Emmanuel Raufflet