Don Conroy
University of Cambridge
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Don Conroy.
Lancet Oncology | 2012
Gillian C. Barnett; Charlotte E. Coles; Rebecca Elliott; Caroline Baynes; Craig Luccarini; Don Conroy; Jennifer S. Wilkinson; Jonathan Tyrer; Vivek Misra; Radka Platte; S. Gulliford; Matthew R. Sydes; Emma Hall; Søren M. Bentzen; David P. Dearnaley; N.G. Burnet; Paul Pharoah; Alison M. Dunning; Catharine M L West
BACKGROUND Several studies have reported associations between radiation toxicity and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in candidate genes. Few associations have been tested in independent validation studies. This prospective study aimed to validate reported associations between genotype and radiation toxicity in a large independent dataset. METHODS 92 (of 98 attempted) SNPs in 46 genes were successfully genotyped in 1613 patients: 976 received adjuvant breast radiotherapy in the Cambridge breast IMRT trial (ISRCTN21474421, n=942) or in a prospective study of breast toxicity at the Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK (n=34). A further 637 received radical prostate radiotherapy in the MRC RT01 multicentre trial (ISRCTN47772397, n=224) or in the Conventional or Hypofractionated High Dose Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer (CHHiP) trial (ISRCTN97182923, n=413). Late toxicity was assessed 2 years after radiotherapy with a validated photographic technique (patients with breast cancer only), clinical assessment, and patient questionnaires. Association tests of genotype with overall radiation toxicity score and individual endpoints were undertaken in univariate and multivariable analyses. At a type I error rate adjusted for multiple testing, this study had 99% power to detect a SNP, with minor allele frequency of 0·35, associated with a per allele odds ratio of 2·2. FINDINGS None of the previously reported associations were confirmed by this study, after adjustment for multiple comparisons. The p value distribution of the SNPs tested against overall toxicity score was not different from that expected by chance. INTERPRETATION We did not replicate previously reported late toxicity associations, suggesting that we can essentially exclude the hypothesis that published SNPs individually exert a clinically relevant effect. Continued recruitment of patients into studies within the Radiogenomics Consortium is essential so that sufficiently powered studies can be done and methodological challenges addressed. FUNDING Cancer Research UK, The Royal College of Radiologists, Addenbrookes Charitable Trust, Breast Cancer Campaign, Cambridge National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre, Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, East Midlands Innovation, the National Cancer Institute, Joseph Mitchell Trust, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Institute of Cancer Research NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Cancer.
Human Molecular Genetics | 2013
Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Edward J. Saunders; Daniel Leongamornlert; Malgorzata Tymrakiewicz; Tokhir Dadaev; Sarah Jugurn-Little; Helen Ross-Adams; Ali Amin Al Olama; Sara Benlloch; Silvia Halim; Roslin Russel; Alison M. Dunning; Craig Luccarini; Joe Dennis; David E. Neal; Freddie C. Hamdy; Jenny Donovan; Kenneth Muir; Graham G. Giles; Gianluca Severi; Fredrik Wiklund; Henrik Grönberg; Christopher A. Haiman; Fredrick R. Schumacher; Brian E. Henderson; Loic Le Marchand; Sara Lindström; Peter Kraft; David J. Hunter; Susan M. Gapstur
Associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at 5p15 and multiple cancer types have been reported. We have previously shown evidence for a strong association between prostate cancer (PrCa) risk and rs2242652 at 5p15, intronic in the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) gene that encodes TERT. To comprehensively evaluate the association between genetic variation across this region and PrCa, we performed a fine-mapping analysis by genotyping 134 SNPs using a custom Illumina iSelect array or Sequenom MassArray iPlex, followed by imputation of 1094 SNPs in 22 301 PrCa cases and 22 320 controls in The PRACTICAL consortium. Multiple stepwise logistic regression analysis identified four signals in the promoter or intronic regions of TERT that independently associated with PrCa risk. Gene expression analysis of normal prostate tissue showed evidence that SNPs within one of these regions also associated with TERT expression, providing a potential mechanism for predisposition to disease.
Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2014
Gillian C. Barnett; Deborah Thompson; Laura Fachal; Sarah L. Kerns; Christopher J. Talbot; Rebecca Elliott; Leila Dorling; Charlotte E. Coles; David P. Dearnaley; Barry S. Rosenstein; Ana Vega; Paul Symonds; John Yarnold; Caroline Baynes; Kyriaki Michailidou; Joe Dennis; Jonathan Tyrer; Jennifer S. Wilkinson; Antonio Gómez-Caamaño; George A. Tanteles; Radka Platte; Rebecca Mayes; Don Conroy; Mel Maranian; Craig Luccarini; S. Gulliford; Matthew R. Sydes; Emma Hall; Joanne Haviland; Vivek Misra
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE This study was designed to identify common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with toxicity 2years after radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS A genome wide association study was performed in 1850 patients from the RAPPER study: 1217 received adjuvant breast radiotherapy and 633 had radical prostate radiotherapy. Genotype associations with both overall and individual endpoints of toxicity were tested via univariable and multivariable regression. Replication of potentially associated SNPs was carried out in three independent patient cohorts who had radiotherapy for prostate (516 RADIOGEN and 862 Gene-PARE) or breast (355 LeND) cancer. RESULTS Quantile-quantile plots show more associations at the P<5×10(-7) level than expected by chance (164 vs. 9 for the prostate cases and 29 vs. 4 for breast cases), providing evidence that common genetic variants are associated with risk of toxicity. Strongest associations were for individual endpoints rather than an overall measure of toxicity in all patients. However, in general, significant associations were not validated at a nominal 0.05 level in the replication cohorts. CONCLUSIONS This largest GWAS to date provides evidence of true association between common genetic variants and toxicity. Associations with toxicity appeared to be tumour site-specific. Future GWAS require higher statistical power, in particular in the validation stage, to test clinically relevant effect sizes of SNP associations with individual endpoints, but the required sample sizes are achievable.
British Journal of Cancer | 2006
Patrick R Benusiglio; Paul Pharoah; Paula Smith; Fabienne Lesueur; Don Conroy; Robert Luben; G Dew; Clare Jordan; Alison M. Dunning; Doug Easton; B A J Ponder
ERBB2 is frequently amplified in breast tumours as part of a wide region of amplification on chromosome 17q21. This amplicon contains many candidate genes for breast cancer susceptibility. We used a genetic association study design to determine if common genetic variation (frequency ⩾5%) in a 400-kb region surrounding ERBB2 and containing the PPARBP, CRK7, NEUROD2, PPP1R1B, STARD3, TCAP, PNMT, CAB2, ERBB2, C17ORF37, GRB7 and ZNFN1A3 genes, was associated with breast cancer risk. Sixteen tagging single-nucleotide polymorphisms (tSNPs) selected within blocks of linkage disequilibrium from the HapMap database, one HapMap singleton SNP, and six additional SNPs randomly selected from dbSNP were genotyped using Taqman in a large study set of British women (2275 cases, 2280 controls). We observed no association between any of the genotypes or associated haplotypes and disease risk. In order to simulate unidentified SNPs, we performed the leave-one-out cross-validation procedure on the HapMap data; over 90% of the common genetic variation was well represented by tagging polymorphisms. We are therefore likely to have tagged any common variants present in our population. In summary, we found no association between common genetic variation in the 17q21 ERBB2 amplicon and breast cancer risk in British women.
