Donald L. Libby

Death rate variation in US subpopulations

OBJECTIVE To account for variations in death rates in population subgroups of the USA. METHODS Factors associated with age-adjusted death rates in 366 metropolitan and non- metropolitan areas of the United States were examined for 1990-92. The rates ranged from 690 to 1108 per 100 000 population (mean = 885 +/- 78 per 100 000). FINDINGS Least squares regression analysis explained 71% of this variance. Factors with the strongest independent positive association were ethnicity (African-American), less than a high school education, high Medicare expenditures, and location in western or southern regions. Factors with the strongest independent negative associations were employment in agriculture and forestry, ethnicity (Hispanic) and per capita income. CONCLUSION Additional research at the individual level is needed to determine if these associations are causal, since some of the factors with the strongest associations, such as education, have long latency periods.

Nursing drives interdisciplinary health care workforce planning in Wisconsin: One state's experience

The Consortium for Primary Care in Wisconsin convened a forum to develop an interdisciplinary primary care workforce plan to address issues related to the supply of and demand for primary health care providers in Wisconsin. Nursing leaders played a pivotal role in making this effort successful and in ensuring that the focus would be on all primary health care professionals, not just physicians. This process used a primary care workforce planning tool (IRM) developed by the Bureau of Health Professions, U.S. Public Health Service which allowed Wisconsin to (1) examine its own workforce needs with data produced in Wisconsin, (2) compare the states situation with national trends, and (3) include these data and projections in a cooperative process for state-level planning for interdisciplinary workforce development. The Bureau has encouraged other states and organizations to adopt a similar strategy through a series of IRM workshops in which the Wisconsin process serves as a model for training materials developed for these workshops. The Wisconsin planning process is an innovative model for other states to follow in facilitating workforce development and serves to encourage other states to share their experiences in the academic literature.

The Feasibility of Consortia for Internal Medicine Graduate Medical Education: Perspectives from a Survey of Residency Directors.

PURPOSE: To assess the perspectives of internal medicine (IM) residency directors on issues that might determine the feasibility of consortia for IM graduate medical education (GME). METHOD: A self-administered questionnaire was mailed to all 413 U.S. IM program directors in June 1994. Of the 413 IM programs, 215 were located in community hospitals; 123 in university hospitals; and 75 in municipal, Veterans Administration, or military hospitals, or hospitals associated with multispecialty clinics (“other”). The questionnaire elicited responses concerning (1) perspectives on the quality of academic affiliations, (2) experience with formal institutional collaboration on GME issues and projection of consortium success, and (3) possible barriers to the success of consortia. Data were analyzed by comparing responses from the three program categories. RESULTS: In all, 330 (80%) program directors responded. Two-thirds reported ongoing academic affiliations. A larger percentage of university program directors considered these ties to be strong and advantageous than did their colleagues in community or other hospitals, who also considered their affiliations to be less equitable and less mutually trusting. Only 31% of community and university programs and 40% of other programs reported any prior experience with institutional collaboration on GME issues. A high percentage of those respondents considered these collaborative experiences to be successful and were optimistic about the projected success of consortia. Of seven possible barriers to consortium success, competition, governance, bureaucracy, and mistrust were most often perceived as major barriers. CONCLUSION: The data appear to indicate some optimism for the prospects of GME consortia, thereby supporting their feasibility for IM GME. Although many respondents perceived barriers to success, such perceptions were less common among program directors who had had direct experience with previous collaborative efforts. Nevertheless, these barriers may require attention if consortia are to succeed in achieving their many possible advantages.