Graham Mercer
Repatriation General Hospital
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Graham Mercer.
Anz Journal of Surgery | 2010
Anthony J. Samson; Graham Mercer; David G. Campbell
Background: The ‘obesity epidemic’ is expected to result in an increased incidence of knee osteoarthritis and hence total knee replacements (TKRs). Reviews have demonstrated the conflicting results of TKR for all obese (body mass index (BMI) >30). The aim of this literature review was to specifically evaluate outcomes of TKR in patients with morbid obesity (MO; BMI >40).
Journal of Arthroplasty | 2012
Stuart A. Callary; David G. Campbell; Graham Mercer; Kjell G. Nilsson; John Field
A prospective cohort of 30 patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty for treatment of osteoarthritis was enrolled in a study to characterize the migration behavior of a clinically successful cementless stem. At 6 years, the mean subsidence of the stem was 0.63 mm (range, -0.33 to 3.68 mm); the mean rotation into retroversion was 1.41° (range, -1.33° to 7.48°). No stems had additional subsidence of more than 0.25 mm between 6 months and 6 years. The resultant mean subsidence between 2 and 6 years was 0.03 mm, which is below the limit measurable by radiostereometric analysis. The data demonstrate that subsidence of this cementless stem occurs within the first 6 months, after which there is persistent stabilization.
Journal of Orthopaedic Research | 2017
Bryant C. Roberts; Dominic Thewlis; Lucian B. Solomon; Graham Mercer; Karen J. Reynolds; Egon Perilli
Tibial subchondral bone plays an important role in knee osteoarthritis (OA). Microarchitectural characterization of subchondral bone plate (SBP), underlying subchondral trabecular bone (STB) and relationships between these compartments, however, is limited. The aim of this study was to characterize the spatial distribution of SBP thickness, SBP porosity and STB microarchitecture, and relationships among them, in OA tibiae of varying joint alignment. Twenty‐five tibial plateaus from end‐stage knee‐OA patients, with varus (n = 17) or non‐varus (n = 8) alignment were micro‐CT scanned (17 μm/voxel). SBP and STB microarchitecture was quantified via a systematic mapping in 22 volumes of interest per knee (11 medial, 11 lateral). Significant within‐condylar and between‐condylar (medial vs. lateral) differences (p < 0.05) were found. In varus, STB bone volume fraction (BV/TV) was consistently high throughout the medial condyle, whereas in non‐varus, medially, it was more heterogeneously distributed. Regions of high SBP thickness were co‐located with regions of high STB BV/TV underneath. In varus, BV/TV was significantly higher medially than laterally, however, not so in non‐varus. Moreover, region‐specific significant associations between the SBP thickness and SBP porosity and the underlying STB microarchitecture were detected, which in general were not captured when considering the values averaged for each condyle. As subchondral bone changes reflect responses to local mechanical and biochemical factors within the joint, our results suggest that joint alignment influences both the medial‐to‐lateral and the within‐condyle distribution of force across the tibia, generating corresponding local bony responses (adaptation) of both the subchondral bone plate and underlying subchondral trabecular bone microarchitecture.
Australian Health Review | 2013
Christine R. Doerr; Stephen Graves; Graham Mercer; Richard H. Osborne
The Orthopaedic Unit of the Repatriation General Hospital (RGH) in Adelaide, South Australia has implemented a quality care management system for patients with arthritis of the hip and knee. The system not only optimises conservative management but ensures that joint replacement surgery is undertaken in an appropriate and timely manner. This new service model addresses identified barriers to service access and provides a comprehensive, coordinated strategy for patient management. Over 4 years the model has reduced waiting times for initial outpatient assessment from 8 to 3 months and surgery from 18 to 8 months, while decreasing length of stay from 6.3 to 5.3 days for hips and 5.8 to 5.3 days for knees. The service reforms have been accompanied by positive feedback from patients and referring general practitioners in relation to the improved coordination of care and enhanced efficiency in service delivery.
Australian Health Review | 2014
Tom P. Walsh; Dolores C. Pilkington; Esther J. Wong; Christopher H. Brown; Graham Mercer
BACKGROUND The Southern Adelaide Local Health Network is serviced by one orthopaedic surgeon specialising in foot and ankle surgery. In 2011, the waiting list to see the surgeon was expanding and the need for assistance was growing. The Department of Podiatry agreed to provide a podiatrist to assist in the management of the outpatient waiting list. Although patient outcome is an important outcome measure, we were interested in evaluating the service with respect to how satisfied patients were with seeing a podiatrist. Therefore, the primary aim of the study was to evaluate patient satisfaction with podiatry-led clinics for the orthopaedic outpatient waiting list. Secondary outcomes included discharge rate and efficiency of care. METHODS We prospectively recruited a consecutive sample discharged from the Department of Podiatry between 1 May and 1 November 2013 to complete the Client Satisfaction Survey (CSQ-8). This survey was used to evaluate the satisfaction of patients following discharge from the Department of Podiatry. RESULTS There were 49 patients (16 men, 33 women) enrolled in the survey during the 6-month period. Of the 49 patients discharged, 21 (43%) were discharged from the outpatient waiting list. Twenty-eight patients (57%) were referred on to the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery for opinion and management. The mean (± s.d.) number of appointments for each patient was 1.3±0.6. Overall, patients were very satisfied with the assessment and/or treatment they received. CONCLUSION A podiatrist, working at an extended scope of practice and in collaboration with an orthopaedic surgeon, can successfully and efficiently assess and treat patients on an orthopaedic outpatient waiting list. Patients generally reported a high level of satisfaction with the process and would return to the clinic again if necessary. Hospital networks wanting to efficiently reduce waiting lists may endorse task substitution for appropriately skilled podiatrists.
International Orthopaedics | 2011
David G. Campbell; Graham Mercer; Kjell G. Nilsson; Vanessa Wells; John Field; Stuart A. Callary
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research | 2013
Stuart A. Callary; David G. Campbell; Graham Mercer; Kjell G. Nilsson; John Field
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology | 2010
David G. Campbell; Graham Mercer; Kjell G. Nilsson; Vanessa Wells; John Field; Stuart A. Callary
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage | 2017
Bryant C. Roberts; Lucian B. Solomon; Graham Mercer; Karen J. Reynolds; Dominic Thewlis; Egon Perilli
Journal of orthopaedics | 2017
Kjell G. Nilsson; Annika Theodoulou; Graham Mercer; Stephen Quinn; Jeganath Krishnan