Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Fridtjof Thomas is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Fridtjof Thomas.


JAMA Internal Medicine | 2012

Statin use and risk of diabetes mellitus in postmenopausal women in the Women's Health Initiative

Annie L. Culver; Ira S. Ockene; Raji Balasubramanian; Barbara C. Olendzki; Deidre M. Sepavich; Jean Wactawski-Wende; JoAnn E. Manson; Yongxia Qiao; Simin Liu; Philip A. Merriam; Catherine Rahilly-Tierny; Fridtjof Thomas; Judith K. Ockene; J. David Curb; Yunsheng Ma

BACKGROUND This study investigates whether the incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with statin use among postmenopausal women participating in the Womens Health Initiative (WHI). METHODS The WHI recruited 161,808 postmenopausal women aged 50 to 79 years at 40 clinical centers across the United States from 1993 to 1998 with ongoing follow-up. The current analysis includes data through 2005. Statin use was captured at enrollment and year 3. Incident DM status was determined annually from enrollment. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the risk of DM by statin use, with adjustments for propensity score and other potential confounding factors. Subgroup analyses by race/ethnicity, obesity status, and age group were conducted to uncover effect modification. RESULTS This investigation included 153,840 women without DM and no missing data at baseline. At baseline, 7.04% reported taking statin medication. There were 10,242 incident cases of self-reported DM over 1,004,466 person-years of follow-up. Statin use at baseline was associated with an increased risk of DM (hazard ratio [HR], 1.71; 95% CI, 1.61-1.83). This association remained after adjusting for other potential confounders (multivariate-adjusted HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.38-1.59) and was observed for all types of statin medications. Subset analyses evaluating the association of self-reported DM with longitudinal measures of statin use in 125,575 women confirmed these findings. CONCLUSIONS Statin medication use in postmenopausal women is associated with an increased risk for DM. This may be a medication class effect. Further study by statin type and dose may reveal varying risk levels for new-onset DM in this population.


Human Molecular Genetics | 2012

Genome-wide meta-analysis points to CTC1 and ZNF676 as genes regulating telomere homeostasis in humans

Massimo Mangino; Shih Jen Hwang; Tim D. Spector; Steven C. Hunt; Masayuki Kimura; Annette L. Fitzpatrick; Lene Christiansen; Inge Petersen; Clara C. Elbers; Tamara B. Harris; Wei Chen; Jeremy D. Kark; Athanase Benetos; Said El Shamieh; Sophie Visvikis-Siest; Kaare Christensen; Gerald S. Berenson; Ana M. Valdes; Ana Viñuela; Melissa Garcia; Donna K. Arnett; Ulrich Broeckel; Michael A. Province; James S. Pankow; Candace M. Kammerer; Yongmei Liu; Michael A. Nalls; Sarah A. Tishkoff; Fridtjof Thomas; Elad Ziv

Leukocyte telomere length (LTL) is associated with a number of common age-related diseases and is a heritable trait. Previous genome-wide association studies (GWASs) identified two loci on chromosomes 3q26.2 (TERC) and 10q24.33 (OBFC1) that are associated with the inter-individual LTL variation. We performed a meta-analysis of 9190 individuals from six independent GWAS and validated our findings in 2226 individuals from four additional studies. We confirmed previously reported associations with OBFC1 (rs9419958 P = 9.1 × 10−11) and with the telomerase RNA component TERC (rs1317082, P = 1.1 × 10−8). We also identified two novel genomic regions associated with LTL variation that map near a conserved telomere maintenance complex component 1 (CTC1; rs3027234, P = 3.6 × 10−8) on chromosome17p13.1 and zinc finger protein 676 (ZNF676; rs412658, P = 3.3 × 10−8) on 19p12. The minor allele of rs3027234 was associated with both shorter LTL and lower expression of CTC1. Our findings are consistent with the recent observations that point mutations in CTC1 cause short telomeres in both Arabidopsis and humans affected by a rare Mendelian syndrome. Overall, our results provide novel insights into the genetic architecture of inter-individual LTL variation in the general population.


