Priscilla D'Agostino

Comparison of the Anatomical Dimensions and Mechanical Properties of the Dorsoradial and Anterior Oblique Ligaments of the Trapeziometacarpal Joint

PURPOSE The respective roles of the dorsoradial (DRL) and anterior oblique (AOL) ligaments in stability of the highly mobile trapeziometacarpal (TMC) joint remain disputed. Earlier publications have pointed to the AOL as the key stabilizing structure; yet, more recent publications have challenged the stabilizing role of the AOL, favoring the DRL as the main TMC joint stabilizer. We executed an anatomical study of the ligaments, including detailed dissection to quantify the length, width, and thickness of the AOL and DRL and tested the material properties of these ligaments. METHODS Thirteen fresh frozen cadaveric thumbs from 9 specimens were used. Length, width, and thickness of the AOL and DRL were measured on magnetic resonance imaging and/or after dissection. Next, the first metacarpal and trapezium were isolated together with both ligaments, and both bones were cut sagittally to isolate a first metacarpal-AOL-trapezium and first metacarpal-DRL-trapezium complex from each thumb. These samples were subjected to cyclic loading in displacement-controlled tests. The obtained force-displacement curves were used to calculate stiffness and hysteresis of each sample. RESULTS Our results showed that the DRL is significantly shorter and thicker than the AOL, which is thin and ill-defined. Our results also indicate that the DRL has a higher stiffness than the AOL, making it a more likely candidate to provide joint stability. CONCLUSIONS Although the AOL has been asserted to be the primary restraint to dorsoradial subluxation, this view has been challenged over the past 10 years by several studies. These studies have shown the AOL to be relatively weak and compliant compared with the intermetacarpal and dorsoradial ligaments and have demonstrated that the DRL is the strongest and stiffest ligament of the TMC joint. Our studies confirm these findings. CLINICAL RELEVANCE This study indicates that the DRL is relatively stiff and thick, suggesting it should be repaired or reconstructed when disrupted to restore stability of the TMC joint.

In vivo kinematics of the thumb during flexion and adduction motion: Evidence for a screw‐home mechanism

The thumb plays a crucial role in basic hand function. However, the kinematics of its entire articular chain have not yet been quantified. Such investigation is essential to improve our understanding of thumb function and to develop better strategies to treat thumb joint pathologies. The primary objective of this study is to quantify the in vivo kinematics of the trapeziometacarpal (TMC) and scaphotrapezial (ST) joints during flexion and adduction of the thumb. In addition, we want to evaluate the potential coupling between the TMC and ST joints during these tasks. The hand of 16 asymptomatic women without signs of thumb osteoarthritis were CT scanned in positions of maximal thumb extension, flexion, abduction, and adduction. The CT images were segmented and three‐dimensional surface models of the radius, scaphoid, trapezium, and the first metacarpal were created for each thumb motion. The corresponding rotations angles, translations, and helical axes were calculated for each sequence. The analysis shows that flexion and adduction of the thumb result in a three‐dimensional rotation and translation of the entire articular chain, including the trapezium and scaphoid. A wider range of motion is observed for the first metacarpal, which displays a clear axial rotation. The coupling of axial rotation of the first metacarpal with flexion and abduction during thumb flexion supports the existence of a screw‐home mechanism in the TMC joint. In addition, our results point to a potential motion coupling between the TMC and ST joints and underline the complexity of thumb kinematics.

In vivo contact biomechanics in the trapeziometacarpal joint using finite deformation biphasic theory and mathematical modelling

The assessment of the contact biomechanics in the trapeziometacarpal (TMC) joint during functional tasks represents a relevant way to obtain a better understanding of the onset of osteoarthritis (OA). CT scans of the hand region of 20 female volunteers were taken in relaxed neutral, lateral key pinch and power grasp configuration. 3D models of the first metacarpal (MC1) and the trapezium were created. The articular area of each bone was quantified and a mathematical model was developed in Matlab to evaluate the projected contact area and stress distribution of each bone. The articular areas of the MC1 and the trapezium presented no significant difference. A slightly smaller projected contact area was calculated for the trapezium compared to the MC1. Similar amounts of stress were reported in the neutral and lateral pinch configurations. The highest stress levels were observed during power grasp. Very consistent results for high stress location on the volar/radial articular sub-region were found in the neutral and power grasp configurations. More variation was reported during lateral pinch. The mathematical model presented in this paper offers the possibility to predict contact patterns within the TMC joint based on in vivo CT images.

In vivo biomechanical behavior of the trapeziometacarpal joint in healthy and osteoarthritic subjects

Background: The contact biomechanics of the trapeziometacarpal joint have been investigated in several studies. However, these led to conflicting results and were mostly performed in vitro. The purpose of this study was to provide further insight on the contact biomechanics of the trapeziometacarpal joint by in vivo assessment of healthy and osteoarthritic subjects. Methods: The hands of 16 healthy women and 6 women with trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis were scanned in positions of maximal thumb extension, flexion, abduction and adduction during three isometric tasks (lateral key pinch, power grasp and jar twist) and in thumb rest posture (relaxed neutral). Three‐dimensional surface models of the trapezium and first metacarpal were created for each thumb configuration. The articular surface of each bone was measured in the neutral posture. A computed tomography‐based proximity mapping algorithm was developed to calculate the distance between opposing joint surfaces, which was used as a surrogate for intra‐articular stress. Findings: Distinct proximity patterns were observed across tasks with a recurrent pattern reported on the volar aspect of the first metacarpal. The comparison between healthy and arthritic subjects showed a significantly larger articular area, in parallel with a significant joint space narrowing and an increase in proximity area in arthritic subjects. We also observed severe articular deformations in subjects with late stage osteoarthritis. Interpretation: This study has increased our insight in the contact biomechanics of the trapeziometacarpal joint during tasks and positions of daily life in healthy and arthritic subjects, which might contribute to a better understanding of the occurrence mechanisms of degenerative diseases such as osteoarthritis. HIGHLIGHTSAn approach based on joint proximity is proposed to assess the contact biomechanics of the thumb.Proximity patterns of healthy and late stage osteoarthritic subjects were compared.Healthy group: distinct proximity patterns were observed between tasks.Osteoarthritic group: severe morphological changes were observed.Findings suggest an association between proximity patterns and osteoarthritis development.