Hans Kottkamp

Perception of atrial fibrillation before and after radiofrequency catheter ablation: relevance of asymptomatic arrhythmia recurrence.

Background—The objective of this study was to assess the incidence and impact of asymptomatic arrhythmia in patients with highly symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) who qualified for radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation. Methods and Results—In this prospective study, 114 patients with at least 3 documented AF episodes together with corresponding symptoms and an ineffective trial of at least 1 antiarrhythmic drug were selected for RF ablation. With the use of CARTO, circumferential lesions around the pulmonary veins and linear lesions at the roof of the left atrium and along the left atrial isthmus were placed. A continuous, 7-day, Holter session was recorded before ablation, right after ablation, and after 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up. During each 7-day Holter monitoring, the patients recorded quality and duration of any complaints by using a detailed symptom log. More than 70 000 hours of ECG recording were analyzed. In the 7-day Holter records before ablation, 92 of 114 patients (81%) had documented AF episodes. All episodes were symptomatic in 35 patients (38%). In 52 patients (57%), both symptomatic and asymptomatic episodes were recorded, whereas in 5 patients (5%), all documented AF episodes were asymptomatic. After ablation, the percentage of patients with only asymptomatic AF recurrences increased to 37% (P<0.05) at the 6-month follow-up. An analysis of patient characteristics and arrhythmia patterns failed to identify a specific subset who were at high risk for the development of asymptomatic AF. Conclusions—Even in patients presenting with highly symptomatic AF, asymptomatic episodes may occur and significantly increase after catheter ablation. A symptom-only–based follow-up would substantially overestimate the success rate. Objective measures such as long-term Holter monitoring are needed to identify asymptomatic AF recurrences after ablation.

Complications of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in a High-Volume Center in 1,000 Procedures: Still Cause for Concern?

Introduction: Catheter ablation is potentially curative treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, complications are more frequent and more severe compared with other ablation procedures. We investigated the complication rate in 1,000 AF ablation procedures in a high‐volume center and examined possible risk factors.

2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

During the past three decades, catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) have evolved from investigational procedures to their current role as effective treatment options for patients with AF. Surgical ablation of AF, using either standard, minimally invasive, or hybrid techniques, is available in most major hospitals throughout the world. Catheter ablation of AF is even more widely available, and is now the most commonly performed catheter ablation procedure. In 2007, an initial Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical AF Ablation was developed as a joint effort of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS).1 The 2007 document was also developed in collaboration with the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC). This Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical AF Ablation was rewritten in 2012 to reflect the many advances in AF ablation that had occurred in the interim.2 The rate of advancement in the tools, techniques, and outcomes of AF ablation continue to increase as enormous research efforts are focused on the mechanisms, outcomes, and treatment of AF. For this reason, the HRS initiated an effort to rewrite and update this Consensus Statement. Reflecting both the worldwide importance of AF, as well as the worldwide performance of AF ablation, this document is the result of a joint partnership between the HRS, EHRA, ECAS, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Latin American Society of Cardiac Stimulation and Electrophysiology (Sociedad Latinoamericana de Estimulacion Cardiaca y Electrofisiologia [SOLAECE]). The purpose of this 2017 Consensus Statement is to provide a state-of-the-art review of the field of catheter and surgical ablation of AF and to report the findings of a writing group, convened by these five international societies. The writing group is charged with defining the indications, techniques, and outcomes of AF ablation procedures. Included within this document are recommendations pertinent to the design of clinical trials in the field of AF ablation and the reporting of outcomes, including definitions relevant to this topic. The writing group is composed of 60 experts representing 11 organizations: HRS, EHRA, ECAS, APHRS, SOLAECE, STS, ACC, American Heart Association (AHA), Canadian Heart Rhythm Society (CHRS), Japanese Heart Rhythm Society (JHRS), and Brazilian Society of Cardiac Arrhythmias (Sociedade Brasileira de Arritmias Cardiacas [SOBRAC]). All the members of the writing group, as well as peer reviewers of the document, have provided disclosure statements for all relationships that might be perceived as real or potential conflicts of interest. All author and peer reviewer disclosure information is provided in Appendix A and Appendix B. In writing a consensus document, it is recognized that consensus does not mean that there was complete agreement among all the writing group members. Surveys of the entire writing group were used to identify areas of consensus concerning performance of AF ablation procedures and to develop recommendations concerning the indications for catheter and surgical AF ablation. These recommendations were systematically balloted by the 60 writing group members and were approved by a minimum of 80% of these members. The recommendations were also subject to a 1-month public comment period. Each partnering and collaborating organization then officially reviewed, commented on, edited, and endorsed the final document and recommendations. The grading system for indication of class of evidence level was adapted based on that used by the ACC and the AHA.3,4 It is important to state, however, that this document is not a guideline. The indications for catheter and surgical ablation of AF, as well as recommendations for procedure performance, are presented with a Class and Level of Evidence (LOE) to be consistent with what the reader is familiar with seeing in guideline statements. A Class I recommendation means that the benefits of the AF ablation procedure markedly exceed the risks, and that AF ablation should be performed; a Class IIa recommendation means that the benefits of an AF ablation procedure exceed the risks, and that it is reasonable to perform AF ablation; a Class IIb recommendation means that the benefit of AF ablation is greater or equal to the risks, and that AF ablation may be considered; and a Class III recommendation means that AF ablation is of no proven benefit and is not recommended. The writing group reviewed and ranked evidence supporting current recommendations with the weight of evidence ranked as Level A if the data were derived from high-quality evidence from more than one randomized clinical trial, meta-analyses of high-quality randomized clinical trials, or one or more randomized clinical trials corroborated by high-quality registry studies. The writing group ranked available evidence as Level B-R when there was moderate-quality evidence from one or more randomized clinical trials, or meta-analyses of moderate-quality randomized clinical trials. Level B-NR was used to denote moderate-quality evidence from one or more well-designed, well-executed nonrandomized studies, observational studies, or registry studies. This designation was also used to denote moderate-quality evidence from meta-analyses of such studies. Evidence was ranked as Level C-LD when the primary source of the recommendation was randomized or nonrandomized observational or registry studies with limitations of design or execution, meta-analyses of such studies, or physiological or mechanistic studies of human subjects. Level C-EO was defined as expert opinion based on the clinical experience of the writing group. Despite a large number of authors, the participation of several societies and professional organizations, and the attempts of the group to reflect the current knowledge in the field adequately, this document is not intended as a guideline. Rather, the group would like to refer to the current guidelines on AF management for the purpose of guiding overall AF management strategies.5,6 This consensus document is specifically focused on catheter and surgical ablation of AF, and summarizes the opinion of the writing group members based on an extensive literature review as well as their own experience. It is directed to all health care professionals who are involved in the care of patients with AF, particularly those who are caring for patients who are undergoing, or are being considered for, catheter or surgical ablation procedures for AF, and those involved in research in the field of AF ablation. This statement is not intended to recommend or promote catheter or surgical ablation of AF. Rather, the ultimate judgment regarding care of a particular patient must be made by the health care provider and the patient in light of all the circumstances presented by that patient. The main objective of this document is to improve patient care by providing a foundation of knowledge for those involved with catheter ablation of AF. A second major objective is to provide recommendations for designing clinical trials and reporting outcomes of clinical trials of AF ablation. It is recognized that this field continues to evolve rapidly. As this document was being prepared, further clinical trials of catheter and surgical ablation of AF were under way.

2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design

This is a report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation, developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS), and in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). This is endorsed by the governing bodies of the ACC Foundation, the AHA, the ECAS, the EHRA, the STS, the APHRS, and the HRS.

Intraoperative Radiofrequency Ablation of Chronic Atrial Fibrillation: A Left Atrial Curative Approach by Elimination of Anatomic “Anchor” Reentrant Circuits

Intraoperative Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Introduction: The percutaneous approach to radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation for curative treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) is an investigational technique, and the optimal composition of lesion lines is unknown. We tested an intraoperative RF ablation concept with elimination of left atrial anatomic “anchor” reentrant circuits.

Electromagnetic Versus Fluoroscopic Mapping of the Inferior Isthmus for Ablation of Typical Atrial Flutter A Prospective Randomized Study

BackgroundRadiofrequency catheter ablation within the tricuspid annulus–inferior caval vein isthmus can cure typical atrial flutter. The target for ablation, nonetheless, is relatively wide, and standard ablation procedures may require significant exposure to radiation. Methods and ResultsA total of 50 patients (mean age, 58±11 years) with typical atrial flutter were prospectively randomized to receive isthmus ablation using conventional fluoroscopy for catheter navigation (group I, n=24) or electromagnetic mapping (group II, n=26). Complete bidirectional isthmus block was verified with double potential mapping. If complete isthmus block could not be achieved after 20 radiofrequency pulses or 25 minutes of fluoroscopy, the patients were switched to the other group. Eight patients from group I (33%) but only 1 patient from group II (4%) were switched. Overall, complete isthmus block was achieved in 47 of 50 patients (94%). The overall fluoroscopy time, including the placement of the diagnostic catheters, was 22.0±6.3 minutes in group I and 3.9±1.5 minutes in group II (P <0.0001). The fluoroscopy time needed for isthmus mapping was 17.7±6.5 minutes in group I and 0.2±0.3 minutes in group II (P <0.0001). ConclusionsElectromagnetic mapping during the induction of linear lesions for the ablation of atrial flutter permitted a highly significant reduction in exposure to fluoroscopy while maintaining high efficacy, and it allowed the time required for fluoroscopy to be reduced to levels anticipated for diagnostic electrophysiological studies.

Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia in Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND The feasibility of radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation for the treatment of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with coronary artery disease and remote myocardial infarction has recently been demonstrated. At present, therapeutic options for VT in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) include antiarrhythmic drugs and implantable cardioverter/defibrillators (ICD). The purpose of the present study was to investigate the feasibility of RF catheter ablation in patients with idiopathic DCM who could not be adequately treated by conventional treatment modalities because of incessant or frequent, recurrent VT. METHODS AND RESULTS RF current application for ablation of 9 VTs (mean cycle length, 402 +/- 78 ms) was attempted in 8 patients with idiopathic DCM (4 men, 4 women; mean age, 54 +/- 6 years; mean left ventricular ejection fraction, 30 +/- 9%). Inclusion criteria for ablation were incessant VT (n = 4) or frequent, recurrent VT reproducibly inducible with programmed electrical stimulation (n = 5). Three patients had suffered aborted sudden cardiac death, and 2 had experienced syncope. Two patients were artificially ventilated and catecholamine dependent for hemodynamic reasons at the time of attempted ablation. Potential target sites for RF current application were identified by detailed endocardial mapping during sinus rhythm, activation and entrainment mapping during VT, and pace mapping. After 7 +/- 5 RF pulses (range, 2 to 18 pulses; median, 6 pulses) applied with 32 +/- 7 W for 39 +/- 9 seconds, 6 of the 9 target VTs (67%) were rendered noninducible (4 of 4 incessant VTs and 2 of 5 chronic recurrent VTs). In 6 patients, VTs with ECG morphologies other than the target VTs were inducible after RF catheter ablation. Seven patients were on antiarrhythmic drugs during the ablation procedure and during the follow-up period of 8 +/- 5 months (range, 2 to 17 months). One patient received an ICD before RF ablation, 4 patients after RF ablation, and 1 patient after ablation of an incessant VT and before attempted ablation of frequent, recurrent VTs. One patient underwent heart transplantation 5 months after ablation in end-stage heart failure. There were no acute complications during the mapping and ablation procedure. During the follow-up period, 1 patient had been resuscitated from ventricular fibrillation 6 weeks after ablation and finally died of congestive heart failure 2 weeks later. No further episodes of incessant VT occurred in the patients who had undergone RF current application for ablation of incessant VT. A complete prevention of VT could be achieved in 2 of 8 patients, whereas in 5 patients, VT episodes were stored in the ICD devices during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The results of the present study indicate that RF current application for ablation of VT in a select group of patients with idiopathic DCM is feasible. The efficacy of RF ablation may be high in patients presenting with incessant VT, whereas the success rate seems to be only moderate in patients with chronic recurrent VT. In all patients, additional treatment options, including antiarrhythmic drugs, ICDs, and/or heart transplantation, were applied after RF ablation, indicating that RF ablation for this indication may be an adjunctive and not a curative treatment option.

Topographic variability of the esophageal left atrial relation influencing ablation lines in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Introduction: The close anatomic relationship of the posterior wall of the left atrium (LA) and the thermosensitive esophagus creates a potential hazard in catheter ablation procedures.

Automatic home monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators

AIMS With the expanding indications for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and reports of unexpected ICD failures, home monitoring (HM) was proposed to decrease follow-up workload and increase patient safety. Home monitoring implantable cardioverter defibrillators offer wireless, everyday transfer of ICD status and therapy data to a central HM Service Center, which notifies the attending physician of relevant HM events. We evaluated functionality and safety of HM ICDs. METHODS AND RESULTS A total of 260 patients with HM ICDs were monitored for a mean of 10 +/- 5 months. Time to HM events [medical (ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation) and technical (ICD system integrity)] since ICD implantation and since the latest in-clinic follow-up was analysed. Mean number of HM events per 100 patients per day was calculated, without and with a 2-day blanking period for re-notifying the same type of event. About 41.2% of the patients had HM events (38.1% medical, 0.8% technical, and 2.3% both types). Probability of any HM event after 1.5 years was 0.50 (95% confidence interval: 0.42-0.58). More than 60% of new HM event types occurred within the first month after follow-up. A mean of 0.86 event notifications was received per 100 patients per day or 0.45 with the 2-day blanking period. CONCLUSION Home monitoring is feasible and associated with an early detection of medical and technical events.

Idiopathic Left Ventricular Tachycardia: New Insights, into Electrophysiological Characteristics and Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation

KOTTKAMP, H., et.al.: Idiopathic Left Ventricular Tachycardia: New Insights into Electrophysiological Characteristics and Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation. Objectives: This study was performed to investigate the electrophysiological characteristics of idiopathic left ventricular tachycardia and to determine the feasibility of radiofrequency catheter ablation for nonpharmacological cure. Background: The underlying electrophysiological mechanism of idiopathic left ventricular tachycardia with right bundle branch block morphology and left‐axis deviation is presently not known. Additionally, only limited data describing the results of radiofrequency catheter ablation for treatment of idiopathic left ventricular tachycardia so far exist. Methods: Electrophysiological studies and radiofrequency catheter ablation were performed in 5 patients (3 male and 2 female, mean age 31 ± 10 years) with idiopathic left ventricular tachycardia (cycle length 376 ± 72 msec). The patients had a history of recurrent palpitations of 4 ± 1 years and had been treated unsuccessfully with 2 ± 1 antiarrhythmic drugs. Sustained ventricular tachycardia with right bundle branch block morphology and left‐ or right‐axis deviation was documented in all patients. Results: Inducibility with critically timed ventricular extrastimuli, inverse relationships of the coupling interval of the initiating extrastimulus and the interval to the first beat of the tachycardia, continuous diastolic or mid‐diastolic electrical activity during ventricular tachycardia, and fragmented late potentials during sinus rhythm suggested reentrant activation as the underlying mechanism in three patients. On the other hand, induction dependent on isoproterenol infusion and rapid ventricular pacing and exercise inducibility indicated different electrophysiological characteristics in the remaining two patients. During electrophysiological study, intravenous verapamil terminated ventricular tachycardia in all patients, whereas ventricular tachycardia did not respond to intravenous adenosine, autonomic maneuvers, or intravenous β‐blocking agent esmolol. Catheter mapping revealed earliest endocardial activation during ventricular tachycardia in different areas of the left ventricular septum being distributed from the base to the midapical portion of the septum in all patients. In 4 of 5 patients, radiofrequency catheter ablation (median number of pulses 4, range 1–9) resulted in complete abolition of idiopathic left ventricular tachycardia during a follow‐up of 4–43 months (median 10) without antiarrhythmic drugs. Successful target sites for catheter ablation included continuous diastolic or mid‐diastolic electrical activity during ventricular tachycardia and late potentials during sinus rhythm (2 patients), polyphasic fragmented presystolic potentials during ventricular tachycardia (1 patient), and pace mapping with identical QRS morphology compared to the ventricular tachycardia and “earliest” detectable activity during tachycardia (1 patient). No procedure related complications occurred. Conclusions: Two different patterns of electrophysiological properties of idiopathic left ventricular tachycardia were observed, indicating that this arrhythmia entity does not represent a homogeneous group. The “origin” of the tachycardias as identified by successful radiofrequency catheter ablation was located in different areas of the left ventricular septum and was distributed from the base to the mid‐apical region. Radiofrequency catheter ablation was an effective and safe treatment modality in most of these patients. Distinct target site characteristics for successful catheter ablation including polyphasic diastolic activity during tachycardia and fragmented late potentials during sinus rhythm could be identified.