Guilherme Dornelas Camara

Enrique Dussel: contribuições para a crítica ética e radical nos Estudos Organizacionais

En este ensayo, nos vinculamos al esfuerzo que algunos autores han llevado a cabo para elaborar una critica etica y radical en los Estudios Organizacionales (EO) para libertar al menos algunas de sus partes de la colonizacion por el management. En este sentido, nos referimos a las proposiciones criticamente situadas en America Latina de la Filosofia de la Liberacion (FL) elaboradas por Enrique Dussel. En la primera parte, presentamos una mirada abarcadora de esta gran obra que se justifica a partir de la apropiacion parcial e incluso incoherente que ha sido realizada en los EO. En la segunda parte, discutimos algunas apropiaciones que se han hecho por autores vinculados a los EO en el contexto latinoamericano, con enfasis en el brasileno. Este dialogo critico es indispensable para la liberacion del camino para que la FL de Dussel contribuya al ejercicio de una critica que niegue, lado a lado con las victimas, la legitimidad de un sistema que explota y oprime y que, al mismo tiempo, se comprometa con la afirmacion de la vida humana en comunidad y, por lo tanto, con la praxis de la liberacion.In this essay, we connect ourselves with the efforts provided by some authors to elaborate a radical and ethical critique in the field of Organization Studies (OS) liberated, at least in some parts, from the colonization by management. In this direction, we take as reference the propositions of Enrique Dussels Philosophy of Liberation (PL), which are critically situated in Latin America. In the first part, we present a comprehensive overview of this vast oeuvre, justified by the partial and even incoherent appropriation that has been happening in OS. In the second part, we discuss some of these appropriations considering some Latin American authors of the OS field, highlighting specially the Brazilian context. This critical dialogue is indispensable to liberate the path for the contribution of Dussels PL to the exercise of a critique that negates, side by side with the victims, the legitimacy of a system that explores and oppresses, and that, simultaneously, gets involved with the affirmation of human life in community, and therefore, with the praxis of liberation.

FORMAÇÃO TÉCNICA E EMPREGABILIDADE EM PROGRAMAS SOCIAIS: A EXPERIÊNCIA DO PROGRAMA BOLSA FAMÍLIA E DO PRONATEC EM UMA CIDADE DA FRONTEIRA BRASIL-URUGUAI

This paper aims to analyze the repercussions of the National Program for Accessing Technical Education and Employment (PRONATEC) for professional insertion and qualification. In academic debate, common sense and technical discussion about its efectiveness to end poverty, its influence in the workers’ stability in the labor market is often questioned. The path of professional insertion is generally seen as sustainable to fight the vulnerability of the families. However, few studies have been dedicated to verify the view of the beneficiaries themselves. Proposing such analysis, this paper brings data collected from interviews with beneficiaries of PRONATEC and Bolsa Família Program (PBF) in a * Doutor em Administração. Professor Adjunto no Departamento de Ciências Administrativas da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Membro do Grupo de Pesquisa Organização e Práxis Libertadora. Correio eletrônico: <guilherme.dornelas@ufrgs.br.>

Organizational practices of social movements and popular struggles: understanding the power of organizing from below

The study of social movements in the field of Organization Studies (OS) has been largely influenced by theories constructed to analyze business organizations and their interactions with formal and informal social movement organizations. The predominant approach has been to construct a theoretical model and then applying it to a largely passive object (social movements). As a consequence, OS has remained relatively blind to the processes of organizing and the knowledge produced in the organizational practices from below.

Enrique Dussel: contribuciones a la crítica ética y radical en los Estudios Organizacionales

En este ensayo, nos vinculamos al esfuerzo que algunos autores han llevado a cabo para elaborar una critica etica y radical en los Estudios Organizacionales (EO) para libertar al menos algunas de sus partes de la colonizacion por el management. En este sentido, nos referimos a las proposiciones criticamente situadas en America Latina de la Filosofia de la Liberacion (FL) elaboradas por Enrique Dussel. En la primera parte, presentamos una mirada abarcadora de esta gran obra que se justifica a partir de la apropiacion parcial e incluso incoherente que ha sido realizada en los EO. En la segunda parte, discutimos algunas apropiaciones que se han hecho por autores vinculados a los EO en el contexto latinoamericano, con enfasis en el brasileno. Este dialogo critico es indispensable para la liberacion del camino para que la FL de Dussel contribuya al ejercicio de una critica que niegue, lado a lado con las victimas, la legitimidad de un sistema que explota y oprime y que, al mismo tiempo, se comprometa con la afirmacion de la vida humana en comunidad y, por lo tanto, con la praxis de la liberacion.In this essay, we connect ourselves with the efforts provided by some authors to elaborate a radical and ethical critique in the field of Organization Studies (OS) liberated, at least in some parts, from the colonization by management. In this direction, we take as reference the propositions of Enrique Dussels Philosophy of Liberation (PL), which are critically situated in Latin America. In the first part, we present a comprehensive overview of this vast oeuvre, justified by the partial and even incoherent appropriation that has been happening in OS. In the second part, we discuss some of these appropriations considering some Latin American authors of the OS field, highlighting specially the Brazilian context. This critical dialogue is indispensable to liberate the path for the contribution of Dussels PL to the exercise of a critique that negates, side by side with the victims, the legitimacy of a system that explores and oppresses, and that, simultaneously, gets involved with the affirmation of human life in community, and therefore, with the praxis of liberation.

Enrique Dussel: contributions to an ethical and radical critique in Organization Studies

En este ensayo, nos vinculamos al esfuerzo que algunos autores han llevado a cabo para elaborar una critica etica y radical en los Estudios Organizacionales (EO) para libertar al menos algunas de sus partes de la colonizacion por el management. En este sentido, nos referimos a las proposiciones criticamente situadas en America Latina de la Filosofia de la Liberacion (FL) elaboradas por Enrique Dussel. En la primera parte, presentamos una mirada abarcadora de esta gran obra que se justifica a partir de la apropiacion parcial e incluso incoherente que ha sido realizada en los EO. En la segunda parte, discutimos algunas apropiaciones que se han hecho por autores vinculados a los EO en el contexto latinoamericano, con enfasis en el brasileno. Este dialogo critico es indispensable para la liberacion del camino para que la FL de Dussel contribuya al ejercicio de una critica que niegue, lado a lado con las victimas, la legitimidad de un sistema que explota y oprime y que, al mismo tiempo, se comprometa con la afirmacion de la vida humana en comunidad y, por lo tanto, con la praxis de la liberacion.In this essay, we connect ourselves with the efforts provided by some authors to elaborate a radical and ethical critique in the field of Organization Studies (OS) liberated, at least in some parts, from the colonization by management. In this direction, we take as reference the propositions of Enrique Dussels Philosophy of Liberation (PL), which are critically situated in Latin America. In the first part, we present a comprehensive overview of this vast oeuvre, justified by the partial and even incoherent appropriation that has been happening in OS. In the second part, we discuss some of these appropriations considering some Latin American authors of the OS field, highlighting specially the Brazilian context. This critical dialogue is indispensable to liberate the path for the contribution of Dussels PL to the exercise of a critique that negates, side by side with the victims, the legitimacy of a system that explores and oppresses, and that, simultaneously, gets involved with the affirmation of human life in community, and therefore, with the praxis of liberation.