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | 2011
Amanda B. Spurdle; Louise Marquart; Lesley McGuffog; Sue Healey; Olga M. Sinilnikova; Fei Wan; Xiaoqing Chen; Jonathan Beesley; Christian F. Singer; Anne Catharine Dressler; Daphne Gschwantler-Kaulich; Joanne L. Blum; Nadine Tung; Jeff Weitzel; Henry T. Lynch; Judy Garber; Douglas F. Easton; Susan Peock; Margaret Cook; Clare Oliver; Debra Frost; Don Conroy; D. Gareth Evans; Fiona Lalloo; Ros Eeles; Louise Izatt; Rosemarie Davidson; Carol Chu; Diana Eccles; Christina G. Selkirk
Background: Inherited BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutations confer elevated breast cancer risk. Knowledge of factors that can improve breast cancer risk assessment in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers may improve personalized cancer prevention strategies. Methods: A cohort of 5,546 BRCA1 and 2,865 BRCA2 mutation carriers was used to evaluate risk of breast cancer associated with BARD1 Cys557Ser. In a second nonindependent cohort of 1,537 of BRCA1 and 839 BRCA2 mutation carriers, BARD1 haplotypes were also evaluated. Results: The BARD1 Cys557Ser variant was not significantly associated with risk of breast cancer from single SNP analysis, with a pooled effect estimate of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.71–1.15) in BRCA1 carriers and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.59–1.29) in BRCA2 carriers. Further analysis of haplotypes at BARD1 also revealed no evidence that additional common genetic variation not captured by Cys557Ser was associated with breast cancer risk. Conclusion: Evidence to date does not support a role for BARD1 variation, including the Cy557Ser variant, as a modifier of risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Impact: Interactors of BRCA1/2 have been implicated as modifiers of BRCA1/2-associated cancer risk. Our finding that BARD1 does not contribute to this risk modification may focus research on other genes that do modify BRCA1/2-associated cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 20(5); 1032–8. ©2011 AACR.
Journal of Medical Genetics | 2017
Brennan Decker; Jamie Allen; Craig Luccarini; Karen A. Pooley; Mitul Shah; Manjeet K. Bolla; Qin Wang; Shahana Ahmed; Caroline Baynes; Don Conroy; Judith E. Brown; Robert Luben; Elaine A. Ostrander; Paul Pharoah; Alison M. Dunning; Douglas F. Easton
Background Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy in women and has a major heritable component. The risks associated with most rare susceptibility variants are not well estimated. To better characterise the contribution of variants in ATM, CHEK2, PALB2 and XRCC2, we sequenced their coding regions in 13 087 BC cases and 5488 controls from East Anglia, UK. Methods Gene coding regions were enriched via PCR, sequenced, variant called and filtered for quality. ORs for BC risk were estimated separately for carriers of truncating variants and of rare missense variants, which were further subdivided by functional domain and pathogenicity as predicted by four in silico algorithms. Results Truncating variants in PALB2 (OR=4.69, 95% CI 2.27 to 9.68), ATM (OR=3.26; 95% CI 1.82 to 6.46) and CHEK2 (OR=3.11; 95% CI 2.15 to 4.69), but not XRCC2 (OR=0.94; 95% CI 0.26 to 4.19) were associated with increased BC risk. Truncating variants in ATM and CHEK2 were more strongly associated with risk of oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive than ER-negative disease, while those in PALB2 were associated with similar risks for both subtypes. There was also some evidence that missense variants in ATM, CHEK2 and PALB2 may contribute to BC risk, but larger studies are necessary to quantify the magnitude of this effect. Conclusions Truncating variants in PALB2 are associated with a higher risk of BC than those in ATM or CHEK2. A substantial risk of BC due to truncating XRCC2 variants can be excluded.
Journal of Medical Genetics | 2018
Wei Xiong Wen; Jamie Allen; Kah Nyin Lai; Shivaani Mariapun; Siti Norhidayu Hasan; Pei Sze Ng; Daphne Shin-Chi Lee; Sheau Yee Lee; Sook-Yee Yoon; Joanna Lim; Shao Yan Lau; Brennan Decker; Karen A. Pooley; Leila Dorling; Craig Luccarini; Caroline Baynes; Don Conroy; Patricia Harrington; Jacques Simard; Cheng Har Yip; Nur Aishah Taib; Weang Kee Ho; Antonis C. Antoniou; Alison M. Dunning; Douglas F. Easton; Soo Hwang Teo
Background Genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 is offered typically to selected women based on age of onset and family history of cancer. However, current internationally accepted genetic testing referral guidelines are built mostly on data from cancer genetics clinics in women of European descent. To evaluate the appropriateness of such guidelines in Asians, we have determined the prevalence of germ line variants in an unselected cohort of Asian patients with breast cancer and healthy controls. Methods Germ line DNA from a hospital-based study of 2575 unselected patients with breast cancer and 2809 healthy controls were subjected to amplicon-based targeted sequencing of exonic and proximal splice site junction regions of BRCA1 and BRCA2 using the Fluidigm Access Array system, with sequencing conducted on a Illumina HiSeq2500 platform. Variant calling was performed with GATK UnifiedGenotyper and were validated by Sanger sequencing. Results Fifty-five (2.1%) BRCA1 and 66 (2.6%) BRCA2 deleterious mutations were identified among patients with breast cancer and five (0.18%) BRCA1 and six (0.21%) BRCA2 mutations among controls. One thousand one hundred and eighty-six (46%) patients and 97 (80%) carriers fulfilled the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for genetic testing. Conclusion Five per cent of unselected Asian patients with breast cancer carry deleterious variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2. While current referral guidelines identified the majority of carriers, one in two patients would be referred for genetic services. Given that such services are largely unavailable in majority of low-resource settings in Asia, our study highlights the need for more efficient guidelines to identify at-risk individuals in Asia.
Scientific Reports | 2018
Bo Gao; Yi Lu; Annemieke J.M. Nieuweboer; Hongmei Xu; Jonathan Beesley; Ingrid A. Boere; Anne Joy M. de Graan; Peter de Bruijn; Howard Gurney; Catherine J. Kennedy; Yoke Eng Chiew; Sharon E. Johnatty; Philip Beale; Michelle Harrison; Craig Luccarini; Don Conroy; Ron H.J. Mathijssen; Paul Harnett; Rosemary L. Balleine; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Stuart MacGregor; Anna de Fazio
Identifying single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that influence chemotherapy disposition may help to personalize cancer treatment and limit toxicity. Genome-wide approaches are unbiased, compared with candidate gene studies, but usually require large cohorts. As most chemotherapy is given cyclically multiple blood sampling is required to adequately define drug disposition, limiting patient recruitment. We found that carboplatin and paclitaxel disposition are stable phenotypes in ovarian cancer patients and tested a genome-wide association study (GWAS) design to identify SNPs associated with chemotherapy disposition. We found highly significant SNPs in ABCC2, a known carboplatin transporter, associated with carboplatin clearance (asymptotic P = 5.2 × 106, empirical P = 1.4 × 10−5), indicating biological plausibility. We also identified novel SNPs associated with paclitaxel disposition, including rs17130142 with genome-wide significance (asymptotic P = 2.0 × 10−9, empirical P = 1.3 × 10−7). Although requiring further validation, our work demonstrated that GWAS of chemotherapeutic drug disposition can be effective, even in relatively small cohorts, and can be adopted in drug development and treatment programs.
Archive | 2017
Brennan Decker; Jamie Allen; Craig Luccarini; Karen A. Pooley; Mitulkumar Nandlal Shah; Manjeet K. Bolla; Qin Wang; Shahana Ahmed; Caroline Baynes; Don Conroy; Judith Brown; Robert Luben; Elaine A. Ostrander; Paul D. P. Pharoah; Alison M. Dunning; Douglas F. Easton
BD is a student in the NIH-Cambridge Scholars Program. BD and EAO were supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Human Genome Research Institute. SEARCH is funded by a programme grant from Cancer Research UK (C490/A10124) and supported by the UK National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at the University of Cambridge. Targeted sequencing in SEARCH was supported by Cancer Research UK grants C1287/A16563 to DFE and C8197/A16565 to AMD.
Carcinogenesis | 2006
Arancha Cebrián; Paul Pharoah; Shahana Ahmed; Santiago Ropero; Mario F. Fraga; Paula Smith; Don Conroy; Robert Luben; Barbara Perkins; Douglas F. Easton; Alison M. Dunning; Manel Esteller; Bruce A.J. Ponder