Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Elisabeth Schwaiger is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Elisabeth Schwaiger.


Transplantation | 2014

Complement component C3 activation: the leading cause of the prozone phenomenon affecting HLA antibody detection on single-antigen beads.

Elisabeth Schwaiger; Markus Wahrmann; Gregor Bond; Farsad Eskandary; Georg A. Böhmig

Background Luminex-based anti-HLA IgG detection on single-antigen flow beads (SAFB) represents a valuable tool for characterization of allosensitization patterns. Assay interpretation, however, may be impeded by false-low test results caused by the prozone effect. Recent experimental data have related this artifact to direct blockade of IgG detection by complement component C1 as a possible candidate mechanism. Methods To dissect a causative role of C1 complex formation and subsequent steps of classical complement activation, native or modified sera obtained from transplant candidates with HLA class I sensitization were evaluated applying SAFB-based IgG, IgM, C1q, C1r, C1s, or C4 and C3 split product detection, respectively. Results Evaluating a total of 1,164 single-antigen reactions, serum dilution (1:10) revealed an 11% incidence of the prozone effect as defined by a greater than 100% increase in IgG mean fluorescence intensity. Prozoning was found to be related to the amount of antibody-triggered C1q, C4 or C3 split product deposition, and was eliminated by serum modifications affecting the integrity of the C1 complex (dithiotreitol, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, heat inactivation). Remarkably, the same effect was achieved without C1 disintegration, either by serum treatment with methylamine to block C4 and C3 split product binding or by cobra venom factor to trigger C3 consumption. Conclusions Our results reinforce a central role of C1 as a trigger of prozoning. However, we provide evidence that C1 may exert its effects only indirectly, namely via inducing C3 fragment deposition, which by coating of the bead surface may block the binding of IgG detection reagents.


Transplant International | 2011

Prevention and treatment of alloantibody-mediated kidney transplant rejection.

Gregor Bartel; Elisabeth Schwaiger; Georg A. Böhmig

Summary Antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR), which is commonly caused by preformed and/or de novo HLA alloantibodies, has evolved as a leading cause of early and late kidney allograft injury. In recent years, effective treatment strategies have been established to counteract the deleterious effects of humoral alloreactivity. One major therapeutic challenge is the barrier of a positive pretransplant lymphocytotoxic crossmatch. Several apheresis‐ and/or IVIG‐based protocols have been shown to enable successful crossmatch conversion, including a strategy of peritransplant immunoadsorption for rapid crossmatch conversion immediately before deceased donor transplantation. While such protocols may increase transplant rates and allow for acceptable graft survival, at least in the short‐term, it has become evident that, despite intense treatment, many patients still experience clinical or subclinical AMR. This reinforces the need for innovative strategies, such as complementary allocation programs to improve transplant outcomes. For acute AMR, various studies have suggested efficiency of plasmapheresis‐ or immunoadsorption‐based protocols. There is, however, no established treatment for chronic AMR and the development of strategies to reverse or at least halt chronic active rejection remains a big challenge. Major improvements can be expected from studies evaluating innovative therapeutic concepts, such as proteasome inhibition or complement blocking agents.


Transplant International | 2013

Solid phase detection of C4d‐fixing HLA antibodies to predict rejection in high immunological risk kidney transplant recipients

Gregor Bartel; Markus Wahrmann; Elisabeth Schwaiger; Željko Kikić; Christine Winzer; Walter H. Hörl; Ferdinand Mühlbacher; Matthias Hoke; Gerhard J. Zlabinger; Heinz Regele; Georg A. Böhmig

Protocols for recipient desensitization may allow for successful kidney transplantation across major immunological barriers. Desensitized recipients, however, still face a considerable risk of antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR), which underscores the need for risk stratification tools to individually tailor treatment. Here, we investigated whether solid phase detection of complement‐fixing donor‐specific antibodies (DSA) has the potential to improve AMR prediction in high‐risk transplants. The study included 68 sensitized recipients of deceased donor kidney allografts who underwent peritransplant immunoadsorption for alloantibody depletion (median cytotoxic panel reactivity: 73%; crossmatch conversion: n = 21). Pre and post‐transplant sera were subjected to detection of DSA‐triggered C4d deposition ([C4d]DSA) applying single‐antigen bead (SAB) technology. While standard crossmatch and [IgG]SAB testing failed to predict outcomes in our desensitized patients, detection of preformed [C4d]DSA (n = 44) was tightly associated with C4d‐positive AMR [36% vs. 8%, P = 0.01; binary logistic regression: odds ratio: 10.1 (95% confidence interval: 1.6–64.2), P = 0.01]. Moreover, long‐term death‐censored graft survival tended to be worse among [C4d]DSA‐positive recipients (P = 0.07). There were no associations with C4d‐negative AMR or cellular rejection. [C4d]DSA detected 6 months post‐transplantation were not related to clinical outcomes. Our data suggest that pretransplant SAB‐based detection of complement‐fixing DSA may be a valuable tool for risk stratification.


Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation | 2014

ABO antibody and complement depletion by immunoadsorption combined with membrane filtration—a randomized, controlled, cross-over trial

Farsad Eskandary; Markus Wahrmann; Peter Biesenbach; Camilla Sandurkov; Franz König; Elisabeth Schwaiger; Thomas Perkmann; Sarojinidevi Künig; Kurt Derfler; Gerhard J. Zlabinger; Georg A. Böhmig

BACKGROUND Potent antibody depletion techniques have paved the way to successful ABO-incompatible transplantation. Considering its efficiency regarding IgG removal, the use of non-antigen-specific semi-selective immunoadsorption (IA) has been advocated. One attractive strategy to overcome the caveat of incomplete IgM depletion and to interfere with complement activation could be the adjunctive use of membrane filtration (MF) to enhance the removal of macromolecules. METHODS To investigate the depletion efficiency of semi-selective IA plus MF, we conducted a randomized, controlled, cross-over trial including patients on regular IA treatment for indications outside recipient desensitization. According to the results of sample size calculation, 14 subjects were enrolled. Two treatment sequences, a single session of IA plus MF followed by IA alone after ≥7 days (and vice versa), were analysed. RESULTS IA plus MF markedly enhanced the median per cent reduction of ABO-specific IgM determined by flow cytometry (primary end point; 59 versus 23%, P < 0.001) and haemagglutination (2 versus 1 titre steps, P < 0.001), respectively. Combined treatment also substantially lowered C1q concentrations (86 versus 58% reduction, P < 0.001) and the functionality of classical complement as reflected by impaired in vitro C3 activation capability. IgG was strongly reduced without any additional effect of MF. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrate that the innovative strategy of combining MF with semi-selective IA may substantially increase IgM elimination and affect classical complement activation. Our findings suggest that this new treatment concept could be an efficient strategy for recipient desensitization in ABO- and HLA-incompatible transplantation.


Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation | 2016

Deceased donor kidney transplantation across donor-specific antibody barriers: predictors of antibody-mediated rejection

Elisabeth Schwaiger; Farsad Eskandary; Nicolas Kozakowski; Gregor Bond; Željko Kikić; Daniel Yoo; Susanne Rasoul-Rockenschaub; Rainer Oberbauer; Georg A. Böhmig

BACKGROUND Apheresis-based desensitization allows for successful transplantation across major immunological barriers. For donor-specific antibody (DSA)- and/or crossmatch-positive transplantation, however, it has been shown that even intense immunomodulation may not completely prevent antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). METHODS In this study, we evaluated transplant outcomes in 101 DSA+ deceased donor kidney transplant recipients (transplantation between 2009 and 2013; median follow-up: 24 months) who were subjected to immunoadsorption (IA)-based desensitization. Treatment included a single pre-transplant IA session, followed by anti-lymphocyte antibody and serial post-transplant IA. In 27 cases, a positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDCXM) was rendered negative immediately before transplantation. Seventy-four of the DSA+ recipients had a negative CDCXM already before IA. RESULTS Three-year death-censored graft survival in DSA+ patients was significantly worse than in 513 DSA- recipients transplanted during the same period (79 versus 88%, P = 0.008). Thirty-three DSA+ recipients (33%) had ABMR. While a positive baseline CDCXM showed only a trend towards higher ABMR rates (41 versus 30% in CDCXM- recipients, P = 0.2), DSA mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) in single bead assays significantly associated with rejection, showing 20 versus 71% ABMR rates at <5000 versus >15 000 peak DSA MFI. The predictive value of MFI was moderate, with the highest accuracy at a median of 13 300 MFI (after cross-validation: 0.72). Other baseline variables, including CDC assay results, human leukocyte antigen mismatch, prior transplantation or type of induction treatment, did not add independent predictive information. CONCLUSIONS IA-based desensitization failed to prevent ABMR in a considerable number of DSA+ recipients. Assessing DSA MFI may help stratify risk of rejection, supporting its use as a guide to organ allocation and individualized treatment.


Human Immunology | 2013

Modified solid-phase alloantibody detection for improved crossmatch prediction.

Markus Wahrmann; Gerald Hlavin; Gottfried Fischer; Lena Marinova; Elisabeth Schwaiger; Walter H. Hörl; Gerhard J. Zlabinger; Günther F. Körmöczi; Franz König; Georg A. Böhmig

Virtual crossmatching based on single-antigen bead (SAB) assays for the detection of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) has limited accuracy of predicting complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDCXM) results. In this study, 672 crossmatch combinations (32 allosensitized patients tested against cells from 21 high resolution-typed individuals) were analyzed to assess the potential of modified SAB tests in predicting T- or B-cell-CDCXM outcomes. Test modifications included measurement of C4d-fixation to detect complement-activating DSA ([C4d]DSA), or addition of dithiotreitol to abrogate the prozone effect ([IgG/DTT]DSA). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed superior predictive accuracy of [C4d]DSA detection. Computing the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) sum value of HLA class I [C4d]DSA in relation to T-cell-CDCXM revealed an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.81. Other parameters, including DSA MFI maximum or number, were less predictive. Computing MFI sum values, AUC levels were lower for [IgG/DTT] (0.77) or [IgG]DSA detection (0.72), and did not considerably increase upon combining classifiers ([C4d] plus [IgG/DTT]: 0.82). ROC analysis revealed that [C4d]DSA detection (HLA class II) was also better at predicting B-cell-CDCXM results, even though, at very low MFI thresholds, the assay was found to provide comparably lower levels of specificity. Overall, B-cell-CDXM prediction was less precise, but could be enhanced by adjusting CDCXM thresholds to higher levels. Our data suggest particular efficiency of solid-phase complement detection as a tool for virtual crossmatching.


American Journal of Transplantation | 2015

Rapamycin and CTLA4Ig Synergize to Induce Stable Mixed Chimerism Without the Need for CD40 Blockade

Nina Pilat; Christoph Klaus; Christoph Schwarz; Karin Hock; Rupert Oberhuber; Elisabeth Schwaiger; Martina Gattringer; Haley Ramsey; Ulrike Baranyi; Bettina Zelger; Gerald Brandacher; Fritz Wrba; Thomas Wekerle

The mixed chimerism approach achieves donor‐specific tolerance in organ transplantation, but clinical use is inhibited by the toxicities of current bone marrow (BM) transplantation (BMT) protocols. Blocking the CD40:CD154 pathway with anti‐CD154 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) is exceptionally potent in inducing mixed chimerism, but these mAbs are clinically not available. Defining the roles of donor and recipient CD40 in a murine allogeneic BMT model, we show that CD4 or CD8 activation through an intact direct or CD4 T cell activation through the indirect pathway is sufficient to trigger BM rejection despite CTLA4Ig treatment. In the absence of CD4 T cells, CD8 T cell activation via the direct pathway, in contrast, leads to a state of split tolerance. Interruption of the CD40 signals in both the direct and indirect pathway of allorecognition or lack of recipient CD154 is required for the induction of chimerism and tolerance. We developed a novel BMT protocol that induces mixed chimerism and donor‐specific tolerance to fully mismatched cardiac allografts relying on CD28 costimulation blockade and mTOR inhibition without targeting the CD40 pathway. Notably, MHC‐mismatched/minor antigen‐matched skin grafts survive indefinitely whereas fully mismatched grafts are rejected, suggesting that non‐MHC antigens cause graft rejection and split tolerance.


Transplantation | 2014

Antibody-mediated rejection: analyzing the risk, proposing solutions.

Arias M; Rush Dn; Wiebe C; Gibson Iw; Blydt-Hansen Td; Nickerson Pw; Sellarés J; López-Hoyos M; San Segundo D; Crespo-Leiro Mg; Marzoa-Rivas R; Barge-Caballero E; Paniagua-Martín Mj; Román A; Daniel Serón; Georg A. Böhmig; Elisabeth Schwaiger

The beneficial effects of HLA matching in renal transplantation have been known for decades, and an allocation system that emphasizes Class II matching has been proposed. Recent data have demonstrated that the development of dnDSA, particularly against Class II HLA antigens, is a major cause of renal transplant loss. The histopathology of chronic antibody-mediated rejection is characterized by immune injury to the endothelium of the glomeruli and peritubular capillaries. The early phases of injury occur subclinically, many months before graft dysfunction, providing the opportunity for the optimization of current therapies and the evaluation of new treatment strategies. Risk factors for dnDSA development include Class II HLA mismatching, patient nonadherence to IS medications, and prior cellular rejection. Because the current treatment of chronic antibody-mediated rejection is largely unsatisfactory, prevention strategies that attempt to minimize the known risk factors should be adopted. The effects of HLA matching on renal allograft outcomes have been reported in Transplant Registries over the last 20 years (6Y8). Data from the UCLA Tissue Typing Laboratory demonstrated that an increase in the number of A, B, and DR mismatches in renal transplantation patients was associated with a higher incidence of both acute rejection and graft loss, and with impaired renal function at various time points after surgery (6). Conversely, Opelz reported a beneficial effect of HLA matching on graft survival in the recipients of living unrelated kidney donors (7), and Opelz Copyright


Transplant International | 2013

Anti-LFA-1 or rapamycin overcome costimulation blockade-resistant rejection in sensitized bone marrow recipients.

Haley Ramsey; Nina Pilat; Karin Hock; Christoph Klaus; Lukas Unger; Christoph Schwarz; Ulrike Baranyi; Martina Gattringer; Elisabeth Schwaiger; Fritz Wrba; Thomas Wekerle

While costimulation blockade‐based mixed chimerism protocols work well for inducing tolerance in rodents, translation to preclinical large animal/nonhuman primate models has been less successful. One recognized cause for these difficulties is the high frequency of alloreactive memory T cells (Tmem) found in the (pre)clinical setting as opposed to laboratory mice. In the present study, we therefore developed a murine bone marrow transplantation (BMT) model employing recipients harboring polyclonal donor‐reactive Tmem without concomitant humoral sensitization. This model was then used to identify strategies to overcome this additional immune barrier. We found that B6 recipients that were enriched with 3 × 107 T cells isolated from B6 mice that had been previously grafted with Balb/c skin, rejected Balb/c BM despite costimulation blockade with anti‐CD40L and CTLA4Ig (while recipients not enriched developed chimerism). Adjunctive short‐term treatment of sensitized BMT recipients with rapamycin or anti‐LFA‐1 mAb was demonstrated to be effective in controlling Tmem in this model, leading to long‐term mixed chimerism and donor‐specific tolerance. Thus, rapamycin and anti‐LFA‐1 mAb are effective in overcoming the potent barrier that donor‐reactive Tmem pose to the induction of mixed chimerism and tolerance despite costimulation blockade.


Clinical & Experimental Allergy | 2012

Persistent molecular microchimerism induces long-term tolerance towards a clinically relevant respiratory allergen

Ulrike Baranyi; Nina Pilat; Martina Gattringer; Birgit Linhart; Christoph Klaus; Elisabeth Schwaiger; John Iacomini; R. Valenta; Thomas Wekerle

Development of antigen‐specific preventive strategies is a challenging goal in IgE‐mediated allergy. We have recently shown in proof‐of‐concept experiments that allergy can be successfully prevented by induction of durable tolerance via molecular chimerism. Transplantation of syngeneic hematopoietic stem cells genetically modified to express the clinically relevant grass pollen allergen Phl p 5 into myeloablated recipients led to high levels of chimerism (i.e. macrochimerism) and completely abrogated Phl p 5‐specific immunity despite repeated immunizations with Phl p 5.

Collaboration


Dive into the Elisabeth Schwaiger's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Georg A. Böhmig

Medical University of Vienna

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Markus Wahrmann

Medical University of Vienna

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nina Pilat

Medical University of Vienna

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas Wekerle

Medical University of Vienna

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christoph Klaus

Medical University of Vienna

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Farsad Eskandary

Medical University of Vienna

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ulrike Baranyi

Medical University of Vienna

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gerhard J. Zlabinger

Medical University of Vienna

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gregor Bond

Medical University of Vienna

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Martina Gattringer

Medical University of Vienna

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge