Ennio Iezzi

Phasic voluntary movements reverse the aftereffects of subsequent theta-burst stimulation in humans

Theta-burst stimulation (TBS) is a technique that elicits long-lasting changes in the excitability of human primary motor cortex (M1). Tonic contraction of the target muscle modifies the aftereffects of TBS, whereas interactions between phasic muscle contraction and the aftereffects of TBS are unknown. In this paper, we investigated whether phasic voluntary movements influence TBS-induced changes in M1 excitability. We examined whether a brief sequence of phasic finger movements performed by healthy humans before both intermittent TBS (iTBS) and continuous TBS (cTBS) influences TBS-induced aftereffects. Ten healthy subjects underwent iTBS and cTBS. To evaluate the TBS-induced aftereffects on M1 excitability, single TMS pulses were given over the FDI motor area before (T0) and 5 (T1), 15 (T2), and 30 min (T3) after TBS. To find out whether finger movements influenced the TBS-induced aftereffects, we tested motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) size by single TMS pulses at T0, immediately after movements, and at T1-T3. We also measured the kinematic variables mean amplitude and mean peak velocity of the movements. When no phasic voluntary movements preceded TBS, iTBS elicited facilitatory and cTBS elicited inhibitory aftereffects on MEP size. Conversely, movements performed before TBS elicited significant changes in the direction of the TBS-induced aftereffects. iTBS produced inhibitory instead of facilitatory aftereffects and cTBS produced facilitatory instead of inhibitory aftereffects. Finger movements alone had no effects on MEPs size tested with single-pulse TMS. Peripheral electrical stimulation had no effect on iTBS-induced aftereffects. Repeated phasic finger movements interfere with TBS-induced aftereffects probably by modulating mechanisms of brain metaplasticity.

Correlation between cortical plasticity, motor learning and BDNF genotype in healthy subjects

There is good evidence that synaptic plasticity in human motor cortex is involved in behavioural motor learning; in addition, it is now possible to probe mechanisms of synaptic plasticity using a variety of transcranial brain-stimulation protocols. Interactions between these protocols suggest that they both utilise common mechanisms. The aim of the present experiments was to test how well responsiveness to brain-stimulation protocols and behavioural motor learning correlate with each other in a sample of 21 healthy volunteers. We also examined whether any of these measures were influenced by the presence of a Val66Met polymorphism in the BDNF gene since this is another factor that has been suggested to be able to predict response to tests of synaptic plasticity. In 3 different experimental sessions, volunteers underwent 5-Hz rTMS, intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) and a motor learning task. Blood samples were collected from each subject for BDNF genotyping. As expected, both 5-Hz rTMS and iTBS significantly facilitated MEPs. Similarly, as expected, kinematic variables of finger movement significantly improved during the motor learning task. Although there was a significant correlation between the effect of iTBS and 5-Hz rTMS, there was no relationship in each subject between the amount of TMS-induced plasticity and the increase in kinematic variables during motor learning. Val66Val and Val66Met carriers did not differ in their response to any of the protocols. The present results emphasise that although some TMS measures of cortical plasticity may correlate with each other, they may not always relate directly to measures of behavioural learning. Similarly, presence of the Val66Met BDNF polymorphism also does not reliably predict responsiveness in small groups of individuals. Individual success in behavioural learning is unlikely to be closely related to any single measure of synaptic plasticity.

Subthalamic nucleus stimulation and somatosensory temporal discrimination in Parkinson’s disease

Whereas numerous studies document the effects of dopamine medication and deep brain stimulation on motor function in patients with Parkinsons disease, few have investigated deep brain stimulation-induced changes in sensory functions. In this study of 13 patients with Parkinsons disease, we tested the effects of deep brain stimulation on the somatosensory temporal discrimination threshold. To investigate whether deep brain stimulation and dopaminergic medication induce similar changes in somatosensory discrimination, somatosensory temporal discrimination threshold values were acquired under four experimental conditions: (i) medication ON/deep brain stimulation on; (ii) medication ON/deep brain stimulation off; (iii) medication OFF/deep brain stimulation on; and (iv) medication OFF/deep brain stimulation off. Patients also underwent clinical and neuropsychological evaluations during each experimental session. Somatosensory temporal discrimination threshold values obtained in patients were compared with 13 age-matched healthy subjects. Somatosensory temporal discrimination threshold values were significantly higher in patients than in healthy subjects. In patients, somatosensory temporal discrimination threshold values were significantly lower when patients were studied in medication ON than in medication OFF conditions. Somatosensory temporal discrimination threshold values differed significantly between deep brain stimulation on and deep brain stimulation off conditions only when the patients were studied in the medication ON condition and were higher in the deep brain stimulation on/medication ON than in the deep brain stimulation off/medication ON condition. Dopamine but not subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation restores the altered somatosensory temporal discrimination in patients with Parkinsons disease. Deep brain stimulation degrades somatosensory temporal discrimination by modifying central somatosensory processing whereas dopamine restores the interplay between cortical and subcortical structures.

Effects of intermittent theta-burst stimulation on practice-related changes in fast finger movements in healthy subjects

In this paper we investigated the effects of intermittent theta‐burst stimulation (iTBS) applied to the primary motor cortex on practice‐related changes in motor performance. Seventeen healthy subjects underwent two experimental sessions, one testing real iTBS and the other testing sham iTBS. Before and after both iTBS sessions, the subjects practiced fast right index‐finger abductions for a few minutes. As measures of cortical excitability we calculated resting motor threshold and motor‐evoked potential amplitude. As measures of practice‐related changes we evaluated the mean movement amplitude, peak velocity and peak acceleration values for each block. When subjects practiced the movement task, the three variables measuring practice‐related changes improved to a similar extent during real and sham iTBS whereas cortical excitability increased only during real iTBS. In a further group of five healthy subjects we investigated the effect of real and sham iTBS on changes in motor performance after a longer task practice and found no significant changes in motor performance and retention after real and sham iTBS. From our results overall we conclude that in healthy subjects iTBS applied to the primary motor cortex leaves practice‐related changes in an index finger abduction task unaffected. We suggest that iTBS delivered over the primary motor cortex is insufficient to alter motor performance because early motor learning probably engages a wide cortical and subcortical network.

Dopamine Influences Primary Motor Cortex Plasticity and Dorsal Premotor-to-Motor Connectivity in Parkinson’s Disease

We investigated abnormal premotor to motor (PMd-to-M1) connectivity in Parkinsons disease (PD) with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). We studied 28 patients off and on dopaminergic therapy and 28 healthy subjects. We delivered 5 Hz rTMS over M1 before and after conditioning PMd with 5 Hz rTMS. In healthy subjects, motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by M1-rTMS were facilitated and PMd-rTMS left MEPs unchanged. In patients, before PMd-rTMS, M1-rTMS induced no MEP facilitation, whereas after PMd-rTMS, it significantly facilitated MEPs only when patients were on therapy. In the second experiment, we delivered M1-rTMS under 3 different attention-demanding tasks: eyes closed, attention directed to the stimulated hand, and attention directed to the nonstimulated hand. In healthy subjects, a more pronounced MEP facilitation was present when subjects directed attention to the stimulated hand. In patients, the MEP facilitation was present when attention was directed to the stimulated hand only when patients were on therapy. Finally, we delivered M1-rTMS in patients on therapy while they were looking at the stimulated hand, before and after 1 Hz PMd-rTMS. PMd-rTMS reduced the attention-induced MEP facilitation. We conclude that in addition to abnormal M1 plasticity, the reduced MEP facilitation in PD also reflects altered PMd-to-M1 connectivity.

Theta-burst stimulation over primary motor cortex degrades early motor learning.

Theta‐burst stimulation (TBS) is currently used for inducing long‐lasting changes in primary motor cortex (M1) excitability. More information is needed on how M1 is involved in early motor learning (practice‐related improvement in motor performance, motor retention and motor consolidation). We investigated whether inhibitory continuous TBS (cTBS) is an effective experimental approach for modulating early motor learning of a simple finger movement in healthy humans. In a short task, 11 subjects practised 160 movements, and in a longer task also testing motor consolidation ten subjects practised 600 movements. During both experiments subjects randomly received real or sham cTBS over the left M1. Motor evoked potentials were tested at baseline and 7 min after cTBS. In the 160‐movement experiment to test motor retention, 20 movements were repeated 30 min after motor practice ended. In the 600‐movement experiment motor retention was assessed 15 and 30 min after motor practice ended, motor consolidation was tested by performing 20 movements 24 h after motor practice ended. Kinematic variables – movement amplitude, peak velocity and peak acceleration – were measured. cTBS significantly reduced the practice‐related improvement in motor performance of finger movements in the experiment involving 160 movements and in the first part of the experiment involving 600 movements. After cTBS, peak velocity and peak acceleration of the 20 movements testing motor retention decreased whereas those testing motor consolidation remained unchanged. cTBS over M1 degrades practice‐related improvement in motor performance and motor retention, but not motor consolidation of a voluntary finger movement.

Short-term and long-term plasticity interaction in human primary motor cortex

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over primary motor cortex (M1) elicits changes in motor evoked potential (MEP) size thought to reflect short‐ and long‐term forms of synaptic plasticity, resembling short‐term potentiation (STP) and long‐term potentiation/depression (LTP/LTD) observed in animal experiments. We designed this study in healthy humans to investigate whether STP as elicited by 5‐Hz rTMS interferes with LTP/LTD‐like plasticity induced by intermittent and continuous theta‐burst stimulation (iTBS and cTBS). The effects induced by 5‐Hz rTMS and iTBS/cTBS were indexed as changes in MEP size. We separately evaluated changes induced by 5‐Hz rTMS, iTBS and cTBS applied alone and those induced by iTBS and cTBS delivered after priming 5‐Hz rTMS. Interactions between 5‐Hz rTMS and iTBS/cTBS were investigated under several experimental conditions by delivering 5‐Hz rTMS at suprathreshold and subthreshold intensity, allowing 1 and 5 min intervals to elapse between 5‐Hz rTMS and TBS, and delivering one and ten 5‐Hz rTMS trains. We also investigated whether 5‐Hz rTMS induces changes in intracortical excitability tested with paired‐pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation. When given alone, 5‐Hz rTMS induced short‐lasting and iTBS/cTBS induced long‐lasting changes in MEP amplitudes. When M1 was primed with 10 suprathreshold 5‐Hz rTMS trains at 1 min before iTBS or cTBS, the iTBS/cTBS‐induced after‐effects disappeared. The 5‐Hz rTMS left intracortical excitability unchanged. We suggest that STP elicited by suprathreshold 5‐Hz rTMS abolishes iTBS/cTBS‐induced LTP/LTD‐like plasticity through non‐homeostatic metaplasticity mechanisms. Our study provides new information on interactions between short‐term and long‐term rTMS‐induced plasticity in human M1.

Effects of unilateral subthalamic deep brain stimulation on contralateral arm sequential movements in Parkinson’s disease

In Parkinson’s disease, unilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN), unlike bilateral stimulation, excludes ipsilateral confounding effects so that the contralateral effects of DBS on motor performance can be investigated alone. Because no kinematic study has yet investigated how unilateral STN-DBS affects the performance of a contralateral fast sequential motor act, we performed a kinematic analysis of the movement duration, switching time and spatial accuracy of a motor arm sequence in 10 parkinsonian patients. Patients were studied without dopaminergic therapy and when they were OFF and ON unilateral STN-DBS. We found that unilateral STN-DBS significantly improved movement time of a motor sequence and the switching time from one sequential step to the next, whereas accuracy deteriorated. We conclude that unilateral STN-DBS improves the performance of contralateral sequential arm movements in patients with Parkinson’s disease.

Neurophysiology of synaptic functioning in multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory immune-mediate disorder of the central nervous system (CNS), primarily affecting the myelin sheath and followed by neurodegeneration. Synaptic alterations are emerging as critical determinants of early neurodegeneration in MS. Inflammation-induced alterations of synaptic transmission and plasticity have been investigated in vitro and also in human MS using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) techniques. Specific inflammatory cytokines alter glutamatergic and GABAergic transmission, resulting in synaptic hyperexcitability. In both experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) and MS, excitotoxic damage and neurodegeneration are found even in the early phases of disease, conversely inflammation persists in the progressive phases. Inflammatory cytokines also affect synaptic plasticity, as both long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) are altered in EAE and in MS patients. In particular, inflammation profoundly subverts plasticity and influence both clinical recovery after a relapse and disease course. Regulation of neuronal activity by cytokines plays important roles in the neuro-immune crosstalk involved in inflammation-associated excitotoxic neuronal damage, and in the chance of developing compensatory plasticity. Innate and adaptive immunity interact with the CNS in MS, in line with the concept that cytokines and chemokines, in concert with neurotransmitters and neuropeptides, represent a major communication system in the CNS.

Correlation between habituation of visual-evoked potentials and magnetophosphene thresholds in migraine: A case-control study

Introduction In migraine most studies report an interictal deficit of habituation of visual-evoked potentials (VEP-hab) and reduced thresholds for phosphene induction (PT) by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). We searched for a possible correlation between VEP-hab and PT in migraine patients and healthy controls to test whether they reflect the same pathophysiological abnormality. Methods We assessed PT and VEP-hab measured as the percentage change of N1/P1 amplitude over six blocks of 100 responses in 15 healthy volunteers (HV) and in 13 episodic migraineurs without aura (MO) between attacks. Results were compared using Mann-Whitney U test. Interrelationships were examined using Spearmans correlation. Results In MO patients VEP-hab was reduced compared to HV (p = 0.001), while PT were not significantly different between HV and MO. There was no correlation between PT and VEP-hab in either group of participants. Conclusions We confirm that in interictal migraine VEP habituation is deficient, but magnetophosphene threshold normal. VEP-hab and PT were not correlated with each other in healthy controls or in migraineurs. This finding suggests that they index different facets of cortical excitability in migraine, i.e. a punctual normal measure of the cortical activation threshold for PT and a dynamic response pattern to repeated stimuli for VEP habituation.