Ernesto Ausilio

Prediction of Seismic Slope Displacements by Dynamic Stick-Slip Analyses

A good‐working balance between simplicity and reliability in assessing seismic slope stability is represented by displacement‐based methods, in which the effects of deformability and ductility can be either decoupled or coupled in the dynamic analyses. In this paper, a 1D lumped mass “stick‐slip” model is developed, accounting for soil heterogeneity and non‐linear behaviour, with a base sliding mechanism at a potential rupture surface. The results of the preliminary calibration show a good agreement with frequency‐domain site response analysis in no‐slip conditions. The comparison with rigid sliding block analyses and with the decoupled approach proves that the stick‐slip procedure can result increasingly unconservative for soft soils and deep sliding depths.

Seismic Response of Alluvial Valleys to SH Waves

This paper presents a theoretical study on the seismic response of alluvial valleys. The considered model consists of a two‐dimensional elastic inclusion of arbitrary shape embedded in a stiffer half‐plane excited by vertically or obliquely incident SH waves. Computations are conducted using a procedure based on the boundary element method. As known, this numerical technique is well suited to deal with wave propagation in infinite media as it avoids the introduction of fictitious boundaries and reduces by one the dimensions of the problem. This provides significant advantages from a computational point of view. A one‐dimensional closed form solution is also used for comparison, and the most significant differences between the results obtained using the two methods are highlighted.

An uncoupled procedure for performance assessment of slopes in seismic conditions

To assess the seismic performance of slopes, the simplified displacement-based methods represent a good-working balance between simplicity and reliability. The so-called uncoupled methods permit to account for the effects of deformability and ductility by computing separately the dynamic site response and the sliding block displacements. In this paper the procedure proposed by Bray and Rathje (1998) was revised and adapted to Italian seismicity on a set of subsoil models, representative of the different soil classes specified by the Italian and European Codes. The relationship expressing the decrease of the equivalent acceleration with earthquake/soil frequency ratio was then obtained by means of dynamic 1D seismic response analyses. Statistical correlations between calculated Newmark displacements, significant ground motion parameters and the critical acceleration ratio were also derived. To estimate the reference ground motion parameters necessary for the full implementation of the proposed procedure, literature predictive equations, calibrated on strong motion records of international databases, were revised for the Italian seismicity. These ground motion prediction equations, together with simplified displacements relationships, allowed for developing an original quick procedure to evaluate the seismic slope performance by specifying the probability of exceedance of a threshold displacement, based only on few seismic input motion parameters.

Seismic Bearing Capacity of Strip Footings Located Close to the Crest of Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Structures

This paper investigates the performance of geo-reinforced soil structures subjected to loading applied to strip footings positioned close to a slope crest. The kinematic theorem of limit analysis, which is based on the upper bound theory of plasticity, is applied for evaluating the ultimate bearing capacity within the framework of pseudo-static approach to account for earthquake effects. The mechanism considered in this analysis is a logarithmic spiral failure surface, which is assumed to start at the edge of the loaded area far from the slope, consistent with the observed failure mechanisms shown in the experimental tests reported in the literature. A parametric study is then carried out to investigate the influence of various parameters including the geosynthetic configuration, backfill soil friction angle, footing distances from the crest of the slope, slope angles and horizontal seismic coefficients. Attention is paid to the failure mechanism because its maximum depth is the depth at least to which the reinforcements must be placed. Results of the analyses are presented in the form of non-dimensional design charts for practical use. Finally, a simple procedure based on the assessment of earthquake-induced permanent displacements is shown for the design of footing resting on reinforced slopes subjected to earthquake.

Local site effects and incremental damage of buildings during the 2016 Central Italy earthquake sequence

The Central Italy earthquake sequence initiated on 24 August 2016 with a moment magnitude M6.1 event, followed by two earthquakes (M5.9 and M6.5) on 26 and 30 October, caused significant damage and loss of life in the town of Amatrice and other nearby villages and hamlets. The significance of this sequence led to a major international reconnaissance effort to thoroughly examine the effects of this disaster. Specifically, this paper presents evidences of strong local site effects (i.e., amplification of seismic waves because of stratigraphic and topographic effects that leads to damage concentration in certain areas). It also examines the damage patterns observed along the entire sequence of events in association with the spatial distribution of ground motion intensity with emphasis on the clearly distinct performance of reinforced concrete and masonry structures under multiple excitations. The paper concludes with a critical assessment of past retrofit measures efficiency and a series of lessons learned as per the behavior of structures to a sequence of strong earthquake events.

Reconnaissance of geotechnical aspects of the 2016 Central Italy earthquakes

Between August and November 2016, three major earthquake events occurred in Central Italy. The first event, with M6.1, took place on 24 August 2016, the second (M5.9) on 26 October, and the third (M6.5) on 30 October 2016. Each event was followed by numerous aftershocks. The 24 August event caused massive damages especially to the villages of Arquata del Tronto, Accumoli, Amatrice, and Pescara del Tronto. In total, there were 299 fatalities, generally from collapses of unreinforced masonry dwellings. The October events caused significant new damage in the villages of Visso, Ussita, and Norcia, although not producing fatalities, since the area had largely been evacuated. The Italy–US Geotechnical Extreme Events Reconnaissance team investigated earthquake effects on slopes, villages, and major infrastructures. The approach adopted to carry out post-earthquake reconnaissance surveys was to combine traditional reconnaissance activities of on-ground evidences and mapping of field conditions with advanced imaging and damage detection routines enabled by state-of-the-art geomatics technology. Presented herein are the outcomes of the post-event reconnaissance surveys conducted after both the August main shock and the October events, focusing on geotechnical aspects, such as earthquake-triggered slope failures, mud volcanoes, performance of different geotechnical structures (i.e., dams, retaining walls, rockfall barriers, road embankments) and building damage patterns related to site amplification.

Correction to: Reconnaissance of geotechnical aspects of the 2016 Central Italy earthquakes

Because of an error during the editorial process the first name initial of author Ernesto Ausilio was incorrectly given as A. (A. Ausilio) in the initial online publication. It should obviously be E. Ausilio. The original article has been corrected.