Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Fiona M. McCarthy is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Fiona M. McCarthy.


Nature Genetics | 1994

A genetic linkage map of the bovine genome

W. Barendse; S. M. Armitage; L. M. Kossarek; A. Shalom; B. W. Kirkpatrick; A. M. Ryan; Daniel Clayton; Lei Li; Holly L. Neibergs; Nan Zhang; W M Grosse; J. Weiss; P. Creighton; Fiona M. McCarthy; M. Ron; A.J. Teale; R. Fries; R.A. McGraw; Stephen S. Moore; Michel Georges; M. Soller; James E. Womack; D. J. S. Hetzel

A cattle genetic linkage map was constructed which marks about 90% of the expected length of the cattle genome. Over 200 DNA polymorphisms were genotyped in cattle families which comprise 295 individuals in full sibling pedigrees. One hundred and seventy–one loci were found linked to one other locus. Twenty nine of the 30 chromosome pairs are represented by at least one of the 36 linkage groups. Less than a 50 cM difference was found in the male and female genetic maps. The conserved loci on this map show as many differences in gene order compared to humans as is found between humans and mice. The conservation is consistent with the patterns of karyotypic evolution found in the rodents, primates and artiodactyls. This map will be important for localizing quantitative trait loci and provides a basis for further mapping.


Nucleic Acids Research | 2008

The Gene Ontology project in 2008

Midori A. Harris; Jennifer I. Deegan; Amelia Ireland; Jane Lomax; Michael Ashburner; Susan Tweedie; Seth Carbon; Suzanna E. Lewis; Christopher J. Mungall; John Richter; Karen Eilbeck; Judith A. Blake; Alexander D. Diehl; Mary E. Dolan; Harold Drabkin; Janan T. Eppig; David P. Hill; Ni Li; Martin Ringwald; Rama Balakrishnan; Gail Binkley; J. Michael Cherry; Karen R. Christie; Maria C. Costanzo; Qing Dong; Stacia R. Engel; Dianna G. Fisk; Jodi E. Hirschman; Benjamin C. Hitz; Eurie L. Hong

The Gene Ontology (GO) project (http://www.geneontology.org/) provides a set of structured, controlled vocabularies for community use in annotating genes, gene products and sequences (also see http://www.sequenceontology.org/). The ontologies have been extended and refined for several biological areas, and improvements to the structure of the ontologies have been implemented. To improve the quantity and quality of gene product annotations available from its public repository, the GO Consortium has launched a focused effort to provide comprehensive and detailed annotation of orthologous genes across a number of ‘reference’ genomes, including human and several key model organisms. Software developments include two releases of the ontology-editing tool OBO-Edit, and improvements to the AmiGO browser interface.


Mammalian Genome | 1994

Characterization of 65 bovine microsatellites

Stephen S. Moore; K. Byrne; K. T. Berger; W. Barendse; Fiona M. McCarthy; James E. Womack; D. J. S. Hetzel

Microsatellites or simple sequence repeat (SSR) polymorphisms are used widely in the construction of linkage maps in many species. High levels of polymorphism coupled with the ease of analysis of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) have resulted in this type of maker being one of the most widely used for genetic analysis. In this paper we describe 58 polymorphic bovine microsatellites that were isolated from insert size selected bovine genomic libraries. Primer sequences, number of alleles, and heterozygosity levels in cattle reference families are reported. Chromosomal locations for 47 of these microsatellites as well as for 7 previously described systems derived from entries in the Genbank or EMBL databases have been determined. The markers map to 24 syntenic or chromosomal locations. Polymorphic bovine microsatellites were estimated to occur, on average, every 320 kb, and there is no evidence of clustering in the genome. Thirty of the bovine-derived microsatellite systems gave specific and polymorphic products in sheep, adding to the number of useful markers in that species.


PLOS Computational Biology | 2009

The Gene Ontology's Reference Genome Project: A Unified Framework for Functional Annotation across Species

Pascale Gaudet; Rex L. Chisholm; Tanya Z. Berardini; Emily Dimmer; Stacia R. Engel; Petra Fey; David P. Hill; Doug Howe; James C. Hu; Rachael P. Huntley; Varsha K. Khodiyar; Ranjana Kishore; Donghui Li; Ruth C. Lovering; Fiona M. McCarthy; Li Ni; Victoria Petri; Deborah A. Siegele; Susan Tweedie; Kimberly Van Auken; Valerie Wood; Siddhartha Basu; Seth Carbon; Mary E. Dolan; Christopher J. Mungall; Kara Dolinski; Paul D. Thomas; Michael Ashburner; Judith A. Blake; J. Michael Cherry

The Gene Ontology (GO) is a collaborative effort that provides structured vocabularies for annotating the molecular function, biological role, and cellular location of gene products in a highly systematic way and in a species-neutral manner with the aim of unifying the representation of gene function across different organisms. Each contributing member of the GO Consortium independently associates GO terms to gene products from the organism(s) they are annotating. Here we introduce the Reference Genome project, which brings together those independent efforts into a unified framework based on the evolutionary relationships between genes in these different organisms. The Reference Genome project has two primary goals: to increase the depth and breadth of annotations for genes in each of the organisms in the project, and to create data sets and tools that enable other genome annotation efforts to infer GO annotations for homologous genes in their organisms. In addition, the project has several important incidental benefits, such as increasing annotation consistency across genome databases, and providing important improvements to the GOs logical structure and biological content.


Science | 2014

Three crocodilian genomes reveal ancestral patterns of evolution among archosaurs

Richard E. Green; Edward L. Braun; Joel Armstrong; Dent Earl; Ngan Nguyen; Glenn Hickey; Michael W. Vandewege; John St. John; Salvador Capella-Gutiérrez; Todd A. Castoe; Colin Kern; Matthew K. Fujita; Juan C. Opazo; Jerzy Jurka; Kenji K. Kojima; Juan Caballero; Robert Hubley; Arian Smit; Roy N. Platt; Christine Lavoie; Meganathan P. Ramakodi; John W. Finger; Alexander Suh; Sally R. Isberg; Lee G. Miles; Amanda Y. Chong; Weerachai Jaratlerdsiri; Jaime Gongora; C. Moran; Andrés Iriarte

INTRODUCTION Crocodilians and birds are the two extant clades of archosaurs, a group that includes the extinct dinosaurs and pterosaurs. Fossils suggest that living crocodilians (alligators, crocodiles, and gharials) have a most recent common ancestor 80 to 100 million years ago. Extant crocodilians are notable for their distinct morphology, limited intraspecific variation, and slow karyotype evolution. Despite their unique biology and phylogenetic position, little is known about genome evolution within crocodilians. Evolutionary rates of tetrapods inferred from DNA sequences anchored by ultraconserved elements. Evolutionary rates among reptiles vary, with especially low rates among extant crocodilians but high rates among squamates. We have reconstructed the genomes of the common ancestor of birds and of all archosaurs (shown in gray silhouette, although the morphology of these species is uncertain). RATIONALE Genome sequences for the American alligator, saltwater crocodile, and Indian gharial—representatives of all three extant crocodilian families—were obtained to facilitate better understanding of the unique biology of this group and provide a context for studying avian genome evolution. Sequence data from these three crocodilians and birds also allow reconstruction of the ancestral archosaurian genome. RESULTS We sequenced shotgun genomic libraries from each species and used a variety of assembly strategies to obtain draft genomes for these three crocodilians. The assembled scaffold N50 was highest for the alligator (508 kilobases). Using a panel of reptile genome sequences, we generated phylogenies that confirm the sister relationship between crocodiles and gharials, the relationship with birds as members of extant Archosauria, and the outgroup status of turtles relative to birds and crocodilians. We also estimated evolutionary rates along branches of the tetrapod phylogeny using two approaches: ultraconserved element–anchored sequences and fourfold degenerate sites within stringently filtered orthologous gene alignments. Both analyses indicate that the rates of base substitution along the crocodilian and turtle lineages are extremely low. Supporting observations were made for transposable element content and for gene family evolution. Analysis of whole-genome alignments across a panel of reptiles and mammals showed that the rate of accumulation of micro-insertions and microdeletions is proportionally lower in crocodilians, consistent with a single underlying cause of a reduced rate of evolutionary change rather than intrinsic differences in base repair machinery. We hypothesize that this single cause may be a consistently longer generation time over the evolutionary history of Crocodylia. Low heterozygosity was observed in each genome, consistent with previous analyses, including the Chinese alligator. Pairwise sequential Markov chain analysis of regional heterozygosity indicates that during glacial cycles of the Pleistocene, each species suffered reductions in effective population size. The reduction was especially strong for the American alligator, whose current range extends farthest into regions of temperate climates. CONCLUSION We used crocodilian, avian, and outgroup genomes to reconstruct 584 megabases of the archosaurian common ancestor genome and the genomes of key ancestral nodes. The estimated accuracy of the archosaurian genome reconstruction is 91% and is higher for conserved regions such as genes. The reconstructed genome can be improved by adding more crocodilian and avian genome assemblies and may provide a unique window to the genomes of extinct organisms such as dinosaurs and pterosaurs. To provide context for the diversification of archosaurs—the group that includes crocodilians, dinosaurs, and birds—we generated draft genomes of three crocodilians: Alligator mississippiensis (the American alligator), Crocodylus porosus (the saltwater crocodile), and Gavialis gangeticus (the Indian gharial). We observed an exceptionally slow rate of genome evolution within crocodilians at all levels, including nucleotide substitutions, indels, transposable element content and movement, gene family evolution, and chromosomal synteny. When placed within the context of related taxa including birds and turtles, this suggests that the common ancestor of all of these taxa also exhibited slow genome evolution and that the comparatively rapid evolution is derived in birds. The data also provided the opportunity to analyze heterozygosity in crocodilians, which indicates a likely reduction in population size for all three taxa through the Pleistocene. Finally, these data combined with newly published bird genomes allowed us to reconstruct the partial genome of the common ancestor of archosaurs, thereby providing a tool to investigate the genetic starting material of crocodilians, birds, and dinosaurs.


Genome Biology | 2012

Sequencing three crocodilian genomes to illuminate the evolution of archosaurs and amniotes

John St. John; Edward L. Braun; Sally R. Isberg; Lee G. Miles; Amanda Yoon-Yee Chong; Jaime Gongora; Pauline Dalzell; C. Moran; Bertrand Bed'hom; Arhat Abzhanov; Shane C. Burgess; Amanda M. Cooksey; Todd A. Castoe; Nicholas G. Crawford; Llewellyn D. Densmore; Jennifer C. Drew; Scott V. Edwards; Brant C. Faircloth; Matthew K. Fujita; Matthew J. Greenwold; Federico G. Hoffmann; Jonathan M. Howard; Taisen Iguchi; Daniel E. Janes; Shahid Yar Khan; Satomi Kohno; A. P. Jason de Koning; Stacey L. Lance; Fiona M. McCarthy; John E. McCormack

The International Crocodilian Genomes Working Group (ICGWG) will sequence and assemble the American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis), saltwater crocodile (Crocodylus porosus) and Indian gharial (Gavialis gangeticus) genomes. The status of these projects and our planned analyses are described.


Genome Biology | 2015

Coordinated international action to accelerate genome-to-phenome with FAANG, the Functional Annotation of Animal Genomes project

Leif Andersson; Alan Archibald; C. D. K. Bottema; Rudiger Brauning; Shane C. Burgess; Dave Burt; E. Casas; Hans H. Cheng; Laura Clarke; Christine Couldrey; Brian P. Dalrymple; Christine G. Elsik; Sylvain Foissac; Elisabetta Giuffra; M.A.M. Groenen; Ben J. Hayes; LuSheng S Huang; Hassan Khatib; James W. Kijas; Heebal Kim; Joan K. Lunney; Fiona M. McCarthy; J. C. McEwan; Stephen S. Moore; Bindu Nanduri; Cedric Notredame; Yniv Palti; Graham Plastow; James M. Reecy; G. A. Rohrer

We describe the organization of a nascent international effort, the Functional Annotation of Animal Genomes (FAANG) project, whose aim is to produce comprehensive maps of functional elements in the genomes of domesticated animal species.


Nucleic Acids Research | 2007

AgBase: a unified resource for functional analysis in agriculture

Fiona M. McCarthy; Susan M. Bridges; Nan Wang; G Bryce Magee; W. Paul Williams; Dawn S. Luthe; Shane C. Burgess

Analysis of functional genomics (transcriptomics and proteomics) datasets is hindered in agricultural species because agricultural genome sequences have relatively poor structural and functional annotation. To facilitate systems biology in these species we have established the curated, web-accessible, public resource ‘AgBase’ (). We have improved the structural annotation of agriculturally important genomes by experimentally confirming the in vivo expression of electronically predicted proteins and by proteogenomic mapping. Proteogenomic data are available from the AgBase proteogenomics link. We contribute Gene Ontology (GO) annotations and we provide a two tier system of GO annotations for users. The ‘GO Consortium’ gene association file contains the most rigorous GO annotations based solely on experimental data. The ‘Community’ gene association file contains GO annotations based on expert community knowledge (annotations based directly from author statements and submitted annotations from the community) and annotations for predicted proteins. We have developed two tools for proteomics analysis and these are freely available on request. A suite of tools for analyzing functional genomics datasets using the GO is available online at the AgBase site. We encourage and publicly acknowledge GO annotations from researchers and provide an online mechanism for agricultural researchers to submit requests for GO annotations.


BMC Bioinformatics | 2007

Prediction of peptides observable by mass spectrometry applied at the experimental set level

William S. Sanders; Susan M. Bridges; Fiona M. McCarthy; Bindu Nanduri; Shane C. Burgess

BackgroundWhen proteins are subjected to proteolytic digestion and analyzed by mass spectrometry using a method such as 2D LC MS/MS, only a portion of the proteotypic peptides associated with each protein will be observed. The ability to predict which peptides can and cannot potentially be observed for a particular experimental dataset has several important applications in proteomics research including calculation of peptide coverage in terms of potentially detectable peptides, systems biology analysis of data sets, and protein quantification.ResultsWe have developed a methodology for constructing artificial neural networks that can be used to predict which peptides are potentially observable for a given set of experimental, instrumental, and analytical conditions for 2D LC MS/MS (a.k.a Multidimensional Protein Identification Technology [MudPIT]) datasets. Neural network classifiers constructed using this procedure for two MudPIT datasets exhibit 10-fold cross validation accuracy of about 80%. We show that a classifier constructed for one dataset has poor predictive performance with the other dataset, thus demonstrating the need for dataset specific classifiers. Classification results with each dataset are used to compute informative percent amino acid coverage statistics for each protein in terms of the predicted detectable peptides in addition to the percent coverage of the complete sequence. We also demonstrate the utility of predicted peptide observability for systems analysis to help determine if proteins that were expected but not observed generate sufficient peptides for detection.ConclusionClassifiers that accurately predict the likelihood of detecting proteotypic peptides by mass spectrometry provide proteomics researchers with powerful new approaches for data analysis. We demonstrate that the procedure we have developed for building a classifier based on an individual experimental data set results in classifiers with accuracy comparable to those reported in the literature based on large training sets collected from multiple experiments. Our approach allows the researcher to construct a classifier that is specific for the experimental, instrument, and analytical conditions of a single experiment and amenable to local, condition-specific, implementation. The resulting classifiers have application in a number of areas such as determination of peptide coverage for protein identification, pathway analysis, and protein quantification.


Nucleic Acids Research | 2011

AgBase: supporting functional modeling in agricultural organisms

Fiona M. McCarthy; Cathy Gresham; Teresia J. Buza; Philippe Chouvarine; Lakshmi R. Pillai; Ranjit Kumar; Seval Ozkan; Hui Wang; Prashanti Manda; Tony Arick; Susan M. Bridges; Shane C. Burgess

AgBase (http://www.agbase.msstate.edu/) provides resources to facilitate modeling of functional genomics data and structural and functional annotation of agriculturally important animal, plant, microbe and parasite genomes. The website is redesigned to improve accessibility and ease of use, including improved search capabilities. Expanded capabilities include new dedicated pages for horse, cat, dog, cotton, rice and soybean. We currently provide 590 240 Gene Ontology (GO) annotations to 105 454 gene products in 64 different species, including GO annotations linked to transcripts represented on agricultural microarrays. For many of these arrays, this provides the only functional annotation available. GO annotations are available for download and we provide comprehensive, species-specific GO annotation files for 18 different organisms. The tools available at AgBase have been expanded and several existing tools improved based upon user feedback. One of seven new tools available at AgBase, GOModeler, supports hypothesis testing from functional genomics data. We host several associated databases and provide genome browsers for three agricultural pathogens. Moreover, we provide comprehensive training resources (including worked examples and tutorials) via links to Educational Resources at the AgBase website.

Collaboration


Dive into the Fiona M. McCarthy's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bindu Nanduri

Mississippi State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Susan M. Bridges

Mississippi State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Amanda M. Cooksey

Mississippi State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Cathy Gresham

Mississippi State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Prashanti Manda

University of North Carolina at Greensboro

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge