Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Erik A. Petigura is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Erik A. Petigura.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2013

Prevalence of Earth-size planets orbiting Sun-like stars

Erik A. Petigura; Andrew W. Howard; Geoffrey W. Marcy

Significance A major question is whether planets suitable for biochemistry are common or rare in the universe. Small rocky planets with liquid water enjoy key ingredients for biology. We used the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Kepler telescope to survey 42,000 Sun-like stars for periodic dimmings that occur when a planet crosses in front of its host star. We found 603 planets, 10 of which are Earth size and orbit in the habitable zone, where conditions permit surface liquid water. We measured the detectability of these planets by injecting synthetic planet-caused dimmings into Kepler brightness measurements. We find that 22% of Sun-like stars harbor Earth-size planets orbiting in their habitable zones. The nearest such planet may be within 12 light-years. Determining whether Earth-like planets are common or rare looms as a touchstone in the question of life in the universe. We searched for Earth-size planets that cross in front of their host stars by examining the brightness measurements of 42,000 stars from National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Kepler mission. We found 603 planets, including 10 that are Earth size () and receive comparable levels of stellar energy to that of Earth (). We account for Kepler’s imperfect detectability of such planets by injecting synthetic planet–caused dimmings into the Kepler brightness measurements and recording the fraction detected. We find that 11 ± 4% of Sun-like stars harbor an Earth-size planet receiving between one and four times the stellar intensity as Earth. We also find that the occurrence of Earth-size planets is constant with increasing orbital period (P), within equal intervals of logP up to ∼200 d. Extrapolating, one finds % of Sun-like stars harbor an Earth-size planet with orbital periods of 200–400 d.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2013

A Plateau in the Planet Population Below Twice the Size of Earth

Erik A. Petigura; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Andrew W. Howard

We carry out an independent search of Kepler photometry for small transiting planets with sizes 0.5-8.0 times that of Earth and orbital periods between 5 and 50 days, with the goal of measuring the fraction of stars harboring such planets. We use a new transit search algorithm, TERRA, optimized to detect small planets around photometrically quiet stars. We restrict our stellar sample to include the 12,000 stars having the lowest photometric noise in the Kepler survey, thereby maximizing the detectability of Earth-size planets. We report 129 planet candidates having radii less than 6 R_E found in three years of Kepler photometry (quarters 1-12). Forty-seven of these candidates are not in Batalha et al., which only analyzed photometry from quarters 1-6. We gather Keck HIRES spectra for the majority of these targets leading to precise stellar radii and hence precise planet radii. We make a detailed measurement of the completeness of our planet search. We inject synthetic dimmings from mock transiting planets into the actual Kepler photometry. We then analyze that injected photometry with our TERRA pipeline to assess our detection completeness for planets of different sizes and orbital periods. We compute the occurrence of planets as a function of planet radius and period, correcting for the detection completeness as well as the geometric probability of transit, R⋆/a. The resulting distribution of planet sizes exhibits a power law rise in occurrence from 5.7 R_E down to 2 R_E, as found in Howard et al. That rise clearly ends at 2 R_E . The occurrence of planets is consistent with constant from 2 R_E toward 1 R_E . This unexpected plateau in planet occurrence at 2 R_E suggests distinct planet formation processes for planets above and below 2 R_E . We find that 15.1^(+1.8)_(-2.7)% of solar type stars—roughly one in six—has a 1-2 R_E planet with P = 5-50 days.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2016

FALSE POSITIVE PROBABILITIES FOR ALL KEPLER OBJECTS OF INTEREST: 1284 NEWLY VALIDATED PLANETS AND 428 LIKELY FALSE POSITIVES

Timothy D. Morton; Stephen T. Bryson; Jeffrey L. Coughlin; Jason F. Rowe; Ganesh Ravichandran; Erik A. Petigura; Michael R. Haas; Natalie M. Batalha

We present astrophysical false positive probability calculations for every Kepler Object of Interest (KOI)—the first large-scale demonstration of a fully automated transiting planet validation procedure. Out of 7056 KOIs, we determine that 1935 have probabilities <1% of being astrophysical false positives, and thus may be considered validated planets. Of these, 1284 have not yet been validated or confirmed by other methods. In addition, we identify 428 KOIs that are likely to be false positives, but have not yet been identified as such, though some of these may be a result of unidentified transit timing variations. A side product of these calculations is full stellar property posterior samplings for every host star, modeled as single, binary, and triple systems. These calculations use vespa, a publicly available Python package that is able to be easily applied to any transiting exoplanet candidate.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2015

A Nearby M Star with Three Transiting Super-Earths Discovered by K2

Ian J. M. Crossfield; Erik A. Petigura; Joshua E. Schlieder; Andrew W. Howard; Benjamin J. Fulton; Kimberly M. Aller; David R. Ciardi; Sebastien Lepine; Imke de Pater; Katherine de Kleer; Elisa V. Quintana; Jessie L. Christiansen; Eddie Schlafly; Lisa Kaltenegger; Justin R. Crepp; Thomas Henning; Christian Obermeier; Niall R. Deacon; Lauren M. Weiss; Howard Isaacson; Brad M. S. Hansen; Michael C. Liu; Tom Greene; Steve B. Howell; Travis Barman; Christoph Mordasini

Small, cool planets represent the typical end-products of planetary formation. Studying the architectures of these systems, measuring planet masses and radii, and observing these planets’ atmospheres during transit directly informs theories of planet assembly, migration, and evolution. Here we report the discovery of three small planets orbiting a bright (Ks = 8:6 mag) M0 dwarf using data collected as part of K2, the new ecliptic survey using the re-purposed Kepler spacecraft. Stellar spectroscopy and K2 photometry indicate that the system hosts three transiting planets with radii 1.5 { 2.1 R , straddling the transition region between rocky and increasingly volatile-dominated compositions. With orbital periods of 10{45 days the planets receive just 1.5{10 the ux incident on Earth, making these some of the coolest small planets known orbiting a nearby star; planet d is located near the inner edge of the system’s habitable zone. The bright, low-mass star makes this system an excellent laboratory to determine the planets’ masses via Doppler spectroscopy and to constrain their atmospheric compositions via transit spectroscopy. This discovery demonstrates the power of K2 and future space-based transit searches to nd many fascinating objects of interest. Subject headings: EPIC 201367065| techniques: photometric | techniques: spectroscopic | eclipses


The Astrophysical Journal | 2011

Carbon and Oxygen in Nearby Stars: Keys to Protoplanetary Disk Chemistry

Erik A. Petigura; Geoffrey W. Marcy

We present carbon and oxygen abundances for 941 FGK stars—the largest such catalog to date. We find that planet-bearing systems are enriched in these elements. We self-consistently measure NC /NO , which is thought to play a key role in planet formation. We identify 46 stars with NC /NO ≥ 1.00 as potential hosts of carbon-dominated exoplanets. We measure a downward trend in [O/Fe] versus [Fe/H] and find distinct trends in the thin and thick disks, supporting the work of Bensby et al. Finally, we measure sub-solar NC /NO = 0.40+0.11 – 0.07, for WASP-12, a surprising result as this star is host to a transiting hot Jupiter whose dayside atmosphere was recently reported to have NC /NO ≥ 1 by Madhusudhan et al. Our measurements are based on 15,000 high signal-to-noise spectra taken with the Keck 1 telescope as part of the California Planet Search. We derive abundances from the [O I] and C I absorption lines at λ = 6300 and 6587 A using the SME spectral synthesizer.


The Astronomical Journal | 2017

The California-Kepler Survey. III. A Gap in the Radius Distribution of Small Planets

Benjamin J. Fulton; Erik A. Petigura; Andrew W. Howard; Howard Isaacson; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Phillip A. Cargile; Leslie Hebb; Lauren M. Weiss; John Asher Johnson; Timothy D. Morton; Evan Sinukoff; Ian J. M. Crossfield; Lea Hirsch

The size of a planet is an observable property directly connected to the physics of its formation and evolution. We used precise radius measurements from the California-Kepler Survey to study the size distribution of 2025 Kepler planets in fine detail. We detect a factor of ≥2 deficit in the occurrence rate distribution at 1.5–2.0 R⊕. This gap splits the population of close-in (P < 100 days) small planets into two size regimes: R_p < 1.5 R⊕ and R_p = 2.0-3.0 R⊕, with few planets in between. Planets in these two regimes have nearly the same intrinsic frequency based on occurrence measurements that account for planet detection efficiencies. The paucity of planets between 1.5 and 2.0 R⊕ supports the emerging picture that close-in planets smaller than Neptune are composed of rocky cores measuring 1.5 R⊕ or smaller with varying amounts of low-density gas that determine their total sizes.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2015

Validation of 12 Small Kepler Transiting Planets in the Habitable Zone

Guillermo Torres; David M. Kipping; Francois Fressin; Douglas A. Caldwell; Joseph D. Twicken; Sarah Ballard; Natalie M. Batalha; Stephen T. Bryson; David R. Ciardi; Christopher E. Henze; Steve B. Howell; Howard Isaacson; Jon M. Jenkins; Philip S. Muirhead; Elisabeth R. Newton; Erik A. Petigura; William J. Borucki; Justin R. Crepp; Mark E. Everett; Elliott P. Horch; Andrew W. Howard; Rea Kolbl; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Sean McCauliff; Elisa V. Quintana

We present an investigation of 12 candidate transiting planets from Kepler with orbital periods ranging from 34 to 207 days, selected from initial indications that they are small and potentially in the habitable zone (HZ) of their parent stars. Few of these objects are known. The expected Doppler signals are too small to confirm them by demonstrating that their masses are in the planetary regime. Here we verify their planetary nature by validating them statistically using the BLENDER technique, which simulates large numbers of false positives and compares the resulting light curves with the Kepler photometry. This analysis was supplemented with new follow-up observations (high-resolution optical and near-infrared spectroscopy, adaptive optics imaging, and speckle interferometry), as well as an analysis of the flux centroids. For 11 of them (KOI-0571.05, 1422.04, 1422.05, 2529.02, 3255.01, 3284.01, 4005.01, 4087.01, 4622.01, 4742.01, and 4745.01) we show that the likelihood they are true planets is far greater than that of a false positive, to a confidence level of 99.73% (3σ) or higher. For KOI-4427.01 the confidence level is about 99.2% (2.6σ). With our accurate characterization of the GKM host stars, the derived planetary radii range from 1.1 to 2.7 R_⊕. All 12 objects are confirmed to be in the HZ, and nine are small enough to be rocky. Excluding three of them that have been previously validated by others, our study doubles the number of known rocky planets in the HZ. KOI-3284.01 (Kepler-438b) and KOI-4742.01 (Kepler-442b) are the planets most similar to the Earth discovered to date when considering their size and incident flux jointly.


The Astronomical Journal | 2015

Discovery and Validation of Kepler-452b: A 1.6 R? Super Earth Exoplanet in the Habitable Zone of a G2 Star

Jon M. Jenkins; Joseph D. Twicken; Natalie M. Batalha; Douglas A. Caldwell; William D. Cochran; Michael Endl; David W. Latham; Gilbert A. Esquerdo; Shawn E. Seader; Allyson Bieryla; Erik A. Petigura; David R. Ciardi; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Howard Isaacson; Daniel Huber; Jason F. Rowe; Guillermo Torres; Stephen T. Bryson; Lars A. Buchhave; Ivan Ramirez; Angie Wolfgang; Jie Li; Jennifer R. Campbell; Peter Tenenbaum; Dwight T. Sanderfer; Christopher E. Henze; Joseph H. Catanzarite; Ronald L. Gilliland; William J. Borucki

We report on the discovery and validation of Kepler-452b, a transiting planet identified by a search through the 4 years of data collected by NASAs Kepler Mission. This possibly rocky 1.63_(-0.20)^(+0.23) R⨁ planet orbits its G2 host star every 384.843_(-0.012)^(+0.007) days, the longest orbital period for a small (R_p < 2 R⨁) transiting exoplanet to date. The likelihood that this planet has a rocky composition lies between 49% and 62%. The star has an effective temperature of 5757 ± 85 K and a log g of 4.32 ± 0.09. At a mean orbital separation of 1.046_(-0.015)^(+0.019) AU, this small planet is well within the optimistic habitable zone of its star (recent Venus/early Mars), experiencing only 10% more flux than Earth receives from the Sun today, and slightly outside the conservative habitable zone (runaway greenhouse/maximum greenhouse). The star is slightly larger and older than the Sun, with a present radius of 1.11_(-0.09)^(+0.15) R⨁ and an estimated age of ~6 Gyr. Thus, Kepler-452b has likely always been in the habitable zone and should remain there for another ~3 Gyr.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2014

Occurrence and core-envelope structure of 1–4× Earth-size planets around Sun-like stars

Geoffrey W. Marcy; Lauren M. Weiss; Erik A. Petigura; Howard Isaacson; Andrew W. Howard; Lars A. Buchhave

Significance Among the nearly 4,000 planets known around other stars, the most common are 1–4× the size of Earth. A quarter of Sun-like stars have such planets orbiting within half an Earth’s orbital distance of them, and more surely orbit farther out. Measurements of density show that the smallest planets are mostly rocky while the bigger ones have rocky cores fluffed out with hydrogen and helium gas, and likely water, befitting the term ‘‘mini-Neptunes.’’ The division between these two regimes is near 1.5 R⊕. Considering exoplanet hospitality, 11% of Sun-like stars have a planet of 1–2× the size of Earth that receives between 1.0–4.0× the incident stellar light that our Earth enjoys. However, we remain ignorant of the origins of, and existence of, exobiology, leaving the location of the habitable zone uncertain. Small planets, 1–4× the size of Earth, are extremely common around Sun-like stars, and surprisingly so, as they are missing in our solar system. Recent detections have yielded enough information about this class of exoplanets to begin characterizing their occurrence rates, orbits, masses, densities, and internal structures. The Kepler mission finds the smallest planets to be most common, as 26% of Sun-like stars have small, 1–2 R⊕ planets with orbital periods under 100 d, and 11% have 1–2 R⊕ planets that receive 1–4× the incident stellar flux that warms our Earth. These Earth-size planets are sprinkled uniformly with orbital distance (logarithmically) out to 0.4 the Earth–Sun distance, and probably beyond. Mass measurements for 33 transiting planets of 1–4 R⊕ show that the smallest of them, R < 1.5 R⊕, have the density expected for rocky planets. Their densities increase with increasing radius, likely caused by gravitational compression. Including solar system planets yields a relation: ρ=2.32+3.19R/R⊕ [g cm−3]. Larger planets, in the radius range 1.5–4.0 R⊕, have densities that decline with increasing radius, revealing increasing amounts of low-density material (H and He or ices) in an envelope surrounding a rocky core, befitting the appellation ‘‘mini-Neptunes.’’ The gas giant planets occur preferentially around stars that are rich in heavy elements, while rocky planets occur around stars having a range of heavy element abundances. Defining habitable zones remains difficult, without benefit of either detections of life elsewhere or an understanding of life’s biochemical origins.


Nature | 2016

A Neptune-sized transiting planet closely orbiting a 5–10-million-year-old star

Trevor J. David; Lynne A. Hillenbrand; Erik A. Petigura; John M. Carpenter; Ian J. M. Crossfield; Sasha Hinkley; David R. Ciardi; Andrew W. Howard; Howard Isaacson; Ann Marie Cody; Joshua E. Schlieder; Charles A. Beichman; Scott A. Barenfeld

Theories of the formation and early evolution of planetary systems postulate that planets are born in circumstellar disks, and undergo radial migration during and after dissipation of the dust and gas disk from which they formed. The precise ages of meteorites indicate that planetesimals—the building blocks of planets—are produced within the first million years of a star’s life. Fully formed planets are frequently detected on short orbital periods around mature stars. Some theories suggest that the in situ formation of planets close to their host stars is unlikely and that the existence of such planets is therefore evidence of large-scale migration. Other theories posit that planet assembly at small orbital separations may be common. Here we report a newly born, transiting planet orbiting its star with a period of 5.4 days. The planet is 50 per cent larger than Neptune, and its mass is less than 3.6 times that of Jupiter (at 99.7 per cent confidence), with a true mass likely to be similar to that of Neptune. The star is 5–10 million years old and has a tenuous dust disk extending outward from about twice the Earth–Sun separation, in addition to the fully formed planet located at less than one-twentieth of the Earth–Sun separation.

Collaboration


Dive into the Erik A. Petigura's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew W. Howard

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Benjamin J. Fulton

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Evan Sinukoff

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David R. Ciardi

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ian J. M. Crossfield

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jessie L. Christiansen

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lea Hirsch

University of California

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge