Evan Sinukoff
California Institute of Technology
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Evan Sinukoff.
Nature | 2013
Andrew W. Howard; Roberto Sanchis-Ojeda; Geoffrey W. Marcy; John Asher Johnson; Joshua N. Winn; Howard Isaacson; Debra A. Fischer; Benjamin J. Fulton; Evan Sinukoff; Jonathan J. Fortney
Planets with sizes between that of Earth (with radius ) and Neptune (about 4) are now known to be common around Sun-like stars. Most such planets have been discovered through the transit technique, by which the planet’s size can be determined from the fraction of starlight blocked by the planet as it passes in front of its star. Measuring the planet’s mass—and hence its density, which is a clue to its composition—is more difficult. Planets of size 2–4 have proved to have a wide range of densities, implying a diversity of compositions, but these measurements did not extend to planets as small as Earth. Here we report Doppler spectroscopic measurements of the mass of the Earth-sized planet Kepler-78b, which orbits its host star every 8.5 hours (ref. 6). Given a radius of 1.20 ± 0.09 and a mass of 1.69 ± 0.41, the planet’s mean density of 5.3 ± 1.8 g cm−3 is similar to Earth’s, suggesting a composition of rock and iron.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2013
Avram M. Mandell; Korey Haynes; Evan Sinukoff; Nikku Madhusudhan; Adam Burrows; Drake Deming
We report an analysis of transit spectroscopy of the extrasolar planets WASP-12 b, WASP-17 b, and WASP-19 b using the Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3) on the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). We analyze the data for a single transit for each planet using a strategy similar, in certain aspects, to the techniques used by Berta et al., but we extend their methodology to allow us to correct for channel- or wavelength-dependent instrumental effects by utilizing the band-integrated time series and measurements of the drift of the spectrum on the detector over time. We achieve almost photon-limited results for individual spectral bins, but the uncertainties in the transit depth for the band-integrated data are exacerbated by the uneven sampling of the light curve imposed by the orbital phasing of HSTs observations. Our final transit spectra for all three objects are consistent with the presence of a broad absorption feature at 1.4 μm most likely due to water. However, the amplitude of the absorption is less than that expected based on previous observations with Spitzer, possibly due to hazes absorbing in the NIR or non-solar compositions. The degeneracy of models with different compositions and temperature structures combined with the low amplitude of any features in the data preclude our ability to place unambiguous constraints on the atmospheric composition without additional observations with WFC3 to improve the signal-to-noise ratio and/or a comprehensive multi-wavelength analysis.
The Astronomical Journal | 2017
Benjamin J. Fulton; Erik A. Petigura; Andrew W. Howard; Howard Isaacson; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Phillip A. Cargile; Leslie Hebb; Lauren M. Weiss; John Asher Johnson; Timothy D. Morton; Evan Sinukoff; Ian J. M. Crossfield; Lea Hirsch
The size of a planet is an observable property directly connected to the physics of its formation and evolution. We used precise radius measurements from the California-Kepler Survey to study the size distribution of 2025 Kepler planets in fine detail. We detect a factor of ≥2 deficit in the occurrence rate distribution at 1.5–2.0 R⊕. This gap splits the population of close-in (P < 100 days) small planets into two size regimes: R_p < 1.5 R⊕ and R_p = 2.0-3.0 R⊕, with few planets in between. Planets in these two regimes have nearly the same intrinsic frequency based on occurrence measurements that account for planet detection efficiencies. The paucity of planets between 1.5 and 2.0 R⊕ supports the emerging picture that close-in planets smaller than Neptune are composed of rocky cores measuring 1.5 R⊕ or smaller with varying amounts of low-density gas that determine their total sizes.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2015
Erik A. Petigura; Joshua E. Schlieder; Ian J. M. Crossfield; Andrew W. Howard; Katherine M. Deck; David R. Ciardi; Evan Sinukoff; Katelyn N. Allers; William M. J. Best; Michael C. Liu; Charles A. Beichman; Howard Isaacson; Brad M. S. Hansen; Sebastien Lepine
Discoveries from the prime Kepler mission demonstrated that small planets (< 3 Earth-radii) are common outcomes of planet formation. While Kepler detected many such planets, all but a handful orbit faint, distant stars and are not amenable to precise follow up measurements. Here, we report the discovery of two small planets transiting K2-21, a bright (K = 9.4) M0 dwarf located 65
The Astrophysical Journal | 2016
Evan Sinukoff; Andrew W. Howard; Erik A. Petigura; Joshua E. Schlieder; Ian J. M. Crossfield; David R. Ciardi; Benjamin J. Fulton; Howard Isaacson; Kimberly M. Aller; Christoph Baranec; Charles A. Beichman; Brad M. S. Hansen; Heather A. Knutson; Nicholas M. Law; Michael C. Liu; Reed Riddle; Courtney D. Dressing
\pm
Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 2016
Ian J. M. Crossfield; David R. Ciardi; Erik A. Petigura; Evan Sinukoff; Joshua E. Schlieder; Andrew W. Howard; Charles A. Beichman; Howard Isaacson; Courtney D. Dressing; Jessie L. Christiansen; Benjamin J. Fulton; Sebastien Lepine; Lauren M. Weiss; Lea Hirsch; J. Livingston; Christoph Baranec; Nicholas M. Law; Reed Riddle; Carl Ziegler; Steve B. Howell; Elliott P. Horch; Mark E. Everett; Johanna K. Teske; Arturo O. Martinez; Christian Obermeier; Björn Benneke; N. Scott; Niall R. Deacon; Kimberly M. Aller; Brad M. S. Hansen
6 pc from Earth. We detected the transiting planets in photometry collected during Campaign 3 of NASAs K2 mission. Analysis of transit light curves reveals that the planets have small radii compared to their host star, 2.60
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2014
Lauren I. Biddle; Kyle A. Pearson; Ian J. M. Crossfield; Benjamin J. Fulton; Simona Ciceri; Jason Eastman; Travis Barman; Andrew W. Mann; Gregory W. Henry; Andrew W. Howard; Michael H. Williamson; Evan Sinukoff; Diana Dragomir; Laura Vican; L. Mancini; J. Southworth; Adam H. Greenberg; Jake D. Turner; Robert J. Thompson; Brian W. Taylor; Stephen E. Levine; Matthew William Webber
\pm
The Astronomical Journal | 2017
Erik A. Petigura; Andrew W. Howard; Geoffrey W. Marcy; John Asher Johnson; Howard Isaacson; Phillip A. Cargile; Leslie Hebb; Benjamin J. Fulton; Lauren M. Weiss; Timothy D. Morton; Joshua N. Winn; Leslie A. Rogers; Evan Sinukoff; Lea Hirsch; Ian J. M. Crossfield
0.14% and 3.15
The Astronomical Journal | 2017
John Asher Johnson; Erik A. Petigura; Benjamin J. Fulton; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Andrew W. Howard; Howard Isaacson; Leslie Hebb; Phillip A. Cargile; Timothy D. Morton; Lauren M. Weiss; Joshua N. Winn; Leslie A. Rogers; Evan Sinukoff; Lea Hirsch
\pm
The Astrophysical Journal | 2016
Joshua E. Schlieder; Ian J. M. Crossfield; Erik A. Petigura; Andrew W. Howard; Kimberly M. Aller; Evan Sinukoff; Howard Isaacson; Benjamin J. Fulton; David R. Ciardi; M. Bonnefoy; Carl Ziegler; Timothy D. Morton; Sebastien Lepine; Christian Obermeier; Michael C. Liu; Vanessa P. Bailey; Christoph Baranec; Charles A. Beichman; Denis Defrere; Thomas Henning; Philip M. Hinz; Nicholas M. Law; Reed Riddle; Andrew J. Skemer
0.20%, respectively. We obtained follow up NIR spectroscopy of K2-21 to constrain host star properties, which imply planet sizes of 1.59