Elizabeth E. Carretta
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Elizabeth E. Carretta.
Gastroenterology | 2011
Neil G. Terry; Yizheng Zhu; Matthew T. Rinehart; William J. Brown; Steven C. Gebhart; Stephanie D. Bright; Elizabeth E. Carretta; Courtney Ziefle; Masoud Panjehpour; Joseph A. Galanko; Ryan D. Madanick; Evan S. Dellon; Dimitri G. Trembath; Ana E. Bennett; John R. Goldblum; Bergein F. Overholt; John T. Woosley; Nicholas J. Shaheen; Adam Wax
BACKGROUND & AIMS Patients with Barretts esophagus (BE) show increased risk of developing esophageal adenocarcinoma and are routinely examined using upper endoscopy with biopsy to detect neoplastic changes. Angle-resolved low coherence interferometry (a/LCI) uses in vivo depth-resolved nuclear morphology measurements to detect dysplasia. We assessed the clinical utility of a/LCI in the endoscopic surveillance of patients with BE. METHODS Consecutive patients undergoing routine surveillance upper endoscopy for BE were recruited at 2 endoscopy centers. A novel, endoscope-compatible a/LCI system measured the mean diameter and refractive index of cell nuclei in esophageal epithelium at 172 biopsy sites in 46 patients. At each site, an a/LCI measurement was correlated with a concurrent endoscopic biopsy specimen. Each biopsy specimen was assessed histologically and classified as normal, nondysplastic BE, indeterminate for dysplasia, low-grade dysplasia (LGD), or high-grade dysplasia (HGD). The a/LCI data from multiple depths were analyzed to evaluate its ability to differentiate dysplastic from nondysplastic tissue. RESULTS Pathology characterized 5 of the scanned sites as HGD, 8 as LGD, 75 as nondysplastic BE, 70 as normal tissue types, and 14 as indeterminate for dysplasia. The a/LCI nuclear size measurements separated dysplastic from nondysplastic tissue at a statistically significant (P < .001) level for the tissue segment 200 to 300 μm beneath the surface with an accuracy of 86% (147/172). A receiver operator characteristic analysis indicated an area under the curve of 0.91, and an optimized decision point gave 100% (13/13) sensitivity and 84% (134/159) specificity. CONCLUSIONS These preliminary data suggest a/LCI is accurate in detecting dysplasia in vivo in patients with BE.
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine | 2017
MeiLan K. Han; Pedro M. Quibrera; Elizabeth E. Carretta; R. Graham Barr; Eugene R. Bleecker; Russell P. Bowler; Christopher B. Cooper; Alejandro Comellas; David Couper; Jeffrey L. Curtis; Gerard J. Criner; Mark T. Dransfield; Nadia N. Hansel; Eric A. Hoffman; Richard E. Kanner; Jerry A. Krishnan; Carlos H. Martinez; Cheryl Pirozzi; Wanda K. O'Neal; Stephen I. Rennard; Donald P. Tashkin; Jadwiga A. Wedzicha; Prescott G. Woodruff; Robert Paine; Fernando J. Martinez; Neil E. Alexis; Wayne Anderson; Richard C. Boucher; Stephanie A. Christenson; Alejandro P. Comellas
BACKGROUND Present treatment strategies to stratify exacerbation risk in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) rely on a history of two or more events in the previous year. We aimed to understand year to year variability in exacerbations and factors associated with consistent exacerbations over time. METHODS In this longitudinal, prospective analysis of exacerbations in the Subpopulations and Intermediate Outcome Measures in COPD Study (SPIROMICS) cohort, we analysed patients aged 40-80 years with COPD for whom 3 years of prospective data were available, identified through various means including care at academic and non-academic medical centres, word of mouth, and existing patient registries. Participants were enrolled in the study between Nov 12, 2010, and July 31, 2015. We classified patients according to yearly exacerbation frequency: no exacerbations in any year; one exacerbation in every year during 3 years of follow-up; and those with inconsistent exacerbations (individuals who had both years with exacerbations and years without during the 3 years of follow-up). Participants were characterised by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) spirometric category (1-4) on the basis of post-bronchodilator FEV1. Stepwise logistic regression was used to compare factors associated with one or more acute exacerbations of COPD every year for 3 years versus no exacerbations in the same timeframe. Additionally, a stepwise zero-inflated negative binomial model was used to assess predictors of exacerbation count during follow-up in all patients with available data. Baseline symptom burden was assessed with the COPD assessment test. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01969344. FINDINGS 2981 patients were enrolled during the study. 1843 patients had COPD, of which 1105 patients had 3 years of complete, prospective follow-up data. 538 (49%) of 1105 patients had at least one acute exacerbation during the 3 years of follow-up, whereas 567 (51%) had none. 82 (7%) of 1105 patients had at least one acute exacerbation each year, whereas only 23 (2%) had two or more acute exacerbations in each year. An inconsistent pattern (both years with and without acute exacerbations) was common (456 [41%] of the group), particularly among GOLD stages 3 and 4 patients (256 [56%] of 456). In logistic regression, consistent acute exacerbations (≥1 event per year for 3 years) were associated with higher baseline symptom burden, previous exacerbations, greater evidence of small airway abnormality on CT, lower interleukin-15 concentrations, and higher interleukin-8 concentrations, than were no acute exacerbations. INTERPRETATION Although acute exacerbations are common, the exacerbation status of most individuals varies markedly from year to year. Among patients who had any acute exacerbation over 3 years, very few repeatedly had two or more events per year. In addition to symptoms and history of exacerbations in the year before study enrolment, we identified several novel biomarkers associated with consistent exacerbations, including CT-defined small airway abnormality, and interleukin-15 and interleukin-8 concentrations. FUNDING National Institutes of Health, and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.Background Current treatment strategies to stratify exacerbation risk rely on history of ≥2 events in the previous year. To understand year-to-year variability and factors associated with consistent exacerbations over time, we present a prospective analysis of the SPIROMICS cohort. Methods We analyzed SPIROMICS participants with COPD and three years of prospective data (n=1,105). We classified participants according to yearly exacerbation frequency. Stepwise logistic regression compared factors associated with individuals experiencing ≥1 AECOPD in every year for three years versus none. Results During three years follow-up, 48·7% of participants experienced at least one AECOPD, while the majority (51·3%) experienced none. Only 2·1% had ≥2 AECOPD in each year. An inconsistent pattern (both years with and years without AECOPD) was common (41·3% of the group), particularly among GOLD stages 3 and 4 subjects (56·1%). In logistic regression, consistent AECOPD (≥1 event per year for three years) as compared to no AECOPD were associated with higher baseline symptom burden assessed with the COPD Assessment Test, previous exacerbations, greater evidence of small airway abnormality by computed tomography, lower Interleukin-15 (IL-15) and elevated Interleukin-8 (IL-8). Conclusions Although AECOPD are common, the exacerbation status of most individuals varies markedly from year to year. Among participants who experienced any AECOPD over three years, very few repeatedly experienced ≥2 events/year. In addition to symptoms and history of exacerbations in the prior year, we identified several novel biomarkers associated with consistent exacerbations, including CT-defined small airway abnormality, IL-15 and IL-8.
Journal of Translational Medicine | 2014
Wanda K. O'Neal; Wayne Anderson; Patricia V. Basta; Elizabeth E. Carretta; Claire M. Doerschuk; R. G. Barr; Eugene R. Bleecker; Stephanie A. Christenson; Jeffrey L. Curtis; MeiLan K. Han; Nadia N. Hansel; Richard E. Kanner; Eric C. Kleerup; Fernando J. Martinez; Stephen P. Peters; Stephen I. Rennard; Mary Beth Scholand; Ruth Tal-Singer; Prescott G. Woodruff; David Couper; Sonia M. Davis
BackgroundAs a part of the longitudinal Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) study, Subpopulations and Intermediate Outcome Measures in COPD study (SPIROMICS), blood samples are being collected from 3200 subjects with the goal of identifying blood biomarkers for sub-phenotyping patients and predicting disease progression. To determine the most reliable sample type for measuring specific blood analytes in the cohort, a pilot study was performed from a subset of 24 subjects comparing serum, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) plasma, and EDTA plasma with proteinase inhibitors (P100™).Methods105 analytes, chosen for potential relevance to COPD, arranged in 12 multiplex and one simplex platform (Myriad-RBM) were evaluated in duplicate from the three sample types from 24 subjects. The reliability coefficient and the coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated. The performance of each analyte and mean analyte levels were evaluated across sample types.Results20% of analytes were not consistently detectable in any sample type. Higher reliability and/or smaller CV were determined for 12 analytes in EDTA plasma compared to serum, and for 11 analytes in serum compared to EDTA plasma. While reliability measures were similar for EDTA plasma and P100 plasma for a majority of analytes, CV was modestly increased in P100 plasma for eight analytes. Each analyte within a multiplex produced independent measurement characteristics, complicating selection of sample type for individual multiplexes.ConclusionsThere were notable detectability and measurability differences between serum and plasma. Multiplexing may not be ideal if large reliability differences exist across analytes measured within the multiplex, especially if values differ based on sample type. For some analytes, the large CV should be considered during experimental design, and the use of duplicate and/or triplicate samples may be necessary. These results should prove useful for studies evaluating selection of samples for evaluation of potential blood biomarkers.
Journal of Translational Medicine | 2015
Sean Crudgington; Valerie R. Stolberg; Jeanette P. Brown; Joanne Sonstein; Neil E. Alexis; Claire M. Doerschuk; Patricia V. Basta; Elizabeth E. Carretta; David Couper; Annette T. Hastie; Robert J. Kaner; Wanda K. O’Neal; Robert Paine; Stephen I. Rennard; Daichi Shimbo; Prescott G. Woodruff; Michelle R. Zeidler; Jeffrey L. Curtis
BackgroundSubpopulations and Intermediate Outcomes in COPD Study (SPIROMICS) is a multi-center longitudinal, observational study to identify novel phenotypes and biomarkers of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In a subset of 300 subjects enrolled at six clinical centers, we are performing flow cytometric analyses of leukocytes from induced sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and peripheral blood. To minimize several sources of variability, we use a “just-in-time” design that permits immediate staining without pre-fixation of samples, followed by centralized analysis on a single instrument.MethodsThe Immunophenotyping Core prepares 12-color antibody panels, which are shipped to the six Clinical Centers shortly before study visits. Sputum induction occurs at least two weeks before a bronchoscopy visit, at which time peripheral blood and bronchoalveolar lavage are collected. Immunostaining is performed at each clinical site on the day that the samples are collected. Samples are fixed and express shipped to the Immunophenotyping Core for data acquisition on a single modified LSR II flow cytometer. Results are analyzed using FACS Diva and FloJo software and cross-checked by Core scientists who are blinded to subject data.ResultsThus far, a total of 152 sputum samples and 117 samples of blood and BAL have been returned to the Immunophenotyping Core. Initial quality checks indicate useable data from 126 sputum samples (83%), 106 blood samples (91%) and 91 BAL samples (78%). In all three sample types, we are able to identify and characterize the activation state or subset of multiple leukocyte cell populations (including CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, B cells, monocytes, macrophages, neutrophils and eosinophils), thereby demonstrating the validity of the antibody panel.ConclusionsOur study design, which relies on bi-directional communication between clinical centers and the Core according to a pre-specified protocol, appears to reduce several sources of variability often seen in flow cytometric studies involving multiple clinical sites. Because leukocytes contribute to lung pathology in COPD, these analyses will help achieve SPIROMICS aims of identifying subgroups of patients with specific COPD phenotypes. Future analyses will correlate cell-surface markers on a given cell type with smoking history, spirometry, airway measurements, and other parameters.Trial registrationThis study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01969344.
PLOS ONE | 2017
Wayne Anderson; Jae Wook Ha; David Couper; Wanda K. O’Neal; R. Graham Barr; Eugene R. Bleecker; Elizabeth E. Carretta; Christopher B. Cooper; Claire M. Doerschuk; M. Bradley Drummond; MeiLan K. Han; Nadia N. Hansel; Victor Kim; Eric C. Kleerup; Fernando J. Martinez; Stephen I. Rennard; Donald P. Tashkin; Prescott G. Woodruff; Robert Paine; Jeffrey L. Curtis; Richard E. Kanner
Rationale Understanding the reliability and repeatability of clinical measurements used in the diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of disease progression is of critical importance across all disciplines of clinical practice and in clinical trials to assess therapeutic efficacy and safety. Objectives Our goal is to understand normal variability for assessing true changes in health status and to more accurately utilize this data to differentiate disease characteristics and outcomes. Methods Our study is the first study designed entirely to establish the repeatability of a large number of instruments utilized for the clinical assessment of COPD in the same subjects over the same period. We utilized SPIROMICS participants (n = 98) that returned to their clinical center within 6 weeks of their baseline visit to repeat complete baseline assessments. Demographics, spirometry, questionnaires, complete blood cell counts (CBC), medical history, and emphysema status by computerized tomography (CT) imaging were obtained. Results Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) were highly repeatable (ICC’s >0.9) but the 6 minute walk (6MW) was less so (ICC = 0.79). Among questionnaires, the Saint George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) was most repeatable. Self-reported clinical features, such as exacerbation history, and features of chronic bronchitis, often produced kappa values <0.6. Reported age at starting smoking and average number of cigarettes smoked were modestly repeatable (kappa = 0.76 and 0.79). Complete blood counts (CBC) variables produced intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) values between 0.6 and 0.8. Conclusions PFTs were highly repeatable, while subjective measures and subject recall were more variable. Analyses using features with poor repeatability could lead to misclassification and outcome errors. Hence, care should be taken when interpreting change in clinical features based on measures with low repeatability. Efforts to improve repeatability of key clinical features such as exacerbation history and chronic bronchitis are warranted.
Journal of Library Metadata | 2010
Jane Greenberg; Rahul Deshmukh; Lina Huang; Javed Mostafa; Lisa La Vange; Elizabeth E. Carretta; Wanda K. O'Neal
Ontology development and maintenance is a costly undertaking, despite known benefits. Empowerment via ownership may offer a solution to this problem. This article considers empowering clinical scientists as ontology engineers and illustrates this concept through an account of an ontology project in Chronic Obstruction Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The article begins with a brief review of ontology and clinical science. Next, the SPIROMICS project is introduced and the inter-workings (nuts-and-bolts) of the current COPD ontology are described, including an overview of the ontology development teams accomplishments. Following is an initial high-level proposal of steps to engage clinical scientists in the COPD work—as engineers, as well as some processing guidelines. The final section presents conclusions and highlights next steps.
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology | 2018
Carlos H. Martinez; Sara X. Li; Andrew J. Hirzel; Valerie R. Stolberg; Neil E. Alexis; R. Graham Barr; Eugene R. Bleecker; Elizabeth E. Carretta; Stephanie A. Christenson; Christopher B. Cooper; David Couper; Claire M. Doerschuk; MeiLan K. Han; Nadia N. Hansel; Annette T. Hastie; Eric A. Hoffman; Robert J. Kaner; Fernando J. Martinez; Deborah A. Meyers; Wanda K. O'Neal; Robert Paine; Nirupama Putcha; Stephen I. Rennard; Prescott G. Woodruff; Michelle R. Zeidler; Jeffrey L. Curtis
Active smoking in stable COPD subjects significantly increased eosinophil accumulation in the distal airspaces, but not in sputum or peripheral blood. Our findings support the need to investigate this cell-type as a potential driver of COPD symptomatology and progression.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine | 2016
Jered Sieren; John D. Newell; R. Graham Barr; Eugene R. Bleecker; Nathan Burnette; Elizabeth E. Carretta; David Couper; Jonathan G. Goldin; Junfeng Guo; MeiLan K. Han; Nadia N. Hansel; Richard E. Kanner; Ella A. Kazerooni; Fernando J. Martinez; Stephen I. Rennard; Prescott G. Woodruff; Eric A. Hoffman
american thoracic society international conference | 2012
Timothy R. Aksamit; Elizabeth E. Carretta; Charles L. Daley; Anne E. O'Donnell; Byron Thomashow; Rosalie Dominik; Kenneth N. Olivier; David E. Griffith; Alan F. Barker; Dean E. Schraufnagel; Edward Eden; Mark L. Metersky; Gregory Tino; Mattias Salathe
Gastroenterology | 2009
Adam Wax; Neil G. Terry; Yizheng Zhu; Steven C. Gebhart; William J. Brown; Stephanie D. Bright; Elizabeth E. Carretta; John T. Woosley; Nicholas J. Shaheen