Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Lauren M. Weiss is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Lauren M. Weiss.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2014

THE MASS-RADIUS RELATION FOR 65 EXOPLANETS SMALLER THAN 4 EARTH RADII

Lauren M. Weiss; Geoffrey W. Marcy

We study the masses and radii of 65 exoplanets smaller than 4 R ⊕ with orbital periods shorter than 100 days. We calculate the weighted mean densities of planets in bins of 0.5 R ⊕ and identify a density maximum of 7.6 g cm–3 at 1.4 R ⊕. On average, planets with radii up to R P = 1.5 R ⊕ increase in density with increasing radius. Above 1.5 R ⊕, the average planet density rapidly decreases with increasing radius, indicating that these planets have a large fraction of volatiles by volume overlying a rocky core. Including the solar system terrestrial planets with the exoplanets below 1.5 R ⊕, we find ρP = 2.43 + 3.39(R P/R ⊕) g cm–3 for R P < 1.5 R ⊕, which is consistent with rocky compositions. For 1.5 ≤ R P/R ⊕ < 4, we find M P/M ⊕ = 2.69(R P/R ⊕)0.93. The rms of planet masses to the fit between 1.5 and 4 R ⊕ is 4.3 M ⊕ with reduced χ2 = 6.2. The large scatter indicates a diversity in planet composition at a given radius. The compositional diversity can be due to planets of a given volume (as determined by their large H/He envelopes) containing rocky cores of different masses or compositions.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2013

THE MASS OF KOI-94d AND A RELATION FOR PLANET RADIUS, MASS, AND INCIDENT FLUX*

Lauren M. Weiss; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Jason F. Rowe; Andrew W. Howard; Howard Isaacson; Jonathan J. Fortney; Neil Miller; Brice-Olivier Demory; Debra A. Fischer; Elisabeth R. Adams; Andrea K. Dupree; Steve B. Howell; Rea Kolbl; John Asher Johnson; Elliott P. Horch; Mark E. Everett; Daniel C. Fabrycky; Sara Seager

We measure the mass of a modestly irradiated giant planet, KOI-94d. We wish to determine whether this planet, which is in a 22 day orbit and receives 2700 times as much incident flux as Jupiter, is as dense as Jupiter or rarefied like inflated hot Jupiters. KOI-94 also hosts at least three smaller transiting planets, all of which were detected by the Kepler mission. With 26 radial velocities of KOI-94 from the W. M. Keck Observatory and a simultaneous fit to the Kepler light curve, we measure the mass of the giant planet and determine that it is not inflated. Support for the planetary interpretation of the other three candidates comes from gravitational interactions through transit timing variations, the statistical robustness of multi-planet systems against false positives, and several lines of evidence that no other star resides within the photometric aperture. We report the properties of KOI-94b (M_P = 10.5 ± 4.6 M_⊕, R_P = 1.71 ± 0.16 R_⊕, P = 3.74 days), KOI-94c (M_P = 15.6^(+5.7)_(-15.6) M_⊕, R_P = 4.32 ± 0.41 R_⊕, P = 10.4 days), KOI-94d (M_P = 106 ± 11 M_⊕, R_P = 11.27 ± 1.06 R_⊕, P = 22.3 days), and KOI-94e (M_P = 35^(+18)_(-28) M_⊕, R_P = 6.56 ± 0.62 R_⊕, P = 54.3 days). The radial velocity analyses of KOI-94b and KOI-94e offer marginal (>2σ) mass detections, whereas the observations of KOI-94c offer only an upper limit to its mass. Using the KOI-94 system and other planets with published values for both mass and radius (138 exoplanets total, including 35 with M_P 150 M_⊕. These equations can be used to predict the radius or mass of a planet.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2015

A Nearby M Star with Three Transiting Super-Earths Discovered by K2

Ian J. M. Crossfield; Erik A. Petigura; Joshua E. Schlieder; Andrew W. Howard; Benjamin J. Fulton; Kimberly M. Aller; David R. Ciardi; Sebastien Lepine; Imke de Pater; Katherine de Kleer; Elisa V. Quintana; Jessie L. Christiansen; Eddie Schlafly; Lisa Kaltenegger; Justin R. Crepp; Thomas Henning; Christian Obermeier; Niall R. Deacon; Lauren M. Weiss; Howard Isaacson; Brad M. S. Hansen; Michael C. Liu; Tom Greene; Steve B. Howell; Travis Barman; Christoph Mordasini

Small, cool planets represent the typical end-products of planetary formation. Studying the architectures of these systems, measuring planet masses and radii, and observing these planets’ atmospheres during transit directly informs theories of planet assembly, migration, and evolution. Here we report the discovery of three small planets orbiting a bright (Ks = 8:6 mag) M0 dwarf using data collected as part of K2, the new ecliptic survey using the re-purposed Kepler spacecraft. Stellar spectroscopy and K2 photometry indicate that the system hosts three transiting planets with radii 1.5 { 2.1 R , straddling the transition region between rocky and increasingly volatile-dominated compositions. With orbital periods of 10{45 days the planets receive just 1.5{10 the ux incident on Earth, making these some of the coolest small planets known orbiting a nearby star; planet d is located near the inner edge of the system’s habitable zone. The bright, low-mass star makes this system an excellent laboratory to determine the planets’ masses via Doppler spectroscopy and to constrain their atmospheric compositions via transit spectroscopy. This discovery demonstrates the power of K2 and future space-based transit searches to nd many fascinating objects of interest. Subject headings: EPIC 201367065| techniques: photometric | techniques: spectroscopic | eclipses


The Astronomical Journal | 2017

The California-Kepler Survey. III. A Gap in the Radius Distribution of Small Planets

Benjamin J. Fulton; Erik A. Petigura; Andrew W. Howard; Howard Isaacson; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Phillip A. Cargile; Leslie Hebb; Lauren M. Weiss; John Asher Johnson; Timothy D. Morton; Evan Sinukoff; Ian J. M. Crossfield; Lea Hirsch

The size of a planet is an observable property directly connected to the physics of its formation and evolution. We used precise radius measurements from the California-Kepler Survey to study the size distribution of 2025 Kepler planets in fine detail. We detect a factor of ≥2 deficit in the occurrence rate distribution at 1.5–2.0 R⊕. This gap splits the population of close-in (P < 100 days) small planets into two size regimes: R_p < 1.5 R⊕ and R_p = 2.0-3.0 R⊕, with few planets in between. Planets in these two regimes have nearly the same intrinsic frequency based on occurrence measurements that account for planet detection efficiencies. The paucity of planets between 1.5 and 2.0 R⊕ supports the emerging picture that close-in planets smaller than Neptune are composed of rocky cores measuring 1.5 R⊕ or smaller with varying amounts of low-density gas that determine their total sizes.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2014

Occurrence and core-envelope structure of 1–4× Earth-size planets around Sun-like stars

Geoffrey W. Marcy; Lauren M. Weiss; Erik A. Petigura; Howard Isaacson; Andrew W. Howard; Lars A. Buchhave

Significance Among the nearly 4,000 planets known around other stars, the most common are 1–4× the size of Earth. A quarter of Sun-like stars have such planets orbiting within half an Earth’s orbital distance of them, and more surely orbit farther out. Measurements of density show that the smallest planets are mostly rocky while the bigger ones have rocky cores fluffed out with hydrogen and helium gas, and likely water, befitting the term ‘‘mini-Neptunes.’’ The division between these two regimes is near 1.5 R⊕. Considering exoplanet hospitality, 11% of Sun-like stars have a planet of 1–2× the size of Earth that receives between 1.0–4.0× the incident stellar light that our Earth enjoys. However, we remain ignorant of the origins of, and existence of, exobiology, leaving the location of the habitable zone uncertain. Small planets, 1–4× the size of Earth, are extremely common around Sun-like stars, and surprisingly so, as they are missing in our solar system. Recent detections have yielded enough information about this class of exoplanets to begin characterizing their occurrence rates, orbits, masses, densities, and internal structures. The Kepler mission finds the smallest planets to be most common, as 26% of Sun-like stars have small, 1–2 R⊕ planets with orbital periods under 100 d, and 11% have 1–2 R⊕ planets that receive 1–4× the incident stellar flux that warms our Earth. These Earth-size planets are sprinkled uniformly with orbital distance (logarithmically) out to 0.4 the Earth–Sun distance, and probably beyond. Mass measurements for 33 transiting planets of 1–4 R⊕ show that the smallest of them, R < 1.5 R⊕, have the density expected for rocky planets. Their densities increase with increasing radius, likely caused by gravitational compression. Including solar system planets yields a relation: ρ=2.32+3.19R/R⊕ [g cm−3]. Larger planets, in the radius range 1.5–4.0 R⊕, have densities that decline with increasing radius, revealing increasing amounts of low-density material (H and He or ices) in an envelope surrounding a rocky core, befitting the appellation ‘‘mini-Neptunes.’’ The gas giant planets occur preferentially around stars that are rich in heavy elements, while rocky planets occur around stars having a range of heavy element abundances. Defining habitable zones remains difficult, without benefit of either detections of life elsewhere or an understanding of life’s biochemical origins.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2015

Time-Varying Potassium in High-Resolution Spectra of the Type Ia Supernova 2014J

Melissa Lynn Graham; S. Valenti; Benjamin J. Fulton; Lauren M. Weiss; Ken J. Shen; Patrick L. Kelly; W. Zheng; Alexei V. Filippenko; G. W. Marcy; D. A. Howell; Jennifer Burt; Eugenio J. Rivera

We present a time series of the highest resolution spectra yet published for the nearby Type Ia supernova (SN) 2014J in M82. They were obtained at 11 epochs over 33 days around peak brightness with the Levy Spectrograph (resolution R~110,000) on the 2.4m Automated Planet Finder telescope at Lick Observatory. We identify multiple Na I D and K I absorption features, as well as absorption by Ca I H & K and several of the more common diffuse interstellar bands (DIBs). We see no evolution in any component of Na I D, Ca I, or in the DIBs, but do establish the dissipation/weakening of the two most blueshifted components of K I. We present several potential physical explanations, finding the most plausible to be photoionization of circumstellar material, and discuss the implications of our results with respect to the progenitor scenario of SN 2014J.


Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 2016

197 CANDIDATES AND 104 VALIDATED PLANETS IN K2's FIRST FIVE FIELDS

Ian J. M. Crossfield; David R. Ciardi; Erik A. Petigura; Evan Sinukoff; Joshua E. Schlieder; Andrew W. Howard; Charles A. Beichman; Howard Isaacson; Courtney D. Dressing; Jessie L. Christiansen; Benjamin J. Fulton; Sebastien Lepine; Lauren M. Weiss; Lea Hirsch; J. Livingston; Christoph Baranec; Nicholas M. Law; Reed Riddle; Carl Ziegler; Steve B. Howell; Elliott P. Horch; Mark E. Everett; Johanna K. Teske; Arturo O. Martinez; Christian Obermeier; Björn Benneke; N. Scott; Niall R. Deacon; Kimberly M. Aller; Brad M. S. Hansen

NASA through the Sagan Fellowship Program; NASA through a Hubble Fellowship - Space Telescope Science Institute; NASA [NAS 5-26555, NNH14CK55B]; National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship [2014184874]; FONDECYT [1130857]; BASAL CATA [PFB-06]; Ministry for the Economy, Development, and Tourisms Programa Iniciativa Cientifica Milenio [IC 120009]; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation; National Science Foundation [AST-0906060, AST-0960343, AST-1207891]; Mt. Cuba Astronomical Foundation; Max Planck Institute for Astronomy; Heidelberg; Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Garching; Johns Hopkins University; Durham University; University of Edinburgh; Queens University Belfast; Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics; Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network Incorporated; National Central University of Taiwan; Space Telescope Science Institute; National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NNX08AR22G]; University of Maryland; Eotvos Lorand University (ELTE)


The Astrophysical Journal | 2016

Revised Masses and Densities of the Planets around Kepler-10

Lauren M. Weiss; Leslie A. Rogers; Howard Isaacson; Eric Agol; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Jason F. Rowe; David M. Kipping; Benjamin J. Fulton; Jack J. Lissauer; Andrew W. Howard; Daniel C. Fabrycky

Determining which small exoplanets have stony-iron compositions is necessary for quantifying the occurrence of such planets and for understanding the physics of planet formation. Kepler-10 hosts the stony-iron world Kepler-10b (K10b), and also contains what has been reported to be the largest solid silicate-ice planet, Kepler-10c (K10c). Using 220 radial velocities (RVs), including 72 precise RVs from Keck-HIRES of which 20 are new from 2014-2015, and 17 quarters of Kepler photometry, we obtain the most complete picture of the Kepler-10 system to date. We find that K10b (Rp=1.47 Re) has mass 3.72


The Astronomical Journal | 2017

The California-Kepler Survey. I. High Resolution Spectroscopy of 1305 Stars Hosting Kepler Transiting Planets

Erik A. Petigura; Andrew W. Howard; Geoffrey W. Marcy; John Asher Johnson; Howard Isaacson; Phillip A. Cargile; Leslie Hebb; Benjamin J. Fulton; Lauren M. Weiss; Timothy D. Morton; Joshua N. Winn; Leslie A. Rogers; Evan Sinukoff; Lea Hirsch; Ian J. M. Crossfield

\pm


The Astronomical Journal | 2017

The California-Kepler Survey. II. Precise Physical Properties of 2025 Kepler Planets and Their Host Stars

John Asher Johnson; Erik A. Petigura; Benjamin J. Fulton; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Andrew W. Howard; Howard Isaacson; Leslie Hebb; Phillip A. Cargile; Timothy D. Morton; Lauren M. Weiss; Joshua N. Winn; Leslie A. Rogers; Evan Sinukoff; Lea Hirsch

0.42 Me and density 6.46

Collaboration


Dive into the Lauren M. Weiss's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew W. Howard

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Benjamin J. Fulton

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Erik A. Petigura

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Evan Sinukoff

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lea Hirsch

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ian J. M. Crossfield

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David R. Ciardi

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jessie L. Christiansen

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge