Edyta Molik

Seasonal effects of central leptin infusion on secretion of melatonin and prolactin and on SOCS-3 gene expression in ewes

Recent studies have demonstrated photoperiodic changes in leptin sensitivity of seasonal mammals. Herein, we examined the interaction of season (long days (LD) versus short days (SD)) and recombinant ovine leptin (roleptin) on secretion of melatonin and prolactin (PRL) and on mRNA expression of suppressor of cytokine signaling-3 (SOCS-3) in the medial basal hypothalamus (MBH) in sheep. Twenty-four Polish Longwool ewes, surgically fitted with third ventricle (IIIV) cannulas, were utilized in a replicated switchback design involving 12 ewes per season. Within-season and replicate ewes were assigned randomly to one of three treatments (four ewes/treatment) and infused centrally three times at 0, 1 and 2 h beginning at sunset. Treatments were 1) control, Ringer-Locke buffer; 2) L1, roleptin, 0.5 microg/kg BW; and 3) L2, roleptin, 1.0 microg/kg BW. Jugular blood samples were collected at 15-min intervals beginning immediately before the start of infusions and continued for 6 h. At the end of blood sampling, a washout period of at least 3 days elapsed before ewes were re-randomized and treated with one of the treatments described above (four ewes/treatment). Ewes were then killed and brains were collected for MBH processing. Leptin treatments increased (P<0.001) circulating leptin concentrations compared with controls during both seasons in a dose-dependent manner. Overall, mean plasma concentrations of melatonin were greater (P<0.001) during LD than SD. However, leptin treatments increased melatonin concentrations during SD in a dose-dependent manner and decreased it during LD. Similarly, plasma concentrations of PRL were greater (P<0.001) during LD than SD. However, unlike changes in melatonin, circulating PRL decreased (P<0.001) in response to leptin during LD. Semi-quantitative PCR revealed that leptin increased (P<0.001) SOCS-3 expression in the MBH region during LD in a dose-dependent manner. Data provide evidence that secretion of photoperiodic hormones such as melatonin and PRL are inversely regulated by leptin during SD and LD. However, the increase in expression of SOCS-3 in the MBH during LD compared with SD fails to fully explain these effects.

Identification of salsolinol in the mediobasal hypothalamus of lactating ewes and its relation to suckling-induced prolactin and GH release

The push-pull perfusions of the infundibular nucleus-median eminence (IN/ME) were made in lactating ewes (n=7) twice, to identify dopamine (DA)-derived salsolinol and the changes in its extracellular concentration in response to suckling. The perfusate collecting period in every ewe consisted of control non-suckling period, 1000-1230 h (five perfusates), and suckling period, 1230-1500 h (next five perfusates). Simultaneously, blood samples were collected from 1000 to 1500 h at 10-min intervals. The perfusate concentrations of salsolinol and DA were measured by HPLC, and plasma prolactin and GH concentrations were assayed by the RIA. Mean concentrations of salsolinol in perfusates collected from the anterior and posterior parts of the IN/ME (according to post-mortem localization of a perfusion site) increased significantly (P<0.05 and P<0.001 respectively) during the suckling period, when compared with those noted during the non-suckling period. While no DA was found in the anterior part, only vestigial amounts of DA were found in a few perfusates collected from the posterior part. Salsolinol was not detected in the IN/ME of ewes 10 weeks after weaning (seasonal anoestrus). Mean plasma prolactin and GH concentrations during suckling were significantly (P<0.001) higher than those noted during the non-suckling period. In conclusion, our current study reveals that salsolinol is present in the IN/ME of lactating ewes and that its extracellular concentration increases during suckling. Moreover, it supports the role of salsolinol as a neurotransmitter involved in the regulatory process of prolactin secretion at least during lactation.

Comparative typology in six european low-intensity systems of grassland management

European biodiversity significantly depends on large‐scale livestock systems with low input levels. In most countries forms of grazing are organized in permanent or seasonal cooperations (land‐owner/land‐user agents) and covers different landscape such as alpine areas, forest, grasslands, mires, and even arable land. Today, the existence of these structures is threatened due to changes in agricultural land use practices and erratic governmental policies. The present chapter investigates six low‐input livestock systems of grassland management with varying degrees of arrangements in different European countries and landscapes. These large‐scale grazing systems (LSGS) are reindeer husbandry in Northern Sapmi (Fennoscandia), sheep grazing in the Polish Tatra mountains, cattle grazing in the Swiss and German Alps, cattle, sheep, and pig grazing in Baixo Alentejo, Southern Portugal, and sedentary sheep grazing in Central Spain. These systems showed very heterogeneous organizational patterns in their way of exploiting the pastoral resources. At the same time, these LSGS showed at least some of the following weaknesses such as poor economic performance, social fragility, and structural shortcomings for proper grazing management. Lack of proper mobility of herds/flocks or accession to specific grazing grounds can be a cause of environmental hazards. The surveyed LSGS are mostly dependent on public handouts for survival, but successive policy schemes have only showed mixed effects and, in particular study areas, clear inconsistencies in their aim to stop the general declining trend of LSGS. This research assumed that detailed system research may open the way for better‐focused policy intervention, but policymakers need to take advantage of this period of support to push ahead for reforms. Recent European Union (EU) guidelines (2007–2013) on Rural Development Policy (RDP) and its operative scale of high nature value (HNV) farmland can easily fit the structure and functions of low‐input grazing systems and LSGS.

Seasonal changes in the interactions among leptin, ghrelin, and orexin in sheep

The adaptation of the physiology of an animal to changing conditions of light and food availability is evident at the behavioral and hormonal levels. Melatonin, leptin, ghrelin, and orexin, which exhibit rhythmic secretion profiles under ad libitum feeding conditions, are sensitive to changes in daylength, forming a tight web of interrelationships in the regulation of energy balance. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of central injections of leptin, ghrelin, and orexin on the reciprocal interactions among these hormones and the influence of photoperiod on these responses. Twenty-four ovariectomized and estradiol-implanted ewes were used in a replicated switchback design. The ewes were assigned randomly to 1 of 6 treatment groups, and the treatments were infused into their third ventricles 3 times at 0, 1, and 2 h, with 0 h being at dusk. The treatments were as follows: 1) control, Ringer-Locke buffer; 2) leptin, 0.5 μg/kg BW; 3) ghrelin, 2.5 μg/kg BW; 4) orexin B, 0.3 μg/kg BW; 5) leptin antagonist, 50 μg/kg BW, then ghrelin, 2.5 μg/kg BW; and 6) leptin antagonist, 50 μg/kg BW, then orexin B, 0.3 μg/kg BW. Blood samples (5 mL) were collected at 15-min intervals for 6 h. The administration of leptin increased (P < 0.05) plasma concentrations of melatonin during short-day (ShD) photoperiods and decreased (P < 0.05) them during long-day (LD) photoperiods, whereas ghrelin decreased (P < 0.05) melatonin concentrations during ShD photoperiod, and orexin had no effect (P > 0.1). Leptin attenuated (P < 0.05) ghrelin concentrations relative to the concentration in controls during ShD. The plasma concentrations of orexin were reduced (P < 0.05) after leptin infusions during LD and ShD photoperiods; however, ghrelin had the opposite effect (P < 0.05) on orexin concentration. Orexin increased (P < 0.05) ghrelin concentrations during LD. Ghrelin and orexin concentrations were increased (P < 0.05) after leptin antagonist infusions. Our data provide evidence that the secretion of leptin, ghrelin, and orexin are seasonally dependent, with relationships that are subject to photoperiodic regulation, and that leptin is an important factor that regulates ghrelin and orexin releases in sheep.

Photoperiod Influences the Effects of Ghrelin and Serotonin Receptor Agonist onGrowth Hormone and Prolactin Secretion in Sheep

Objective: Recent studies have identified a novel heterodimer involving the ghrelin receptor (GHS-R1A) and the 5-HT2C receptor, a subtype of serotonin receptors. Whether or not interactions between GHS-R1A and the 5-HT2C receptor exist and how they are modulated by photoperiod and nutritional status in seasonally animals remains unknown. The aims of this study were to determine the effects of ghrelin and a 5-HT2B/2C serotonin receptor agonist, 1-(3-chlorophenyl) piperazine hydrochloride (m-CPP), on GH and PRL secretion under the influence of nutritional status and photoperiod. Methods: Normally fed (n=12) or fasted (n=12) ewes were assigned to one of 4 groups and treatments: 1) control (saline); 2) ghrelin (2.5 μg/kg); 3) m-CPP (2.5 mg/kg); 4) ghrelin followed by m-CPP were infused once at the beginning of the study for groups 1, 2 and 3; in group 4, ghrelin was administered at 15 min, and m-CPP at 30 min. Blood samples were collected at 15 min intervals for 3 h during the short day (SD) and long day (LD) season. Results: Ghrelin and m-CPP enhanced (p<0.05) GH secretion in fasted ewes during LD. The m-CPP significantly decreased GH concentrations in fasted ewes during SD. Prolactin concentrations were lower (p<0.01) in normally fed ewes after the ghrelin+m-CPP treatment compared to treatment with m-CPP alone. Conclusion: There were interactions among ghrelin, serotonin, photoperiod and metabolic status that influenced GH and PRL secretion in ewes. Using an ovine model, our work provides a basis for future studies of the pathogenesis of metabolic disorders associated with alterations in nutritional status and day length.

The Effect of the Photoperiod and Exogenous Melatonin on the Protein Content in Sheep Milk

© 2012 Molik et al., licensee InTech. This is an open access chapter distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Effect of the Photoperiod and Exogenous Melatonin on the Protein Content in Sheep Milk

The effects of leptin on plasma concentrations of prolactin, growth hormone, and melatonin vary depending on the stage of pregnancy in sheep1

The effects of hyperleptinemia and leptin resistance during gestation are unclear. Leptin, an important neuroendocrine regulator, has anorexic effects, but its interactions with other metabolic hormones during pregnancy are unclear. We examined potential roles of leptin in regulating prolactin (PRL), GH, and melatonin plasma concentrations during pregnancy in Polish Longwool ewes. Twelve estrus-synchronized ewes carrying twins after mating were randomly assigned to receive i.v. injections of saline or recombinant ovine leptin (2.5 or 5.0 µg/kg BW). Blood samples were collected (15-min intervals over 4 h) immediately before the first injection at dusk and kept under red light. Treatments were repeated at 2-wk intervals, starting before mating and continuing from days 30 to 135 of gestation. Concentrations of plasma PRL, GH, and melatonin were determined using a validated RIA. The effects of leptin on hormone plasma concentrations varied depending on pregnancy stage and leptin dose. PRL plasma concentrations were affected at most stages of pregnancy and before gestation. In non-, very early- (day 30), and late- (day 120 and 135) pregnant ewes, exogenous leptin stimulated PRL (P < 0.001) plasma concentrations, while during the second month of gestation, it decreased PRL concentrations (P < 0.01). Leptin affected GH plasma concentrations (P < 0.05) only during the first 2 mo of pregnancy, with no effects during the second part of gestation or before pregnancy. In early-pregnant ewes (day 30 and 45), leptin decreased melatonin plasma concentrations (P < 0.05), but at day 60, leptin stimulated melatonin plasma concentrations at low (P < 0.01) and high doses (P < 0.05), with no effects in ewes after 105 d of gestation. These data indicate specific pregnancy-induced endocrine adaptations to changes in energy homeostasis, supporting the hypothesis that leptin affects PRL, GH, and melatonin release during gestation.

Induction of the Secretion of LH and GH by Orexin A and Ghrelin is Controlled in Vivo by Leptin and Photoperiod in Sheep

Abstract The influence of leptin on orexin A and the interaction of leptin with ghrelin in regulating the gonadotropic and somatotropic axes in seasonally polyestrous animals are not well understood. This study examined the effects of these factors as well as the mediating roles of specific ovine leptin antagonist (SOLA; mutant D23L/L39A/D40A/F41A) and photoperiod on luteinizing hormone (LH) and growth hormone (GH) secretion. Twenty-four ovariectomized, estradiol-implanted ewes were used in a replicated switchback design. The ewes were assigned randomly to 1 of 6 treatments (infused into the third ventricle 3 times at 0 (dusk), 1, and 2 h) as follows: control, Ringer-Locke buffer; leptin, 0.5 μg/kg b.w.; orexin A, 0.3 μg/kg b.w.; ghrelin, 2.5 μg/kg b.w.; SOLA, 50 μg/kg b.w. + orexin A, 0.3 μg/kg b.w.; and SOLA, 50 μg/kg b.w. + ghrelin, 2.5 μg/kg b.w. Blood samples (5 ml) were collected at 15-min intervals for 4 h. SOLA + orexin A resulted in an increase (P<0.01) in the LH plasma concentration during short-day (SD) and long-day (LD) photoperiods. However, ghrelin and SOLA + ghrelin had the opposite effect. SOLA + orexin A resulted in an increase (P<0.001) in the GH concentration compared with leptin or orexin A during the LD season. Ghrelin and SOLA + ghrelin increased the GH concentration (P<0.01) regardless of the season. In summary, LH and GH secretion are seasonally dependent on relationships that are subject to photoperiodic regulation, and leptin is an important regulator of the effects of ghrelin and orexin A on the activities of the gonadotropic and somatotropic axes in sheep.

The Effect of Physiological and Environmental Factors on the Prolactin Profile in Seasonally Breeding Animals

© 2013 Molik et al., licensee InTech. This is an open access chapter distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Effect of Physiological and Environmental Factors on the Prolactin Profile in Seasonally Breeding Animals