Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Eric C. Polley is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Eric C. Polley.


Nature Biotechnology | 2016

Comprehensive characterization of the Published Kinase Inhibitor Set

J.M. Elkins; Vita Fedele; M. Szklarz; Kamal R. Abdul Azeez; E. Salah; Jowita Mikolajczyk; Sergei Romanov; Nikolai Sepetov; Xi-Ping Huang; Bryan L. Roth; Ayman Al Haj Zen; Denis Fourches; Eugene N. Muratov; Alex Tropsha; Joel Morris; Beverly A. Teicher; Mark Kunkel; Eric C. Polley; Karen E Lackey; Francis Atkinson; John P. Overington; Paul Bamborough; Susanne Müller; Daniel J. Price; Timothy M. Willson; David H. Drewry; Stefan Knapp; William J. Zuercher

Despite the success of protein kinase inhibitors as approved therapeutics, drug discovery has focused on a small subset of kinase targets. Here we provide a thorough characterization of the Published Kinase Inhibitor Set (PKIS), a set of 367 small-molecule ATP-competitive kinase inhibitors that was recently made freely available with the aim of expanding research in this field and as an experiment in open-source target validation. We screen the set in activity assays with 224 recombinant kinases and 24 G protein–coupled receptors and in cellular assays of cancer cell proliferation and angiogenesis. We identify chemical starting points for designing new chemical probes of orphan kinases and illustrate the utility of these leads by developing a selective inhibitor for the previously untargeted kinases LOK and SLK. Our cellular screens reveal compounds that modulate cancer cell growth and angiogenesis in vitro. These reagents and associated data illustrate an efficient way forward to increasing understanding of the historically untargeted kinome.


JAMA Oncology | 2017

Associations Between Cancer Predisposition Testing Panel Genes and Breast Cancer

Fergus J. Couch; Hermela Shimelis; Chunling Hu; Steven N. Hart; Eric C. Polley; Jie Na; Emily Hallberg; Raymond Moore; Abigail Thomas; Jenna Lilyquist; Bingjian Feng; Rachel McFarland; Tina Pesaran; Robert Huether; Holly LaDuca; Elizabeth C. Chao; David E. Goldgar; Jill S. Dolinsky

Importance Germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 predispose to an increased lifetime risk of breast cancer. However, the relevance of germline variants in other genes from multigene hereditary cancer testing panels is not well defined. Objective To determine the risks of breast cancer associated with germline variants in cancer predisposition genes. Design, Setting, and Participants A study population of 65 057 patients with breast cancer receiving germline genetic testing of cancer predisposition genes with hereditary cancer multigene panels. Associations between pathogenic variants in non-BRCA1 and non-BRCA2 predisposition genes and breast cancer risk were estimated in a case-control analysis of patients with breast cancer and Exome Aggregation Consortium reference controls. The women underwent testing between March 15, 2012, and June 30, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures Breast cancer risk conferred by pathogenic variants in non-BRCA1 and non-BRCA2 predisposition genes. Results The mean (SD) age at diagnosis for the 65 057 women included in the analysis was 48.5 (11.1) years. The frequency of pathogenic variants in 21 panel genes identified in 41 611 consecutively tested white women with breast cancer was estimated at 10.2%. After exclusion of BRCA1, BRCA2, and syndromic breast cancer genes (CDH1, PTEN, and TP53), observed pathogenic variants in 5 of 16 genes were associated with high or moderately increased risks of breast cancer: ATM (OR, 2.78; 95% CI, 2.22-3.62), BARD1 (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.31-3.63), CHEK2 (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.31-1.67), PALB2 (OR, 7.46; 95% CI, 5.12-11.19), and RAD51D (OR, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.21-7.88). Conversely, variants in the BRIP1 and RAD51C ovarian cancer risk genes; the MRE11A, RAD50, and NBN MRN complex genes; the MLH1 and PMS2 mismatch repair genes; and NF1 were not associated with increased risks of breast cancer. Conclusions and Relevance This study establishes several panel genes as high- and moderate-risk breast cancer genes and provides estimates of breast cancer risk associated with pathogenic variants in these genes among individuals qualifying for clinical genetic testing.


Gynecologic Oncology | 2017

Frequency of mutations in a large series of clinically ascertained ovarian cancer cases tested on multi-gene panels compared to reference controls

Jenna Lilyquist; Holly LaDuca; Eric C. Polley; Brigette Tippin Davis; Hermela Shimelis; Chunling Hu; Steven N. Hart; Jill S. Dolinsky; Fergus J. Couch; David E. Goldgar

OBJECTIVES Given the lack of adequate screening modalities, knowledge of ovarian cancer risks for carriers of pathogenic alterations in predisposition genes is important for decisions about risk-reduction by salpingo-oophorectomy. We sought to determine which genes assayed on multi-gene panels are associated with ovarian cancer, the magnitude of the associations, and for which clinically meaningful associations could be ruled out. METHODS 7768 adult ovarian cancer cases of European ancestry referred to a single clinical testing laboratory underwent multi-gene panel testing for detection of pathogenic alterations in known or suspected ovarian cancer susceptibility genes. A targeted capture approach was employed to assay each of 19 genes for the presence of pathogenic or likely pathogenic alterations. Mutation frequencies in ovarian cancer cases were compared to mutation frequencies in individuals from the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC). Analyses stratified by family and personal history of other cancers and age at diagnosis were also performed. RESULTS Significant associations (p<0.001) were identified between alterations in 11 genes and ovarian cancer, with eight of these displaying ≥5-fold increased risk (BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, MSH2, MSH6, RAD51C, RAD51D). Relative risks of ovarian cancer greater than two-fold were also observed for ATM, but could reliably be ruled out for RAD50 and CHEK2. CONCLUSIONS These results will inform clinical management of women found to carry pathogenic alterations in genes tested on multi-gene panels. The knowledge that some genes are not associated with OC can reduce concerns of women found to carry pathogenic alterations in those genes.


European Journal of Cancer | 2017

Societal challenges of precision medicine : Bringing order to chaos

Roberto Salgado; Helen M. Moore; John W. M. Martens; Tracy G. Lively; Shakun Malik; Ultan McDermott; Stefan Michiels; Jeffrey A. Moscow; Sabine Tejpar; Tawnya C. McKee; Denis Lacombe; Robert Becker; Philip A. Beer; Jonas Bergh; Jan Bogaerts; Simon J. Dovedi; Antonio Tito Fojo; Moritz Gerstung; Vassilis Golfinopoulos; Stephen M. Hewitt; Daniel Hochhauser; Hartmut Juhl; Robert J. Kinders; Thomas Lillie; Kim Lyerly Herbert; Shyamala Maheswaran; Mehdi Mesri; Sumimasa Nagai; Irene Norstedt; Daniel O'Connor

The increasing number of drugs targeting specific proteins implicated in tumourigenesis and the commercial promotion of relatively affordable genome-wide analyses has led to an increasing expectation among patients with cancer that they can now receive effective personalised treatment based on the often complex genomic signature of their tumour. For such approaches to work in routine practice, the development of correspondingly complex biomarker assays through an appropriate and rigorous regulatory framework will be required. It is becoming increasingly evident that a re-engineering of clinical research is necessary so that regulatory considerations and procedures facilitate the efficient translation of these required biomarker assays from the discovery setting through to clinical application. This article discusses the practical requirements and challenges of developing such new precision medicine strategies, based on leveraging complex genomic profiles, as discussed at the Innovation and Biomarkers in Cancer Drug Development meeting (8th-9th September 2016, Brussels, Belgium).


Cancer Research | 2017

The National Cancer Institute ALMANAC: A Comprehensive Screening Resource for the Detection of Anticancer Drug Pairs with Enhanced Therapeutic Activity

Susan Holbeck; Richard F. Camalier; James A. Crowell; Jeevan Prasaad Govindharajulu; Melinda G. Hollingshead; Lawrence W. Anderson; Eric C. Polley; Larry Rubinstein; Apurva K. Srivastava; Deborah Wilsker; Jerry M. Collins; James H. Doroshow

