Emilie Maillard

Time until definitive quality of life score deterioration as a means of longitudinal analysis for treatment trials in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUNDnThe Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive phase III trial in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma comparing 5FU, folinic acid and cisplatin combination followed by gemcitabine (Arm A) versus the opposite sequence (Arm B) failed to demonstrate a benefit in overall survival. To longitudinally compare the quality of life (QoL) we explored different definitions of time until definitive deterioration (TUDD) of QoL scores according to minimal clinically important difference (MCID) cut-offs.nnnMETHODSnQoL was evaluated using the EORTC QLQ-C30 every 8 weeks until death. The following scores were analysed: global health, emotional functioning, physical functioning, fatigue and pain. TUDD was defined as the time interval between randomisation and the first occurrence of a decrease in QLQ-C30 score ≥5 points without any further improvement in QoL score ≥5 points or any further available QoL data. Analyses were repeated using a 10 point MCID and/or including death as event.nnnRESULTSnFrom 08/2003 to 05/2006, 102 patients in Arm A and 100 in Arm B were included. Using a 5 and a 10 point MCID, TUDD curves of the 5 scores did not differ according to treatment arm., The median TUDD of global health was 5.2 months (4.3-6.2) in Arm A and 6.1 months (5.1-8.5) in Arm B (log-rank p=0.50) including death as an event for a 5 point MCID. Multivariate Cox model showed that tumour localisation and progression were independently associated with TUDD (p<0.05).nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe strategy of chemotherapy did not influence the deterioration of QoL. The TUDD approach seems to provide meaningful clinical results that are adapted to metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma trials.

PRODIGE 34-FFCD 1402-ADAGE: Adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with resected stage III colon cancer: A randomized phase 3 trial.

Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, CHU Avicenne, APHP, Bobigny, France Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France Oncogeriatry, ICM Val d’Aurelle, Montpellier, France Oncology, CH Senlis, Senlis, France Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive, Burgundy University, INSERM U866, Dijon, France Geriatry, CHU Henri Mondor, APHP, Creteil, France Geriatry, Centre Gerontologique Departemental, Marseille, France Gastroenterology, CH de la Roche sur Yon, La Roche sur Yon, France Oncology, CHU Saint-Antoine, APHP, Paris, France rance Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, CHU La Timone, APHM, Marseille, F

High-Dose FOLFIRI plus Bevacizumab in the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients with Two Different UGT1A1 Genotypes: FFCD 0504 Study.

High-dose FOLFIRI has an acceptable safety profile and promising efficacy. UDP-glucuronosyltransferase: (UGT1A1) polymorphism may be predictive of toxicity and efficacy of irinotecan. This phase II study aimed to evaluate the combination of high-dose FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) based on their UGT1A1 genotype. Patients with the UGT1A1 *1/*1 (group 1) or *1/*28 (group 2) genotype received bevacizumab plus high-dose FOLFIRI every 2 weeks. Using the Bryant and Day design with objective response rate and toxicity as the primary endpoints, 54 patients in each group were required with a planned interim analysis after inclusion of 17 patients per group. We planned to stop the trial at the interim analysis if ≤7 patients exhibited an objective response (OR) and/or ≥3 patients exhibited severe toxicity. At the interim analysis, ORs were higher than the number expected: 52.9% (group 1) and 58.8% (group 2). More than three toxic events occurred in both groups and, according to the interim analysis rule, the trial was closed due to unacceptable toxicity. Recruitment was stopped when 86 patients were included and an analysis on overall population was done for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The median PFS was 10.7 months (group 1) and 10.4 months (group 2). The median OS was 25.5 months (group 1) and 23.9 months (group 2). This trial does not support the use of the intensive treatment with HD-FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab combination for MCRC in patients with the UGTA1*1/UGT1A1*1 or UGT1A1*1/UGT1A1*28 genotype. Mol Cancer Ther; 14(12); 2782–8. ©2015 AACR.

Randomised controlled trial of lipiodol transarterial chemoembolisation with or without amiodarone for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUNDnThere is no consensus about the most effective method for transarterial chemoembolisation of hepatocellular carcinoma.nnnAIMnThe aim of this phase II trial was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of lipiodol transarterial chemoembolisation with amiodarone in association with pirarubicin or doxorubicin versus lipiodol transarterial chemoembolisation with anthracycline alone in a control group.nnnMETHODSnPatients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma and Child-Pugh A/B7 were considered eligible for the trial. transarterial chemoembolisation was repeated every 6 weeks for a maximum of 4 sessions.nnnRESULTSnThirteen patients were randomised in the amiodarone group, and 14 were randomised in the control group. The two groups were comparable with respect to their baseline characteristics. The objective response rate according to the EASL criteria was 62% (95% CI 35-88) in the amiodarone group and 50% (95% CI 24-76) in the control group. At 1 and 2 years, survival rates were 77% (95% CI 44-92) and 52% (95% CI 22-75) in the amiodarone group, and 57% (95% CI 28-78) and 40% (95% CI 15-65) in the control group, respectively. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of toxicity.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe results of this study suggest that lipiodol transarterial chemoembolisation with anthracycline and amiodarone was safe but did not increase survival compared with lipiodol transarterial chemoembolisation with anthracycline alone in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Aspirin versus placebo in stage III or high-risk stage II colon cancer with PIK3CA mutation: A French randomised double-blind phase III trial (PRODIGE 50-ASPIK)

Oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy is standard of care for radically resected stage III colon cancer and an accepted option for high-risk stage II. Two recent retrospective studies strongly suggested that low-dose aspirin used (100u202fmg/d) after surgical resection of colorectal cancer with a PIK3CA mutation could act as a targeted therapy with a major protective effect on the risk of recurrence. We propose a double-blind randomized phase III study to evaluate aspirin (100u202fmg/d during 3 years or until recurrence) versus placebo. Main inclusion criteria are patients aged 18 or 20, stage III or high risk stage II. The primary endpoint of the study is 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). Hypotheses are to improve 3-years DFS from placebo: 72% to aspirin: 83% (HRu202f=u202f0.56). 94 events and 264 patients with PIK3CA mutation are required. The secondary endpoints are DFS at 5 years, the overall survival rate at 5 years, grade 3-4 severe bleeding.

Abstract C129: Relation between long‐term blood pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenomics, and severe neurotoxicity in patients undergoing an oxaliplatin‐based regimen

The aim of the study was to investigate the residual blood level of O before each cycle of various oxaliplatin (O) based protocols, and to explore its predictive value for potential occurrence of a severe neurotoxicity. Methods: Between 11/2005 and 06/2008, 220 Pts were included in a prospective cohort, in 7 French centers. Patients received a minimum of 7 cycles of O. Blood samples were taken before each cycle with a maximum of 12 cycles. In parallel neurotoxicity was assessed by the modified Levi score (grade 0 to 3) and by the Von Frey filament exam. Saliva was collected before the first cycle for genomics analysis. The O concentration was obtained by Atomic Absorption Spectrometry assay after nitric digestion of total blood. Polymorphism of different targets were investigated (carrier proteins: MRP2, OCT1, OCT2, GSTP1, adducts repair system: ERCC1, ERCC2). Time to first severe neurotoxicity occurrence (TTSN Events: Grade 2 or3) was estimated using Kaplan‐Meier. Predictive value of severe neurotoxicity was explored using univariate and multivariate logistic or Cox regressions. Harrel C index was produced. Results: 206 pts with gastro‐intestinal cancer had, at the time of analysis, completed follow‐up and 201 pts (91.3%) were eligible for pharmacokinetics. (85%) received FOLFOX regimen (85mg/m2every 2 weeks), the others GEMOX or XELOX (100mg/m2 every 3 weeks). The mean total dose of O received for all pts was 1.18 ± 0.4 g. After cycle 1, 2 and 10, median residual level of O was respectively 0.31 mg/L, 0.43 mg/L and 0.60 mg/L. The maximal concentration was obtained between cycle 5 and cycle 9. Respectively 89 Pts (44%) and 15 pts (7%) had a Gr2 and a Gr3 neurotoxicity. Median time TTSN was 141 days (95% CI: 132 – 161). O concentration before 2nd cure (HR = 1.39, p Conclusions: 1. The mean residual blood level of O before the second cure is correlated with the occurrence of Gr2 or Gr3 neurotoxicity (p Mann‐Whitney = 0.0007) 2. The residual blood level of O before the second O cure is correlated with the delay of occurrence of a Gr2 or Gr3 neurotoxicity in patients receiving an O based‐regimen (Harrel C=0.54, p=0.021). Further statistical analyses will be done to analyse the data from the Von Frey filaments and the gene polymorphism and will be presented at the meeting. An O posology adaptation or infusion duration modification based on Platinum residual level of cure 1 have to be considered in future clinical trial in order to avoid severe Gr2 or Gr3 neurotoxicity. Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8(12 Suppl):C129.