JAMA | 2015

Association of aspirin and NSAID use with risk of colorectal cancer according to genetic variants

Hongmei Nan; Carolyn M. Hutter; Yi Lin; Eric J. Jacobs; Cornelia M. Ulrich; Emily White; John A. Baron; Sonja I. Berndt; Hermann Brenner; Katja Butterbach; Bette J. Caan; Peter T. Campbell; Christopher S. Carlson; Graham Casey; Jenny Chang-Claude; Stephen J. Chanock; Michelle Cotterchio; David Duggan; Jane C. Figueiredo; Charles S. Fuchs; Edward Giovannucci; Jian Gong; Robert W. Haile; Tabitha A. Harrison; Richard B. Hayes; Michael Hoffmeister; John L. Hopper; Thomas J. Hudson; Mark A. Jenkins; Noralane M. Lindor

IMPORTANCE Use of aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is associated with lower risk of colorectal cancer. OBJECTIVE To identify common genetic markers that may confer differential benefit from aspirin or NSAID chemoprevention, we tested gene × environment interactions between regular use of aspirin and/or NSAIDs and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in relation to risk of colorectal cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Case-control study using data from 5 case-control and 5 cohort studies initiated between 1976 and 2003 across the United States, Canada, Australia, and Germany and including colorectal cancer cases (n=8634) and matched controls (n=8553) ascertained between 1976 and 2011. Participants were all of European descent. EXPOSURES Genome-wide SNP data and information on regular use of aspirin and/or NSAIDs and other risk factors. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Colorectal cancer. RESULTS Regular use of aspirin and/or NSAIDs was associated with lower risk of colorectal cancer (prevalence, 28% vs 38%; odds ratio [OR], 0.69 [95% CI, 0.64-0.74]; P = 6.2 × 10(-28)) compared with nonregular use. In the conventional logistic regression analysis, the SNP rs2965667 at chromosome 12p12.3 near the MGST1 gene showed a genome-wide significant interaction with aspirin and/or NSAID use (P = 4.6 × 10(-9) for interaction). Aspirin and/or NSAID use was associated with a lower risk of colorectal cancer among individuals with rs2965667-TT genotype (prevalence, 28% vs 38%; OR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.61-0.70]; P = 7.7 × 10(-33)) but with a higher risk among those with rare (4%) TA or AA genotypes (prevalence, 35% vs 29%; OR, 1.89 [95% CI, 1.27-2.81]; P = .002). In case-only interaction analysis, the SNP rs16973225 at chromosome 15q25.2 near the IL16 gene showed a genome-wide significant interaction with use of aspirin and/or NSAIDs (P = 8.2 × 10(-9) for interaction). Regular use was associated with a lower risk of colorectal cancer among individuals with rs16973225-AA genotype (prevalence, 28% vs 38%; OR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.62-0.71]; P = 1.9 × 10(-30)) but was not associated with risk of colorectal cancer among those with less common (9%) AC or CC genotypes (prevalence, 36% vs 39%; OR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.78-1.20]; P = .76). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this genome-wide investigation of gene × environment interactions, use of aspirin and/or NSAIDs was associated with lower risk of colorectal cancer, and this association differed according to genetic variation at 2 SNPs at chromosomes 12 and 15. Validation of these findings in additional populations may facilitate targeted colorectal cancer prevention strategies.


PLOS Biology | 2013

Generalization and dilution of association results from European GWAS in populations of non-European ancestry: the PAGE study.

Christopher S. Carlson; Tara C. Matise; Kari E. North; Christopher A. Haiman; Megan D. Fesinmeyer; Steven Buyske; Fredrick R. Schumacher; Ulrike Peters; Nora Franceschini; Marylyn D. Ritchie; David Duggan; Kylee L. Spencer; Logan Dumitrescu; Charles B. Eaton; Fridtjof Thomas; Alicia Young; Cara L. Carty; Gerardo Heiss; Loic Le Marchand; Dana C. Crawford; Lucia A. Hindorff; Charles Kooperberg

A multi-ethnic study demonstrates that the extrapolation of genetic disease risk models from European populations to other ethnicities is compromised more strongly by genetic structure than by environmental or global genetic background in differential genetic risk associations across ethnicities.


Birth Defects Research Part A-clinical and Molecular Teratology | 2011

Racial Differences in Gene-Specific DNA Methylation Levels are Present at Birth

Ronald M. Adkins; Julia Krushkal; Frances A. Tylavsky; Fridtjof Thomas

BACKGROUND DNA methylation patterns differ among children and adults and play an unambiguous role in several disease processes, particularly cancers. The origin of these differences is inadequately understood, and this is a question of specific relevance to childhood and adult cancer. METHODS DNA methylation levels at 26,485 autosomal CpGs were assayed in 201 newborns (107 African American and 94 Caucasian). Nonparametric analyses were performed to examine the relation between these methylation levels and maternal parity, maternal age, newborn gestational age, newborn gender, and newborn race. To identify the possible influences of confounding, stratification was performed by a second and third variable. For genes containing CpGs with significant differences in DNA methylation levels between races, analyses were performed to identify highly represented gene ontological terms and functional pathways. RESULTS 13.7% (3623) of the autosomal CpGs exhibited significantly different levels of DNA methylation between African Americans and Caucasians; 2% of autosomal CpGs had significantly different DNA methylation levels between male and female newborns. Cancer pathways, including four (pancreatic, prostate, bladder, and melanoma) with substantial differences in incidence between the races, were highly represented among the genes containing significant race-divergent CpGs. CONCLUSIONS At birth, there are significantly different DNA methylation levels between African Americans and Caucasians at a subset of CpG dinucleotides. It is possible that some of the epigenetic precursors to cancer exist at birth and that these differences partially explain the different incidence rates of specific cancers between the races.


BMC Medical Genetics | 2011

Parental ages and levels of DNA methylation in the newborn are correlated

Ronald M. Adkins; Fridtjof Thomas; Frances A. Tylavsky; Julia Krushkal

BackgroundChanges in DNA methylation patterns with age frequently have been observed and implicated in the normal aging process and its associated increasing risk of disease, particularly cancer. Additionally, the offspring of older parents are at significantly increased risk of cancer, diabetes, and neurodevelopmental disorders. Only a proportion of these increased risks among the children of older parents can be attributed to nondisjunction and chromosomal rearrangements.ResultsUsing a genome-wide survey of 27,578 CpG dinucleotides in a cohort of 168 newborns, we examined the relationship between DNA methylation in newborns and a variety of parental and newborn traits. We found that methylation levels of 144 CpGs belonging to 142 genes were significantly correlated with maternal age. A weaker correlation was observed with paternal age. Among these genes, processes related to cancer were over-represented, as were functions related to neurological regulation, glucose/carbohydrate metabolism, nucleocytoplasmic transport, and transcriptional regulation. CpGs exhibiting gender differences in methylation were overwhelmingly located on the X chromosome, although a small subset of autosomal CpGs were found in genes previously shown to exhibit gender-specific differences in methylation levels.ConclusionsThese results indicate that there are differences in CpG methylation levels at birth that are related to parental age and that could influence disease risk in childhood and throughout life.


JAMA Internal Medicine | 2016

Dietary Patterns and Fractures in Postmenopausal Women: Results From the Women's Health Initiative

Bernhard Haring; Carolyn J. Crandall; Chunyuan Wu; Erin LeBlanc; James M. Shikany; Laura D. Carbone; Tonya Orchard; Fridtjof Thomas; Jean Wactawaski-Wende; Wenjun Li; Jane A. Cauley; Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller

IMPORTANCE Considerable efforts have been undertaken to relate single nutrients to bone health. To this point, results are inconsistent. Suboptimal single nutrient intake does not occur in isolation but rather reflects a poor diet quality. OBJECTIVE To assess the association between adherence to a diet quality index constructed on the basis of dietary recommendations or existing healthy dietary patterns and fractures in postmenopausal women. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Post hoc analysis was conducted of longitudinal data from 40 clinical centers throughout the United States included in the Womens Health Initiative (WHI) observational study. Participants in the prospective cohort included 93 676 women who were eligible for the WHI if they were aged 50 to 79 years. Recruitment was conducted from October 1, 1993, to December 31, 1998, with the study ending August 29, 2014. The WHI food frequency questionnaire was used to derive nutrient and food intake at baseline. Diet quality and adherence were assessed by scores on the alternate Mediterranean Diet (aMED), a 9-category measure of adherence to a Mediterranean dietary pattern; the Healthy Eating Index 2010 (HEI-2010), a 100-point measure of 12 food components; the 11-item Alternate Healthy Eating Index 2010 (AHEI-2010); or the 8-component Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet score. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Outcome measures included incident total and hip fractures. Hazard ratios (HRs) by quintiles of dietary index scores were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. RESULTS Of the 93 676 participants, 90 014 were included in the analysis (mean [SD] age, 63.6 [7.4]) years. During a median follow-up time of 15.9 years, there were 2121 cases of hip fractures and 28 718 cases of total fractures. Women scoring in the highest quintile (Q5) of the aMED index had a lower risk for hip fractures (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.66-0.97), with an absolute risk reduction of 0.29% and a number needed to treat of 342 (95% CI, 249-502). No association between the aMED score and total fractures was observed (Q5 HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.95-1.07). Higher HEI-2010 or DASH scores tended to be inversely related to hip fracture risk, but the results were nonsignificant (Q5 HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.75-1.02; and Q5 HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.75-1.06, respectively). The AHEI-2010 score was associated with neither hip nor total fractures. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Higher adherence to a Mediterranean diet is associated with a lower risk for hip fractures. These results support that a healthy dietary pattern may play a role in maintaining bone health in postmenopausal women.


Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | 2013

Prospective analysis of association between statin use and breast cancer risk in the women's health initiative.

Pinkal Desai; Rowan T. Chlebowski; Jane A. Cauley; JoAnn E. Manson; Chunyuan Wu; Lisa W. Martin; Allison Jay; Cathryn H. Bock; Michele L. Cote; Nancie Petrucelli; Carol A. Rosenberg; Ulrike Peters; Ilir Agalliu; Nicole Budrys; Mustafa Abdul-Hussein; Dorothy S. Lane; Juhua Luo; Hannah Lui Park; Fridtjof Thomas; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Michael S. Simon

Background: Statins are a class of cholesterol-lowering drugs that affect many intracellular pathways that may have implications for chemoprevention against cancer. Epidemiologic data on statins and breast cancer are conflicting. We analyzed updated data from the Womens Health Initiative (WHI) to assess the relationship between statins and breast cancer risk. Methods: The population included 154,587 postmenopausal women ages 50 to 79 years, with 7,430 pathologically confirmed cases of breast cancer identified over an average of 10.8 (SD, 3.3) years. Information on statins was collected at baseline and years one, three, six, and nine. Self- and interviewer-administered questionnaires were used to collect information on risk factors. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to calculate HRs with 95% confidence intervals (CI) to evaluate the relationship between statin use and cancer risk. Statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Statins were used by 11,584 (7.5%) women at baseline. The annualized rate of breast cancer was 0.42% among statin users and 0.42% among nonusers. The multivariable adjusted HR of breast cancer for users versus nonusers was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.83–1.06). In the multivariable-adjusted, time-dependent model, the HR for simvastatin was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.71–1.07). There was no significant trend by overall duration of use (P value for trend 0.68). There was no effect of tumor stage, grade, or hormone receptor status. Conclusion: Overall, statins were not associated with breast cancer risk. Impact: Our study is one of the largest prospective observational studies on this topic, and substantially adds to the literature suggesting no relationship between statins and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 22(10); 1868–76. ©2013 AACR.


Journal of the National Cancer Institute | 2011

Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Risks of Melanoma and Nonmelanoma Skin Cancers: Women’s Health Initiative Randomized Trials

Jean Y. Tang; Katrina Spaunhurst; Rowan T. Chlebowski; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Elizabeth Keiser; Fridtjof Thomas; Matthew L. Anderson; Nathalie C. Zeitouni; Joseph C. Larson; Marcia L. Stefanick

BACKGROUND Case-control studies have reported that exogenous estrogen use is associated with increased risk of skin cancer. The effects of menopausal hormone therapy on incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer and melanoma were evaluated in post hoc analyses of the Womens Health Initiative randomized placebo-controlled hormone therapy trials of combined estrogen plus progestin (E + P) and estrogen only (E-alone). METHODS Postmenopausal women aged 50-79 years were randomly assigned to conjugated equine estrogen (0.625 mg/d) plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (2.5 mg/d) or placebo in the E + P trial if they had an intact uterus (N = 16,608) or to conjugated equine estrogen alone or placebo in the E-alone trial if they had a hysterectomy (N = 10,739); the mean follow-up was 5.6 and 7.1 years, respectively. Incident nonmelanoma skin cancers (n = 980 [E + P trial]; n = 820 [E-alone trial]) and melanomas (n = 57 [E + P trial]; n =38 [E-alone trial]) were ascertained by self-report. Incident cases of cutaneous malignant melanoma were confirmed by physician review of medical records. Incidences of nonmelanoma skin cancer and melanoma were compared between the two randomization groups within each trial using hazard ratios (HRs), with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and Wald statistic P values from Cox proportional hazards models. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS Rates of incident nonmelanoma skin cancer and melanoma were similar between the active hormone (combined analysis of E + P and E-alone) and placebo groups (nonmelanoma skin cancer: HR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.89 to 1.07; melanoma: HR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.61 to 1.37). Results were similar for the E + P and E-alone trials when analyzed individually. CONCLUSIONS Menopausal hormone therapy did not affect overall incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer or melanoma. These findings do not support a role of menopausal estrogen, with or without progestin, in the development of skin cancer in postmenopausal women.


Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | 2012

A Pooled Analysis of Smoking and Colorectal Cancer: Timing of Exposure and Interactions with Environmental Factors

Jian Gong; Carolyn M. Hutter; John A. Baron; Sonja I. Berndt; Bette J. Caan; Peter T. Campbell; Graham Casey; Andrew T. Chan; Michelle Cotterchio; Charles S. Fuchs; Steven Gallinger; Edward Giovannucci; Tabitha A. Harrison; Richard B. Hayes; Li Hsu; Yi Lin; Noralane M. Lindor; Polly A. Newcomb; Bethann M. Pflugeisen; Amanda I. Phipps; Thomas E. Rohan; Robert E. Schoen; Daniela Seminara; Martha L. Slattery; Deanna L. Stelling; Fridtjof Thomas; Greg S. Warnick; Emily White; John D. Potter; Ulrike Peters

Background: Considerable evidence suggests that cigarette smoking is associated with a higher risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). What is unclear, however, is the impact of quitting smoking on risk attenuation and whether other risk factors for CRC modify this association. Methods: We conducted a pooled analysis of eight studies, including 6,796 CRC cases and 7,770 controls, to evaluate the association between cigarette smoking history and CRC risk and to investigate potential effect modification by other risk factors. Results: Current smokers [OR, 1.26; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.11–1.43] and former smokers (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.09–1.27), relative to never smokers, showed higher risks of CRC. Former smokers remained at higher CRC risk, relative to never smokers, for up to about 25 years after quitting. The impact of time since quitting varied by cancer subsite: The excess risk due to smoking decreased immediately after quitting for proximal colon and rectal cancer but not until about 20 years post-quitting for distal colon cancer. Furthermore, we observed borderline statistically significant additive interactions between smoking status and body mass index [BMI; relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI]), 0.15; 95% CI, −0.01 to 0.31; P = 0.06] and significant additive interaction between smoking status and fruit consumption (RERI, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.01–0.30; P = 0.04). Conclusion: CRC risk remained increased for about 25 years after quitting smoking, and the pattern of decline in risk varied by cancer subsite. BMI and fruit intake modified the risk associated with smoking. Impact: These results contribute to a better understanding of the mechanisms through which smoking impacts CRC etiology. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 21(11); 1974–85. ©2012 AACR.

Collaboration


Dive into the Fridtjof Thomas's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Csaba P. Kovesdy

University of Tennessee Health Science Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Praveen K. Potukuchi

University of Tennessee Health Science Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Miklos Z. Molnar

University of Tennessee Health Science Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Keiichi Sumida

University of Tennessee Health Science Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jun Ling Lu

University of Tennessee Health Science Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Karen C. Johnson

University of Tennessee Health Science Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rowan T. Chlebowski

Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Elani Streja

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge