Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Edward H. Kennedy is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Edward H. Kennedy.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2014

Rate of false conviction of criminal defendants who are sentenced to death

Samuel R. Gross; Barbara O'Brien; Chen Hu; Edward H. Kennedy

Significance The rate of erroneous conviction of innocent criminal defendants is often described as not merely unknown but unknowable. We use survival analysis to model this effect, and estimate that if all death-sentenced defendants remained under sentence of death indefinitely at least 4.1% would be exonerated. We conclude that this is a conservative estimate of the proportion of false conviction among death sentences in the United States. The rate of erroneous conviction of innocent criminal defendants is often described as not merely unknown but unknowable. There is no systematic method to determine the accuracy of a criminal conviction; if there were, these errors would not occur in the first place. As a result, very few false convictions are ever discovered, and those that are discovered are not representative of the group as a whole. In the United States, however, a high proportion of false convictions that do come to light and produce exonerations are concentrated among the tiny minority of cases in which defendants are sentenced to death. This makes it possible to use data on death row exonerations to estimate the overall rate of false conviction among death sentences. The high rate of exoneration among death-sentenced defendants appears to be driven by the threat of execution, but most death-sentenced defendants are removed from death row and resentenced to life imprisonment, after which the likelihood of exoneration drops sharply. We use survival analysis to model this effect, and estimate that if all death-sentenced defendants remained under sentence of death indefinitely, at least 4.1% would be exonerated. We conclude that this is a conservative estimate of the proportion of false conviction among death sentences in the United States.


Journal of The Royal Statistical Society Series B-statistical Methodology | 2017

Non‐parametric methods for doubly robust estimation of continuous treatment effects

Edward H. Kennedy; Zongming Ma; Matthew D. McHugh; Dylan S. Small

Continuous treatments (e.g., doses) arise often in practice, but many available causal effect estimators are limited by either requiring parametric models for the effect curve, or by not allowing doubly robust covariate adjustment. We develop a novel kernel smoothing approach that requires only mild smoothness assumptions on the effect curve, and still allows for misspecification of either the treatment density or outcome regression. We derive asymptotic properties and give a procedure for data-driven bandwidth selection. The methods are illustrated via simulation and in a study of the effect of nurse staffing on hospital readmissions penalties.


Statistics in Medicine | 2014

Comparison of methods for estimating the effect of salvage therapy in prostate cancer when treatment is given by indication

Jeremy M. G. Taylor; Jincheng Shen; Edward H. Kennedy; Lu Wang; Douglas E. Schaubel

For patients who were previously treated for prostate cancer, salvage hormone therapy is frequently given when the longitudinal marker prostate-specific antigen begins to rise during follow-up. Because the treatment is given by indication, estimating the effect of the hormone therapy is challenging. In a previous paper we described two methods for estimating the treatment effect, called two-stage and sequential stratification. The two-stage method involved modeling the longitudinal and survival data. The sequential stratification method involves contrasts within matched sets of people, where each matched set includes people who did and did not receive hormone therapy. In this paper, we evaluate the properties of these two methods and compare and contrast them with the marginal structural model methodology. The marginal structural model methodology involves a weighted survival analysis, where the weights are derived from models for the time of hormone therapy. We highlight the different conditional and marginal interpretations of the quantities being estimated by the three methods. Using simulations that mimic the prostate cancer setting, we evaluate bias, efficiency, and accuracy of estimated standard errors and robustness to modeling assumptions. The results show differences between the methods in terms of the quantities being estimated and in efficiency. We also demonstrate how the results of a randomized trial of salvage hormone therapy are strongly influenced by the design of the study and discuss how the findings from using the three methodologies can be used to infer the results of a trial.


arXiv: Statistics Theory | 2016

Semiparametric Theory and Empirical Processes in Causal Inference

Edward H. Kennedy

In this paper we review important aspects of semiparametric theory and empirical processes that arise in causal inference problems. We begin with a brief introduction to the general problem of causal inference, and go on to discuss estimation and inference for causal effects under semiparametric models, which allow parts of the data-generating process to be unrestricted if they are not of particular interest (i.e., nuisance functions). These models are very useful in causal problems because the outcome process is often complex and difficult to model, and there may only be information available about the treatment process (at best). Semiparametric theory gives a framework for benchmarking efficiency and constructing estimators in such settings. In the second part of the paper we discuss empirical process theory, which provides powerful tools for understanding the asymptotic behavior of semiparametric estimators that depend on flexible nonparametric estimators of nuisance functions. These tools are crucial for incorporating machine learning and other modern methods into causal inference analyses. We conclude by examining related extensions and future directions for work in semiparametric causal inference.


Clinical Trials | 2015

Surrogate markers for time-varying treatments and outcomes

Jesse Y. Hsu; Edward H. Kennedy; Jason Roy; Alisa J. Stephens-Shields; Dylan S. Small; Marshall M. Joffe

Background: A surrogate marker is a variable commonly used in clinical trials to guide treatment decisions when the outcome of ultimate interest is not available. A good surrogate marker is one where the treatment effect on the surrogate is a strong predictor of the effect of treatment on the outcome. We review the situation when there is one treatment delivered at baseline, one surrogate measured at one later time point, and one ultimate outcome of interest and discuss new issues arising when variables are time-varying. Methods: Most of the literature on surrogate markers has only considered simple settings with one treatment, one surrogate, and one outcome of interest at a fixed time point. However, more complicated time-varying settings are common in practice. In this article, we describe the unique challenges in two settings, time-varying treatments and time-varying surrogates, while relating the ideas back to the causal-effects and causal-association paradigms. Conclusion: In addition to discussing and extending popular notions of surrogacy to time-varying settings, we give examples illustrating that one can be misled by not taking into account time-varying information about the surrogate or treatment. We hope this article has provided some motivation for future work on estimation and inference in such settings.


Sociological Methods & Research | 2018

Principled Machine Learning Using the Super Learner: An Application to Predicting Prison Violence

Valerio Baćak; Edward H. Kennedy

A rapidly growing number of algorithms are available to researchers who apply statistical or machine learning methods to answer social science research questions. The unique advantages and limitations of each algorithm are relatively well known, but it is not possible to know in advance which algorithm is best suited for the particular research question and the data set at hand. Typically, researchers end up choosing, in a largely arbitrary fashion, one or a handful of algorithms. In this article, we present the Super Learner—a powerful new approach to statistical learning that leverages a variety of data-adaptive methods, such as random forests and spline regression, and systematically chooses the one, or a weighted combination of many, that produces the best forecasts. We illustrate the use of the Super Learner by predicting violence among inmates from the 2005 Census of State and Federal Adult Correctional Facilities. Over the past 40 years, mass incarceration has drastically weakened prisons’ capacities to ensure inmate safety, yet we know little about the characteristics of prisons related to inmate victimization. We discuss the value of the Super Learner in social science research and the implications of our findings for understanding prison violence.


Annals of Surgical Oncology | 2015

Preoperative Metyrosine Improves Cardiovascular Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Surgery for Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma.

Heather Wachtel; Edward H. Kennedy; Salman Zaheer; Edmund K. Bartlett; Lauren Fishbein; Robert E. Roses; Douglas L. Fraker; Debbie L. Cohen


Biometrika | 2015

Semiparametric causal inference in matched cohort studies

Edward H. Kennedy; Arvid Sjölander; Dylan S. Small


Journal of Marriage and Family | 2015

Marginal Structural Models: An Application to Incarceration and Marriage During Young Adulthood

Valerio Baćak; Edward H. Kennedy


arXiv: Methodology | 2017

Nonparametric Double Robustness

Ashley I. Naimi; Edward H. Kennedy

Collaboration


Dive into the Edward H. Kennedy's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dylan S. Small

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marshall M. Joffe

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Scott A. Lorch

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Valerio Baćak

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Barbara O'Brien

Michigan State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Chen Hu

American College of Radiology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Debbie L. Cohen

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge