Emily Joan Hurren
Griffith University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Emily Joan Hurren.
Psychology Crime & Law | 2008
Mark Rhys Kebbell; Laurence Alison; Emily Joan Hurren
Abstract Forty-three convicted sex offenders read each of four different offence vignettes that involved a man forcing a female victim into sex and the offenders subsequent police interview. The experimental manipulation involved giving participants each of four different scenarios concerning how the police interviewed the offender. These were interviews characterized by humanity, dominance, displaying an understanding of sex offenders’ cognitive distortions, or a neutral, control interview. Participants were required to rate the interviews on a variety of dimensions, such as the offenders likelihood of confessing, and the fairness of the interview. Where participants were told the man had been interviewed with humanity and compassion, they rated the offender as more likely to confess and rated the interview as fairer than the other conditions. In contrast, participants rated the offender interviewed with a dominant approach as less likely to confess, and for this procedure to be less fair than the other conditions. Displaying an understanding of sex offenders’ cognitive distortions appeared to have had no influence on perceived likelihood of confessions but was perceived to make the crime appear less serious.
Child Abuse & Neglect | 2017
Emily Joan Hurren; Anna Louise Stewart; Susan Michelle Dennison
In this study we examined the consistency of life-course child maltreatment trajectories and youth offending links across birth cohorts. In so doing we demonstrated the value of replication studies for maltreatment research. We applied the methodology of Stewart et al. (2008) and linked population-based (1990 birth cohort) child protection and youth justice administrative data from Queensland, Australia. We performed a group based trajectory analysis to identify distinct maltreatment trajectory groups distinguishable by maltreatment timing and frequency across the life-course. We explored group-based youth offending outcomes with consideration of variations in maltreatment chronicity, timing, and frequency, multi-type maltreatment, gender and race (Indigenous Australian versus non-Indigenous Australian youths). To determine the consistency of maltreatment trajectories and offending links across cohorts (1983/84 versus 1990) we compared our results with those of Stewart et al. (2008). Consistent with Stewart et al. (2008): (1) We identified six distinct maltreatment trajectory groups; (2) Trajectory groups characterised by chronic maltreatment and/or adolescent maltreatment had the largest proportion of young offenders; and (3) Maltreatment frequency commonly peaked at transition points. Extending beyond Stewart et al. (2008) we noted considerable overlap between maltreatment dimensions and a potential impact of race and multi-type maltreatment on maltreatment and offending links. We endorse replication studies as a valuable tool to advance child maltreatment policy and practice and recommend further research on interactions between maltreatment dimensions, gender, race, and youth offending.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health | 2017
Emily Joan Hurren; Anna Louise Stewart; Susan Michelle Dennison
Administrative data are crucial to the “big data” revolution of social science and have played an important role in the development of child maltreatment research. These data are also of value to administrators, policy makers, and clinicians. The focus of this paper is the use of administrative data to produce and replicate longitudinal studies of child maltreatment. Child protection administrative data have several advantages. They are often population-based, and allow longitudinal examination of child maltreatment and complex multi-level analyses. They also allow comparison across subgroups and minority groups, remove burden from individuals to disclose traumatic experiences, and can be less biased than retrospective recall. Finally, they can be linked to data from other agencies to explore comorbidity and outcomes, and are comparatively cost and time effective. The benefits and challenges associated with the use of administrative data for longitudinal child maltreatment research become magnified when these data are used to produce replications. Techniques to address challenges and support future replication efforts include developing a biographical understanding of the systems from which the data are drawn, using multiple data sources to contextualize the data and research results, recognizing and adopting various approaches to replication, and documenting all data coding and manipulation processes. These techniques are illustrated in this paper via a case study of previous replication work.
Psychology Crime & Law | 2010
Mark Rhys Kebbell; Laurence Alison; Emily Joan Hurren; Paul Mazerolle
Applied Cognitive Psychology | 2006
Mark Rhys Kebbell; Emily Joan Hurren; Shannon Roberts
Trends and issues in crime and criminal justice | 2006
Mark Rhys Kebbell; Emily Joan Hurren; Paul Mazerolle
Trends and issues in crime and criminal justice | 2006
Susan Michelle Dennison; Anna Louise Stewart; Emily Joan Hurren
Archive | 2005
Susan Michelle Dennison; Emily Joan Hurren; Anna Louise Stewart
Practical Psychology for Forensic Investigations and Prosecutions | 2008
Mark Rhys Kebbell; Emily Joan Hurren
Archive | 2018
Troy John Allard; Emily Joan Hurren; Carleen Marie Thompson; Brian Jenkins; April Chrzanowski; Anna Louise Stewart