To date, over 100 small-molecule oncology drugs have been approved by the FDA. Because of the inherent heterogeneity of tumors, these small molecules are often administered in combination to prevent emergence of resistant cell subpopulations. Therefore, new combination strategies to overcome drug resistance in patients with advanced cancer are needed. In this study, we performed a systematic evaluation of the therapeutic activity of over 5,000 pairs of FDA-approved cancer drugs against a panel of 60 well-characterized human tumor cell lines (NCI-60) to uncover combinations with greater than additive growth-inhibitory activity. Screening results were compiled into a database, termed the NCI-ALMANAC (A Large Matrix of Anti-Neoplastic Agent Combinations), publicly available at https://dtp.cancer.gov/ncialmanac Subsequent in vivo experiments in mouse xenograft models of human cancer confirmed combinations with greater than single-agent efficacy. Concomitant detection of mechanistic biomarkers for these combinations in vivo supported the initiation of two phase I clinical trials at the NCI to evaluate clofarabine with bortezomib and nilotinib with paclitaxel in patients with advanced cancer. Consequently, the hypothesis-generating NCI-ALMANAC web-based resource has demonstrated value in identifying promising combinations of approved drugs with potent anticancer activity for further mechanistic study and translation to clinical trials. Cancer Res; 77(13); 3564-76. ©2017 AACR.


JAMA | 2018

Association between inherited germline mutations in cancer predisposition genes and risk of pancreatic cancer

Chunling Hu; Steven N. Hart; Eric C. Polley; Rohan Gnanaolivu; Hermela Shimelis; Kun Y. Lee; Jenna Lilyquist; Jie Na; Raymond Moore; Samuel O. Antwi; William R. Bamlet; Kari G. Chaffee; John DiCarlo; Zhong Wu; Raed Samara; Pashtoon Murtaza Kasi; Robert R. McWilliams; Gloria M. Petersen; Fergus J. Couch

Importance Individuals genetically predisposed to pancreatic cancer may benefit from early detection. Genes that predispose to pancreatic cancer and the risks of pancreatic cancer associated with mutations in these genes are not well defined. Objective To determine whether inherited germline mutations in cancer predisposition genes are associated with increased risks of pancreatic cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants Case-control analysis to identify pancreatic cancer predisposition genes; longitudinal analysis of patients with pancreatic cancer for prognosis. The study included 3030 adults diagnosed as having pancreatic cancer and enrolled in a Mayo Clinic registry between October 12, 2000, and March 31, 2016, with last follow-up on June 22, 2017. Reference controls were 123 136 individuals with exome sequence data in the public Genome Aggregation Database and 53 105 in the Exome Aggregation Consortium database. Exposures Individuals were classified based on carrying a deleterious mutation in cancer predisposition genes and having a personal or family history of cancer. Main Outcomes and Measures Germline mutations in coding regions of 21 cancer predisposition genes were identified by sequencing of products from a custom multiplex polymerase chain reaction–based panel; associations of genes with pancreatic cancer were assessed by comparing frequency of mutations in genes of pancreatic cancer patients with those of reference controls. Results Comparing 3030 case patients with pancreatic cancer (43.2% female; 95.6% non-Hispanic white; mean age at diagnosis, 65.3 [SD, 10.7] years) with reference controls, significant associations were observed between pancreatic cancer and mutations in CDKN2A (0.3% of cases and 0.02% of controls; odds ratio [OR], 12.33; 95% CI, 5.43-25.61); TP53 (0.2% of cases and 0.02% of controls; OR, 6.70; 95% CI, 2.52-14.95); MLH1 (0.13% of cases and 0.02% of controls; OR, 6.66; 95% CI, 1.94-17.53); BRCA2 (1.9% of cases and 0.3% of controls; OR, 6.20; 95% CI, 4.62-8.17); ATM (2.3% of cases and 0.37% of controls; OR, 5.71; 95% CI, 4.38-7.33); and BRCA1 (0.6% of cases and 0.2% of controls; OR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.54-4.05). Conclusions and Relevance In this case-control study, mutations in 6 genes associated with pancreatic cancer were found in 5.5% of all pancreatic cancer patients, including 7.9% of patients with a family history of pancreatic cancer and 5.2% of patients without a family history of pancreatic cancer. Further research is needed for replication in other populations.


Cancer Research | 2018

Abstract PD1-01: Triple negative breast cancer predisposition genes

Fergus J. Couch; Hermela Shimelis; Holly LaDuca; Chunling Hu; Steven N. Hart; Eric C. Polley; Tina Pesaran; B Tippin-Davis; David E. Goldgar; Jill S. Dolinsky

Background: Germline cancer testing panels provide an effective method for identifying individuals at increased risk for breast cancer. However, estimates of risk for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) (estrogen receptor-negative, progesterone receptor-negative, HER2-negative) associated with pathogenic mutations in panel genes have not been established. We sought to define the genes that contribute to TNBC. Methods:Germline hereditary cancer multigene panel testing results were obtained for 8,753 TNBCs evaluated by a clinical testing laboratory. Associations between pathogenic mutations in individual genes and TNBC were assessed by comparing mutation frequencies in TNBCs and in the Exome Aggregation Consortium, non-Finn European, non-Cancer Genome Atlas reference controls. Results: Inactivating mutations in 21 known cancer predisposition genes were identified in 14.6% of TNBCs. BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, BARD1 , and RAD51D alterations were associated with high risks (odds ratio(OR)>5.0) of TNBC and variants in BRIP1 , RAD51C , MSH6, and TP53 were associated with moderate risks (OR>2). In contrast, ATM, CHEK2, NBN, and RAD50 yielded no clinically relevant risks of TNBC. Pathogenic mutations in these established non- BRCA1/2 TNBC susceptibility genes were detected in 6.3% of TNBCs. Similar trends were observed among African American TNBCs. Overall, 5.5% of TNBCs with pathogenic mutations did not meet NCCN clinical testing criteria for BRCA1/2 due to a lack of significant family history and diagnosis over the age of 60. Conclusions: The identification of genes associated with elevated risk of TNBC will improve understanding of the etiology of this aggressive form of breast cancer and inform risk management of individuals receiving panel testing. The high frequency of pathogenic variants suggests that all patients with TNBC, regardless of age of diagnosis or family history of cancer, should be considered for multigene panel testing. Citation Format: Couch FJ, Shimelis H, LaDuca H, Hu C, Hart SN, Polley EC, Pesaran T, Tippin-Davis B, Goldgar DE, Dolinsky JS. Triple negative breast cancer predisposition genes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD1-01.


bioRxiv | 2018

Microbiome-TP53 Gene Interaction in Human Lung Cancer

K. Leigh Greathouse; James R White; Ashley J. Vargas; Valery Bliskovsky; Jessica Beck; Natalia von Muhlinen; Eric C. Polley; Elise D. Bowman; Mohammed A. Khan; Ana I. Robles; Tomer Cooks; Bríd M. Ryan; Amiran Dzutsev; Giorgio Trinchieri; Marbin Pineda; Sven Bilke; Paul S. Meltzer; Alexis N. Hokenstad; Tricia M. Stickrod; Marina Walther-Antonio; Joshua P. Earl; Joshua Chang Mell; Jaroslaw Krol; Sergey Balashov; Archana S. Bhat; Garth D. Ehrlich; Alex Valm; Clayton Deming; Sean Conlan; Julia Oh

Background Lung cancer is the leading cancer diagnosis worldwide and the number one cause of cancer deaths. Exposure to cigarette smoke, the primary risk factor in lung cancer, reduces epithelial barrier integrity and increases susceptibility to infections. Herein, we hypothesized that somatic mutations together with cigarette smoke generate a dysbiotic microbiota that is associated with lung carcinogenesis. Using lung tissue from controls (n=33) and cancer cases (n=143), we conducted 16S rRNA bacterial gene sequencing, with RNA-seq data from lung cancer cases in The Cancer Genome Atlas (n=1112) serving as the validation cohort. Results Overall, we demonstrate a lower alpha diversity in normal lung as compared to non-tumor adjacent or tumor tissue. In squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) specifically, a separate group of taxa were identified, in which Acidovorax was enriched in smokers (P =0.0013). Acidovorax temporans was identified by fluorescent in situ hybridization within tumor sections, and confirmed by two separate 16S rRNA strategies. Further, these taxa, including Acidovorax, exhibited higher abundance among the subset of SCC cases with TP53 mutations, an association not seen in adenocarcinomas (AD). Conclusions The results of this comprehensive study show both a microbiome-gene and microbiome-exposure interactions in SCC lung cancer tissue. Specifically, tumors harboring TP53 mutations, which can damage epithelial function, have a unique bacterial consortia which is higher in relative abundance in smoking-associated SCC. Given the significant need for clinical diagnostic tools in lung cancer, this study may provide novel biomarkers for early detection.


Journal of the National Cancer Institute | 2018

Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Risk Genes Identified by Multigene Hereditary Cancer Panel Testing

Hermela Shimelis; Holly LaDuca; Chunling Hu; Steven N. Hart; Jie Na; Abigail Thomas; Margaret Akinhanmi; Raymond Moore; Hiltrud Brauch; Angela Cox; Diana Eccles; Amanda Ewart-Toland; Peter A. Fasching; Florentia Fostira; Judy Garber; Andrew K. Godwin; Irene Konstantopoulou; Heli Nevanlinna; Priyanka Sharma; Drakoulis Yannoukakos; Song Yao; Bingjian Feng; Brigette Tippin Davis; Jenna Lilyquist; Tina Pesaran; David E. Goldgar; Eric C. Polley; Jill S. Dolinsky; Fergus J. Couch

Abstract Background Germline genetic testing with hereditary cancer gene panels can identify women at increased risk of breast cancer. However, those at increased risk of triple-negative (estrogen receptor–negative, progesterone receptor–negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor–negative) breast cancer (TNBC) cannot be identified because predisposition genes for TNBC, other than BRCA1, have not been established. The aim of this study was to define the cancer panel genes associated with increased risk of TNBC. Methods Multigene panel testing for 21 genes in 8753 TNBC patients was performed by a clinical testing laboratory, and testing for 17 genes in 2148 patients was conducted by a Triple Negative Breast Cancer Consortium (TNBCC) of research studies. Associations between deleterious mutations in cancer predisposition genes and TNBC were evaluated using results from TNBC patients and reference controls. Results Germline pathogenic variants in BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, and RAD51D were associated with high risk (odds ratio > 5.0) of TNBC and greater than 20% lifetime risk for overall breast cancer among Caucasians. Pathogenic variants in BRIP1, RAD51C, and TP53 were associated with moderate risk (odds ratio > 2) of TNBC. Similar trends were observed for the African American population. Pathogenic variants in these TNBC genes were detected in 12.0% (3.7% non-BRCA1/2) of all participants. Conclusions Multigene hereditary cancer panel testing can identify women with elevated risk of TNBC due to mutations in BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, and RAD51D. These women can potentially benefit from improved screening, risk management, and cancer prevention strategies. Patients with mutations may also benefit from specific targeted therapeutic strategies.


Journal of Virology | 2018

HIV Protease-Generated Casp8p41, When Bound and Inactivated by Bcl2, Is Degraded by the Proteasome

Sekar Natesampillai; Nathan W. Cummins; Zilin Nie; Rahul Sampath; Jason V. Baker; Keith Henry; Marilia Rita Pinzone; Una O'Doherty; Eric C. Polley; Gary D. Bren; David J. Katzmann; Andrew D. Badley

ABSTRACT HIV protease is known to cause cell death, which is dependent upon cleavage of procaspase 8. HIV protease cleavage of procaspase 8 generates Casp8p41, which directly binds Bak with nanomolar affinity, causing Bak activation and consequent cell death. Casp8p41 can also bind Bcl2 with nanomolar affinity, in which case cell death is averted. Central memory CD4 T cells express high levels of Bcl2, possibly explaining why those cells do not die when they reactivate HIV. Here, we determine that the Casp8p41-Bcl2 complex is polyubiquitinated and degraded by the proteasome. Ixazomib, a proteasome inhibitor in clinical use, blocks this pathway, increasing the abundance of Casp8p41 and causing more cells to die in a Casp8p41-dependent manner. IMPORTANCE The Casp8p41 pathway of cell death is unique to HIV-infected cells yet is blocked by Bcl2. Once bound by Bcl2, Casp8p41 is polyubiquitinated and degraded by the proteasome. Proteasome inhibition blocks degradation of Casp8p41, increasing Casp8p41 levels and causing more HIV-infected cells to die.

Collaboration


Dive into the Eric C. Polley's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James H. Doroshow

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge