Gerald S. Lipshutz

Liver Transplantation Criteria For Hepatocellular Carcinoma Should Be Expanded: A 22-Year Experience With 467 Patients at UCLA

Objective:To assess the efficacy of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the impact of current staging criteria on long term survival. Summary Background Data:HCC is becoming an increasingly common indication for OLT. Medicare approves OLT only for HCCs meeting the Milan criteria, thus limiting OLT for an expanding pool of potential liver recipients. We analyzed our experience with OLT for HCC to determine if expansion of criteria for OLT for HCC is warranted. Methods:All patients undergoing OLT for HCC from 1984 to 2006 were evaluated. Outcomes were compared for patients who met Milan criteria (single tumor ≤5 cm, maximum of 3 total tumors with none >3 cm), University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) criteria (single tumor <6.5 cm, maximum of 3 total tumors with none >4.5 cm, and cumulative tumor size <8 cm), or exceeded UCSF criteria. Results:A total of 467 transplants were performed for HCC. At mean follow up of 6.6 ± 0.9 years, recurrence rate was 21.2%, and overall 1, 3, and 5-year survival was 82%, 65%, and 52%, respectively. Patients meeting Milan criteria had similar 5-year post-transplant survival to patients meeting UCSF criteria by preoperative imaging (79% vs. 64%; P = 0.061) and explant pathology (86% vs. 71%; P = 0.057). Survival for patients with tumors beyond UCSF criteria was significantly lower and was below 50% at 5 years. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor number (P < 0.001), lymphovascular invasion (P < 0.001), and poor differentiation (P = 0.002) independently predicted poor survival. Conclusions:This largest single institution experience with OLT for HCC demonstrates prolonged survival after liver transplantation for tumors beyond Milan criteria but within UCSF criteria, both when classified by preoperative imaging and by explant pathology. Measured expansion of OLT criteria is justified for tumors not exceeding the UCSF criteria.

Analysis of long-term outcomes of 3200 liver transplantations over two decades: A single-center experience

Objective:Few studies have evaluated long-term outcomes after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). This work analyzes the experience of nearly 2 decades by the same team in a single center. Outcomes of OLT and factors affecting survival were analyzed. Methods:Retrospective analysis of 3200 consecutive OLTs that were performed at our institution, between February 1984 and December 31, 2001. Results:Of 2662 recipients, 578 (21.7%) and 659 (24.7%) were pediatric and urgent patients, respectively. Overall 1-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year patient and graft survival estimates were 81%, 72%, 68%, 64% and 73%, 64%, 59%, 55%, respectively. Patient survival significantly improved in the second (1992–2001) versus the era I (1984–1991) of transplantation (P < 0.001). Similarly, graft survival was better in the era II of transplantation (P < 0.02). However, biliary and infectious complications increased in era II. When OLT indications were considered, best recipient survival was obtained in children with biliary atresia (82%, 79%, and 78% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively), while malignant disease in adult patients resulted in the worst outcomes of 68% and 43% at 1 and 5 years, post-OLT. Further, patients <18 years and nonurgent recipients exhibited superior survival when compared with recipients >18 years (P < 0.001) or urgent patients (P < 0.001). Of 13 donor and recipient variables, era of OLT, recipient age, urgent status, donor age, donor length of hospital stay, etiology of liver disease, retransplantation, warm and cold ischemia, but not graft type (whole, split, living-donor), significantly impacted patient survival. Conclusions:Long-term benefits of OLT are greatest in pediatric and nonurgent patients. Multiple factors involving the recipient, etiology of liver disease, donor characteristics, operative variables, and surgical experience influence long-term survival outcomes. By balancing and matching these factors with a given recipient, optimum results can be achieved.

Obesity and outcome following renal transplantation

Single institution series have demonstrated that obese patients have higher rates of wound infection and delayed graft function (DGF), but similar rates of graft survival. We used UNOS data to determine whether obesity affects outcome following renal transplantation.

Optimal Utilization of Donor Grafts With Extended Criteria: A Single-Center Experience in Over 1000 Liver Transplants

Objective:Severely limited organ resources mandate maximum utilization of donor allografts for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). This work aimed to identify factors that impact survival outcomes for extended criteria donors (ECD) and developed an ECD scoring system to facilitate graft-recipient matching and optimize utilization of ECDs. Methods:Retrospective analysis of over 1000 primary adult OLTs at UCLA. Extended criteria (EC) considered included donor age (>55 years), donor hospital stay (>5 days), cold ischemia time (>10 hours), and warm ischemia time (>40 minutes). One point was assigned for each extended criterion. Cox proportional hazard regression model was used for multivariate analysis. Results:Of 1153 allografts considered in the study, 568 organs exhibited no extended criteria (0 score), while 429, 135 and 21 donor allografts exhibited an EC score of 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Overall 1-year patient survival rates were 88%, 82%, 77% and 48% for recipients with EC scores of 0, 1, 2 and 3 respectively (P < 0.001). Adjusting for recipient age and urgency at the time of transplantation, multivariate analysis identified an ascending mortality risk ratio of 1.4 and 1.8 compared to a score of 0 for an EC score of 1, and 2 (P < 0.01) respectively. In contrast, an EC score of 3 was associated with a mortality risk ratio of 4.5 (P < 0.001). Further, advanced recipient age linearly increased the death hazard ratio, while an urgent recipient status increased the risk ratio of death by 50%. Conclusions:Extended criteria donors can be scored using readily available parameters. Optimizing perioperative variables and matching ECD allografts to appropriately selected recipients are crucial to maintain acceptable outcomes and represent a preferable alternative to both high waiting list mortality and to a potentially futile transplant that utilizes an ECD for a critically ill recipient.

Outcomes of Dual Adult Kidney Transplants in the United States: An Analysis of the OPTN/UNOS Database

Background. The organ shortage has resulted in increased use of kidneys from expanded criteria donors (ECD). For ECD kidneys unsuitable for single use, dual kidney transplants (DKT) may be possible. There are limited data comparing outcomes of DKT to single kidney ECD transplants, making it unclear where DKT fits in the current allocation scheme. Our purpose was to compare outcomes of DKT and ECD transplants in the United States. Methods. From 2000 to 2005, a total of 625 DKT, 7686 single kidney ECD, and 6,044 SCD transplants from donors aged ≥50 years were identified from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing data. Allograft survival was the primary outcome. Results. DKT comprised 4% of kidney transplants from donors aged ≥50 years. Compared to the ECD donor group, the DKT donor group was older (mean age 64.6±7.7 years vs. 59.9±6.2 years) and consisted of more African Americans (13.1% vs. 9.9%), and more diabetic donors (16.3% vs. 10.4%; P<0.001). Mean cold ischemic time was longer in DKT (22.2±9.7 hr), but rates of delayed graft function were lower (29.3%) compared to ECD transplants (33.6%, P=0.03). Three-year overall graft survival was 79.8% for DKT and 78.3% for ECD transplants. Conclusion. DKT were infrequent and had outcomes comparable to ECD transplants, despite the use of organs from higher risk donors. With a more upfront approach to DKT by offering this option to patients at the time of wait-listing as part of an ECD algorithm, we may be able to further optimize outcomes of DKT and minimize discard of potential organs.

BKV in Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Leading Cause of Renal Graft Loss in First 2 Years Post-Transplant

With the introduction of more potent immunosuppressive agents, rejection has decreased in simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplant (SPK) recipients. However, as a consequence, opportunistic infections have increased. The purpose of this report is to outline the course of SPK patients who developed polyomavirus‐associated nephropathy (PVAN). A retrospective review of 146 consecutive SPK recipients from January 1, 1996 to December 31, 2002 was performed. Immunosuppression, rejection and development of PVAN were reviewed. Nine patients were identified. All received induction with either OKT3 or thymoglobulin. Immunosuppression included tacrolimus/cyclosporine, MMF/azathioprine and sirolimus/prednisone. Two patients were treated for kidney rejection prior to the diagnosis of PVAN. Time to diagnosis was an average of 359.3 days post‐transplantation. Immunosuppression was decreased but five ultimately lost function. However, none developed pancreatic abnormalities as demonstrated by normal glucose and amylase. Two underwent renal retransplantation after PVAN diagnosis and both have normal kidney function. PVAN was the leading cause of renal loss in SPK patients in the first 2 years after transplantation and is a serious concern for SPK recipients. The pancreas, however, is spared from evidence of infection, and no pancreatic rejection occurred when immunosuppression was decreased.

BK nephropathy in kidney transplant recipients treated with a calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression regimen.

Recently, polyomavirus‐associated nephropathy (PVAN) has been reported more frequently and is emerging as an important cause of renal allograft dysfunction and graft loss. Susceptibility appears to be related to the type and intensity of pharmacologic immunosuppression but some reports have suggested a link among the development of PVAN, the treatment of rejection or maintenance with a tacrolimus‐based immunosuppressive regimen. We report three cases of PVAN in patients who never received immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). Two patients received induction immunosuppression consisting of an IL‐2 receptor antagonist while 1 received thymoglobulin. These 3 patients were maintained on prednisone, sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and none was treated for rejection. All three patients presented with an elevated serum creatinine and demonstrated polyomavirus infection on biopsy and by blood PCR. These cases demonstrate that, unlike reports linking tacrolimus and PVAN, polyomavirus infection may develop in patients maintained on CNI‐free immunosuppressive regimens and have not had episodes of rejection.

Thorotrast-induced liver neoplasia: a collective review.

Thorotrast, a colloidal solution of thorium dioxide and dextrin, was used as a radiographic contrast agent in the United States, Europe, and Japan from 1930 to 1960. Thorium is a naturally occurring radionuclide with a physical half-life of 14 billion years and is deposited in tissues after parenteral injection, resulting in a lifetime of alpha-radiation exposure. Today, its former use has been primarily reported in its relationship to a wide range of malignancies, primarily of the liver, with the major causes of the death being liver cancer, cirrhosis, hematologic malignancies, and other cancers.

RH10 provides superior transgene expression in mice when compared with natural AAV serotypes for neonatal gene therapy.

Neonatal gene therapy is a promising strategy for treating diseases diagnosed before or shortly after birth. Early and long‐term expression of therapeutic proteins may limit the consequences of genetic mutations and result in a potential ‘cure’. Adeno‐associated viral vectors have shown promise in many areas of adult gene therapy but their properties have not been systematically investigated in the neonate.

rPSGL-Ig for Improvement of Early Liver Allograft Function: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Single-Center Phase II Study†

The selectin antagonist known as recombinant P‐selectin glycoprotein ligand IgG (rPSGL‐Ig) blocks leukocyte adhesion and protects against transplantation ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) in animal models. This randomized (1:1) single‐center double‐blind 47‐patient phase 2 study with 6‐month follow‐up assessed rPSGL‐Igs safety and impact on early graft function at 1 mg/kg systemic dose with pretransplant allograft ex vivo treatment in deceased‐donor liver transplant recipients. Safety was assessed in all patients, whereas efficacy was assessed in a prospectively defined per‐protocol patient set (PP) by peak serum transaminase (TA) and bilirubin values, and normalization thereof. In PP patients, the incidence of poor early graft function (defined as peak TA >2500 U/L or bilirubin >10 mg/dL), average peak liver enzymes and bilirubin, normalization thereof and duration of primary and total hospitalization trended consistently lower in the rPSGL‐Ig group compared to placebo. In patients with donor risk index above study‐average, normalization of aspartate aminotransferase was significantly improved in the rPSGL‐Ig group (p < 0.03). rPSGL‐Ig treatment blunted postreperfusion induction versus placebo of IRI biomarker IP‐10 (p < 0.1) and augmented cytoprotective IL‐10 (p < 0.05). This is the first clinical trial of an adhesion molecule antagonist to demonstrate a beneficial effect on liver transplantation IRI and supported by therapeutic modulation of two hepatic IRI biomarkers.