Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Filip Callewaert is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Filip Callewaert.


The FASEB Journal | 2009

Differential regulation of bone and body composition in male mice with combined inactivation of androgen and estrogen receptor-α

Filip Callewaert; Katrien Venken; Jill Ophoff; Karel De Gendt; Antonia Torcasio; G. Harry van Lenthe; Hans Van Oosterwyck; Steven Boonen; Roger Bouillon; Guido Verhoeven; Dirk Vanderschueren

Osteoporosis and muscle frailty are important health problems in elderly men and may be partly related to biological androgen activity. This androgen action can be mediated directly through stimulation of the androgen receptor (AR) or indirectly through stimulation of estrogen receptor‐alpha (ERα) following aromatization of androgens into estrogens. To assess the differential action of AR and ERα pathways on bone and body composition, AR‐ERα double‐knockout mice were gener‐ated and characterized. AR disruption decreased trabec‐ular bone mass, whereas ERα disruption had no additional effect on the AR‐dependent trabecular bone loss. In contrast, combined AR and ERα inactivation additionally reduced cortical bone and muscle mass compared with either AR or ERα disruption alone. ERα inactivation—in the presence or absence of AR—increased fat mass. We demonstrate that AR activation is solely responsible for the development and maintenance of male trabecular bone mass. Both AR and ERα activation, however, are needed to optimize the acquisition of cortical bone and muscle mass. ERα activation alone is sufficient for the regulation of fat mass. Our findings clearly define the relative importance of AR and ERα signaling on trabecu‐lar and cortical bone mass as well as body composition in male mice.—Callewaert, F., Venken, K., Ophoff, J., De Gendt, K., Torcasio, A., van Lenthe, G. H., Van Ooster‐wyck, H., Boonen, S., Bouillon, R., Verhoeven, G., Vanderschueren, D. Differential regulation of bone and body composition in male mice with combined inactivation of androgen and estrogen receptor‐α. FASEB J. 23, 232‐240 (2009)


Journal of Endocrinology | 2010

Skeletal sexual dimorphism: relative contribution of sex steroids, GH–IGF1, and mechanical loading

Filip Callewaert; Mieke Sinnesael; Evelien Gielen; Steven Boonen; Dirk Vanderschueren

Structural gender differences in bone mass - characterized by wider but not thicker bones - are generally attributed to opposing sex steroid actions in men and women. Recent findings have redefined the traditional concept of sex hormones as the main regulators of skeletal sexual dimorphism. GH-IGF1 action is likely to be the most important determinant of sex differences in bone mass. Estrogens limit periosteal bone expansion but stimulate endosteal bone apposition in females, whereas androgens stimulate radial bone expansion in males. Androgens not only act directly on bone through the androgen receptor (AR) but also activate estrogen receptor-α or -β (ERα or ERβ) following aromatization into estrogens. Both the AR and ERα pathways are needed to optimize radial cortical bone expansion, whereas AR signaling alone is the dominant pathway for normal male trabecular bone development. Estrogen/ERα-mediated effects in males may - at least partly - depend on interaction with IGF1. In addition, sex hormones and their receptors have an impact on the mechanical sensitivity of the growing skeleton. AR and ERβ signaling may limit the osteogenic response to loading in males and females respectively, while ERα may stimulate the response of bone to mechanical stimulation in the female skeleton. Overall, current evidence suggests that skeletal sexual dimorphism is not just the end result of differences in sex steroid secretion between the sexes, but depends on gender differences in GH-IGF1 and mechanical sensitivity to loading as well.


Endocrinology | 2009

Androgen Signaling in Myocytes Contributes to the Maintenance of Muscle Mass and Fiber Type Regulation But Not to Muscle Strength or Fatigue

Jill Ophoff; Karen Van Proeyen; Filip Callewaert; Karel De Gendt; Katrien De Bock; An Vanden Bosch; Guido Verhoeven; Peter Hespel; Dirk Vanderschueren

Muscle frailty is considered a major cause of disability in the elderly and chronically ill. However, the exact role of androgen receptor (AR) signaling in muscle remains unclear. Therefore, a postmitotic myocyte-specific AR knockout (mARKO) mouse model was created and investigated together with a mouse model with ubiquitous AR deletion. Muscles from mARKO mice displayed a marked reduction in AR protein (60-88%). Interestingly, body weights and lean body mass were lower in mARKO vs. control mice (-8%). The weight of the highly androgen-sensitive musculus levator ani was significantly reduced (-46%), whereas the weights of other peripheral skeletal muscles were not or only slightly reduced. mARKO mice had lower intra-abdominal fat but did not demonstrate a cortical or trabecular bone phenotype, indicating that selective ablation of the AR in myocytes affected male body composition but not skeletal homeostasis. Furthermore, muscle contractile performance in mARKO mice did not differ from their controls. Myocyte-specific AR ablation resulted in a conversion of fast toward slow fibers, without affecting muscle strength or fatigue. Similar results were obtained in ubiquitous AR deletion, showing lower body weight, whereas some but not all muscle weights were reduced. The percent slow fibers was increased, but no changes in muscle strength or fatigue could be detected. Together, our findings show that myocyte AR signaling contributes to the maintenance of muscle mass and fiber type regulation but not to muscle strength or fatigue. The levator ani weight remains the most sensitive and specific marker of AR-mediated anabolic action on muscle.


Journal of Bone and Mineral Research | 2010

Sexual Dimorphism in Cortical Bone Size and Strength But Not Density Is Determined by Independent and Time-Specific Actions of Sex Steroids and IGF-1: Evidence From Pubertal Mouse Models

Filip Callewaert; Katrien Venken; John J. Kopchick; Antonia Torcasio; G. Harry van Lenthe; Steven Boonen; Dirk Vanderschueren

Although it is well established that males acquire more bone mass than females, the underlying mechanism and timing of this sex difference remain controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the relative contribution of sex steroid versus growth hormone–insulin‐like growth factor 1 (GH–IGF‐1) action to pubertal bone mass acquisition longitudinally in pubertal mice. Radial bone expansion peaked during early puberty (3 to 5 weeks of age) in male and female mice, with significantly more expansion in males than in females (+40%). Concomitantly, in 5 week old male versus female mice, periosteal and endocortical bone formation was higher (+70%) and lower (−47%), respectively, along with higher serum IGF‐1 levels during early puberty in male mice. In female mice, ovariectomy increased radial bone expansion during early puberty as well as the endocortical perimeter. In male mice, orchidectomy reduced radial bone expansion only during late puberty (5 to 8 weeks of age), whereas combined androgen and estrogen deficiency modestly decreased radial bone expansion during early puberty, accompanied by lower IGF‐1 levels. GHRKO mice with very low IGF‐1 levels, on the other hand, showed limited radial bone expansion and no skeletal dimorphism. From these data we conclude that skeletal sexual dimorphism is established during early puberty and depends primarily on GH–IGF‐1 action. In males, androgens and estrogens have stimulatory effects on bone size during late and early puberty, respectively. In females, estrogens limit bone size during early puberty. These longitudinal findings in mice provide strong evidence that skeletal dimorphism is determined by independent and time‐specific effects of sex steroids and IGF‐1.


Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism | 2010

Sex steroids and the male skeleton: a tale of two hormones

Filip Callewaert; Steven Boonen; Dirk Vanderschueren

Traditionally, the stronger male skeleton was considered to result from higher androgen levels in men compared to women. However, the regulation of male bone growth by sex steroids appears more complex than originally anticipated. Based on clinical observations and studies in animal models, not only androgens and androgen receptor (AR), but also estrogens and estrogen receptor-alpha (not ERbeta) are required for optimal bone mineral acquisition during male growth. In addition, both sex steroids are involved in the maintenance of male skeletal health. In fact, bone loss and fracture risk have been associated with estrogen exposure in elderly men. Overall, a compelling body of evidence suggests that both androgens and estrogens are crucial for male skeletal growth and maintenance.


Osteoporosis International | 2008

Sex hormones, their receptors and bone health

Katrien Venken; Filip Callewaert; Steven Boonen; Dirk Vanderschueren

Sex steroids regulate skeletal maturation and preservation in both men and women, as already recognized in the 1940s by Albright and Reifenstein. The impact of gonadal insufficiency on skeletal integrity has been widely recognized in adult men and women ever since. In the context of their skeletal actions, androgens and estrogens are no longer considered as just male and female hormones, respectively. Androgens can be converted into estrogens within the gonads and peripheral tissues and both are present in men and women, albeit in different concentrations. In the late 1980s, sex steroid receptors were discovered in bone cells. However, the understanding of sex steroid receptor activation and translation into biological skeletal actions is still incomplete. Due to the complex metabolism, sex steroids may have not only endocrine but also paracrine and/or autocrine actions. Also, circulating sex steroid concentrations do not necessarily reflect their biological activity due to strong binding to sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG). Finally, sex steroid signaling may include genomic and non-genomic effects in bone and non-bone cells. This review will focus on our current understanding of gonadal steroid metabolism, receptor activation, and their most relevant cellular and biological actions on bone.


Hormone Research in Paediatrics | 2009

Bone and metabolism: a complex crosstalk.

Liesbet Lieben; Filip Callewaert; Roger Bouillon

Background: Until recently, communication from metabolism to bone was considered purely unidirectional, involving complex interactions among an adipocyte-derived factor (leptin), the sympathetic nervous system and neuropeptides. However, studies in animal models now show that bone regulates glucose metabolism and fat mass via the uncarboxylated form of an osteoblast-derived factor (osteocalcin). These findings not only demonstrate that energy metabolism regulates bone remodeling through neural relays, but also that the skeleton acts as an endocrine tissue that regulates metabolic homeostasis. Conclusions: Further study is needed to understand the physiological role of these complex interactions in man and their implications for human diseases.


International Journal of Clinical Practice | 2009

Osteoporosis management: a perspective based on bisphosphonate data from randomised clinical trials and observational databases.

Steven Boonen; Richard Kay; C Cooper; Patrick Haentjens; Dirk Vanderschueren; Filip Callewaert; Koen Milisen; Serge Livio Ferrari

Aims:  The efficacy of treatments for osteoporosis can be evaluated using a variety of study designs. This article aims to comprehensively review the evidence for bisphosphonate anti‐fracture efficacy in postmenopausal women, discussing the strengths and limitations associated with each study method.


International Journal of Andrology | 2011

7α-methyl-19-nortestosterone vs. testosterone implants for hypogonadal osteoporosis: a preclinical study in the aged male orchidectomized rat model

M. Sinnesael; Filip Callewaert; M. Morreels; Narender Kumar; R. Sitruk-Ware; K. Van Proeyen; Peter Hespel; Steven Boonen; F. Claessens; Dirk Vanderschueren

Overt male hypogonadism induces not only osteoporosis but also unfavourable changes in body composition, which can be prevented by testosterone (T) replacement. In this preclinical study, the potential of synthetic androgen 7α-methyl-19-nortestosterone (MENT) as alternative treatment for male hypogonadism was evaluated in comparison with T. Eleven-month-old male rats were orchidectomized (orch) and left untreated for 2-months. Subsequently, the effects of 4-month MENT (12 μg/day) and T (72 μg/day) treatment on bone, muscle and fat were analysed using microcomputed tomography, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, dynamic bone histomorphometry and muscle fibre typing. At the onset of treatment, orch rats were clearly hypogonadal. This was evidenced by significant reductions of androgen-sensitive organ weight, lean mass, cortical thickness and trabecular bone volume compared with sham-operated aged-matched controls (sham). MENT and T restored weight of androgen-sensitive organs to a similar extent, with a superior anabolic action of MENT on levator ani muscle. Both androgens not only fully rescued hypogonadal loss of lean mass but also restored muscle fibre type composition and trabecular bone volume. Cortical bone loss was similarly prevented by MENT and T, but without full recovery to sham. Both androgens stimulated periosteal bone formation, but with a stronger effect of T. By contrast, MENT more strongly suppressed endocortical bone formation and bone turnover rate and reduced fat mass and serum leptin to a greater extent than T. MENT and T are both effective replacement therapies to stimulate bone and muscle in hypogonadal rats, with stronger lipolytic action of MENT.


Osteoporosis in Men (Second Edition)#R##N#The Effects of Gender on Skeletal Health | 2010

Aging and Bone Loss

Steven Boonen; Dirk Vanderschueren; Filip Callewaert; Patrick Haentjens

Publisher Summary While data on the effects of aging on bone loss in women are well known, many healthcare providers and patients are less familiar with the prevalence and impact of bone changes in older males. Understanding expected bone health changes and factors that predict accelerated bone loss is essential to designing preventive health maintenance strategies for men and women. This chapter reviews the epidemiology of bone loss with aging in men, including definitions of abnormal bone density and other methods for assessing bone changes with aging. Factors affecting bone loss in men, including ethnic factors, weight and vitamin intake, are also reviewed, as these may provide important markers when assessing male osteoporosis risk in the clinic. Practical approaches to maximize osteoporosis screening in men are also described.

Collaboration


Dive into the Filip Callewaert's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Steven Boonen

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dirk Vanderschueren

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Katrien Venken

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Roger Bouillon

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Evelien Gielen

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Guido Verhoeven

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jill Ophoff

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Karel De Gendt

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Antonia Torcasio

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

G. Harry van Lenthe

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge