Evie Vereecke

The role of hind limb tendons in gibbon locomotion: springs or strings?

SUMMARY Tendon properties have an important effect on the mechanical behaviour of muscles, with compliant tendons allowing near-isometric muscle contraction and facilitating elastic energy storage and recoil. Stiff tendons, in contrast, facilitate rapid force transfer and precise positional control. In humans, the long Achilles tendon contributes to the mechanical efficiency of running via elastic energy storage and recovery, and its presence has been linked to the evolution of habitual bipedalism. Gibbons also possess relatively long hind limb tendons; however, their role is as yet unknown. Based on their large dimensions, and inferring from the situation in humans, we hypothesize that the tendons in the gibbon hind limb will facilitate elastic energy storage and recoil during hind-limb-powered locomotion. To investigate this, we determined the material properties of the gibbon Achilles and patellar tendon in vitro and linked this with available kinematic and kinetic data to evaluate their role in leaping and bipedalism. Tensile tests were conducted on tendon samples using a material testing machine and the load–displacement data were used to calculate stiffness, Youngs modulus and hysteresis. In addition, the average stress-in-life and energy absorption capacity of both tendons were estimated. We found a functional difference between the gibbon Achilles and patellar tendon, with the Achilles tendon being more suitable for elastic energy storage and release. The patellar tendon, in contrast, has a relatively high hysteresis, making it less suitable to act as elastic spring. This suggests that the gibbon Achilles tendon might fulfil a similar function as in humans, contributing to reducing the locomotor cost of bipedalism by acting as elastic spring, while the high stiffness of the patellar tendon might favour fast force transfer upon recoil and, possibly, enhance leaping performance.

Impact of Osteoarthritis and Total Joint Arthroplasty on the Kinematics of the Trapeziometacarpal Joint: A Pilot Study

PURPOSEnTo quantify the effect of osteoarthritis (OA) and total trapeziometacarpal (TMC) joint replacement on thumb kinematics during the primary physiological motions of the thumb.nnnMETHODSnWe included 4 female patients with stage III TMC OA. A computed tomography-based markerless method was used to quantify the 3-dimensional thumb kinematics in patients before and after TMC joint replacement surgery with the Arpe implant.nnnRESULTSnTrapeziometacarpal OA led to a marked decrease of internal rotation and abduction of the first metacarpal (MC1) during thumb flexion and a decrease of MC1 adduction during thumb adduction. As a compensatory phenomenon, the trapezium displayed increased abduction. The absence of MC1 translation in the ball-and-socket implant seems to induce a decrease of MC1 adduction as well as a decrease of trapezium adduction during thumb adduction, compared with OA and healthy joints. Implant replacement displayed an unchanged MC1 flexion during thumb flexion and seemed to slightly increase MC1 axial rotation during thumb flexion and adduction. Abduction and adduction of the MC1 are limited and compensated by this somewhat increased axial rotation, allowing more efficient thumb opposition.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe study highlights that advanced TMC OA mainly restricts the MC1 mobility. We also showed that, whereas total joint arthroplasty is able to restore thumb function, it cannot fully replicate the kinematics of the healthy TMC joint.nnnCLINICAL RELEVANCEnThe quantification of TMC joint kinematics in OA and implanted patients is essential to improve our understanding of TMC OA as well as to enhance the functionality of implant designs.