Gabor Fulop

Stabilization of the coronary sinus electrode position with coronary stent implantation to prevent and treat dislocation.

Introduction: Coronary sinus (CS) leads used for cardiac resynchronization have undergone development in the last years. However, dislocation rate remained high (5–9%). The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of stent implantation in a CS side vein to stabilize the left ventricular lead position after postoperative or intraoperative dislocation of the electrode.

Minimal invasive coronary sinus lead reposition technique for the treatment of phrenic nerve stimulation

AIMS Phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS), which is often intolerable for the patient, is a known complication of resynchronization therapy. We describe a new, minimal invasive method for treating PNS. METHODS AND RESULTS Untreatable PNS was found in nine cardiac resynchronization therapy patients with distal coronary sinus (CS) lead position 6 +/- 6 (0.5-17) months after the implantation. Ablation catheter and Amplatz Left 2 type guiding catheter were introduced into the right atrium via the right femoral vein. Coronary sinus was cannulated with the Amplatz catheter, and on a normal guide wire, a coronary stent was introduced beside the lead into the side branch in seven cases or a bigger stent into the CS in two patients. The ablation catheter was looped around the CS lead in the atrium with bent tip and was drawn backward together with the CS electrode. New lead positions were evaluated with electrophysiological measurements, and the suitable position was stabilized with inflation of the stent. Pericardial effusion was not detected on post-operative echocardiography. After repositioning, suitable pacing parameters were registered (threshold: 1.6 +/- 1.1 V; 0.5 ms, impedance: 565 +/- 62 ohm). Phrenic nerve stimulation was not found with 7.5 V; 1.5 ms pacing. During follow-up (7.7 +/- 4.6 months), stable pacing threshold and impedance values were measured; transient and reprogrammable PNS was present in only one patient. CONCLUSION Coronary sinus electrode reposition using the femoral approach seems to be a safe and effective procedure, which means smaller burden for the patients compared with the established reposition operation. The technique can be used successfully if the CS lead is in a distal position.

Very late drug-eluting stent thrombosis after nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug treatment despite dual antiplatelet therapy

BACKGROUND Drug-eluting coronary stent implantation emerged as a safe and effective therapeutic approach by preventing coronary restenosis and reducing the need for further revascularization. However, in contrast to bare metal stents, recent data suggest a unique underlying pathology, namely late coronary stent thrombosis and delayed endothelial healing. OBJECTIVE To report a case of very late coronary stent thrombosis (834 days after implantation) requiring repeat urgent target-vessel revascularization. Importantly, six days before the acute coronary event, combined nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy was initiated. RESULTS Although a dual antiplatelet regimen was continuously maintained, aggregation measurements indicated only partial antiplatelet effect, which returned to the expected range when nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were omitted. CONCLUSIONS The observation indicates that, even 834 days after drug-eluting stent implantation, effective combined antiplatelet therapy might be crucial in certain individuals and the possible impact of drug interactions should not be underestimated. Further efforts should focus on the challenging task of identifying patients or medical situations with prolonged, increased risk of stent thrombosis.