H.Y. Khater
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by H.Y. Khater.
Fusion Engineering and Design | 2001
Mohamed A. Abdou; Alice Ying; Neil B. Morley; K. Gulec; Sergey Smolentsev; M. Kotschenreuther; S. Malang; S.J. Zinkle; Thomas D. Rognlien; P.J. Fogarty; B. Nelson; R.E. Nygren; K.A. McCarthy; M.Z. Youssef; Nasr M. Ghoniem; D.K. Sze; C.P.C. Wong; M.E. Sawan; H.Y. Khater; R. Woolley; R.F. Mattas; Ralph W. Moir; S. Sharafat; J.N. Brooks; A. Hassanein; David A. Petti; M. S. Tillack; M. Ulrickson; Tetsuya Uchimoto
Abstract This study, called APEX, is exploring novel concepts for fusion chamber technology that can substantially improve the attractiveness of fusion energy systems. The emphasis of the study is on fundamental understanding and advancing the underlying engineering sciences, integration of the physics and engineering requirements, and enhancing innovation for the chamber technology components surrounding the plasma. The chamber technology goals in APEX include: (1) high power density capability with neutron wall load >10 MW/m 2 and surface heat flux >2 MW/m 2 , (2) high power conversion efficiency (>40%), (3) high availability, and (4) simple technological and material constraints. Two classes of innovative concepts have emerged that offer great promise and deserve further research and development. The first class seeks to eliminate the solid “bare” first wall by flowing liquids facing the plasma. This liquid wall idea evolved during the APEX study into a number of concepts based on: (a) using liquid metals (Li or Sn–Li) or a molten salt (Flibe) as the working liquid, (b) utilizing electromagnetic, inertial and/or other types of forces to restrain the liquid against a backing wall and control the hydrodynamic flow configurations, and (c) employing a thin (∼2 cm) or thick (∼40 cm) liquid layer to remove the surface heat flux and attenuate the neutrons. These liquid wall concepts have some common features but also have widely different issues and merits. Some of the attractive features of liquid walls include the potential for: (1) high power density capability; (2) higher plasma β and stable physics regimes if liquid metals are used; (3) increased disruption survivability; (4) reduced volume of radioactive waste; (5) reduced radiation damage in structural materials; and (6) higher availability. Analyses show that not all of these potential advantages may be realized simultaneously in a single concept. However, the realization of only a subset of these advantages will result in remarkable progress toward attractive fusion energy systems. Of the many scientific and engineering issues for liquid walls, the most important are: (1) plasma–liquid interactions including both plasma–liquid surface and liquid wall–bulk plasma interactions; (2) hydrodynamic flow configuration control in complex geometries including penetrations; and (3) heat transfer at free surface and temperature control. The second class of concepts focuses on ideas for extending the capabilities, particularly the power density and operating temperature limits, of solid first walls. The most promising idea, called EVOLVE, is based on the use of a high-temperature refractory alloy (e.g. W–5% Re) with an innovative cooling scheme based on the use of the heat of vaporization of lithium. Calculations show that an evaporative system with Li at ∼1 200°C can remove the goal heat loads and result in a high power conversion efficiency. The vapor operating pressure is low, resulting in a very low operating stress in the structure. In addition, the lithium flow rate is about a factor of ten lower than that required for traditional self-cooled first wall/blanket concepts. Therefore, insulator coatings are not required. Key issues for EVOLVE include: (1) two-phase heat transfer and transport including MHD effects; (2) feasibility of fabricating entire blanket segments of W alloys; and (3) the effect of neutron irradiation on W.
Fusion Engineering and Design | 1997
F. Najmabadi; C.G. Bathke; M.C. Billone; James P. Blanchard; Leslie Bromberg; Edward Chin; Fredrick R Cole; Jeffrey A. Crowell; D.A. Ehst; L. El-Guebaly; J. Stephen Herring; T.Q. Hua; Stephen C. Jardin; Charles Kessel; H.Y. Khater; V.Dennis Lee; S. Malang; T.K. Mau; R.L. Miller; E.A. Mogahed; Thomas W. Petrie; Elmer E Reis; J.H. Schultz; M. Sidorov; D. Steiner; I.N. Sviatoslavsky; D.K. Sze; Robert Thayer; M. S. Tillack; Peter H. Titus
The ARIES-RS tokamak is a conceptual, D‐T-burning 1000 MWe power plant. As with earlier ARIES design studies, the final design of ARIES-RS was obtained in a self-consistent manner using the best available physics and engineering models. Detailed analyses of individual systems together with system interfaces and interactions were incorporated into the ARIES systems code in order to assure self-consistency and to optimize towards the lowest cost system. The ARIES-RS design operates with a reversed-shear plasma and employs a moderate aspect ratio (A4.0). The plasma current is relatively low (Ip11.32 MA) and bootstrap current fraction is high ( fBC 0.88). Consequently, the auxiliary power required for RF current drive is relatively low ( 80 MW). At the same time, the average
Fusion Engineering and Design | 2003
H.Y. Khater; E.A. Mogahed; D.K. Sze; M. S. Tillack; X. R. Wang
The ARIES-RS safety design and analysis focused on achieving two objectives: (1) The avoidance of sheltering or evacuation in the event of an accident; and (2) the generation of only low-level waste, no greater than Class C. The ARIES-RS baseline design employs V–4Cr–4Ti as the blanket structural material and a low activation ferritic steel in the reflector and shield. In the event of a LOCA, the baseline design first wall maximum temperature falls in the range of 1100–1200°C. For this temperature range, the hazard assessment indicates that the dose at the site boundary will be less than 1 rem per year. Thus, no sheltering or evacuation would be required in the event of a LOCA. Although the baseline design satisfies the first safety objective noted above, a first wall maximum temperature of 1100–1200°C would likely compromise the integrity of the vanadium blanket structure and would require blanket replacement following such a temperature excursion. To avoid this situation, a modified blanket design incorporating supplemental heat removal is also proposed. Preliminary analysis of this modified design suggests that the first wall maximum temperature can be kept below the temperature range of concern, 1000–1100°C, in the event of a LOCA. When the ferritic steel used in the reflector and shield is one reduced in Ir and Ag impurities, all in-vessel components qualify for near-surface shallow land burial as Class C low-level waste.
Fusion Technology | 1989
G.L. Kulcinski; G. A. Emmert; James P. Blanchard; L. El-Guebaly; H.Y. Khater; John F. Santarius; M.E. Sawan; I.N. Sviatoslavsky; L.J. Wittenberg; R.J. Witt
A preconceptual design of a tokamak reactor fueled by a D-He-3 plasma is presented. A low aspect ratio (A=2-4) device is studied here but high aspect ratio devices (A > 6) may also be quite attractive. The Apollo D-He-3 tokamak capitalizes on recent advances in high field magnets (20 T) and utilizes rectennas to convert the synchrotron radiation directly to electricity. The overall efficiency ranges from 37 to 52% depending on whether the bremsstrahlung energy is utilized. The low neutron wall loading (0.1 MW/m/sup 2/) allows a permanent first wall to be designed and the low nuclear decay heat enables the reactor to be classed as inherently safe. The cost of electricity from Apollo is > 40% lower than electricity from a similar sized DT reactor.
Fusion Engineering and Design | 2000
C.P.C. Wong; R.E. Nygren; C.B. Baxi; P.J. Fogarty; Nasr M. Ghoniem; H.Y. Khater; K.A. McCarthy; Brad J. Merrill; B. Nelson; E.E Reis; S. Sharafat; R.W. Schleicher; D.K. Sze; M. Ulrickson; S. Willms; M.Z. Youssef; S.J. Zinkle
Abstract Under the APEX program the He-cooled system design task is to evaluate and recommend high power density refractory alloy first wall and blanket designs and to recommend and initiate tests to address critical issues. We completed the preliminary design of a helium-cooled, W–5Re alloy, lithium breeder design and the results are reported in this paper. Many areas of the design were assessed, including material selection, helium impurity control, and mechanical, nuclear and thermal hydraulics design, and waste disposal, tritium and safety design. Systems study results show that at a closed cycle gas turbine (CCGT) gross thermal efficiency of 57.5%, a superconducting coil tokamak reactor, with an aspect ratio of 4, and an output power of 2 GWe, can be projected to have a cost of electricity at 54.6 mill/kW h. Critical issues were identified and we plan to continue the design on some of the critical issues during the next phase of the APEX design study.
Fusion Engineering and Design | 1998
D.K. Sze; M.C. Billone; T.Q. Hua; M. S. Tillack; F. Najmabadi; X. R. Wang; S. Malang; L. El-Guebaly; I.N. Sviatoslavsky; James P. Blanchard; Jeffrey A. Crowell; H.Y. Khater; E.A. Mogahed; Lester M. Waganer; Dennis Lee; Dick Cole
The ARIES-RS fusion power plant design study is based on reversed-shear (RS) physics with a Li/V (lithium breeder and vanadium structure) blanket. The reversed-shear discharge has been documented in many large tokamak experiments. The plasma in the RS mode has a high beta, low current, and low current drive requirement. Therefore, it is an attractive physics regime for a fusion power plant. The blanket system based on Li/V has high temperature operating capability, good tritium breeding, excellent high heat flux removal capability, long structural life time, low activation, low after heat and good safety characteristics. For these reasons, the ARIES-RS reactor study selected Li/V as the reference blanket. The combination of attractive physics and attractive blanket engineering is expected to result in a superior power plant design. This paper summarizes the power core design of the ARIES-RS power plant study.
Journal of Fusion Energy | 1998
John F. Santarius; G.L. Kulcinski; L. El-Guebaly; H.Y. Khater
Could todays technology suffice for engineering advanced-fuel, magnetic-fusion power plants, thus making fusion development primarily a physics problem? Such a path would almost certainly cost far less than the present D-T development program, which is driven by daunting engineering challenges as well as physics questions. Advanced fusion fuels, in contrast to D-T fuel, produce a smaller fraction of the fusion power as neutrons but have lower fusion reactivity, leading to a trade-off between engineering and physics. This paper examines the critical fusion engineering issues and related technologies with an eye to their application in tokamak and alternate-concept D-3He power plants. These issues include plasma power balance, magnets, surface heat flux, input power, fuel source, radiation damage, radioactive waste disposal, and nuclear proliferation.
Fusion Engineering and Design | 2000
R.F. Mattas; S. Malang; H.Y. Khater; Saurin Majumdar; E.A. Mogahed; B. Nelson; M.E. Sawan; D.K. Sze
A new concept for an advanced fusion first wall and blanket has been identified. The key feature of the concept is the use of the heat of vaporization of lithium (about 10 times higher than water) as the primary means for capturing and removing the fusion power. A reasonable range of boiling temperatures of this alkali metal is 1200 to 1400 C, corresponding with a saturation pressure of 0.035 to 0.2 MPa. Calculations indicate that a evaporative system with Li at {approximately}1200 C can remove a first wall surface heat flux of >2 MW/m2 with an accompanying neutron wall load of >10 MW/m2. Work to date shows that the system provides adequate tritium breeding and shielding, very high thermal conversion efficiency, and low system pressure. Tungsten is used as the structural material, and it is expected to operate at a surface wall load of 2 MW/m2 at temperatures above 1200 C.
ieee npss symposium on fusion engineering | 1991
F. Najmabadi; R.W. Conn; C.G. Bathke; James P. Blanchard; Leslie Bromberg; J. Brooks; E.T. Cheng; Daniel R. Cohn; D.A. Ehst; L. El-Guebaly; G.A. Emmert; T.J. Dolan; P. Gierszewski; S.P. Grotz; M.S. Hasan; J.S. Herring; S.K. Ho; A. Hollies; J.A. Holmes; E. Ibrahim; S.A. Jardin; C. Kessel; H.Y. Khater; R.A. Krakowski; G.L. Kuleinski; J. Mandrekas; T.-K. Mau; G.H. Miley; R.L. Miller; E.A. Mogahed
A description of the ARIES-III research effort is presented, and the general features of the ARIES-III reactor are described. The plasma engineering and fusion-power-core design are summarized, including the major results, the key technical issues, and the central conclusions. Analyses have shown that the plasma power-balance window for D-/sup 3/He tokamak reactors is small and requires a first wall (or coating) that is highly reflective to synchrotron radiation and small values of tau /sub ash// epsilon /sub e/ (the ratio of ash-particle to energy confinement times in the core plasma). Both first and second stability regimes of operation have been considered. The second stability regime is chosen for the ARIES-III design point because the reactor can operate at a higher value of tau /sub ash// tau /sub E// tau /sub E/ approximately=2 (twice that of a first stability version), and because it has a reduced plasma current (30 MA), magnetic field at the coil (14 T), mass, and cost (also compared to a first-stability D-/sup 3/He reactor). The major and minor radii are, respectively 7.5 and 2.5 m.<<ETX>>
Fusion Engineering and Design | 2002
M.E. Sawan; H.Y. Khater; S.J. Zinkle
The main nuclear features of the baseline design of fusion ignition research experiment (FIRE) have been evaluated. Critical issues were addressed and R&D needs were identified. Modest values of nuclear heating occur in the FIRE components. The total nuclear heating in the 16 TF coils during DT shots is 19 MW. The cumulative damage in the copper alloys used is very low (< 0.05 dpa). However, issues of low temperature embrittlement and thermal creep at high temperatures need to be resolved by an R&D program. The radiation induced resistivity increase in the conductors of the TF coils is primarily due to displacement damage and is < 20% of the unirradiated resistivity. The magnet insulator development R&D program should involve irradiation to dose levels up to 1.5 x 10 10 Rad with the proper mix between neutrons and gamma photons (50% gamma dose) relevant to FIRE conditions. Low levels of activity and decay heat are obtained. Hands-on ex-vessel maintenance is feasible. All components qualify as Class C low-level waste. Activation of nitrogen gas inside the cryostat produces a very small amount of 13 N and 14 C.