Elien Vandermarliere

Getting intimate with trypsin, the leading protease in proteomics

Nowadays, mass spectrometry-based proteomics is carried out primarily in a bottom-up fashion, with peptides obtained after proteolytic digest of a whole proteome lysate as the primary analytes instead of the proteins themselves. This experimental setup crucially relies on a protease to digest an abundant and complex protein mixture into a far more complex peptide mixture. Full knowledge of the working mechanism and specificity of the used proteases is therefore crucial, both for the digestion step itself as well as for the downstream identification and quantification of the (fragmentation) mass spectra acquired for the peptides in the mixture. Targeted protein analysis through selected reaction monitoring, a relative newcomer in the specific field of mass spectrometry-based proteomics, even requires a priori understanding of protease behavior for the proteins of interest. Because of the rapidly increasing popularity of proteomics as an analytical tool in the life sciences, there is now a renewed demand for detailed knowledge on trypsin, the workhorse protease in proteomics. This review addresses this need and provides an overview on the structure and working mechanism of trypsin, followed by a critical analysis of its cleavage behavior, typically simply accepted to occur exclusively yet consistently after Arg and Lys, unless they are followed by a Pro. In this context, shortcomings in our ability to understand and predict the behavior of trypsin will be highlighted, along with the downstream implications. Furthermore, an analysis is carried out on the inherent shortcomings of trypsin with regard to whole proteome analysis, and alternative approaches will be presented that can alleviate these issues. Finally, some reflections on the future of trypsin as the workhorse protease in mass spectrometry-based proteomics will be provided.

Structural Investigation of B‑Raf Paradox Breaker and Inducer Inhibitors

The V600E missense mutation in B-Raf kinase leads to an anomalous regulation of the MAPK pathway, uncontrolled cell proliferation, and initiation of tumorigenesis. While the ATP-competitive B-Raf inhibitors block the MAPK pathway in B-Raf mutant cells, they induce conformational changes to wild-type B-Raf kinase domain leading to heterodimerization with C-Raf causing a paradoxical hyperactivation of MAPK pathway. A new class of inhibitors (paradox breakers) has been developed that inhibit B-Raf(V600E) activity without agonistically affecting the MAPK pathway in wild-type B-Raf cells. In this study, we explore the structural, conformational, and cellular effects on the B-Raf kinase domain upon binding of paradox breakers and inducers. Our results indicate that a subtle structural difference between paradox inducers and breakers leads to significant conformational differences when complexed with B-Raf. This study provides a novel insight into the activation of B-Raf by ATP-competitive inhibitors and can aid in the design of more potent and selective inhibitors without agonistic function.

Predicting tryptic cleavage from proteomics data using decision tree ensembles

Trypsin is the workhorse protease in mass spectrometry-based proteomics experiments and is used to digest proteins into more readily analyzable peptides. To identify these peptides after mass spectrometric analysis, the actual digestion has to be mimicked as faithfully as possible in silico. In this paper we introduce CP-DT (Cleavage Prediction with Decision Trees), an algorithm based on a decision tree ensemble that was learned on publicly available peptide identification data from the PRIDE repository. We demonstrate that CP-DT is able to accurately predict tryptic cleavage: tests on three independent data sets show that CP-DT significantly outperforms the Keil rules that are currently used to predict tryptic cleavage. Moreover, the trees generated by CP-DT can make predictions efficiently and are interpretable by domain experts.

Protein structure as a means to triage proposed PTM sites

PTMs such as phosphorylation are often important actors in protein regulation and recognition. These functions require both visibility and accessibility to other proteins; that the modification is located at the surface of the protein. Currently, many repositories provide information on PTMs but structural information is often lacking. This study, which focuses on phosphorylation sites available in UniProtKB/Swiss‐Prot, illustrates that most phosphorylation sites are indeed found at the surface of the protein, but that some sites are found buried in the core of the protein. Several of these identified buried phosphorylation sites can easily become accessible upon small conformational changes while others would require the whole protein to unfold and are hence most unlikely modification sites. Subsequent analysis of phosphorylation sites available in PRIDE demonstrates that taking the structure of the protein into account would be a good guide in the identification of the actual phosphorylated positions in phophoproteomics experiments. This analysis illustrates that care must be taken when simply accepting the position of a PTM without first analyzing its position within the protein structure if the latter is available.

Ryanodine receptors are targeted by anti-apoptotic Bcl-XL involving its BH4 domain and Lys87 from its BH3 domain

Anti-apoptotic B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) family members target several intracellular Ca2+-transport systems. Bcl-2, via its N-terminal Bcl-2 homology (BH) 4 domain, inhibits both inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors (IP3Rs) and ryanodine receptors (RyRs), while Bcl-XL, likely independently of its BH4 domain, sensitizes IP3Rs. It remains elusive whether Bcl-XL can also target and modulate RyRs. Here, Bcl-XL co-immunoprecipitated with RyR3 expressed in HEK293 cells. Mammalian protein-protein interaction trap (MAPPIT) and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) showed that Bcl-XL bound to the central domain of RyR3 via its BH4 domain, although to a lesser extent compared to the BH4 domain of Bcl-2. Consistent with the ability of the BH4 domain of Bcl-XL to bind to RyRs, loading the BH4-Bcl-XL peptide into RyR3-overexpressing HEK293 cells or in rat hippocampal neurons suppressed RyR-mediated Ca2+ release. In silico superposition of the 3D-structures of Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL indicated that Lys87 of the BH3 domain of Bcl-XL could be important for interacting with RyRs. In contrast to Bcl-XL, the Bcl-XLK87D mutant displayed lower binding affinity for RyR3 and a reduced inhibition of RyR-mediated Ca2+ release. These data suggest that Bcl-XL binds to RyR channels via its BH4 domain, but also its BH3 domain, more specific Lys87, contributes to the interaction.

Resolution of protein structure by mass spectrometry

Typically, mass spectrometry is used to identify the peptides present in a complex peptide mixture and subsequently the precursor proteins. As such, mass spectrometry focuses mainly on the primary structure, the (modified) amino acid sequence of peptides and proteins. In contrast, the three-dimensional structure of a protein is typically determined with protein X-ray crystallography or NMR. Despite the close relationship between these two aspects of protein studies (sequence and structure), mass spectrometry and structure determination are not frequently combined. Nevertheless, this combination of approaches, dubbed conformational proteomics, can offer insight into the function, working mechanism, and conformational status of a protein. In this review, we will discuss the developments at the intersection of mass spectrometry-based proteomics and protein structure determination and start from a brief overview of the classic approaches to identify protein structure along with their advantages and disadvantages. We will subsequently discuss the ability of mass spectrometry to overcome some of the hurdles of these classic methods. Finally, we will provide an outlook on the interplay of mass spectrometry and protein structure determination, and highlight several recent experiments in which mass spectrometry was successfully used to either aid or complement structure elucidation.

An extra dimension in protein tagging by quantifying universal proteotypic peptides using targeted proteomics

The use of protein tagging to facilitate detailed characterization of target proteins has not only revolutionized cell biology, but also enabled biochemical analysis through efficient recovery of the protein complexes wherein the tagged proteins reside. The endogenous use of these tags for detailed protein characterization is widespread in lower organisms that allow for efficient homologous recombination. With the recent advances in genome engineering, tagging of endogenous proteins is now within reach for most experimental systems, including mammalian cell lines cultures. In this work, we describe the selection of peptides with ideal mass spectrometry characteristics for use in quantification of tagged proteins using targeted proteomics. We mined the proteome of the hyperthermophile Pyrococcus furiosus to obtain two peptides that are unique in the proteomes of all known model organisms (proteotypic) and allow sensitive quantification of target proteins in a complex background. By combining these ’Proteotypic peptides for Quantification by SRM’ (PQS peptides) with epitope tags, we demonstrate their use in co-immunoprecipitation experiments upon transfection of protein pairs, or after introduction of these tags in the endogenous proteins through genome engineering. Endogenous protein tagging for absolute quantification provides a powerful extra dimension to protein analysis, allowing the detailed characterization of endogenous proteins.

Unraveling the specificities of the different human methionine sulfoxide reductases

The oxidation of free and protein‐bound methionine into methionine sulfoxide is a frequently occurring modification caused by ROS. Most organisms express methionine sulfoxide reductases (MSR enzymes) to repair this potentially damaging modification. Humans express three different MSRB enzymes which reside in different cellular compartments. In this study, we have explored the specificity of the human MSRB enzymes both by in silico modeling and by experiments on oxidized peptides. We found that MSRB1 is the least specific MSRB enzyme, which is in agreement with the observation that MSRB1 is the only MSRB enzyme found in the cytosol and the nucleus, and therefore requires a broad specificity to reduce all possible substrates. MSRB2 and MSRB3, which are both found in mitochondria, are more specific but because of their co‐occurrence they can likely repair all possible substrates.

A double point mutation at residues Ile14 and Val15 of Bcl‐2 uncovers a role for the BH4 domain in both protein stability and function

B‐cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl‐2) protein is the archetype apoptosis suppressor protein. The N‐terminal Bcl‐2‐homology 4 (BH4) domain of Bcl‐2 is required for the antiapoptotic function of this protein at the mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The involvement of the BH4 domain in Bcl‐2′s antiapoptotic functions has been proposed based on Gly‐based substitutions of the Ile14/Val15 amino acids, two hydrophobic residues located in the center of Bcl‐2′s BH4 domain. Following this strategy, we recently showed that a BH4‐domain‐derived peptide in which Ile14 and Val15 have been replaced by Gly residues, was unable to dampen proapoptotic Ca2+‐release events from the ER. Here, we investigated the impact of these mutations on the overall structure, stability, and function of full‐length Bcl‐2 as a regulator of Ca2+ signaling and cell death. Our results indicate that full‐length Bcl‐2 Ile14Gly/Val15Gly, in contrast to wild‐type Bcl‐2, (a) displayed severely reduced structural stability and a shortened protein half‐life; (b) failed to interact with Bcl‐2‐associated X protein (BAX), to inhibit the inositol 1,4,5‐trisphosphate receptor (IP3R) and to protect against Ca2+‐mediated apoptosis. We conclude that the hydrophobic face of Bcl‐2′s BH4 domain (Ile14, Val15) is an important structural regulatory element by affecting protein stability and turnover, thereby likely reducing Bcl‐2′s ability to modulate the function of its targets, like IP3R and BAX. Therefore, Bcl‐2 structure/function studies require pre‐emptive and reliable determination of protein stability upon introduction of point mutations at the level of the BH4 domain.

A Pipeline for Differential Proteomics in Unsequenced Species

Shotgun proteomics experiments often take the form of a differential analysis, where two or more samples are compared against each other. The objective is to identify proteins that are either unique to a specific sample or a set of samples (qualitative differential proteomics), or that are significantly differentially expressed in one or more samples (quantitative differential proteomics). However, the success depends on the availability of a reliable protein sequence database for each sample. To perform such an analysis in the absence of a database, we here propose a novel, generic pipeline comprising an adapted spectral similarity score derived from database search algorithms that compares samples at the spectrum level to detect unique spectra. We applied our pipeline to compare two parasitic tapeworms: Taenia solium and Taenia hydatigena, of which only the former poses a threat to humans. Furthermore, because the genome of T. solium recently became available, we were able to prove the effectiveness and reliability of our pipeline a posteriori.