Gregory D. Carlson

Radiculopathy and Myelopathy at Segments Adjacent to the Site of a Previous Anterior Cervical Arthrodesis

BACKGROUND We studied the incidence, prevalence, and radiographic progression of symptomatic adjacent-segment disease, which we defined as the development of new radiculopathy or myelopathy referable to a motion segment adjacent to the site of a previous anterior arthrodesis of the cervical spine. METHODS A consecutive series of 374 patients who had a total of 409 anterior cervical arthrodeses for the treatment of cervical spondylosis with radiculopathy or myelopathy, or both, were followed for a maximum of twenty-one years after the operation. The annual incidence of symptomatic adjacent-segment disease was defined as the percentage of patients who had been disease-free at the start of a given year of follow-up in whom new disease developed during that year. The prevalence was defined as the percentage of all patients in whom symptomatic adjacent-segment disease developed within a given period of follow-up. The natural history of the disease was predicted with use of a Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis. The hypothesis that new disease at an adjacent level is more likely to develop following a multilevel arthrodesis than it is following a single-level arthrodesis was tested with logistic regression. RESULTS Symptomatic adjacent-segment disease occurred at a relatively constant incidence of 2.9 percent per year (range, 0.0 to 4.8 percent per year) during the ten years after the operation. Survivorship analysis predicted that 25.6 percent of the patients (95 percent confidence interval, 20 to 32 percent) who had an anterior cervical arthrodesis would have new disease at an adjacent level within ten years after the operation. There were highly significant differences among the motion segments with regard to the likelihood of symptomatic adjacent-segment disease (p<0.0001); the greatest risk was at the interspaces between the fifth and sixth and between the sixth and seventh cervical vertebrae. Contrary to our hypothesis, we found that the risk of new disease at an adjacent level was significantly lower following a multilevel arthrodesis than it was following a single-level arthrodesis (p<0.001). More than two-thirds of all patients in whom the new disease developed had failure of nonoperative management and needed additional operative procedures. CONCLUSIONS Symptomatic adjacent-segment disease may affect more than one-fourth of all patients within ten years after an anterior cervical arthrodesis. A single-level arthrodesis involving the fifth or sixth cervical vertebra and preexisting radiographic evidence of degeneration at adjacent levels appear to be the greatest risk factors for new disease. Therefore, we believe that all degenerated segments causing radiculopathy or myelopathy should be included in an anterior cervical arthrodesis. Although our findings suggest that symptomatic adjacent-segment disease is the result of progressive spondylosis, patients should be informed of the substantial possibility that new disease will develop at an adjacent level over the long term.

The success of anterior cervical arthrodesis adjacent to a previous fusion.

Study Design. A retrospective review of all patients surgically treated for adjacent segment disease of the cervical spine over a 20‐year period. Objectives. To determine the clinical and radiographic success of discectomy with interbody grafting and corpectomy with strut grafting in the treatment of adjacent segment disease of the cervical spine. Summary of Background Data. Up to 25% of all patients undergoing anterior cervical fusion have new disease due to degeneration of an adjacent segment within 10 years. The success of surgical treatment in these patients with adjacent segment disease has not been reported. Methods. Thirty‐eight patients were surgically treated for adjacent segment disease by discectomy with interbody grafting or corpectomy with strut grafting. Arthrodesis was evaluated by flexion‐extension lateral radiographs and clinical outcomes were assessed using Robinsons criteria at least 2 years after surgery. Fusion rates were compared by Fishers exact test, and outcomes were compared by rank‐sum analysis. Results. The rate of arthrodesis was significantly lower in the 24 patients treated by discectomy with interbody grafting at one or more levels (63%) than in the 14 patients treated by corpectomy with strut grafting (100%; P = 0.01). Clinical outcomes were similar for the corpectomy and discectomy groups (P = 0.55). There was a trend toward better outcomes in patients who achieved a solid arthrodesis (P = 0.13). Conclusions. Achieving fusion is more difficult when anterior cervical arthrodesis is performed adjacent to a prior fusion. Strut grafting resulted in a significantly higher rate of arthrodesis than interbody grafting.

Sustained spinal cord compression. Part I: Time-dependent effect on long-term pathophysiology

Background: The objective of this study is to determine whether there is a relationship between the duration of sustained spinal cord compression and the extent of spinal cord injury and the capacity for functional recovery after decompression.Methods: Sixteen dogs underwent sustained spinal cord compression for thirty or 180 minutes. The cords were compressed with use of a loading device with a hydraulic piston. A pressure transducer was attached to the surface of the piston, which transmitted real-time spinal cord interface pressures to a data-acquisition system. Somatosensory evoked potentials were monitored during a sixty-minute recovery period as well as at twenty-eight days after the injury. Functional motor recovery was judged throughout a twenty-six-day period after the injury with use of a battery of motor tasks. The volume of the lesion and damage to the tissue were assessed with both magnetic resonance imaging and histological analysis.Results: Sustained spinal cord compression was associated with a gradual decline in interface pressure. Despite this, there was continuous decline in the amplitude of the somatosensory evoked potentials, which did not return until the cord was decompressed. Within one hour after the decompression, the dogs in the thirty-minute-compression group had recovery of somatosensory evoked potentials, but no animal had such recovery in the 180-minute group. Recovery of the somatosensory evoked potentials in the thirty-minute group was sustained over the twenty-eight days after the injury. Motor tests demonstrated rapid recovery of hindlimb motor function in the thirty-minute group, but there was considerable impairment in the 180-minute group. Within two weeks after the injury, balance, cadence, stair-climbing, and the ability to walk up an inclined plane were significantly better in the thirty-minute group than in the 180-minute group. The longer duration of compression produced lesions of significantly greater volume, which corresponded to the long-term functional outcome.Conclusions: The relatively rapid viscoelastic relaxation of the spinal cord during the early phase of sustained cord compression suggests that there are mechanisms of secondary injury that are linked to tissue displacement. Longer periods of displacement allow propagation of the secondary injury process, resulting in a lack of recovery of somatosensory evoked potentials, limited functional recovery, and more extensive tissue damage.Clinical Relevance: The findings underscore the importance of timely decompression to improve long-term functional recovery after spinal cord injury.

Results of surgery for spinal stenosis adjacent to previous lumbar fusion.

The literature provides little data to guide surgical management of spinal stenosis adjacent to previous lumbar fusion. Thirty-three consecutive patients who had surgical decompression for spinal stenosis at the lumbar segments adjacent to a previous lumbar fusion were studied. The mean interval between fusion and the adjacent segment surgery was 94 months. Of the 33 patients, 26 were followed for 3-14 years (mean: 5 years) after adjacent segment surgery and were clinically evaluated and independently completed an outcome questionnaire. Of the 26 patients, 15 rated their outcome as completely satisfactory, 6 were neutral toward the surgery, and 5 considered their surgery a failure. The surgery was generally effective at improving or relieving lower extremity neurogenic claudication. The strongest independent predictive factor of patient dissatisfaction was ongoing postoperative low back pain (r = 0.7, p = 0.001). A higher back pain score at follow-up was associated with continued narcotic use (p = 0.001) and decreased ability to perform activities of daily living (p = 0.05). Six patients required further lumbar surgery during the follow-up period. This study provides the longest published follow-up data of surgical results for symptomatic spinal stenosis adjacent to a previously asymptomatic lumbar fusion.

Viscoelastic relaxation and regional blood flow response to spinal cord compression and decompression

Study Design. To better understand the relationships between primary mechanical factors of spinal cord trauma and secondary mechanisms of injury, this study evaluated regional blood flow and somatosensory evoked potential function in an in vivo canine model with controlled velocity spinal cord displacement and real-time piston-spinal cord interface pressure feedback. Objectives. To determine the effect of regional spinal cord blood flow and viscoelastic cord relaxation on recovery of neural conduction, with and without spinal cord decompression. Summary of Background Data. The relative contribution of mechanical and vascular factors on spinal cord injury remains undefined. Methods. Twelve beagles were anesthetized and underwent T13 laminectomy. A constant velocity spinal cord compression was applied using a hydraulic loading piston with a subminiature pressure transducer rigidly attached to the spinal column. Spinal cord displacement was stopped when somatosensory evoked potential amplitudes decreased by 50% (maximum compression). Six animals were decompressed 5 minutes after maximum compression and were compared with six animals who had spinal cord displacement maintained for 3 hours and were not decompressed. Regional spinal cord blood flow was measured with a fluorescent microsphere technique. Results. At maximum compression, regional spinal cord blood flow at the injury site fell from 19.0 ± 1.3 mL/100 g/min to 12.6 ± 1.0 mL/100 g/min, whereas piston-spinal cord interface pressure was 30.5 ± 1.8 kPa, and cord displacement measured 2.1 ± 0.1 mm (mean ± SE). Five minutes after the piston translation was stopped, the spinal cord interface pressure had dissipated 51%, whereas the somatosensory evoked potential amplitudes continued to decrease to 16% of baseline. In the sustained compression group, cord interface pressure relaxed to 13% of maximum within 90 minutes; however, no recovery of somatosensory evoked potential function occurred, and regional spinal cord blood flow remained significantly lower than baseline at 30 and 180 minutes after maximum compression. In the six animals that underwent spinal cord decompression, somatosensory evoked potential function and regional spinal cord blood flow recovered to baseline 30 minutes after maximum compression. Conclusions. Despite rapid cord relaxation of more than 50% within 5 minutes after maximum compression, somatosensory evoked potential conduction recovered only with early decompression. Spinal cord decompression was associated with an early recovery of regional spinal cord blood flow and somatosensory evoked potential recovery. By 3 hours, spinal cord blood flow was similar in both the compressed and decompressed groups, despite that somatosensory evoked potential recovery occurred only in the decompressed group.

Sustained spinal cord compression. Part II: Effect of methylprednisolone on regional blood flow and recovery of somatosensory evoked potentials

Background: The efficacy of methylprednisolone in the treatment of traumatic spinal cord injury is controversial. We examined the effect of methylprednisolone on regional spinal cord blood flow and attempted to determine whether recovery of electrophysiological function is dependent on reperfusion, either during sustained spinal cord compression or after decompression.Methods: The effects of methylprednisolone therapy on recovery of somatosensory evoked potentials and on spinal cord blood flow were examined in a canine model of dynamic spinal cord compression. Methylprednisolone (30 mg/kg intravenous loading dose followed by 5.4 mg/kg/hr intravenous infusion) or saline solution was administered to thirty-six beagles (eighteen in each group) five minutes after cessation of dynamic spinal cord compression and loss of all somatosensory evoked potentials. After ninety minutes of sustained compression, the spinal cords were decompressed. Somatosensory evoked potentials and spinal cord blood flow were evaluated throughout the period of sustained compression and for three hours after decompression.Results: Seven dogs treated with methylprednisolone and none treated with saline solution recovered measurable somatosensory evoked potentials during sustained compression. After decompression, three more dogs treated with methylprednisolone and seven dogs treated with saline solution recovered somatosensory evoked potentials. Four dogs treated with methylprednisolone lost their previously measurable somatosensory evoked potentials. In the methylprednisolone group, spinal cord blood flow was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the dogs that had recovered somatosensory evoked potentials than it was in the dogs that had not. Reperfusion blood flow was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the saline-solution group than it was in the methylprednisolone group. Spinal cord blood flow in the saline-solution group returned to baseline levels within five minutes after decompression. It did not return to baseline levels in the dogs treated with methylprednisolone.Conclusions: The methylprednisolone administered in this study did not provide a large or significant lasting benefit with regard to neurological preservation or restoration. Methylprednisolone may reduce regional spinal cord blood flow through mechanisms affecting normal autoregulatory blood-flow function.Clinical Relevance: This study suggests that a major drawback of methylprednisolone therapy may be the reduction in regional spinal cord blood flow after decompression.

Cerebral spinal fluid pressure: effects of body position and lumbar subarachnoid drainage in a canine model.

Study Design. This study used an in vivo model of subarachnoid cerebrospinal fluid pressure measurement. Objectives. To examine the relation between subarachnoid cerebrospinal fluid pressure in the cervical and lumbar spine and varying body positions, and to test the hypothesis that increasing body inclination and lumbar subarachnoid drainage decreases cervical cerebrospinal fluid pressures. Summary of Background Data. Cerebrospinal fluid leaks are a recognized complication of anterior or posterior cervical surgery. Conflicting opinion exists regarding the benefits of postoperative patient positioning and lumbar subarachnoid drainage. Methods. Subarachnoid cerebrospinal fluid pressure of 7 beagles was monitored via two angiocatheters attached to pressure transducers inserted into the subarachnoid space through laminectomies at C3 and L4. Pressure measurements were taken when body position was inclined to 30°, 60°, and 90°. A lumbar durotomy was performed to simulate the effects of lumbar subarachnoid drainage. The body was repositioned to 90°, and pressure was measured. Results. As inclination increased from 0° to 90°, the mean cervical cerebrospinal fluid pressure significantly decreased. The mean lumbar subarachnoid pressure significantly increased as inclination increased from 0° to 90°. Lumbar durotomy plus repositioning to 90° resulted in a significant reduction in cervical cerebrospinal fluid subarachnoid pressure, with pressures dropping by 46%. Lumbar cerebrospinal fluid subarachnoid pressure dropped to zero after lumbar durotomy plus repositioning to 90°. Conclusions. Cerebrospinal fluid pressures in the subarachnoid space of both the cervical and lumbar spines are affected by changes in body position. Both patient positioning and lumbar drainage may be important in reducing cervical cerebrospinal fluid pressure, and may reduce the occurrence of cerebrospinal fluid leaks after primary dural repair in the neck.

Perfusion-Limited Recovery of Evoked Potential Function After Spinal Cord Injury

STUDY DESIGN The current study was designed to determine whether progressive spinal cord damage during residual compression is caused by low blood flow and ischemia. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this experiment was to determine the effects of sustained spinal cord compression on regional blood flow and evoked potential recovery after time-dependent decompression. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Spinal cord injury after trauma is commonly associated with residual cord compression. Although decreased blood flow has been reported after spinal cord contusion, the effect of residual spinal cord displacement on reperfusion of blood flow or recovery of neurologic function remains unclear. METHODS Eighteen beagles were anesthetized, and the spinal cord at T13 was loaded dorsally under precision loading conditions until evoked potential amplitudes were reduced by 50%. At this function endpoint, spinal cord displacement was maintained for 90 minutes. Somatosensory-evoked potentials were measured at regular intervals until 3 hours after decompression. Regional spinal cord blood flow was measured with a fluorescent microsphere technique at regular time points during and after spinal cord decompression. RESULTS Within 5 minutes after dynamic cord compression was discontinued, evoked potential signals were absent in all dogs. Evoked potential recovery was observed after decompression in 7 of 18 dogs. Regional spinal cord blood flow at baseline, 21.8 +/- 1.9 mL/100 g. min (mean +/- SE), decreased to 3.9 +/- 0.9 mL/100 g. min after dynamic compression was discontinued. Although spinal cord-piston interface pressure dissipated by 87% of maximum interface pressure during sustained compression, mean blood flow recovered to only 34% of baseline flow. In the 7 dogs that recovered evoked potential function, blood flow increased to 11.3 +/- 2.7 mL/100g. min immediately before decompression (P < or = 0.05). In the 11 dogs that did not recover evoked potential function after decompression, regional blood flow did not improve during sustained compression. CONCLUSIONS Recovery of evoked potential function after decompression corresponded with a greater return of blood flow during sustained displacement and greater reperfusion of blood flow associated with decompression.

Use of a Postoperative Lumbar Corset After Lumbar Spinal Arthrodesis for Degenerative Conditions of the Spine: A Prospective Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND Lumbosacral corsets and braces have been used to treat a variety of spinal disorders. Although their use after lumbar arthrodesis for degenerative conditions has been reported, there is a lack of evidence on which to base guidelines on their use. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a postoperative corset on the outcome of lumbar arthrodesis. METHODS A prospective randomized trial was performed in which patients who wore a postoperative lumbar corset for eight weeks full-time after a posterior lumbar arthrodesis for a degenerative spinal condition were compared with those who did not use a corset after such an operation. Ninety patients were randomized to one of the two treatments. A history was recorded and patients were assessed with a physical examination, radiographs, and functional outcome questionnaires (the Dallas Pain Questionnaire [DPQ] and the Short Form-36 [SF-36]) preoperatively and at one year and two years following the surgery. The primary outcome measure of the study was the DPQ, a disease-specific patient-derived functional measure of the spine, and secondary end points included the SF-36 scores, complications, rates of fusion as determined radiographically, and reoperation rates. RESULTS Follow-up analysis was performed for seventy-two patients, thirty-seven randomized to the brace (experimental) group and thirty-five randomized to the control group. Regardless of the treatment method, the patients had substantial improvement in the disease-specific and general health measures by two years postoperatively. At two years, there was no difference in the DPQ category scores (the primary outcome parameter) of the two treatment groups. There was also no difference in the mean SF-36 component scores at two years. Postoperative complications occurred in 22% and 23% of patients in the experimental and control groups, respectively, and a subsequent lumbar spinal operation was performed in 19% and 14%, respectively. Seven patients (five in the experimental group and two in the control group) with radiographic evidence of nonunion underwent revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS This study does not indicate a significant advantage or disadvantage to the use of a postoperative lumbar corset following spinal arthrodesis for degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.