I. Gastinger

Comparison of 17,641 Patients With Right- and Left-Sided Colon Cancer: Differences in Epidemiology, Perioperative Course, Histology, and Survival

PURPOSE: There is a growing amount of data suggesting that carcinomas of the right and left colon should be considered as different tumor entities. Using the data and analysis compiled in the German multicentered study “Colon/Rectum Cancer,” we aimed to clarify whether the existing differences influence clinical and histological parameters, the perioperative course, and the survival of patients with right- vs left-sided colon cancer. METHODS: During a 3-year period data on all patients with colon cancer were evaluated. Right- and left-sided cancers were compared regarding the following parameters: demographic factors, comorbidities, and histology. For patients who underwent elective surgery with curative intent, the perioperative course and survival were also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 17,641 patients with colon carcinomas were included; 12,719 underwent curative surgery. Patients with right-sided colon cancer were significantly older, and predominantly women with a higher rate of comorbidities. Mortality was significantly higher for this group. Final pathology revealed a higher percentage of poorly differentiated and locally advanced tumors. Rate of synchronous distant metastases was comparable. However, hepatic and pulmonary metastases were more frequently found in left-sided, peritoneal carcinomatosis in right-sided carcinomas. Survival was significantly worse in patients with right-sided carcinomas on an adjusted multivariate model (odds ratio, 1.12). CONCLUSIONS: We found that right- and left-sided colon cancers are significantly different regarding epidemiological, clinical, and histological parameters. Patients with right-sided colon cancers have a worse prognosis. These discrepancies may be caused by genetic differences that account for distinct carcinogenesis and biological behavior. The impact of these findings on screening and therapy remains to be defined.

Protective defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma

Anastomotic leak is a serious complication of resection for low rectal carcinoma.

Value of a Protective Stoma in Low Anterior Resections for Rectal Cancer

AbstractINTRODUCTION: Anastomotic leakage is a major problem in colorectal surgery and in particular in operations for low rectal cancer. The present study investigates the question whether a protective stoma can reduce the (clinical and radiologic) anastomotic leakage rate and/or the rate of leakage requiring surgery. METHODS: The investigation took the form of a prospective multicenter study involving 75 German hospitals and was performed between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 1999. A comparison was made of the postoperative results of procedures performed with and those performed without a protective stoma in patients undergoing low anterior rectal resection. In addition, logistic regression using the target criteria, overall anastomotic leakage and anastomotic leakage requiring surgery, was applied. RESULTS: Among the 3,695 operations performed for carcinoma of the rectum or colon, 482 were low anterior resections. In 334 patients (69.3 percent) no protective stoma was constructed, whereas 148 (30.7 percent) received such protection. Age, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, and body mass index were identical in both groups. In the group receiving a protective stoma, however, neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy was more common, the tumors were lower—and thus the total mesorectal excision rate higher, the intraoperative complication rate was higher, and the duration of the operation was longer. The differences were all significant. The major criterion (overall anastomotic leakage rate) was identical in the two groups, but the rate of leakage requiring surgery was significantly lower in patients receiving a protective stoma (P = 0.028). The logistic regression revealed that use of a protective stoma is a predictor of protection against anastomotic leakage requiring surgery. The distance of the tumor from the anal verge and the duration of the operation are further predictors. CONCLUSION: The particular benefit of a covering stoma is reduction in the rate of leaks requiring surgery and thus in the severe consequences of an anastomotic leakage.

Impact of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcome after rectal cancer resection

Anastomotic leakage has a major impact on morbidity and mortality in rectal cancer surgery. Its relevance to oncological outcome is controversial. This observational study investigated the influence of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcome.

The Impact of the Risk Factor “Age” on the Early Postoperative Results of Surgery for Colorectal Carcinoma and Its Significance for Perioperative Management

The risks and benefits of surgery for colorectal cancer in old patients have not been unequivocally defined. The present investigation was carried out in 309 hospitals as a prospective multicenter study. In the period between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2001, a total of 19,080 patients were recruited for the study; 16,142 (84.6%) patients were younger than 80 years (<80) and 2932 (15.4%) were 80 years and older (≥ 80). Significant differences between the age groups were observed for general postoperative complications (22.3% for <80 years; 33.9% for ≥ 80). Specific postoperative complications were identical in both groups. Overall, significantly elevated morbidity and mortality rates were found with increasing age (morbidity: 33.9% vs. 43.5%; mortality: 2.6% vs. 8.0%). The distribution of tumor stages revealed a significantly higher percentage of locally advanced tumors in the older age group (stage II: 28.0% vs. 34.4%). In contrast, no increase in metastasizing tumors was found in the older age group (stage IV: 17.4% vs. 14.1%). Logistic regression showed that, in concert with a number of other parameters, age is a significant influencing factor on postoperative morbidity and mortality. The increase in postoperative morbidity and mortality rates associated with aging is a result of the increase in general postoperative complications, in particular, pneumonia and cardiovascular complications. Age as such does not represent a contraindication for surgical treatment. The short-term outcome and quality of life are of overriding importance for the geriatric patient.

Discordance Between K-ras Mutations in Bone Marrow Micrometastases and the Primary Tumor in Colorectal Cancer

PURPOSE To study bone marrow micrometastases from colorectal cancer patients for the presence of K-ras mutations and to compare their genotype with that of the corresponding primary tumor. PATIENTS AND METHODS Bilateral iliac crest aspiration was performed in 51 patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer, and bone marrow micrometastases were detected by immunohistochemistry. The presence of K-ras mutations was determined by single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis on both primary tumors and paired bone marrow samples and was confirmed by sequencing. RESULTS In six patients with primary tumor mutations, it was possible to amplify a mutated K-ras gene also from the bone marrow sample. In three of those patients the pattern of K-ras mutations differed between both samples, in two patients the mutation was identical between the bone marrow and its primary tumor, and in one patient the same mutation plus a different one were found. Fifteen of 17 K-ras mutations found in primary tumors were located in codon 12, whereas in bone marrow, five of seven mutations were found in codon 13 (P =.003). CONCLUSION Our results demonstrate that, at least for K-ras mutations, disseminated epithelial cells are not always clonal with the primary tumor and they question the malignant genotype of bone marrow micrometastases. They also indicate that different tumoral clones may be circulating simultaneously or sequentially in the same patient. Analysis of the type of mutations suggests that cell dissemination might be an early event in colorectal carcinogenesis.

Ninety-four Appendectomies for Suspected Acute Appendicitis during Pregnancy

ABSTRACTAcute appendicitis during pregnancy is a rare event, and large numbers of cases reported in the literature stem entirely from data stored in national registers. Between 1974 and 2000 relevant perioperative data on the treatment of appendicitis were collected consecutively and analyzed retrospectively. Surgical and obstetric data relating to the medical history, the clinical, intraoperative, and histologic findings, and the course of the pregnancy were recorded. Altogether, 9793 appendectomies were performed, 94 of which were in pregnant women (24.5% during the first trimester, 51% during the second trimester, and 24.5% during the third trimester). This represents 0.2% of the 46,960 deliveries during the period under observation. Fifty percent of the case histories during the second trimester were atypical. The overall perforation rate was 14.9%; it was 8.7%, 12.5%, and 26.1% during the three trimesters, respectively. Maternal mortality was 0%; the combined miscarriage/abortion rate was 8.5% (n = 8); and infant mortality was 3.2% (n = 3). The postoperative spontaneous abortion rate was 13.0% and the additional therapeutic/requested abortion rate 21.7% during the first trimester. In view of the elevated postoperative abortion rate and the facility of the clinical diagnosis during the first trimester, the indication for invasive diagnostic measures and surgery requires careful consideration. During the second and third trimesters the difficulty of establishing a clinical diagnosis makes it necessary to undertake exploratory surgery early.

Prospektive Multizenterstudien “Kolon-/Rektumkarzinome” als flächendeckende chirurgische Qualitätssicherung

AbstractIntroduction. Currently, only a small percentage of the diagnostic and therapeutic data on colonic carcinomas has been confirmed by data obtained in randomized controlled studies. For this reason, the results of prospective multicentre observational studies are extremely important. Method. Within a multicentre observational study involving 75 surgical departments carried out between 01.01. and 31.12.1999, 3,756 patients with a colorectal carcinoma (2,293 carcinoma of the colon; 1,463 carcinomas or the rectum) were investigated prospectively using a standardised questionnaire. Results. The OP rate was 98.4%, the resection rate 92.5% (colon 94.1%, rectum 89.9%). The rate of rectal extirpations was relatively high at 30.3%. General postoperative morbidity was 27.4% (colon 27.0%, rectum 27.9%); the specific postoperative morbidity was 24.6% (colon 21.8%, rectum 29.1%). The anastomotic insufficiency rate was 5.2% (colon 3.7%, rectum 9.5%). The 30-day mortality rate was 4.7%, and the postoperative mortality rate 5.7%. Conclusions. Surgical quality control in the form of prospective multicentre observational studies make possible the analysis of the therapeutic situation of a surgical disease under quality assurance aspects. At the same time, the comprehensive data material available will serve the specific planning of prospective randomized studies. With the aid of the present study, a basis for a thorough and complete evaluation of colorectal carcinoma has been created.ZusammenfassungHintergrund. Nur ein geringer Teil der Diagnostik und Therapie des kolorektalen Karzinoms ist derzeit durch prospektiv randomisierte Studiendaten abgesichert. Aus diesem Grund kommt den Ergebnissen prospektiver multizentrischer Beobachtungsstudien ein hoher Stellenwert zu. Methode. Innerhalb einer multizentrischen Beobachtungsstudie wurden vom 01.01.–31.12.1999 an 75 Kliniken 3.756 Patienten mit einem kolorektalen Karzinom (2.293 Kolonkarzinome, 1.463 Rektumkarzinome) mittels eines standardisierten Fragebogens prospektiv erfasst. Ergebnisse. Die Operationsrate betrug 98,4%. Die Resektionsquote lag bei 92,5% (Kolon 94,1%, Rektum 89,9%). Die Rektumexstirpationsquote war mit 30,3% relativ hoch. Die allgemeine postoperative Morbidität betrug 27,4% (Kolon 27,0%, Rektum 27,9%), die spezifische postoperative Morbidität 24,6% (Kolon 21,8%, Rektum 29,1%). Die Anastomoseninsuffizienzrate lag bei 5,2% (Kolon 3,7%, Rektum 9,5%). Es war eine 30-Tage-Letalität von 4,7% und eine postoperative Letalität von 5,7% zu verzeichnen. Schlussfolgerung. Chirurgische Qualitätssicherung in Form von prospektiven multizentrischen Beobachtungsstudien ermöglicht die Analyse der Behandlungssituation eines chirurgischen Krankheitsbildes unter qualitätssichernden Aspekten. Gleichzeitig wird mit dem vorliegenden umfangreichen Datenmaterial die gezielte Planung von prospektiv randomisierten Studien unterstützt. Mit dieser Studie wurden die Grundlagen für eine bundesweite Erfassung der kolorektalen Karzinome geschaffen.

Effect of caseload on the short-term outcome of colon surgery: results of a multicenter study

Abstract This prospective multicenter study investigated the effect of hospital caseload on early postoperative outcome of surgery for carcinoma of the colon in 75 German hospitals and included 2293 patients. The hospitals were divided into those with a caseload of 1–30 (group A), 31–60 (group B), and more than 60 (group C) operations. Increasing caseload was associated only with fewer general postoperative complications. It was also associated with significantly greater use of antibiotic prophylaxis. No significant differences between the groups were found in resection rates, intraoperative complications, specific postoperative complications, overall postoperative morbidity, hospital mortality, or 30-day mortality. The significance of hospital caseload for the short-term postoperative outcome following surgery on the colon should not be overestimated. Basing conclusions about the results to be expected simply on the case volume is impermissible. On the basis of the available data it is not possible to establish a threshold value, that is, a minimum number of required operations.

Primary appendiceal carcinoma – Epidemiology, surgery and survival: Results of a German multi-center study

BACKGROUND While carcinoma of the colon is a common malignancy, primary carcinoma of the appendix is rare. Many retrospective reviews outlined experience from different centers on appendiceal neoplasms. However, the study population is often small because it is so rare. The aim of this study was to analyze the type of surgery and survival of patients with appendiceal malignancies using data from a German multi-center observational study (31 341 patients). METHODS During a five-year period, 196 consecutive patients with malignant appendiceal tumors were distributed into four groups: appendiceal carcinoids, adenocarcinoma, mucinous adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma. The following parameters were analyzed: demographics, clinical presentation, comorbidities, type and appropriateness of surgery, final pathology and survival. RESULTS Adenocarcinoma had the highest incidence (50.5%). The most common presentation was that of acute appendicitis. Mean age at presentation was youngest for carcinoid tumors. Carcinoid tumors had lowest tumor size and localized disease was present in 72.9%. Metastatic spread at presentation was highest for adenosquamous and mucinous adenocarcinoma and each had a distinct pattern. Right hemicolectomy was performed in 71.4%, limited resection in 11.7%. Overall 5-year survival was 83.1% for carcinoid vs. 49.2% for non-carcinoid tumors. Histological subtype and tumor stage significantly affected survival. CONCLUSIONS Long-term outcome of carcinoid tumors is superior to non-carcinoid neoplasms. Among all appendiceal neoplasms, adenosquamous carcinoma is the rarest histological subtype which is most commonly associated with advanced tumor stage and worst prognosis. Appropriate oncologic resection is being performed in a significant percentage of cases in Germany. However, the high rate of right hemicolectomy in patients with small carcinoid tumors needs to be critically discussed.